NYGEAR UP State Evaluation State Technical Workshop February 23, 2015.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation February 2011.

Advertisements

PROVINCIAL COACHING COMMISSIONS STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.

POETRY IN MOTION The Partnership Outreach Education Models – two years on.

Sport Workforce Audit Tool Capability Building in Sport Organisations Pre-forum Workshop 2 Our Sporting Futures.

Third-Party Evaluation Studies as a Basis for Determining Program Effectiveness and Improvement Needs Center for Research and Reform in Education Johns.

NIDRR-funded AATT Project (Agricultural Assistive Technology Training) DOE/OSERS Project # H133G TRAINING OVERVIEW On-line and In-person Evaluations.

Program Directors: Updates, Evaluations, and Reports.

EURIDICE project Evaluation of image database use in online learning environment 11/

Strengthening Evaluation at USAID Gerald Britan, Ph.D., Chief Performance Division, USAID November 7, 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association.

EVALUATING TAACCCT Robin Fernkas Director, Division of Strategic Investments U.S. DOL, ETA July 25,

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes 2003 State Special Education Outcomes: Marching On Results of NCEO’s Survey of State Directors of Special.

Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.

2009 Student Satisfaction Survey. Survey Background Created to address the “Student Satisfaction” Performance Measures Developed and updated by the Student.

Collection Level Description: The RASCAL Experience A Case Study Clare McVeigh RASCAL Project Manager 8 February 2002.

WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.

ADVANCED LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR SUPERVISORS (ALDS) PROGRAM YEAR 1 IMPLEMENTATION MARCH 2010 – FEBRUARY 2011 PILOT PROGRAM.

California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.

Monitoring LEA McKinney-Vento Programs State Coordinators Meeting February 2009 Arlington, Virginia.

Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.

The RRCP Program A Framework for Change Presented to our SPDG Partners June 2010.

Steps towards Safe School Annex 1.. «Safe school is a school without any danger New educational context: - New educational model - “Our new school ”-

Completion and Attrition in AGEP and non-AGEP Institutions Technical Workshop CGS Annual Meeting December 10, 2011 Robert Sowell Jeff Allum Nathan Bell.

EVALUATION AND THE RESIDENCY PROGRAM Caroline C. Nielsen, Ph.D.

WHO European Ministerial Conference on Couteracting Obesity European Commission Workshop About Shape Up.

Seeking, Choosing & Sustaining Super Staff. o For summer camp, start the process in February o For the school year, start the process in June o Post ad.

Group. “Your partner in developing future Lifelong Learners” UROWNE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.

BLOOMFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS Every Student, Every Day, Every classroom Climate and Satisfaction Survey Results Dr. James Thompson, Superintendent Dr. Ellen.

Without Technology Learning is Impossible Study of Learning and Development Practices in the Humanitarian Sector Rachel Griffith-Boyes & Jeroen Breman.

Does Reading First Work? Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.

SLIC /JISC FE Survey Preliminary Findings Catherine Kearney Assistant Director (SLIC)

Technical requirement or technicality? Denise Louden MBC Final Project May 2006 Persuasive Presentations.

CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.

2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.

What is randomization and how does it solve the causality problem? 2.3.

Parents as Teachers © (PAT)  Vision All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential.  Mission To provide the information,

1 Illinois Department of Human Services Division of Mental Health Presents March 11,2008 Illinois Mental Health Collaborative for Access and Choice and.

Planning for a Disaster: Service Provider and Advocacy Organizations Carl T. Cameron, PhD Pat Heineman.

GEF: Support for the Implementation of Article 8(j) and Related Provisions Informal Presentation at the Meeting of the Working Group on Article 8(j) Montreal,

Impact Assessment Indicators for Administration of Public Transportation Grants NCHRP Task 49 Viktor Zhong Scott Baker Dec 3, 2015.

The Jewish Fund Grantee and Applicant Perception Survey May Joe Gaglio Principal Deloitte & Touche LLP.

M&E Joint Programming in Mozambique 12 th May 2009.

Planning Next Year’s Staff Development Beryl Johnson Director of Staff Development City of Sacramento ~ Sacramento START Beryl Johnson Director of Staff.

School Goals for Parent Engagement Goal #1: Welcoming Environment Provide a welcoming environment for families and invite them to participate as equal.

Personal Health Budgets Evaluation Evaluation of the Personal Health Budgets Pilots Wider Cohort Pilot Sites.

Accountability & Effectiveness Innovation Network, Inc. January 22, 2003.

Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.

NSW Smarter Schools National Partnerships Evaluating literacy and numeracy improvements: Securing rewards for demonstrating improvement 1.

Staff Leadership at Northwestern Kellogg School of Management 2012.

Ipod Project Initial Overview Training February 15, :30-5:30 PM (SEA #11 – 309 – Academic) Lenoir County Public Schools.

Evaluating the benefits of using VAT data to improve the efficiency of editing in a multivariate annual business survey Daniel Lewis.

What Advocacy Is and Is Not, and the Role for Advocates: Serge Resnikoff, MD, PhD ICO Director for Advocacy.

TST Session 1.1 Welcome & Introduction Trader Survey Training WFP Markets Learning Programme1.1.1 Trader Survey Training.

Work Related Project Presentation The Design and Development of Overview of Database online Learning Materials Makeba Adero.

Descriptive Evaluation Summary Year 4 & Grant-to-Date December 1, 2007 – November 30, 2008.

Hume Koorie Pathways - a regional approach. Background Pilot in 2007 through a partnership between NETracksLLEN and region Inclusive of Koorie students.

Program Evaluation Key Informant Interview Themes Jack Thompson, Director Northwest Center for Public Health Practice University of Washington School of.

IMPLEMENTATION AND PROCESS EVALUATION PBAF 526. Today: Recap last week Next week: Bring in picture with program theory and evaluation questions Partners?

How Can Evaluation Efforts Illuminate Systems Change in Courts, Tribes, and States? 19 th Annual National Human Services Training Evaluation Symposium.

SIGGINS MILLER REPORT – TRAINING NETWORKS DoT Workshop Sydney, May 2014.

Logical Framework Approach to PSIP formulation By Edward Joshua (Chief Economist, EP&D) Presentation 10 : 2015 PSIP Process Review Workshop 1.

The Challenge Building Infrastructure for Marlborough STEM’s School-Industry Partnerships HOW TO… Design the infrastructure that effectively implements.

Good Regional Student Participation

Sara Gaudon, Executive Director of LogicalOutcomes

AMCHP Return on Investment Analytic Action Learning Collaborative

2017 Technical Conference September 25-26, 2017.

Measurement Incorporated HESC Technical Workshop October 2016

SWFI Evaluation Overview And Update

TECHHIRE GRANTS MANAGEMENT PLENARY SESSION: EVALUATION UPDATE

COS Website Content COS will have a new look website to add value for its members Dr Rina will coordinate COS members to provide content Workshop in December:

Presentation transcript:

NYGEAR UP State Evaluation State Technical Workshop February 23, 2015

Who we are What we bring to NYGEAR UP

1.How is NYGEAR UP being implemented? 2.How do students, parents, staff, and partners perceive the NYGEAR UP program? 3.Is there a relationship between NYGEAR UP participation and student outcomes? 4.What factors predict student outcomes? 5.What are the differences between participants and nonparticipants in key outcomes? 6.How can NYGEAR UP be improved?

1.NYGEAR UP online database and reporting system 2.Bi-monthly student and parent survey 3.Annual student, parent, and staff survey 4.Sector partner interview 5.Annual site visit

1.Training on NYGEAR UP online system 2.Federal APR report production 3.State expenditure reports

1.Background information about NYGEAR UP schools 2.NYGEAR UP student data template 3.APR template

Sara L. Silver, Ph.D. Project Director Measurement Incorporated (914) x 328