Colorado River Water Availability Study Colorado Water Workshop Gunnison, Colorado July 21, 2010 CWCB Project Manager Ray Alvarado Consulting Team AECOM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interactions with Colorado Municipal Water Managers Elevate the Use of Climate Information Jessica Lowrey and Andrea Ray NOAA and Univ. of Colorado Western.
Advertisements

Potential Climate Change Impacts to the NW Hydroelectric System NW Hydroelectric Association Conference February 20, 2013.
Responses to the New Normal Creative Partnerships for Innovative Water Solutions Colorado Water Workshop – July 17, 2013.
Drought Index Project Planning Workshop Boulder, August 18-19, 2009 Jim Verdin U.S. Geological Survey NIDIS Program Office NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory.
Overview of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study National Climate Assessment Workshop Boulder, CO June 6-8, 2011.
Impacts of Climate Change on Western Forests Dr. Mark Johnston Saskatchewan Research Council and Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative.
NWS Headquarters August 10, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 CBRFC Decision Support for Colorado River Water Management.
Climate Change Impacts on the Water Cycle Emmanouil Anagnostou Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Environmental Engineering Program UCONN.
Ancient trees, climate models, and the future of drought in western Colorado Jeff Lukas - Western Water Assessment CIRES, University.
Streamflow/runoff sensitivity to warming and drying in the Colorado (Western US) River Basin Tapash Das, Dan Cayan, David Pierce, Mike Dettinger.
Dave Sauchyn, Ph.D., P.Geo. C-CIARN Prairies Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry Ottawa, December, 2002.
Colorado River Basin Supply and Demand Study What’s Normal and What’s New?
Using the Best Science to Estimate Consumptive Use March 12, 2010.
Effects of Climate Change on Natural and Regulated Flood Risks in the Skagit River Basin and Prospects for Adaptation Se-Yeun Lee 1 Alan F. Hamlet 2,1.
The Importance of Realistic Spatial Forcing in Understanding Hydroclimate Change-- Evaluation of Streamflow Changes in the Colorado River Basin Hydrology.
The Impacts of Climate Change on Portland’s Water Supply Richard Palmer and Margaret Hahn University of Washington Department of Civil and Environmental.
Dennis P. Lettenmaier Lan Cuo Nathalie Voisin University of Washington Climate Impacts Group Climate and Water Forecasts for the 2009 Water Year October.
Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier Amy K. Snover JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental.
Regional Climate Change Water Supply Planning Tools for Central Puget Sound Austin Polebitski and Richard Palmer Department of Civil and Environmental.
Optimized Flood Control in the Columbia River Basin for a Global Warming Scenario 1Dept. of Civil and Env. Engineering, UW 2CSES Climate Impacts Group,
Dennis P. Lettenmaier Alan F. Hamlet JISAO Climate Impacts Group and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington July,
Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Seethu Babu Marketa McGuire Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Climate Impacts Group and the Department of Civil Engineering University.
Developing Tools to Enable Water Resource Managers to Plan for & Adapt to Climate Change Amy Snover, PhD Climate Impacts Group University of Washington.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Climate Impacts Group and the Department of Civil Engineering University of Washington September,
Colorado River Water Availability Assessment Under Climate Variability Annie Yarberry 1, Balaji Rajagopalan 2,3 and James Prairie 4 1. Humboldt State University,
Optimized Flood Control in the Columbia River Basin for a Global Warming Scenario 1Dept. of Civil and Env. Engineering, UW 2CSES Climate Impacts Group,
Washington State Climate Change Impacts Assessment: Implications of 21 st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington Marketa M Elsner 1 with.
Understanding Drought
Moving Forward after the Colorado River Basin Water Supply & Demand Study Urban Water Institute’s 21 st Annual Conference San Diego, CA August 14, 2014.
How bad is climate change going to impact water delivery? Kevin Richards and K.T.Shum, EBMUD - California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual.
How Much Do We Have Left? Coming to Terms With the Colorado River Water Availability Study Annual Colorado Water Workshop July 21, 2010 Ben Harding – AMEC.
The Colorado River: Operation, Current and Projected Future Conditions Southern California Water Dialogue Los Angeles, CA April 27, 2011.
NWS Headquarters August 10, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 CBRFC Decision Support for Colorado River Water Management.
Overview of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study
Overview of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Urban Water Institute 19 th Annual Water Policy Conference August 22-24, 2012 San Diego.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Urban Water Institute 18 th Annual Water Policy Conference August 26, 2011.
Modeling water and biogeochemical cycles in the Front Range, Colorado: effects of climate and landuse changes Landrum, Laura L., Natural Resource Ecology.
1. Introduction 3. Global-Scale Results 2. Methods and Data Early spring SWE for historic ( ) and future ( ) periods were simulated. Early.
Why Should New Mexico Dam Owners Care about Climate Change and Extreme Events Dagmar Llewellyn, Reclamation Albuquerque Area Office Presentation to the.
Alan F. Hamlet, Philip W. Mote, Nate Mantua, Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University.
Center for Science in the Earth System Annual Meeting June 8, 2005 Briefing: Hydrology and water resources.
Reclamation Climate Variabilaity Activities March 28, 2014 Tucson, AZ.
Alan F. Hamlet Philip W. Mote Martyn Clark Dennis P. Lettenmaier Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and.
The hydrological cycle of the western United States is expected to be significantly affected by climate change (IPCC-AR4 report). Rising temperature and.
Alan F. Hamlet, Philip W. Mote, Nate Mantua, Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University.
Analytic Vs Numeric Ground Water Models Ray R. Bennett, PE Colorado Division of Water Resources.
South Platte Decision Support System Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources.
Colorado River Update Terry Fulp Deputy Regional Director
Alan F. Hamlet, Philip W. Mote, Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington.
RFC Climate Requirements 2 nd NOAA Climate NWS Dialogue Meeting January 4, 2006 Kevin Werner.
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
Water Supply and Flood Forecasting with Climate Change Michael Anderson, PhD California Department of Water Resources Division of Flood Management.
PNW Climate Change Impacts & Related Studies Marketa McGuire Elsner Climate Impacts Group Center for Science in the Earth System Joint Institute for the.
Application of Climate Change research in CAP Planning activities Mohammed Mahmoud Colorado River Programs Central Arizona Project.
Complementary Science Questions 1. How are interseasonal, interdecadal, and future projected climate change in the land-atmosphere dynamics of the Colorado.
Note: This presentation contains only preliminary research results. If you have any questions, please contact Julie Vano at Thanks.
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update November 14, 2012.
Predicting the hydrologic implications of land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Yuma Agriculture Water - Rights and Supply Terry Fulp Director, Lower Colorado Region Yuma Agriculture Water Conference January 13, 2016.
Upper Rio Grande R Basin
Montana Climate Assessment stakeholder driven, science informed
Mississagua Lake Chain Levels To August 19, 2017 & Projections for Climate Change in the TSW Reservoir Area Presentation to the Cavendish Community Ratepayers’
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
150 years of land cover and climate change impacts on streamflow in the Puget Sound Basin, Washington Dennis P. Lettenmaier Lan Cuo Nathalie Voisin University.
Long-Lead Streamflow Forecast for the Columbia River Basin for
JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System and the
Water Resources Planning for an Uncertain Future Climate
WRE-1 BY MOHD ABDUL AQUIL CIVIL ENGINEERING.
Presentation transcript:

Colorado River Water Availability Study Colorado Water Workshop Gunnison, Colorado July 21, 2010 CWCB Project Manager Ray Alvarado Consulting Team AECOM AMEC Earth & Environmental Canyon Water Resources Leonard Rice Engineers Stratus Consulting

“How much water from the Colorado River Basin is available to meet Colorado's water needs?“ Phase I Water Availability under current infrastructure, currently perfected water rights, and current levels of consumptive and non-consumptive water demands Phase II Water Availability under projected demands from existing, conditional, and new water rights and for additional consumptive and non-consumptive water demands Objectives 2Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

StateMod StateCU Statistical Models Observed Hydrology Overall Hydrology Approach GCM’s & Hydrology Paleohydrology 3Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Douglas-fir, south-central CO From NOAA, NOAA treeflow.info Basis for Paleo-Hydrology 4PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Re-sequencing – The Motivation 5PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Repeat 100x Paleohydrology – Re-sequencing 1950 Years Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

StateMod StateCU Statistical Models Paleohydrology Observed Hydrology GCM’s & Hydrology Overall Hydrology Approach 7Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Colorado River Basin “Down-Scaled” Projections Revised Basin-Wide Hydrology Result: Altered Stream Flows Earth Emissions Scenarios Global Climate Models Result: Altered Temperature and Precipitation State of Colorado CDSS Modeling Result: Water Availability GCMs and Hydrology 8Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Climate Effect Actual Climate Adjusted Actual Climate Adjusted } Climate Effect GCM Hydrology Process 9Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

StateMod StateCU Statistical Models Paleohydrology Observed Hydrology GCM’s & Hydrology Overall Hydrology Approach 10Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

11PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

12PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

13PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

14PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

15PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

16PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

17PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

18PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Natural Flow

19PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

20PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Natural Flow Results

21PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Result Summary – Natural Flow 22PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Annual flow increases in some possible futures and decreases in others Annual flow generally increases in parts of the Yampa River basin and at higher elevation watersheds Annual flow generally decreases in south-western watersheds and at lower elevations Shifts toward earlier peak runoff Flow decreases in late summer and early fall

Ranking of uncertainties (Wilby & Harris, 2005), largest to smallest: –GCM Projections –Downscaling method –Hydrology model structure –Hydrology model parameters –Emissions scenarios Uncertainties interact, but are not additive. 23PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Uncertainties—Natural Flow

All projections, Glenwood Springs 24PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Ensemble of GCMs, Glenwood Springs 25PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Precipitation Time Series, Lees Ferry 26PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Temperature Time Series, Lees Ferry 27PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Natural Flow Time series at Lees Ferry 28PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Phase I demonstrates broad range of impacts to natural flows. –Complexity of modeling atmospheric circulation –Inherent uncertainties in GCM projections Robust results –Increased temperatures –Less snowpack and earlier melt Conclusions 29PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

30Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I POCKET SLIDES

“How much water from the Colorado River Basin is available to meet Colorado's water needs?“ What is a reasonable base of existing uses for Phase I of the CRWAS? How does historical hydrology compare to paleohydrology? What is a reasonable projection for hydrology affected by climate change? How much water is available to Colorado under certain compact assumptions? Objectives 31Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

“How much water from the Colorado River Basin is available to meet Colorado's water needs?“ Update / expand CDSS based on stakeholder input through BRTs Assess water availability using historical hydrology Assess water availability using paleohydrology Assess water availability using climate-adjusted hydrology Compare water availability from historical and climate-adjusted hydrology Estimate water available to Colorado under certain compact assumptions Technical Approach 32Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

~30 public meetings / workshops / peer reviews –CWCB Board –CWCB, DWR, and AG Staff –CWCB Climate Change Technical Advisory Group (CCTAG) –Interbasin Compact Committee (IBCC) and Basin Roundtables (BRTs) –Joint Front Range Climate Change Vulnerability Study Program (JFRCCVS) –Centennial Water & Sanitation District / Metro District of Highlands Ranch –NOAA Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments Program (RISA) –University of Colorado’s Western Water Assessment Program (WWA) –Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (Water User Meeting) –Colorado River Water Conservation District (Annual Seminar) –Colorado House-Senate Joint Agriculture Committee –Front Range Water Council –Colorado Water Congress Public Outreach 33Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) Hydrology Model Colorado Decision Support System (CDSS) Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) Hydrologic Determination Mass Balance Analysis Analysis Tools 34Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Douglas-fir, south-central CO From NOAA, NOAA treeflow.info Paleo Hydrology 2. How does historical hydrology compare to a longer hydrologic trace based on tree ring analysis 35PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Paleo Hydrology--Approach Two approaches –Regression Models flow sequences and magnitudes Based on mathematical model relating tree-ring width to flow magnitude –Re-sequencing Models flow sequences Obtains magnitudes from historical record Based on model of “state” transition –E.g. “wet-to-wet”, “dry-to-wet”… 36PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Re-sequencing – The Motivation 37PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Paleo Hydrology--Results Statistics of Annual Flows –Median 56-year mean was slightly greater than mean flow Paleo record indicates slightly more wet years Statistics of wet spells and drought –Median durations were similar –Median surplus volumes tended lower –Median drought volumes often higher Extreme events are represented in flow data –This is the real benefit from using the paleo record 38PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Repeat 100x Re-sequencing Climate Adjusted Hydrology 1950 Years Colorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

CDSS Model Nodes

CDSS Baseflow Nodes

CDSS Model Nodes with Results in Report Appendix

Forest Change Hydrology 43PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Forest Change Due to Fire –Localized –Relatively small except for very rare cases. –Occurrence is substantially random over long periods. Forest Change Due to Insect Infestation –Data Availability –Forest Recovery Timeframe –Water Supply Impact Detection Threshold

Forest Change due to Insect Infestation 44PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Data Availability –Tree and beetle science is changing rapidly –USFS and participating agencies have ongoing studies in North Platte Basin –Re-growth, snow studies, and new hydrologic data

Forest Change due to Insect Infestation 45PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Forest Recovery Timeframe: –Re-growth begins immediately via immature trees and understory vegetation –ET reduction offset quickly by grass / shrub regrowth –Evaporation reduction offset by tree re-growth (before 2040)

Forest Change due to Insect Infestation 46PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Water Supply Impact Detection Threshold: –Most flow volume from sub-alpine forest (elevations >8,000 feet) –20%-30% watershed must be cleared before detectable flow change –Stream flow impact from forest disturbance <<< Impacts from climate change

Approach –Used mass-balance analysis at Lee Ferry (2007 Hydrologic Determination) –Simulated full-development water use requests in upper basin –Calculated 10-year cumulative flow at Lee Ferry. –Calculated upper basin consumptive use that could be maintained considering Compact provisions Hydrology adjusted for climate change NM, UT, WY fully developed All Upper Basin storage capacity fully used Colorado Water Availability for Future Consumptive Use 47PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

48PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Colorado Water Availability for Future Consumptive Use Applied Upper Basin water use requests used in 2007 Hydrologic Determination: Potential Lee Ferry ObligationUpper Basin Water Use 75 MAF6.76 MAF 82.5 MAF5.98 MAF

Colorado Water Availability for Future Consumptive Use 49PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I 1906 – 2000 (Hydrologic Determination) 1950 – 2005 Study Period Extended Historical Hydrology Climate Impacted Hydrology –Focus on 2040 time frame –Five projections for the time frame

Colorado Water Availability for Future Consumptive Use Phase I Assumptions on Current Consumptive Use Colorado Water Availability for Future Consumptive Use Phase I Assumptions on Current Consumptive Use 50PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Estimated by StateMod – natural flows and weather –Current irrigated acreage –Current M&I demands –Simulates diversions, crop CU, evaporation –Excludes evaporation from Aspinall Unit and Navajo evaporation chargeable to New Mexico –Excludes exports to New Mexico Estimated CU = 2.6 MAF

2040 vs All 112 projections at Glenwood Springs 51PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Questions Why were the 2070 results “discounted” Why is there so little difference between the distributions for 2040 and 2070? 52PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

2040 vs By Scenario at Glenwood Springs 53PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

54PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I P-E Analysis, Winter Park

Hydrology impacts between 2040 and PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Glenwood Springs

Extremes of curve are from one GCM 56PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

All projections, Glenwood Springs 57PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Ensemble of GCMs, Glenwood Springs 58PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

2040 vs Lees Ferry 59PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Time series at Lees Ferry 60PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Precipitation Time Series, Lees Ferry 61PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Precipitation Time Series, Lees Ferry 62PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

VIC Hydrology Response 63PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Christensen & Lettenmaier 64PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I

Synthesis Report, Christensen & Lettenmaier PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEW

66PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study | Phase I Development of Run-to-Run Uncertainty

Variability—How do GCMs Compare to Paleo? PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEW

Climate Change: Selection of Projections 68PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I Projections selected based on change in Temperature and Precipitation Selected projections intended to represent a region that contains approximately 80% of all projections Temperature Change (F) Precipitation Change (%)

Projections for 2040 and 2070 not very different Climate Change: Range of Projections 69PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Climate Change: 2040 Selected Projections 70PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

Climate Change: 2070 Selected Projections 71PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I

The selected projections for 2040 are representative of both periods Climate Change: 2040 and 2070 Projection Comparison 72PRELIMINARY RESULTS – UNDER REVIEWColorado River Water Availability Study – Phase I