DARK ENERGY IN SPACE: WFIRST AND EUCLID RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) ON BEHALF OF THE PHYSPAG DARK ENERGY COMMUNITY Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Advertisements

Dark Energy with Clusters with LSST Steve Allen Ian Dell’Antonio.
Optimization of large-scale surveys to probe the DE David Parkinson University of Sussex Prospects and Principles for Probing the Problematic Propulsion.
WFIRST & Euclid Jason Rhodes NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Copyright 2011 California Institute of Technology. Government.
CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble ACS Parallels WFC3 Parallels 6 arcmin. = 2.2 z=0.5 Footprints of HST Cameras: ACS FOV in.
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
R. Pain9/18/2008 LSST-SNAP complementarity Reynald Pain IN2P3/LPNHE Paris, France Page 1.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009.
The SNAP Project at SLAC Phil Marshall SLAC/KIPAC Slide 1.
The Dark Energy Survey and The Dark Energy Spectrograph Josh Frieman DES Project Director Portsmouth, June 2011.
X-ray Optical microwave Cosmology at KIPAC. The Survey 5000 square degrees (overlap with SPT and VISTA) Five-band (grizY) + VISTA (JHK) photometry to.
LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, 2011 Analysis Overview Bhuv Jain and Jeff Newman.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
Quotes from NWNH 2/3/ Two complementary approaches to understanding dark energy have been considered by this survey: one on the ground and the.
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
Robust cosmological constraints from SDSS-III/BOSS galaxy clustering Chia-Hsun Chuang (Albert) IFT- CSIC/UAM, Spain.
PHYSPAG JANUARY 2015 DARK ENERGY UPDATE RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit: ESA 1.
THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY Science Goals: Perform a 5000 sq. deg. survey of the southern galactic cap Map the cosmological density field to z=1 Constrain the.
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
Jenam 2010 Exoplanet Targets for Upcoming Cosmic Visions Space Missions James Frith September 8 th 2010 University of Hertfordshire.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
WFIRST-AFTA Mission Science Alan Dressler, AAS Seattle, January 7, /30/2014WFIRST-AFTA SDT Report 1.
Physics of the Cosmos Program Analysis Group John Nousek Penn State University International Workshop on Astronomical X–Ray Optics Prague, Czech Republic.
Weak Lensing from Space with SNAP Alexandre Refregier (IoA) Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (IoA) Richard Massey (IoA) Gary Bernstein (Michigan) Tim.
What’s going on with Dark Energy? Bill Carithers Aspen 2008.
David Weinberg, Ohio State University Dept. of Astronomy and CCAPP The Cosmological Content of Galaxy Redshift Surveys or Why are FoMs all over the map?
Surveying the Universe with SNAP Tim McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Seattle AAS Meeting: 1/03 For the SNAP collaboration.
Ignacy Sawicki Université de Genève Understanding Dark Energy.
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
DMD Spectroscopy Yun Wang Yun Wang (with DMD slides from Massimo Robberto) WFIRST SDT #2, March, 2011.
The Far-Infrared Universe: from the Universe’s oldest light to the birth of its youngest stars Jeremy P. Scott, on behalf of Locke D. Spencer Physics and.
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
LSST and Dark Energy Dark Energy - STScI May 7, 2008 Tony Tyson, UC Davis Outline: 1.LSST Project 2.Dark Energy Measurements 3.Controlling Systematic Errors.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
NRO Telescopes David Spergel. History meter telescopes meter mirror “Residual space hardware” from Future Imagery Architecture, failed program.
DRM 2 What to do?. A: Remind you of the charge Develop a final DRM for WFIRST that does not duplicate the capabilities of Euclid and LSST. Assess options.
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
ISWG - December 7, Destiny, The Dark Energy Space Telescope.
Cosmological Weak Lensing With SKA in the Planck era Y. Mellier SKA, IAP, October 27, 2006.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
CTIO Camera Mtg - Dec ‘03 Studies of Dark Energy with Galaxy Clusters Joe Mohr Department of Astronomy Department of Physics University of Illinois.
NIRSS: the Near-Infrared Sky Surveyor WFIRST Meeting 2011 February 3 Daniel Stern (JPL/Caltech)
The Euclid Mission Jason Rhodes (Caltech/JPL) March 7, 2013 © 2013, government sponsorship acknowledged.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
DESpec in the landscape of large spectrographic surveys Craig Hogan University of Chicago and Fermilab.
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
Next Generation Data Sets: An Overview of CMB-S4 and WFIRST David Spergel Princeton University Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute.
Map-making leads to understanding When we understand the evolution from one map to another, we can understand  the sociological, economic, and political.
The Dark Energy Science Collaboration Andy Connolly (DESC Computing Coordinator), Rachel Bean (DESC Spokesperson)
The Dark Side of the Universe L. Van Waerbeke APSNW may 15 th 2009.
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
The Dark Energy Survey Probe origin of Cosmic Acceleration:
Cosmological Constraints from the Double-
Princeton University & APC
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
NEW Telescope Meeting , Princeton
Complementarity of Dark Energy Probes
Ben Wandelt Flatiron Institute
Ignacy Sawicki CEICO, Institute of Physics, Prague
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

DARK ENERGY IN SPACE: WFIRST AND EUCLID RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) ON BEHALF OF THE PHYSPAG DARK ENERGY COMMUNITY Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit: ESA 1

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 Dark energy science has evolved significantly since its discovery Richer, complementary constraints of geometry & expansion on cosmic scales Samushia et al 2012 Additional insights from LSS linear growth rate Rostomian and Ross, BOSS/LBL “Post-parameterized” formalism bridges theory and data Baker et al 2012

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 Vital to test of gravity & matter in environments beyond stellar systems Image Credit: Dimitrios Psaltis LIGO Event Horizon Telescope Galaxy Rotation and Halo Structure Cosmological Probes Stellar Systems 3 Phenomenology: effects on relativistic and non-relativistic matter evolution new matter: G light = G matter ≠G change to GR: G light ≠ G matter smoking gun G light ≠ G matter Zhang, Liguori, RB, Dodelson PRL 2007

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 Required breadth, depth & complexity not achievable by a single survey Trade offs in Techniques (SN1a, BAO,RSD, WL, Clusters) Photometric speed vs. spectroscopic precision Angular and spectral resolution Astrophysical tracers (LRGs, ELGs, Lya/QSOs, clusters, CMB) Epochs and scales to study Much more than a DETF FoM: Astrophysical & instrumental systematic control mitigation is crucial, but not so easily summarized. Readiness vs technological innovation Survey area vs depth and repeat imaging of the same sky (dithering, cadence and survey area overlap/config.) WFIRST and Euclid will make distinct and highly complementary contributions both with each other and with ground based surveys (LSST, DESI and others) 4

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 NASA is contributing NIR detectors and associated hardware Three US science teams have joined the Euclid Consortium (now including 54 US scientists) Euclid public Data Releases at ~26, 50, and 84 months NASA has established the Euclid NASA Science Center at IPAC (ENSCI) in order to support the US Euclid science community Changes to spectrograph filters, shifting from 2 blue/2 red to all red underway. Euclid overview Starts, duration Imaging/ weak lensing (0<z<2.) SN1a BAO/RSD Spec. res.  Diameter FoV (deg 2 ) Spec. range Area (deg 2 ) pixel (arcsec) Euclid 2020 Q2, 7 yr gal/arcmin 2 1 broad vis. band 550– 900 nm ~50m Hα ELGs Z~ (slitless)  m 20,000 (N + S) 0.13 (based on publicly available data) 5

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 All 4 probes (SN/BAO/RSD/WL). Unique SN1a IFU characterization. Multi-band imaging and DM higher resolution mapping than from ground or with smaller telescope Spectroscopically selected galaxies for BAO/RSD 1<z<3 Systematics’ control a priority (e.g. WL shapes, SN1a characterization) Congress added $66M WFIRST- AFTA funding added to FY13 &14 NASA budget. Supported in President’s FY15 budget. WFIRST overview Starts, duration WFIRST-AFTA ~2023, 5-6 yr Imaging/ weak lensing (0<z<2.) SN1a 68 gal/arcmin 2 3 bands nm 2700 SN1a z = 0.1–1.7 IFU spectroscopy BAO/RSD 20m Hα ELGs z = 1–2, 2m [OIII] ELGS z = 2–3 Spec. res.  (slitless) Diameter2.4 FoV (deg 2 )0.281 Spec. range  m Area (deg 2 )2,400 (S) pixel (arcsec)0.12 Euclid 2020 Q2, 7 yr gal/arcmin 2 1 broad vis. band 550– 900 nm ~50m Hα ELGs Z~ (slitless)  m 20,000 (N + S) 0.13 (based on publicly available data) 6

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 In the broader context Starts, duration WFIRST-AFTA ~2023, 5-6 yr Imaging/ weak lensing (0<z<2.) SN1a 68 gal/arcmin 2 3 bands nm 2700 SN1a z = 0.1–1.7 IFU spectroscopy BAO/RSD 20m Hα ELGs z = 1–2, 2m [OIII] ELGS z = 2–3 Spec. res.  (slitless) Diameter2.4 FoV (deg 2 )0.281 Spec. range  m Area (deg 2 )2,400 (S) pixel (arcsec)0.12 Euclid 2020 Q2, 7 yr gal/arcmin 2 1 broad vis. band 550– 900 nm ~50m Hα ELGs Z~ (slitless)  m 20,000 (N + S) 0.13 DESILSST ~2018, 5 yr2020, 10 yr gal/arcmin 2 5 bands nm SN1a/yr z = 0.–0.7 photometric 20-30m LRGs/[OII] ELGs 0.6 < z < 1.7, 1m QSOs/Lya 1.9<z< (N fib =5000) 4 (less 1.8+) nm 14,000 (N)20,000 (S) 0.7 Stage IV Now & near term: e.g. DES, HSC; BOSS, eBOSS, PFS; J-PAS, JWST; Planck, ACT+, Spider, SPT+ 7

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 Extra slides 8

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 WFIRST and Euclid reflect these advances in measurement & theory Don’t presume a strong theoretical prior a-priori Data will be good enough to test beyond w=-1 or w 0 -w a Constrain growth and expansion in a model- independent way Search for a diverse array of signatures: Geometry and inhomogeneity constraints across multiple epochs Multiple tracers sampling distinct gravitational environments (galaxy and cluster positions and motions; CMB lensing and ISW; galaxy and cluster lensing) Probe non-linear regimes (access many more modes & gravitational screening) Recognizes importance of systematic control in realizing survey potential Survey complementarity/cross-correlation Ascribe effects to cosmology rather than uncharacterized systematic. 9

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 Euclid overview Starts, duration Imaging/ weak lensing (0<z<2.) SN1a BAO/RSD Spec. res.  Diameter FoV (deg 2 ) Spec. range Area (deg 2 ) pixel (arcsec) Euclid 2020 Q2, 7 yr gal/arcmin 2 1 broad vis. band 550– 900 nm ~50m Hα ELGs Z~ (slitless)  m 20,000 (N + S) 0.13 Amendola et al 2012 Updates to H  LF, and spectrograph  f g )/f g likely higher (based on publicly available data) 10

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 WFIRST overview Starts, duration WFIRST-AFTA ~2023, 5-6 yr Imaging/ weak lensing (0<z<2.) SN1a 68 gal/arcmin 2 3 bands nm 2700 SN1a z = 0.1–1.7 IFU spectroscopy BAO/RSD 20m Hα ELGs z = 1–2, 2m [OIII] ELGS z = 2–3 Spec. res.  (slitless) Diameter2.4 FoV (deg 2 )0.281 Spec. range  m Area (deg 2 )2,400 (S) pixel (arcsec)0.12 Euclid 2020 Q2, 7 yr gal/arcmin 2 1 broad vis. band 550– 900 nm ~50m Hα ELGs Z~ (slitless)  m 20,000 (N + S) 0.13 Spergel, Gehrels et al (WFIRST-AFTA SDT) 2013 (based on publicly available data) 11

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Chicago August 2014 WFIRST overview Starts, duration WFIRST-AFTA ~2023, 5-6 yr Imaging/ weak lensing (0<z<2.) SN1a 68 gal/arcmin 2 3 bands nm 2700 SN1a z = 0.1–1.7 IFU spectroscopy BAO/RSD 20m Hα ELGs z = 1–2, 2m [OIII] ELGS z = 2–3 Spec. res.  (slitless) Diameter2.4 FoV (deg 2 )0.281 Spec. range  m Area (deg 2 )2,400 (S) pixel (arcsec)0.12 Euclid 2020 Q2, 7 yr gal/arcmin 2 1 broad vis. band 550– 900 nm ~50m Hα ELGs Z~ (slitless)  m 20,000 (N + S) 0.13 Spergel, Gehrels et al (WFIRST-AFTA SDT) 2013 (based on publicly available data) 12