Table 3. Results from Constructed Wetland Treatment System Bird Surveys. Table amended from Kadlec & Knight, 1996. Sites are listed by increasing marsh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Product Flow Model May 2008 Product Flow Model Overview.
Advertisements

Introduction The Oberlin College Living Machine (LM) is a wastewater treatment facility designed to model the functional processes of nutrient removal.
WATER DEPTH, VEGETATION, AND POLLUTANT REMOVAL IN A CONSTRUCTED WETLAND TREATING AQUACULTURE EFFLUENT Brian E. Dyson, Kim D. Jones, Ron Rosati* Department.
CALCULATING DAILY PARTICULATE PHOSPHORUS LOADS FROM DISCRETE SAMPLES AND DAILY FLOW DATA METHODS RESULTS * y= (flow) – 2.247; * 1 Y= 0.052(flow)^0.1947;
Twelve Years of Migratory Fish Counting: Evolving Information Strategies for Citizen Science Robert D. Stevenson University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston,
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Establishing GIS for Management in the Sauvie Island Wildlife Management Area, Oregon Jeremy Hruska Masters Degree in GIS Candidate Penn State University.
Measured Removal of Nitrogen from Drainage Through Riparian Buffers (per 100’) Quality of Buffer Nitrogen Removal High68-92% Medium45-68% Low15-45% From:
Investigation of Acid Deposition Trends in the United States March 2014.
Sensitivity Analysis of a Spatially Explicit Fish Population Model Applied to Everglades Restoration Ren é A. Salinas and Louis J. Gross The Institute.
Water Analysis of the University of Cincinnati, Clermont Campus Bridget Jennings, Brittany Miller, Sara Neel, Kristopher Thomas, Tricia Wright June 6,
Diets of two human-subsidized predators, common raven and glaucous gull, on Alaska’s Coastal Plain Abby N. Powell, U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative.
Data Analysis The English Housing Condition Survey database contains information on the age, structure, and construction type of different buildings. There.
-Reducing Wildlife Hazards through Habitat Modification -34 th Annual Airports Conference Loomacres Wildlife Management
The Effects of Climate Change on Waterfowl Migration Flyway Habitat in North America By Jason Preuett Southern University Urban Forestry.
Copyright © 2005 Advantica Inc. (USA Only) and Advantica Ltd. (Outside USA). All rights reserved by the respective owner. Own Use Gas Review of Pre-heater.
+ Environmental Factors and Risk Areas of West Nile Virus in Southern California, 2007–2009 Hua Liu & Qihao Weng Ivonna Reda.
SAN FRANISCO BAY By: Randall Alcorn. Golden Gate Bridge.
Conserving San Francisco Bay's Waterbirds: three decades in a rapidly changing landscape Vanessa Tobias 1, Catherine Burns 2, Cheryl Strong 3, Orien Richmond.
Impacts of Waterfowl and Water Levels on Wetland Vegetation Jay Frentress, Adrienne Froelich, David Lodge, Department of Biological Sciences, University.
April 22, 2003 IERM Overall Objectives 1.Quantify relationship between hydrologic and hydraulic attributes and effects on selected ecological performance.
Aquatic Plants and the Environment (SWES, ECOL, WFSc 474/574)
Department Chemical and FoodInstitute of Technology of Cambodia.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Ohau Channel Diversion Wall  Lake Rotorua experiences anoxic bottom waters and cyanobacterial blooms (Fig. 1A). Water from Lake Rotorua flows through.
Seasonal Changes in Biogeochemistry of a Natural Wetland Receiving Drainage from an Abandoned Mine Diane McKnight and Eric August – University of Colorado.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 11.
Introduction Oithona similis is the most abundant copepod in the Gulf of Alaska, and is a dominant in many ecosystems from the poles to the sub-tropics.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Effects of restoration on avian populations in the Napa Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area: density changes.
Membership Need to clarify members and determine who has authority to vote on group decisions.
1. Introduction The Big Darby Creek is categorized as a national scenic river with an array of biological species. Since this is one of the last pristine.
Adjusting N:P ratios in liquid dairy manure through nitrification and chemical phosphorus removal to match crop fertilizer requirements Background Nutrient.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Statistics. Statistical Methods Were developed to serve a purpose Were developed to serve a purpose The purpose for each statistical.
 Prior to the 1930’s, the natural microbial processes of nitrification and denitrification were at equilibrium in the environment and nitrogen availability.
Process Optimization By Dr : Mona Ossman.
Benthic Community Assessment Tool Development Ananda Ranasinghe (Ana) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Sediment.
Low-Flow Fountain Darter Movement Study. Background Previous studies have described fountain darters as sedentary under stable conditions Some other darter.
1 Using Integrative Passive Samplers to Monitor Current-Use and Legacy Pesticides in San Francisco Bay, CA Kelly L. Smalling and Kathryn M. Kuivila USGS.
Trace that Nitrate An Overview of “Nitrate Stable Isotopes: Tools for Determining Nitrate Sources Among Different Land Uses in the Mississippi Basin” by.
Figure 2. Decrease in K and NO 3 over time in (a) AN1, (b) AN2, (c) CA2. Best fit determined by moving average. Potential for using anaerobic settling.
WEEK25 PHYSICAL SCIENCE VOCABULARY. 1) DATA Information collected through observation and scientific research.
Disturbance and Fish Daniel D. Magoulick USGS, Arkansas Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas.
Handheld Flow Calibrator for Aerosol Observing System Jonathan Ma, Dung (Yung) Hoang Nguyen, Mario Zuniga Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Narragansett Bay Environmental Monitoring Li-Ling Yang Roger Williams University.
Can you teach a long-term benthic monitoring program new tricks? Marc Vayssières, Karen Gehrts and Cindy Messer - CA Dept. of Water Resources Assessment.
1 Blend Times in Stirred Tanks Reacting Flows - Lecture 9 Instructor: André Bakker © André Bakker (2006)
Response of Birds to Vegetation, Habitat Characteristics, and Landscape Features in Restored Marshes Mark Herzog 1, Diana Stralberg 1, Nadav Nur 1, Karin.
Nutrient Response of the Ventura River to Drought Conditions in Southern California Al Leydecker 1 and Jessica Altstatt 2 ( 1 Bren School of Environmental.
Solving Water Pollution Problems in the Wakulla Springshed The City of Tallahassee’s Efforts to Reduce Stormwater Pollution Hydrogeology Workshop May 12-13,
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Comparison of Odonata Populations in Natural and Constructed Emergent Wetlands in the Bluegrass Region of Kentucky Introduction Wetlands provide valuable.
HSI (Habitat Suitability Index) models developed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service are a numerical index that describes the habitat quality.
References. Methods Results We conducted avian point counts at pre-established points (created by USFWS within the Whittlsey Creek Watershed in the
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Dissolved Gas Concentrations in Two Reservoir Systems Kyle Hacker, Christopher Whitney, Drew Robison, Wilfred Wollheim Introduction/Background Methods.
Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos L
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
Upper Rio Grande R Basin
Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.
Outdoor Water Sediment Study – Adding Effects of Sunlight to Aquatic System Exposure Assessment Cecilia Mucha Hirata (DuPont Crop Protection, Newark DE,
Confined Growth of Water Hyacinth for Bio-remediation in Caohai, Dianchi Lake , China: The Effects on Water Quality The topic of my presentation today.
ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS BACKGROUND CONCLUSIONS OBJECTIVES
Denitrification in Delaware Bay Tidal Marshes and Creeks
2.3 Measuring Biotic Components of the system
URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS
Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids
SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 BIOLOGY 10 DM MRS. HAUGHTON
Sampling methods.
Hydrogeologic Investigations of the Silver Lake Wetland
Conclusion & Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Table 3. Results from Constructed Wetland Treatment System Bird Surveys. Table amended from Kadlec & Knight, Sites are listed by increasing marsh area. Compared with several other treatment wetlands, counts at SJWS are high for total number of species observed and in the middle of the range for average annual density. Methods Balancing Wildlife Needs and Nitrate Removal in Constructed Wetlands: The Case of the Irvine Ranch Water District’s San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary. Maia S. Fleming-Singer a & Alexander J. Horne, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, #1710, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA a Corresponding Author: Stillwater Sciences Inc. Berkeley, CA 94705, USA (510) , FAX (510) , Acknowledgements: Louis Denger, Irvine Ranch Water District; Nancy & Richard Kenyon, Sea & Sage Audubon; Mark Taylor, Hayward Shoreline Marsh. Background The San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary (SJWS), Irvine CA, is a 32-ha series of shallow ponds owned and operated by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). SJWS was created to maximize nitrogen removal rates while still maintaining 90% open water and episodically exposed shoreline for waterfowl, shorebird and wading bird habitat. These avian design elements created non-ideal denitrification conditions in the marsh by diminishing an important source of organic carbon (emergent vegetation) and increasing sediment exposure to oxygen. Seasonal plantings of barnyard grass (E. crusgalli) in two of the largest ponds were intended to serve as a carbon amendment for denitrification. We show SJWS aqueous nitrogen and avian data for non- winter months , analyzed to determine whether design and operating conditions allowed for simultaneous nitrogen removal and diverse, abundant avian habitat. AB A B San Deigo Creek Flow Direction To Upper Newport Bay Flow, water level & water quality (WQ) data collected by IRWD personnel. WQ data analyzed using Standard Methods (APHA 1998) in the IRWD certified laboratory. 4-week running average (4-wk RA) used to represent system behavior for non-winter (April-October) data. Application of steady state models. 2. Avian Species Diversity and Abundance Rationale for averaging period: The chosen metric is approximately: 2x the typical hydraulic residence time of water (HRT=10-14 days); 2x the most frequent volumetric perturbation period (approx bi-weekly); 0.2x the seasonal time scale of interest (28-weeks of non-winter months). The 4-wk RA incorporates information about system dynamics without being overwhelmed by extremes of changing pond volumes occurring on smaller time scales. SJWS design perturbations invalidate the application of simplified reactor models which on a weekly time scale. Simple models use inlet and outlet parameters and the assumption of steady state behavior to describe wetland performance. Although more complex versions of the reactor models can be applied under non-steady state conditions (Kadlec and Knight 1996), accurate knowledge of flow and volume fluctuations is required for all modeling periods; a requirement that was not met for the SJWS. Results Conclusions Avian design features did not appear to inhibit high rates of denitrification in SJWS during Overall, SJWS met its dual design objectives of high TN removal (56 ± 1%) and the creation of diverse, abundant avian habitat. During , barnyard grass amendments did not appear to enhance N-removal. Low levels of Org-N were produced in SJWS, and algal-N production was greatest relative to TN-removed in July and August of each year. Bird census data collected and reported by volunteer birders to the Audobon Sea and Sage House ( 1. Water Monthly species abundance = average combined bird density (dabbling ducks + diving ducks + shorebirds + fish-eating birds + gulls + landbirds). Avian species diversity = number of species observed each month, where data available. Figure 2. Relative Amounts of Three Major Nitrogen Species Entering and Leaving SJWS TN removal is shown in parentheses for each year. Across all four years, average TN removal was 56±1% (±1SE). Note there is no discernable difference between amended and non-amended conditions. NO 2 - +NO 3 - was the greatest fraction of wetland inlet N, while Org-N was the greatest fraction of total outlet N except in 2001, when it was roughly equal to NO 2 - +NO 3 -. Figure 3. Calculated Non-Winter Denitrification in SJWS. 4-wk RA (a) nitrate removal rates and (b) the relationship between estimated denitrification rates and inlet nitrate. Denit. rates correlated well with inlet NO 2 - +NO 3 - concentrations. First order rate constants [k(20°C)] are not shown in the figures, however they ranged d -1. Figure 4. Comparison of TN Removal to Algal Nitrogen Produced in SJWS. 4-wk RA TN and Chl-a data (expressed as N in algal biomass). Chl-a data was not available for Summer The amount of algal-N produced at SJWS as a fraction of TN removed was at its greatest (10-40%) during July and August of each year. Figure 5. Comparison of SJWS Bird Density (±1 SE) with Two Constructed Wetlands in Northern CA. Note the increase in numbers during fall migration in the Hayward Marsh, as compared with the other two systems which are relatively younger. Table 1. Compared with several other treatment wetlands, species diversity at SJWS was high while average annual density was mid- range. Figure 1. Location Map 33 o 39' 18"N; 117 o 50' 41" E, near San Diego Creek inlet to upper Newport Bay, CA. Pumped flow shown by arrows, indicating approximate locations for inlet and outlet of each pond. Ponds A and B are initial holding ponds. Water levels in Ponds 3 & 4 fluctuate on a bi- weekly basis to provide habitat for shorebirds. In Out 1999 In Out 2000 In Out 2001 In Out 2002 Org-N NH 4 + NO 2 - +NO % 40% 10% Ponds 1 & 2 amended with barnyard grass No grass amendments (a) (b) Table modifed from Kadlec, R. H. and R. L. Knight Treatment Wetlands. Boca Raton, Florida, Lewis Publishers, 893 p. where k is the first order rate constant (d -1 ) for nitrate removal and t is the average HRT (d). a McAllister 1993a b EPA 1999 c d Taylor, pers. Comm. e Range rather than average data was available for this site. McAllister 1993b (60%) (69%) (47%) (52%) A B