Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-Metrics: Which Ones?. Outline comparison of international e-metrics projects survey results from NZ and Australia on e-metrics practice suggestions.
Advertisements

Usage statistics in context - panel discussion on understanding usage, measuring success Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER AAP/PSP 9 February 2005.
COUNTER: an overview Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER Usage Statistics Training Seminar, Oxford, 9 December 2005.
Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Resources: Developing an Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.
Global Developments in Assessment: LibQUAL+ ® and Beyond… 6th International JISC/CNI Conference York, U.K. July 6-7, 2006 Duane Webster Executive Director.
The COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER UKSG E-Books Seminar, 9 November 2005.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The.
Nancy Turner Syracuse University Library ARL Survey Coordinators and SPEC Liaisons January 19, 2007 E-Metrics Services and ARL Statistics.
Ontario University Library Consortia Activity Ontario University Library Consortia Activity Gwendolyn Ebbett Dean of the Library University of Windsor.
of Research Libraries Measures for Electronic Use: The ARL E-Metrics Project Statistics in Practice - Measuring & Managing IFLA.
Colorado State University Libraries Where we are, Where we're going
DigiQUAL™ Regrounding LibQUAL+® for the Digital Library Environment: An Analysis of the DigiQUAL® Data Presented at 9 th Northumbria by.
of Research Libraries Next Generation Statistics for Libraries: CAUL Forum 20 January 2003 Sydney, NSW The ARL E-Metrics Project.
Health Center Library Overview Evelyn Morgen, Director March 2007.
Academic Research Library Support of Sponsored Research in the United States Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries Qualitative.
Presented at the GAELIC Summer Training Camp November 2010 Use of Usage Statistics in Academic Libraries: Experiences of the University of the Witwatersrand.
Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services: Developing Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.
The ARL E-Metrics Project Measures for Electronic Resources ACRL/NEC Information Technology Interest Group May 17, 2002 Brinley Franklin Director, University.
Session 15b Digital resource usage statistics E-Resources usage statistics with EzProxy Simon Huggard, Systems Manager, Monash University.
Assessing the Bang for the Buck: Tools for Measuring & Evaluating Electronic Resources, Part II Denise M. Davis Consultant, EMIS Training Project August.
Technical Implementation of the MINES Survey Methodology ACRL 2005 Minneapolis, MN April 7, 2005 Terry Plum Assistant Dean, Simmons GSLIS Association of.
of Research Libraries Assessing Library Performance: New Measures, Methods, and Models 24 th IATUL Conference 2-5 June 2003 Ankara,
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The COUNTER Code of Practice -Release 1 Released January 14,
Martha Kyrillidou Brinley Franklin Terry Plum MINES for Libraries TM ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES Assessing the Value of Networked Electronic Services:
ACRL: Outcome Assessment Tools for the Library of the Future: MINES at OCUL Association of College and Research Libraries ACRL Conference 2005 Minneapolis.
Demonstrating Value and Creating Value: Evidence-Based Library Management through MINES for Libraries™
SOS EGEE ‘06 GGF Security Auditing Service: Draft Architecture Brian Tierney Dan Gunter Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Marty Humphrey University.
SUSHI: Standardized Usage Statistics Harvesting Initiative Tim Jewell Oliver Pesch NISO SUSHI Working Group ALA Midwinter January 2006 San Antonio.
September 9, 2005 Washington, D.C. My.Medicare.gov - The Medicare Beneficiary Portal The Future of Beneficiary Self-Service.
Understanding Virtual Users: Connecting Research to Practice Lynn Silipigni Connaway Consulting Research Scientist Clifton Snyder Software Engineer October.
Data, Data Everywhere: Making Sense of the Sea of User Data.
Diana McDuffee North Carolina AHEC Digital Library Hospital_Librarians_Symposium.ppt.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
E-Metrics Project Update American Library Assocation Orlando June 27, 2002 Sherrie Schmidt Dean of University Libraries Arizona State.
Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.
Web-Based Usage Surveys MINES for Libraries TM Brinley Franklin University of Connecticut Terry Plum Simmons GSLIS
Single Copy Task Group TRLN Zari Kamarei University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill June 4, :30 PAM-Wide RT.
ARL Statistics In recognition of Kendon Stubbs’ contributions Webcast Washington, DC October 9, 2003 Martha Kyrillidou Senior Program Officer.
Dana Thomas, Ontario Council of University Libraries Alan Darnell, Ontario Council of University Libraries Understanding Use of Networked Information Content:
ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Effective, Sustainable and Practical Assessment Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Service Quality Programs.
Assessing the Scholars Portal Melody Burton, Queen’s University Toni Olshen, York University Ontario Library Association Superconference February 3, 2005.
A.M.TammaroUniversity of Tbilisi, 5-15 July 2010 Evaluation of Digital library Anna Maria Tammaro University of Parma.
TM Project web site: Presented by: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Mid-Winter January, 2006 “ 22 Items and a Box ” Qualitative.
Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007.
Project Counter in brief Jim Self University of Virginia Library ARL Survey Coordinators Meeting Chicago, Illinois June 24, 2005.
of Research Libraries Library Metrics in a Changing Environment National Seminar of Libraries in Malaysia, May 25-27, 2004 Bruce.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory and Practice A Librarian’s Perspective ALA / ALCTS June 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois Brinley Franklin Vice.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank and a Lincolnshire man in Chicago.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries.
North Carolina MSP Data Collection Center. Primary Purposes To create a database application containing common information for all MSP’s across NC To.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Scholarly Reading in a Digital Age: Some things change, some stay the same Carol Tenopir University of.
Do Students Want Mobile Library Access And Are Librarians Ready to Deliver? Electronic Resources & Libraries, February 28, 2011 Angela Dresselhaus, Electronic.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Delivering the Goods: Health Librarianship by Distance (Rural Queensland, Australia) Jane Orbell-Smith AFALIA Presenter: Jane Orbell-Smith AFALIA Affiliation:
Making Sense of the Alphabet Soup of Standards Practical Support for Managing Electronic Resources DDAKBARTTransfer Betty Landesman ER&L Conference February.
Greater Western Library Alliance 2006 Spring Membership Meeting Arizona State University, Tempe AZ February 27, 2006 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.
Webmetrics Workshop American Library Association Chicago, IL June 24, 2004 Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Association.
Assessing the Value and Impact of Digital Content Brinley Franklin Vice Provost for University Libraries University of Connecticut March 1, 2007.
Brinley Franklin and Terry Plum August 18, 2005
ARL New Measures MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Evaluating the Portal: The Story Behind the Numbers
Assessing Library Performance:
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Standards for Use Measures for Electronic Resources
MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The North American Experience Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.
The Story Behind the Numbers: Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES) and the Assessment of the Ontario Council of University Libraries’
Presentation transcript:

Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries

ARL New Measures E-Metrics LibQual +™ DD/ILL Study DigiQual SAILS MINES

E-Metrics Technical Infrastructure Information Content Information Services SupportManagement (D3) Cost of digital collection and management (R1) # of e-full- text journals (R2) # of e- reference sources (R3) # of e-books (D1) Size of digital library collection (U5) # virtual visits to the resources (P2) % of virtual visits of all visits (P3) % of e-books to all books (D2) Use of digital collection (U1) # e-ref transactions (U2) # of logins (sessions) to e- databases (U3) # of queries in e- databases (U4) Items requested in e-databases (U5) # virtual visits (P1) % of e-ref of total ref (D3) Cost of digital collection construction & management (C1) Cost of e-full-text journals (C2) Cost of e-ref sources (C3) cost of e-books (C4) Library exp. for bibl-utilities, networks & consortia (C5) External exp. for bibl-utilities, networks & consortia (D3) Cost of digital collection construction.. Incorporated into ARL Supplementary Statistics in FY 2004.

MINES is a research methodology consisting of a web- based survey form and a sampling plan. MINES measures who is using electronic resources, where users are located at the time of use, and their purpose of use. MINES was adopted by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) as part of the “New Measures” toolkit in May, MINES is different from other electronic resource usage measures that quantify total usage (e.g., COUNTER, EQUINOX, E-Metrics, ICOLC Guidelines, ISO and NISO standards) or measure how well a library makes electronic resources accessible (LibQual+ TM ). What is MINES?

Data was collected at seven main campus libraries and seven academic health science libraries in the U.S., between January, 2003 and January, Recent Data Collection Activities Main University LibrariesAcademic Medical Libraries University of ColoradoUniversity of Connecticut Health Center University of ConnecticutUniversity of North Carolina University of Texas Medical Branch Oregon State UniversityUniversity of Texas Southwestern University of Utah University of Virginia Washington University

More than 45,000 networked electronic services uses were surveyed. At each library, the MINES survey was one component of a comprehensive cost analysis study that assigned all library costs to sponsored research, instruction/education/non- sponsored research, patient care, other sponsored activities and other activities. Recent Data Collection Activities MINES is also being conducted by the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) in in conjunction with ARL.

How extensively do sponsored researchers use the new digital information environment? Are researchers more likely to use networked electronic resources from inside or outside the library? Are there differences in usage of electronic information based on the user’s location (e.g., in the library; on-campus, but not in the library; or off-campus)? What is a statistically valid methodology for capturing electronic services usage both in the library and remotely through web surveys? Are particular network configurations more conducive to studies of digital libraries patron use? Questions Addressed

A representative sampling plan, including sample size, is determined at the outset. Typically, there are 48 hours of surveying over 12 months at a medical library and 24 hours a year at a main library. Random moment/web-based surveys are employed at each site. Participation is usually mandatory, negating non-respondent bias, and is based on actual use in real-time. Libraries with database-to-web gateways or proxy re-writers offer the most comprehensive networking solution for surveying all networked services users during survey periods. MINES Methodological Considerations

Library User Survey

Patron Status

Library User Survey Affiliation

Library User Survey Location

Library User Survey Purpose

On-Campus, Not in the Library n = 15,423 In the Library n = 6,312 Purpose of Use By Location Medical Libraries 2003 – 2005 Off-Campus n = 4,375 *83% of sponsored research usage occurred outside the library. 92% of this use took place on-campus. Overall Use n = 26,110

Purpose of Use By Location Main Campus Libraries 2003 – 2005 In the Library n = 7,618 On-Campus, not in the Library n = 6,641 All Usage n = 19,271 72% of sponsored research usage of electronic resources occurred outside the library; 83% of this took place on campus. Off-Campus n = 5,012

Location of Users Medical Library Main Library All Libraries 30% 40% 60% 70% 76% 24%

Demographics by Location of User Main Libraries On Campus, Not in the Library n = 6,391 Inside the Library n = 7,064 Off-Campus n = 4,953 Total Users n = 18,408

Off-Campus n = 5,133 Demographics by Location of User Medical Libraries Inside the Library n = 6,635 On Campus, Not in the Library n = 19,244 Total Users n = 31,012

Location of Users All Libraries 20% 52% 28% 72% 28%