Development of Indicators Using Remote Sensing Technology – funded by NASA Classify land use change from 1992-2002. Classify land use change from 1992-2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Deep Creek Lake Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Survey: Progress Report DCL Policy Review Board Meeting 7/23/12.
Advertisements

The Effectiveness of Remote Sensing Techniques in Lineament Mapping for Groundwater Exploration in Volcanic Terrains Hard-rock aquifers are only productive.
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
Linking In situ Measurements, Remote Sensing, and Models to Validate MODIS Products Related to the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Peter B. Reich, University.
Riparian forest loss and landscape-scale change in Sudanian West Africa Jeremy I. Fisher John F. Mustard Geological Sciences Brown University August, 2004.
Northeast Landscape Planning Committee Meeting #7 – Ecological Policy Framework (cont’d) Resource review Landcover data Watershed data FIA data.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Sabie Environmental Consulting TITLE: Remote sensed land cover classifcation REQUIRED BY: Biological Science DepartmentPRODUCT # 34.
Development of Remote Sensing-based Predictive Models for the Management of Taste and Odor Events in Kansas Reservoirs Dr. Mark Jakubauskas Kansas Biological.
AA_Vis_1. Students examine both the “true color” And “false-color Infrared” images provided by GLOBE AA_Vis_2.
Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR by Philip A. Townsend Neal Simpson ES 5053 Final Project.
Urbanization and Land Cover Change in Dakota County, Minnesota Kylee Berger and Julia Vang FR 3262 Remote Sensing Section 001/002.
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Carbon Benefits Project: Measurement of Carbon in Woody Biomass Mike Smalligan, Research Forester Global Observatory for Ecosystem Services Department.
Change analysis of Northborough, Massachusetts, Kristopher Kuzera and Silvia Petrova 1987 LANDSAT TM – 30m resolution False Color Composite Bands.
Detecting Emerald Ash Borer Infestation with Hyperspectral data using Spectral Mixture Analysis Silvia Petrova Objective The objective of this project.
Data Merging and GIS Integration
AA_Vis_1. Using the software “MultiSpec,” students follow protocols to prepare a “clustered” image of their GLOBE Study Site.
Refine and integrate linked hydrological/ecological models with remote sensing products: leaf area index, wetland maps, seasonal flooding, water boundaries.
NORTHERN IRELAND COUNTRYSIDE SURVEY AND HNV FARMLAND Richard Weyl and Mark Wright Biodiversity Unit Northern Ireland Environment Agency.
Remote Sensing Applications. Signatures – a unique identifier…
1 SWALIM Workshop June, Nairobi Monitoring Land Cover Dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa H.D. Eva, A. Brink and D. Simonetti.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Landscape-scale forest carbon measurements for reference sites: The role of Remote Sensing Nicholas Skowronski USDA Forest Service Climate, Fire and Carbon.
Corrie Hannah Mentor: Dr. Stuart E. Marsh, Office of Arid Lands Studies NASA Space Grant Symposium April 17, 2009 Arizona State University Using Remote.
Lesley Bross - Portland State University August 1, 2014 Using multispectral imagery to monitor vegetation change following flow restoration.
The Use of AVHRR NDVI in Environmental Applications Contact: Elizabeth R. McDonald ERIN Remote Sensing Coordinator Department of the Environment and Heritage.
Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Steve Williams Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center North Carolina State University.
Investigating Land Cover Change In Crow Wing County Emily Smoter and Michael Palmer Remote Sensing of Natural Resources and the Environment University.
Proposed Special Conservation Area (SCA) for the Lakewood and Laona Districts of the Nicolet National Forest Jeanette Jaskula, Monica Hauck- Whealton,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Saving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places High Resolution Land Cover Data in the Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Conservancy.
Conversion of Forestland to Agriculture in Hubbard County, Minnesota By: Henry Rodman Cory Kimball 2013.
Remote Sensing with Multispectral Scanners. Multispectral scanners First developed in early 1970’s Why use? Concept: Gather data from very specific wavelengths.
Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting.
Minnesota Science Team: Updates and next steps MN Science Team September 26, 2012.
Selection of Multi-Temporal Scenes for the Mississippi Cropland Data Layer, 2004 Rick Mueller Research and Development Division National Agricultural Statistics.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Data Update IGOL: Rome September 13-15, 2004 Doug Muchoney USGS.
How we measure forests David W. MacFarlane Dept. of Forestry MSU.
The Forest Resource in Iowa. Iowa’s Forest Cover   Iowa’s forests cover 8% of our landscape   87% of our 2,97,000 acres are owned by private landowners.
FORESTRY TEST BASICS. How To Measure the Diameter of a Tree? Stand next to the trunk (if on an non-level slope – then stand on the uphill side of the.
Landscape Analysis: 1.Determine 1993 and 2001 Land Cover of the Sougahatchee Basin Sougahatchee Basin 2. Compare 2001 Land Cover to 1993 Land Cover 3.
February 25-26, 2003 San Diego, California Inventory & Monitoring Technology Development USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Application Center,
Overcoming Chance Agreement in Classification Tree Modeling: Predictor Variables, Training Data, and Spatial Autocorrelation Considerations Southwest Regional.
Assessing the Phenological Suitability of Global Landsat Data Sets for Forest Change Analysis The Global Land Cover Facility What does.
DEMs Download from Seamless Server Project Mosaic Calculate Slope Create a DEM (ArcGIS)
A Project Linking In-situ and Satellite Measurements to Validate MODIS Terrestrial Ecology Products Warren B. Cohen, US Forest Service; Stith T. Gower,
Duluth Watersheds Miller Chester Tischer Amity. Aerial Photos.
Comparing Three Great Lakes Research Projects By Mary Bresee.
Contribution of Agricultural Expansion to Mato Grosso Deforestation LC22: Douglas Morton, Yosio Shimabukuro, Ruth DeFries, Liana Anderson, Egidio.
H51A-01 Evaluation of Global and National LAI Estimates over Canada METHODOLOGY LAI INTERCOMPARISONS LEAF AREA INDEX JUNE 1997 LEAF AREA INDEX 1993 Baseline.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
Modeling biodiversity response to habitat heterogeneity in agricultural lands of Eastern Ontario using multi spatial and temporal remote sensing data Supervisor:
Evaluation of New Jersey Land Use Change in Relation to Spatial Proximity to Wetlands David Tulloch, Rick Lathrop, and Eric Yadlovski Center for Remote.
Using GIS To Distinguish Wetland Vegetation/Shorelines from Current Drought Conditions in The Great Salt Lake. By Mitch Jenkins.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Maryia Bakhtsiyarava FNRM 5262.
100+ Years of Land Change for Coastal Louisiana By: National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette and Baton Rouge, LA and Louisiana Coastal Area (LCA) Land.
Re-evaluating estimates of impervious cover and riparian zone condition in New England watersheds: Green infrastructure effectiveness at the watershed.
Week Fourteen Remote sensing of vegetation Remote sensing of water
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Mapping of Coastal Wetlands via Hyperspectral AVIRIS Data
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
Forest Habitat Networks for Biodiversity on Montréal Island
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
The Pagami Creek Wildfire
WP05: Turkey Land Use Change Model
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Presentation transcript:

Development of Indicators Using Remote Sensing Technology – funded by NASA Classify land use change from Classify land use change from Produce land use and wetland classification using new high-resolution satellite data (QuickBird; 2.44m). Produce land use and wetland classification using new high-resolution satellite data (QuickBird; 2.44m). –Persistent, emergent, floating aquatic, and submergent aquatic vegetation (SAV) Develop a bathymetry map of near-shore areas during low water period Develop a bathymetry map of near-shore areas during low water period –Model shoreline mobility –Assess susceptibility of wetland vegetation to changing water levels G. Niemi, C. Johnston, T. Brown & P. Wolter; University of Minnesota, Duluth 30

Sample of the multi-temporal Landsat classification literature as of 1991 Kalensky 1974 “could improve results” Kalensky 1974 “could improve results” Kalensky and Scherk 1975 “multi-date is best” Kalensky and Scherk 1975 “multi-date is best” Kan and Weber 1978 “no clear benefit” Kan and Weber 1978 “no clear benefit” Beaubien 1979 “provides better contrast” Beaubien 1979 “provides better contrast” Walsh 1980 “September better than June” Walsh 1980 “September better than June” Nelson 1984 “avoid senescent imagery” Nelson 1984 “avoid senescent imagery” Toll 1985 “not significantly better” Toll 1985 “not significantly better” Schriever and Congalton 1991 “more efficient” Schriever and Congalton 1991 “more efficient”

Layered Classification Approach Using Vegetation Indicies (NDVI) and Image Differencing

jack pine jack pine - hardwood jack pine - oak red pine red pine - hardwood spruce-fir spruce-fir - hardwood cedar cedar - hardwood tamarack black spruce acid bog conifer, stagnant conifer, regeneration black ash black ash - conifer black ash - conifer under. hardwoods, misc. (lowland) aspen-birch aspen-birch - conifer aspen-birch - conifer under. northern hardwoods northern hardwoods - conifer northern hwd, con. under. red oak pin oak oak - pine hardwood, regeneration water emergent, aquatic emergent Sphagnum spp. agriculture grass, native grass, native (lowland) grass, cool season grass, domestic brush, alder brush, alder (lowland) brush, willow brush, willow (lowland) brush, misc. brush, misc. (lowland) brush, ericacious developed

National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) The USGS, in cooperation with the EPA, has produced a land cover dataset for the conterminous United States on the basis of 1992 Landsat thematic mapper imagery and supplemental data. The NLCD is a component of the USGS Land Cover Characterization Program. Stratify Landsat-7 with NLCD Classify using phenology Age structure by species Change analysis Develop landscape indicators Our Processing Steps

Landscape Indicators  Land use adjacent to coastal wetlands  Urban density  Farmland as a percentage of total land  Number of wetlands per unit area  Area of forest cut  Wetland acreage losses or gains  Area of land paved or permanently covered  Wetland size, abundance  Aerial extent of wetland types  Nature and extent of riparian vegetation  Exotic species 31

RedYellow QuickBird Sites in Red & Radar DEM Sites in Yellow 33

2 October 2001 Level = ft.

Little Tail Point Green Bay 34

Nuphar advena Typha latifolia Phragmites australis Wet Meadow

36

6 September 1999 Level = ft. 2 October 2001 Level = ft. March 1964 Level = ft. October 1986 Level = ft. 15 July 1997 Level = ft.

Some of the indicators we hope to derive: Area of land paved Area of land paved Area of forest permanently lost to development Area of forest permanently lost to development Urban density and rate of change Urban density and rate of change Loss/gain of wetlands Loss/gain of wetlands Percent change in land use type Percent change in land use type Area of redeveloped brown fields Area of redeveloped brown fields Loss/gain of forested land Loss/gain of forested land Percent cropland by area and change through time Percent cropland by area and change through time Area of cropland within 1, 5, and 10 Km or a shoreline Area of cropland within 1, 5, and 10 Km or a shoreline Area of cropland near waterways on slopes Area of cropland near waterways on slopes Proportion of various land use/cover types in the basin Proportion of various land use/cover types in the basin Coastal wetland size, abundance and susceptibility to high water threats Coastal wetland size, abundance and susceptibility to high water threats Nature and extent of riparian vegetation Nature and extent of riparian vegetation

Visit our website