School of Education California Baptist University Overview of Assessment Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Advertisements

Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
February 2005Transition Services Preparation & Training Developing NCATE Assessment Rubrics: Modeling Best Practice For Our Students Pamela Luft Kent State.
REICH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION SPRING SEMESTER 2008 Opening Meeting WELCOME.
Documents That Provide Basis for Professional Standards and NASP Approval and Practices in ISU SCPY Internship* 1. Ed.S. Internship Handbook 2. Internship/Practicum.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
Mara Manson, Ed.D Adelphi University March 28, 2014.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
WASC ARC 2008 CBU1 Assessment at California Baptist University The goal of assessment is the continual improvement of the learning environment. Student.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Yanling Sun, Ph.D Carolyn Masterson, Ed. D. Implementing ePortfolio among Pre-service Teachers and Interns Montclair State University.
University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
ADEPT Framework
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
A Comprehensive Unit Assessment Plan Program Improvement, Accountability, and Research Johns Hopkins University School of Education Faculty Meeting October.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Assessment at CBU1 Assessment at California Baptist University The goal of assessment is the continual improvement of the learning environment.  Student.
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Assessment Planning. Introduction Assessment is essential to creating a culture of continuous improvement – It provides input for the enhancement.
ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN DEGREE PROGRAMS CSULA Workshop Anne L. Hafner May 12, 2005.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
The Role of the NCATE Coordinator Kate M. Steffens St. Cloud State University NCATE Institutional Orientation September, 2002.
Educational Effectiveness Fall Faculty Retreat 2006 Leanne Neilson Halyna Kornuta.
Purdue University Preparing for Implementation of Revised ASHA Standards Phase I: Curriculum Review Phase II: Revision of Procedures Phase III: Development.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Using Assessment Data Helen Thumann Department of Education.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Student Outcomes Assesment for CTE Programs. Student Outcomes Assessment and Program Review  In 2004, the Program Review process was redesigned based.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Educator Effectiveness System Overview Training
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Accreditation Collier County Public Schools Fall 2015.
Texas Tech University PROGRAM-LEVEL ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP WRAP-UP SESSION FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 11,
Valley City State University School of Education and Graduate Studies Aggregate Assessment Data Please click on the action boxes to navigate your way through.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Unit Meeting Feb. 15, ◦ Appreciative Inquiry Process-BOT Steering Committee and Committee Structure. ◦ Four strategies identified from AIP: Each.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
California Baptist University Basic Assessment Requirements For Faculty
Reading and Literacy M.Ed. Program.  Graduate programs across the university require some sort of exit option that shows that the student has mastered.
+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
Understanding Assessment Projects. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate the requirements.
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Standard I Systematic Planning.
Constructing a Course Outline as a Novice Teacher
Program Learning Outcomes
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
planning THE ASSESSMENT CYCLE
Presentation transcript:

School of Education California Baptist University Overview of Assessment Project

Outcomes-Based Assessment A set of student learning outcomes has been identified at the university level, the School of Education level, and the professional organization and/or accreditation organization level. A set of student learning outcomes has been identified at the university level, the School of Education level, and the professional organization and/or accreditation organization level. Critical assignments for each course assess these student learning outcomes. Critical assignments for each course assess these student learning outcomes.

Why Have Outcomes-Based Assessment? WASC Requirements (See requirements in WASC Rubric) WASC Requirements (See requirements in WASC Rubric) CCTC: Requires evidence of assessed standards CCTC: Requires evidence of assessed standards University: Requires a systematic approach and is using LT as a means to collect/analyze/report data University: Requires a systematic approach and is using LT as a means to collect/analyze/report data Programmatic Improvement Programmatic Improvement Improved student learning Improved student learning

Learning Outcomes Learning outcomes are identified for each course in alignment with professional standards (e.g.,CTC, NASP, ASCA, CEC), university student outcomes (USOs), and program student outcomes (PSOs) Learning outcomes are identified for each course in alignment with professional standards (e.g.,CTC, NASP, ASCA, CEC), university student outcomes (USOs), and program student outcomes (PSOs)

A Developmental, Outcomes- Based Portfolio The SOE portfolio is identified as the collection of critical assignments chosen to document performance on specific learning outcomes, and assessed by faculty as the candidate proceeds through a given program. The SOE portfolio is identified as the collection of critical assignments chosen to document performance on specific learning outcomes, and assessed by faculty as the candidate proceeds through a given program. Each Critical Assignment is supported by a reflective analysis of the learning linked to the PSO. Each Critical Assignment is supported by a reflective analysis of the learning linked to the PSO.

Developmental Portfolio Two Components Provide Evidence of Learning Critical Assignments: Provides evidence of competence with meeting standards in prerequisite, specialization, and capstone courses. Critical Assignments: Provides evidence of competence with meeting standards in prerequisite, specialization, and capstone courses. Reflective Statement: Provides evidence of development of critical thinking skills/establishment of professional voice by explaining how the assignment provides evidence of competence with PSOs/standards. Reflective Statement: Provides evidence of development of critical thinking skills/establishment of professional voice by explaining how the assignment provides evidence of competence with PSOs/standards.

Formative Program Assessment INTERNAL Assessment of performance throughout the program: prerequisite courses, specialization courses, and graduate core courses. Assessment of performance throughout the program: prerequisite courses, specialization courses, and graduate core courses.EXTERNAL Standardized tests: CBEST, RICA Standardized tests: CBEST, RICA Fieldwork evaluation Fieldwork evaluation

Summative Program Assessment Internal Measurement of performance on graduate projects, comprehensive exams, or thesis. Measurement of performance on graduate projects, comprehensive exams, or thesis.External Measures of performance on standardized tests, during student teaching, internships, TPAs, district supervisor evaluations, and/or employer surveys. Measures of performance on standardized tests, during student teaching, internships, TPAs, district supervisor evaluations, and/or employer surveys.

Live Text Rubric Development Summative Rubrics on Live Text: LT rubrics should be few in number and applicable to a variety of critical assignments. LT rubrics should be few in number and applicable to a variety of critical assignments. LT rubrics should be specific for each program’s PSOs/outcomes. (i.e., PPS rubrics suited to PPS critical assignments and outcomes). LT rubrics should be specific for each program’s PSOs/outcomes. (i.e., PPS rubrics suited to PPS critical assignments and outcomes). Rubrics could have levels built in so that the rubric is applicable to several levels or ranges of proficiencies. Rubrics could have levels built in so that the rubric is applicable to several levels or ranges of proficiencies. All faculty should be involved in making the rubrics so that the rubrics cover the specific outcomes and critical assignments in their specific programs. All faculty should be involved in making the rubrics so that the rubrics cover the specific outcomes and critical assignments in their specific programs.

What Evidence Should Be Collected in Preparation for CTC and WASC Reviews? Portfolio/Critical Assignments Portfolio/Critical Assignments Assessment Rubrics (formative and summative) Assessment Rubrics (formative and summative) Student Work Samples Student Work Samples Syllabi Syllabi Annual Assessment Reports Annual Assessment Reports Data Reports (on assessed PSOs from Live Text data analysis) Data Reports (on assessed PSOs from Live Text data analysis) Results of Data Analysis Results of Data Analysis Programmatic changesProgrammatic changes Course changes/Other?Course changes/Other?

Presentation of Evidence for University and External Reviews Live Text: The LT Exhibit Center will be the major storage place for evidence of assessment documents, reports, student work and portfolios. The LT Exhibit Center will be the major storage place for evidence of assessment documents, reports, student work and portfolios.

Live Text Implementation Timeline : Live Text selected by University as a means of storing/assessment data : Live Text selected by University as a means of storing/assessment data 2006-Fall Semester: The last semester in the SOE for exemptions for positing critical assignments in LT portfolio 2006-Fall Semester: The last semester in the SOE for exemptions for positing critical assignments in LT portfolio 2007-Spring Semester: Students post critical assignments on LT for review 2007-Spring Semester: Students post critical assignments on LT for review Fall Semester - Reflective statement required as evidence/explanation of competence of meeting PSO Fall Semester - Reflective statement required as evidence/explanation of competence of meeting PSO.

Assessment Reports and Completion Schedule There are 4 different assessment reports to be completed each assessment period. 1. Initial Report: Completed by Oct. 1 st of each assessment period 2. Final Report: Completed by Spring Break of each assessment period 1. Recap Report: Completed at the end of the semester and submitted no later than May FEEE Report: Completed at the end of the semester and submitted no later than May 15

Purpose of Each Report 1. Initial Report: The Initial Report frames what will be accomplished during the assessment period. The PSOs are aligned with the USOs and Course Leads revise syllabi and critical assignments as needed to meet PSOs. This report can be completed during the time set aside for assessment in regular SOE meetings. 2. Final Reports: The final report records the findings and the changes made in syllabi, courses, and programs that are based on the assessment results. This report can be completed during the semester including the time set aside for assessment in regular SOE meetings. 3. Recap Report: This report serves to make the assessment report readable for all participants. It is a place to narrow the results to a few statements and statistics reflecting the assessment results. This report can be completed during the time set aside for assessment in regular SOE meetings. 4. FEEE Report: The Framework for Evaluation of Educational Effectiveness (FEEE) report provides a voice/input for all faculty members to evaluate assessment process concerning key WASC /standards This report can be completed during the time set aside for assessment in regular SOE meetings.