Using an Evidence-Based Approach to Address Maternal and Child Health Priorities Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Community Guide Branch, Centers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Health Essential Service #2
Advertisements

Understanding Capacity Building Assistance
Thurston County Public Health & Social Services Department Public Health and Social Services Department Assessment Team Meeting.
Principles of Standards and Measures
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
MOVING TOWARDS A HEALTHIER HARFORD KATHERINE RICHARDSON, MD An Analysis of Obesity Prevention Interventions for Harford County, Maryland.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
AMCHP-CDC Skills Building Suite: Evidence-based Practice: Moving along the Continuum from Selection to Sustainability Friday, September 13, 2013 Starr.
Practicing Community-engaged Research Mary Anne McDonald, MA, Dr PH Duke Center for Community Research Duke Translational Medicine Institute Division of.
Understanding the Details of Your Evidence-Based Options Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Community Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Public Health Collaborations to Improve Health Outcomes: Healthy Aging Opportunities Lynda Anderson, PhD Director, Healthy Aging Program Centers for Disease.
Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.
WORKING TOGETHER TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHY AGING PROGRAMS: PUBLIC HEALTH, AGING, AND UNIVERSITY COMMUNITIES Lucinda L. Bryant PhD MSHA MBA, University.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Sustaining Local Public Health and Built Environment Programs Fit Nation NYC November 3, 2011 Annaliese Calhoun.
Healthy North Carolina 2020 and EBS/EBI 101 Joanne Rinker MS, RD, CDE, LDN Center for Healthy North Carolina Director of Training and Technical Assistance.
Implementing and Evaluating Evidence-based Strategies
NCALHD Public Health Task Force NC State Health Director’s Conference January 2014 A Blueprint of the Future for Local Public Health Departments in North.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Outcomes of Public Health
Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in The Effective Health Care Program Supriya Janakiraman MD MPH AHRQ.
Selecting an Evidence-based Approach (EBA) with the Best Fit Image courtesy of Naypong at FreeDigitalPhotos.net.
Sustainability… Start Now for a Vibrant Future Sustainability Workshop for Persistently Dangerous Schools Grantees Philadelphia, PA Tuesday, September.
National Prevention Strategy 1. National Prevention Council Bureau of Indian AffairsDepartment of Labor Corporation for National and Community Service.
Implementation Opening Activity Implementation Considerations Implementation Activity.
1 OPHS FOUNDATIONAL STANDARD BOH Section Meeting February 11, 2011.
The Evaluation Plan.
Defining Evidence. Session Objectives Define evidence-based public health practice Discuss two important targets of evidence-based intervention - behavior.
Healthy Kansans 2010 Workgroup: Early Disease Prevention, Risk Identification and Intervention for Women, Children and Adolescents Deb Williams Facilitator.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Recommendations and a Plan for Preventing Preterm Birth Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality (SACIM) August 10, 2015.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Evidence-Based Public Health Selecting Evidence-Based Interventions Joanne Rinker 1.
+ Chapter 1 Self, Family, and Community © 2013 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 1.
Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.
The Sociocultural Environment and Health: Systematic Reviews of Community Interventions.
Why a CPCRN? CDC Expectations Katherine M. Wilson, PhD, MPH CPCRN Technical Monitor Division of Cancer Prevention and Control CDC.
Getting There from Here: Creating an Evidence- Based Culture Within Special Education Ronnie Detrich Randy Keyworth Jack States.
CIFOR Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response CIFOR Guidelines and CIFOR Toolkit Donald J. Sharp, MD, DTM&H Food Safety Office National Center for.
The 2012 Island County Community Health Improvement Plan & Process The Community Health Advisory Board (CHAB) & Island County Public Health Greg Wisont,
11 The CPCRN, DCPC, NCI, and the Community Guide: Areas for Collaboration and Supportive Work Shawna L. Mercer, MSc, PhD Director The Guide to Community.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Water interventions generally described positive health impacts, but there was insufficient data on some types of interventions to draw strong conclusions.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Finding evidence-based approaches. Assessing your Community Implementing & Evaluating Establishing Goals & Objectives; Planning for Evaluation Finding.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 ©
John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Program 3/10/2015 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Intermediate.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
Evidence-Based Public Health in Action: Strategies from New York Moderator: Amy Ramsay Association of State and Territorial Health Officials Speakers from.
Community Guide 101 December 13, 2010 Shawna L. Mercer, MSc, PhD, Director, The Guide to Community Preventive Services, Centers for Disease Control and.
11 Evidence-Based Prevention Interventions Involves assessing evidence of the effectiveness of two categories of preventive services: 1.Clinical preventive.
Increased # of AI/AN receiving in- home environmental assessment and trigger reduction education and asthma self-management education Increased # of tribal.
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
1 Considerations When Providing Technical Assistance on Using Evidence December 13, 2010 Shawna L. Mercer, MSc, PhD, Director, The Guide to Community Preventive.
David M. Murray, Ph.D. Associate Director for Prevention Director, Office of Disease Prevention Multilevel Intervention Research Methodology September.
Stages of Research and Development
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Research Translation: Lessons from Dissemination and Implementation Research for Interventions Promoting Walking and Walkability August 18, am Pacific,
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Evidence-Based Strategies to Increase Adult Vaccination Rates Recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services Megan C. Lindley, MPH.
The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2011
Presentation transcript:

Using an Evidence-Based Approach to Address Maternal and Child Health Priorities Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Community Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention September 5, 2013 Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (proposed) Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services (proposed)

Disclaimer Any views or opinions expressed by the speaker do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC, HHS, or any other entity of the United States government. Furthermore, the use of any product names, trade names, images, or commercial sources is for identification purposes only, and does not imply endorsement or government sanction by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2

Acknowledgements This training is brought to you by 3

AMCHP/Community Guide 2013 Webinar Series  Part 1 (September 5): Why use an evidence-based approach? The Community Guide: a resource for evidence-based strategies. Locating evidence-based program and policy interventions.  Part 2 (September 10): Selecting an evidenced-based option that fits your community. Adapting interventions to fit your community.  Part 3 (September 13): Using different forms of evaluation methods. Assessing sustainability of your program. 4

Today’s Learner Objectives  Explain the benefits of using an evidence-based approach.  Describe the types of findings the Community Preventive Services Task Force (Task Force) makes about the evidence.  Demonstrate how to access broad evidence-based strategies and related Task Force findings on The Community Guide website.  Locate specific evidence-based program and policy interventions using the Research-Tested Intervention Programs (RTIPs) and Center for Training and Research Translation (Center TRT) websites.  State elements of organizational capacity affecting the use of evidence. 5

WHAT IS THE VALUE OF USING AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH TO SELECT INTERVENTIONS? 6

What is Evidence? “The available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief is true or valid.” Brownson RC, Baker EA, Leet TL, Gillespie KN Evidence-Based Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press. 7

What is Evidence in Public Health?  Personal experience  Word of mouth  Program evaluation  An intervention research study  Systematic reviews of multiple intervention studies Practice-based Research-based 8

Why Use an Evidence-Based Approach?  Allows for scarce resources to be used wisely.  Shortens the time that it takes to develop a program or policy.  Increases your likelihood of success.  Funders are requiring more accountability. 9

THE COMMUNITY GUIDE: A RESOURCE FOR IDENTIFYING EVIDENCE-BASED STRATEGIES 10

The Community Guide  Evidence-based recommendations and findings Provide information about the effectiveness of community preventive programs, services, and policies. Developed by the Community Preventive Services Task Force (Task Force).  Systematic reviews Analyze all available evidence on the effectiveness of community-based programs, services, and policies in public health. Assess the economic benefit of all effective programs, services, and policies. Highlight critical evidence gaps. Conducted, with Task Force oversight, by scientists and subject matter experts from CDC in collaboration with a wide range of government, academic, policy, and practice-based partners. 11

What is The Community Preventive Services Task Force?  A non-federal, independent, rotating panel.  Internationally renowned experts in public health research, practice, and policy.  Members are appointed by CDC Director; nominated using broad input from throughout public health and healthcare.  Serve without payment.  CDC is mandated to provide scientific, technical and administrative support for the Task Force. 12

More than 220 Task Force Recommendations and Findings Adolescent Health Alcohol - Excessive Consumption Asthma Birth Defects Cancer Cardiovascular Disease Diabetes Emergency Preparedness Health Communication Health Equity Worksite HIV/AIDS, STIs, Pregnancy Mental Health Motor Vehicle Injury Nutrition Obesity Oral Health Physical Activity Tobacco Vaccination Violence 13  21 public health topic areas  Strategies may be informational; behavioral, social; environmental, policy; health system-based.

The Task Force Seeks to Answer Key Questions about Interventions  Do they work?  How well?  For whom?  Under what circumstance are they appropriate (applicability)?  What do they cost?  How do they affect health equity?  Are there barriers to their use?  Are there any harms?  Are there any unanticipated outcomes? 14

Findings of the Task Force  Recommend Strong Evidence Sufficient Evidence  Recommend against Strong Evidence Sufficient Evidence  Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against 15

What Does Insufficient Evidence Mean?  This does NOT mean the intervention does not work.  Insufficient evidence means that more research is needed for the Task Force to decide if the intervention is effective or not. Too few studies exist for the Task Force to make a decision. Not enough studies were of the quality needed for the Task Force to make a decision. Enough studies exist, but have inconsistent results for the following reasons: Variables other than the intervention could have influenced the results. The intervention was not carried out in the same way in all the studies. A substantial subset of studies show a minimal or negative effect.  Consider: Do better documented alternatives exist for reaching the same goals? 16

What to Do with a Recommendation “Even if it is evidence-based, it is not certainty.” McGinnis and Foege, 2000  Not a cookbook or a one-size-fits-all solution.  Users must combine scientific information (e.g., effectiveness, cost) with other information (e.g., needs, values, capacities, resources). 17

Organizational Capacity  Organization = all parent organizations or agencies in which the program is housed.*  Organizational capacity = having the internal support and resources needed to effectively manage your program and its activities.*  Elements of organizational capacity Pre-implementation – Staffing, training available, ability to recruit Implementation – Participant recruitment, means to track progress Evaluation – Knowledgeable staff, use evaluation results *The Program Sustainability Framework, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 18

Organizational Readiness Checklist 19

What are your impressions of the Organizational Readiness checklist? 20

What did you learn about your organization after completing the Organizational Readiness checklist? 21

ACCESSING EVIDENCE-BASED STRATEGIES: THE COMMUNITY GUIDE WEBSITE 22

What do you think? 23

Selecting a Strategy 1.Identify criteria to determine what may “fit” with your audience and/or organization. 2.Acquire information about potential options from evidence- based resources, (e.g., The Community Guide). 3.Review available information about the strategies using fit criteria (e.g., articles, implementation guides, etc.). 4.Decide which option to adopt. 24

Strategy Comparison Tool 25

The Community Guide: A Source of Evidence-Based Strategies Aim CG Strategy Intervention Programs Increase physical activity 26 Alive! Diet and Physical Activity Program Individually- adapted health behavior change programs A New Leaf…Choices For Healthy Living

LOCATING EVIDENCE-BASED PROGRAM AND POLICY INTERVENTIONS 27

28

29

Activity! 30

Matching Intervention Program Labels Center TRT Setting Health Equity Considerations Topic Core Elements Resources Implementation Evidence Summary Potential Public Impact Intervention Materials RTIPS Topics Setting Materials (products) Need Program (how-to) Community Preventive Services Task Force Finding Required Resources About the Study Key Findings 31

Additional Resources

Additional Resources (cont’d)

Intervention Comparison Tool 34

Homework for Next Webinar (Sep 10)  Scavenger Hunt Handout 1.Explore The Community Guide website and answer questions specific to the Task Force-recommended strategy, Behavioral and Social Approaches to Increase Physical Activity: Individually-Adapted Health Behavior Change Programs. 2.Use the RTIPs and Center TRT websites to Select one program intervention from each that is aligned with the Task Force-recommended strategy, Behavioral and Social Approaches to Increase Physical Activity: Individually-Adapted Health Behavior Change Programs. Answer questions for each program intervention you selected. 35

Homework for Next Webinar (cont’d)  Intervention Comparison Tool Handout 1.Review your responses on the Organizational Readiness Checklist. 2.Consider the information you gathered about your health priority and community. 3.Fill out only the first blank column “Priority Area for Our Community” based on your community as well as your responses for the Organizational Readiness Checklist. You will fill out the remaining columns during our next webinar. 36

Next Webinar…Why Is Understanding the Details of Evidence-Based Options Important?  Assess how much adaptation is needed by gauging its fit to your community and organization.  Review methods, facilitators’ guide or implementation protocol to understand the steps for delivery.  Learn the costs of implementation. In short, decide which program to use. 37

38 Questions & Discussion

Thank you! Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Community Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (proposed) Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services (proposed)