Robert Mc Donald 1 Moville/G’castle Sewerage Scheme An Overview of the Site Selection Process An Board Pleanala June 2009.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

P roblem S olving I nnovator Solving Tomorrows Problems Today Manual Prioritisation of 1 st Why / Functions. Manual Prioritisation of 1 st Why / Functions.

Advertisements

Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.

Evaluating Shadow Flicker in the Current Regulatory Environment Massachusetts Wind Working Group Meeting: October 30, 2013 Richard Lampeter, INCE Senior.

IEEE Fellow Program April 2008 Saint Julians, Malta Rosann Marosy.

Strategic Planning Process. UWRC Strategic Plan Components Donor Survey Community Conversations 2014 Community Indicators Report SWOT Analysis (Board/Staff)

ISSUES TO CONSIDER IN YOUR PROJECT This is a short presentation from issues discussed in a meeting of MCS3 on Tues 2 nd March 2004.

Storage and disposal of mercury and mercury waste in Asia - Conclusions Sven Hagemann GRS.

Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by: Miss Syazwani Mahmad Puzi School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.

FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.

Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,

//plug-in ready michigan //powerpoint// made possible through the generous support of the U.S. Department of Energy plug-in ready michigan an electric.

WSNTG Annual Conference September 2006 Water Services National Training Group 10 th Annual Conference 7 th September 2006.

Effluent Outfalls An Board Pleanala June 2009 Moville-G/castle Sewerage Scheme.

Lay-out of Proposed Scheme. Positives – Well located for integration into both NMBM Potable and Industrial supply infrastructure Can supplement either.

G21 - GEELONG REGION ALLIANCE STATE OF THE REGION – WIDE BAY BURNETT ELAINE CARBINES CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER APRIL 2014.

Budget Setting Process For 2015 Budget Draft 0.1 Member Forum Date of Meeting: 27th May 2014.

Consideration Of The Aggregate Recycling Systems Illegal Disposal Site For The Solid Waste Disposal and Codisposal Site Cleanup Program and Augmentation.

The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.

ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS PERMITTING FOR UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA ENDANGERED.

STUDENT SERVICES REVIEW January 8, Context – Administrative Unit Reviews Objectives Roles Unit Self-Study Internal Review Committee External Reviewers.

25 June 2009, London Impact significance in air quality assessment Application of EPUK criteria to road schemes?

School Admissions arrangements for September 2016 Consultation 9 th – 12 th February 2015.

Children and Young People Select Committee - Review of School Organisation and Admission Arrangements (Phase 1) – Response to consultation.

Robert Fookes Although separate applications must be made for the generating station and the grid upgrade. Government believes that both applications.

Anglophone West School District Education Council Sustainability Study – Bath Elementary and Middle Schools Executive Summary April 23, 2015.

Station Square EI scheme Response to: Request de.

11 User Pays User Committee 12th November Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.

Climate Action Lessons from the ESD compliance cycle and its flexibility mechanisms: Current state of discussions Jürgen Salay European Commission, DG.

Mod_02_13 Registration of Charges Legal Spending Update.

Scoring Criteria and Evaluation Process for the Used Oil Nonprofit Grant Program (7 th cycle – UNP7) FY 2006/2007; and the Used Oil Research, Testing,

1 10% Worst Performing Circuits Reliability Program SWEDE Conference San Antonio, TX May 10, 2007 Kenton M. Brannan, P.E.

Innovations in Affordable Housing: Indiana’s General Set-Aside Matt Rayburn October 6, 2015.

Performance Management Reporting: Quarter 4 Guide to Q4’s reporting Overall performance for Q4 Key Service Priorities Other performance indicators Next.

SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January

West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.

The Cohesion Fund in Poland and the Selection System for Environmental Investments Andrzej Guła Institute of Environmental Economics – Poland CEE Bankwatch.

NFP/Eionet meeting, October 2014, EEA PAN NFP/Eionet coordination European Environment Agency (EEA) Key points and actions Bratislava, Slovakia,

CEDR TD Management PG2 – Planning the Network Task M3/M8 Status Report for Executive Board 19 June 2008.

1 IFAD consideration of a Code of Conduct for Executive Board Representatives Historical Background Presentation to an Informal Seminar of the Executive.

Steps to consider. Find a Focus A literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources themselves as an annotated.

11 HPSA and MUA/P NEGOTIATED RULEMAKING A DRAFT ROAD MAP HOW DO WE GET FROM HERE TO WHERE WE NEED TO BE? November 17, 2010 Edward Salsberg, HHS Representative.

1 © 2013 Protiviti Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared for use by OOCEA’s management, audit committee, and board of directors. This.

PERRIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent’s Advisory Attendance Area Advisory Committee Report December 10, 2015.

ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (RISM) Harry Cullen SPM Road Safety, National Roads Authority, Ireland Chairman of CEDR Technical Group.

Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Upgrade Nampa Wastewater Advisory Group Meeting #10 October 9, 2012.

November 26, 2004Governance Committee1 Objective:  Understand from Board Members the strengths and the weaknesses of the TWC Board.

© JABEE 2015 Fundamental Concept of JABEE Evaluation and Accreditation JABEE evaluation and accreditation is to confirm the engineering educational program.

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.

Users’ Office. 8.March 2016 ACCU meeting - D.Chromek-Burckhart – Users’ Office 2 News on Health Insurance D. Chromek-Burckhart – Head of Users’ Office.

Budget 2005/2006 Focusing on Our Priorities BUDGET CONSULTATION Social Care and Health Scrutiny Committee 25 th January 2005.

Presentation Overview

Hillsborough MPO School Safety Study

EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process

Guilford Standards for Promotion and Tenure

Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update May 28, 2014

Retail Marijuana committee

North Wales National League Proposals

Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School

Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School

Slaughden SMP Policy Review

Indicative PRIDe Project Plan

Katherine Edwards Colin Biggers & Paisley Lawyers

LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2016

Release 3 Scope Selection and Plans

Addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts

Station Square EI scheme

Review of the Community Council Scheme of Establishment

Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process

Presentation transcript:

Robert Mc Donald 1 Moville/G’castle Sewerage Scheme An Overview of the Site Selection Process An Board Pleanala June 2009

Robert Mc Donald /2 Site Selection Criteria 2001/2 Site Selection Criteria

Robert Mc Donald 3 No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 Site Prioritisation JBB 2001 Site Selection Report Mill Site DCC Depot Fork Field Glenburnie N. Greencastle Bracken Bayfield

Robert Mc Donald 4 7 potential sites filtered down to 3 IEAC instructed engineers…. Situation at End of 2002 “The Committee recommended that the site selection process be finalised ….. ” If this results in any change in the order of priority of the three sites, the Depot and the Fork fields should be investigated further, if necessary ”

Robert Mc Donald 5 No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 Site Prioritisation Jan Site Selection Report Depot Mill Site Glenburnie Bayfield N. Greencastle Fork Field Bracken

Robert Mc Donald Jan Site Selection Report Conclusions/Recommendation “as although one site has scored highest, the magnitude of distinction between the sites is not considered significant. One site does not stand out clearly above the others.” “We recommend that FURTHER SITES BE EXAMINED”

Robert Mc Donald 7 No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No. 6 No. 7 Top 7 of 18 Sites April 2003 Site Selection Report Mill Site Glencrow Bayfield Depot Derry Road Eleven Ballyboes Cornashamma

Robert Mc Donald April 2003 Site Selection Report Conclusions/Recommendation “This Report identifies the Mill Site as the highest ranked site using the criteria designed for this project ” XCri

Robert Mc Donald 9 No. 1 No.2 No.3 No.4 Site Prioritisation April 2003 Site Selection Report Glencrow Eleven Ballyboes Coolnasillagh (Carnagarve) Ballybrack

Robert Mc Donald Nov Site Selection Report Conclusions/Recommendation “Of the remaining areas the Industrial Area at Glencrow is the highest ranked site in the Moville/Greencastle area” Arl JB Barry “….in an existing industrial/commercial area – a more appropriate location for a WWTP ”

Robert Mc Donald 11 Options Available Option 1:Adhere to project criteria Mill Site Option 2:Introduce new buffer criteria Glencrow Decision:Find a NEW SITE Why

Robert Mc Donald 12 The Mill & Glencrow WHY were the “most appropriate sites in the Moville Greencastle area” abandoned?

Robert Mc Donald 13 Effects of Glencrow Abandonment Effects of Glencrow Abandonment Carnagarve GlencrowIndustrial Residential Field Homes Local People Sheep

Robert Mc Donald Some Quotes from JBB 2002 ”The study so far indicates that the most appropriate site for the WWTP is the Mill Site closely followed by DCC Depot” ”The bulk of the opinions expressed at the May Open Day tended to favour the Mill Site.” The Mill Site “…Community preferred site” ”…the potential for adverse environmental impacts from the development of a greenfield site is considered significantly higher than developing either the Mill or DCC which are both on previously disturbed sites”

Robert Mc Donald 15 The Community Perception: Mill site was being processed Carnagarve was sourced in early 2003 Local community were unaware until 2005 April 2005 resident uncovered proposal

Robert Mc Donald 16 Minutes of IEAC 07/03/05 March 2005 “The members discussed the proposed site for Moville/Greencastle SS and stated that there was general agreement that local residents would not object to the proposed site, provided that Tertiary Treatment is provided” ST January 2005 Councillors agreed with Executive to locate plant into Carnagarve

Robert Mc Donald 17 The Final Conclusion This has been a presentation on how not to conduct a project! Yet DCC expect us to accept its conclusions

Robert Mc Donald 18 Moville/G’castle Sewerage Scheme An Overview of the Selection Process An Board Pleanala June 2009

Robert Mc Donald 19 PP