Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
TRUMANSBURG CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT’S ENTRY PLAN
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. 6 leadership standards what are they? 3 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Session Materials  Wiki
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Lead Evaluator Training
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review SLOs: Lessons Learned A Look at Some Evidence Planning School Visits Supporting Principals Closure.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: Different? One Year Later Coaching Principals Collect evidence Support your local.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Messaging Research & Literature Article Read Planning Visits (and HW) Artifact Review Support your local.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1. Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: So far Revised resources Collect evidence from a “faculty meeting” Debrief Planning.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research: Principal Characteristics Time Out: §3012-d Planning Forest or the Trees? Making a “To-Do”
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
A Policy-oriented Board of Trustees A Review of Selected Research.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking Ahead to Next Year

Back Again: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and use of Student Growth Percentile and VA Growth Model data 4.Application and use of the State-approved teacher or principal rubrics 5.Application and use of any assessment tools used to evaluate teachers and principals

Back Again: 9 Components 6.Application and use of State-approved locally selected measures of student achievement 7.Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System 8.Scoring methodology used to evaluate teachers and principals 9.Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of ELLs and students with disabilities

Back Again : 9+ Components 10.State-determined district-wide student growth goal setting process (Student Learning Objectives) 11.Effective supervisory visits and feedback 12.Soliciting structured feedback from constituent groups 13.Reviewing school documents, records, state accountability processes and other measures 14.Principal contribution to teacher effectiveness 15.Increasing the likelihood that it makes a difference

Resources Are Archived

Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: So far Revised resources Collect evidence from a “faculty meeting” Debrief Planning your next school visit

Research & Literature Update

Principal Evaluation New from Joe Murphy and others

Common Pitfalls Unclear rubrics –Can be too vague –Can be too much of a checklist Overreliance on observations –Talk to people –Use focus groups Misuse of achievement data –Make growth goals that make sense –Achievement, growth & equity

Guiding Principles Foundational Principles Highlight learning-centered leadership Be grounded on the national standards for school leaders (ISLLC)

Guiding Principles Process Principles Be evidence based Have set benchmarks agreed upon in advance Be transparent Foster a culture of collaboration between principal and supervisor Be valid and reliable Be comprehensive, but not overly complex Be both formative and summative Include multiple measures, including student achievement Tap into the views of multiple constituents Have well-defined timelines Provide ongoing feedback to the principal Be site specific, connected to needs of specific school Be flexible enough to allow for adjustments

Guiding Principles Outcome Principles Promote school improvement Enhance academic and social learning of students Motivate principals to improve Promote targeted professional growth opportunities Result in meaningful consequences

Strong Districts & Their Leadership

District Leadership Matters Characteristics of Strong Districts Leadership Practices Personal Leadership Resources A Vision of Future District Leadership

District Leadership Matters As we go through the slides, pause and reflect on the characteristic. Circle your current state on the scale.

District Characteristic #1 A broadly shared mission, vision and goals founded on ambitious images of the educated person System-wide focus on learning Widely understood and endorsed Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

District Characteristic #2 A coherent instructional guidance system Vertical and horizontal curriculum Process to help all understand Identified performance standards Teacher collaboration Instructional leadership from all leaders Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

District Characteristic #3 Deliberate and consistent use of multiple sources of evidence to inform decisions Accessible (and managed) data Research-based PLC-like Instructional decisions & accountability Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

District Characteristic #4 Learning-oriented organizational improvement process Strategic planning Narrow focus Processes for integrating new and old; deliberate and manageable Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

District Characteristic #5 Job-embedded professional development for all members Meetings are instructional PD is aligned (and differentiated) Time for collaborative work Teachers and administrators Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

District Characteristic #6 Budgets, structures, personnel policies and procedures, and uses of time aligned with the district’s mission, vision and goals Aligned with student goals Aligned with instructional improvement Adequate time & money Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

District Characteristic #7 A comprehensive approach to leadership development Recruitment Development Growth-producing feedback (evaluation) All levels of leadership are focused Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

District Characteristic #8 A policy-oriented board of education Helps assess community values and interests Uses vision as foundation for planning and evaluation Respects role of leader and senior staff Holds leadership accountable for vision Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

District Characteristic #9 Productive working relationships with all staff and stakeholders Central office roles interconnected Participation in systems decisions PLCs well established and have become the way of doing business Rate your situation on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 high:

Reflection on the Year (so far)

Taking Stock at a District Level Reflect on the progress the district has made this year:

Evidence Collection From an End-of-the-Year Meeting

Evidence Collection Watch the simulated End-of-the-Year Meeting Collect evidence Talk about the evidence at your table: –What did you collect? –What did you not collect? –Implications?

Evidence Collection End-of-the-Year Meeting Simulation At your table, talk about the meetings your principals have with their teachers What worked? What do you want to be different this year?

Using Your Rubric

Consider these short descriptions of principal practices What is your reaction to the practice? Does it fit with the current context? Which standards/domains does it touch? Is it something you would want your principals to do?

Your Principal’s End-of-the-Year Meetings With Their Teachers

Meeting Plan (or Map*) Begin to fill out the organizer What are the things you want your principals to address with everyone?

Make Your Plan How (and when) will you communicate to your principals what you want them to do with all of their teachers during end-of-the- year meetings? Talk about your plans or your options at your table.

End-of-the-Year Meetings With Your Principals

And Finally… When you meet with your principals… What do you want all of your principals to hear? What will your agenda or plan be? How will you communicate this to your principals in advance? How will you use this year to look ahead?

Next Year Next Year? Three sessions? After CSA or not? Will we need a year one cohort?

Closure: Next Year On note paper, write a quick letter to Jeff about what you would like to see included in or changed for Principal Evaluator Training, NEXT YEAR. Leave it at your table. Dear Jeff: