GDPs in Support of SWAP Initial Concepts CDM A&D Meeting. January 24, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Don Willis Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC March 30, 2004 There are no benefits to compromising safety…only dire consequences Assessment.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
© 2001 The MITRE Corporation Document Number Here Traffic Flow Management Impact Assessment Research TFM Technical Interchange Meeting 31 October 2001.
October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
FAA / Eurocontrol TFM/CDM Technical Interchange Meeting
01/14/01 S2K+1 Field Training Spring /14/01 FAR 121 Air Safety PAD Operational Responsibility shared by: –P ilots –A TC –D ispatchers Enhancing.
Resource Allocations within Constrained Airspace October 31, 2001 Metron Aviation, Inc. Robert Hoffman, Ph.D.
Reduced EDCT Window CDM A&D Meeting December 13, CDM Meeting Daytona Beach, FL Presented by Roger Beatty - AAL SOC.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
Air Traffic Analysis, Inc Using WITI for Airport Arrival Performance Analysis A report on work-in-progress December 2010.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.
27 June Report on two themes: Airport Management Weather & Environment by: Jan Terlouw (NLR) ATM 2003 Seminar, Budapest June 27, 2003.
Historical Use of “Exempt by Time/Status” Parameter in GDPs CDM Meeting June 28, 2000.
Development of a Closed-Loop Testing Method for a Next-Generation Terminal Area Automation System JUP Quarterly Review April 4, 2002 John Robinson Doug.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Evans benefits ARAM1 jee 6/4/2015 Assessment of Aviation Delay Reduction Benefits for Nowcasts and Short Term Forecasts James Evans.
FCAA01 FCAA01 is defined by the western boundary of ZNY and extending to Lake Erie. Altitude Filters: 120 – 600 Arrival Filters: ZNY & ZBW Departure Filters:
Science Meeting-1 Lin 12/17/09 MIT Lincoln Laboratory Prediction of Weather Impacts on Air Traffic Through Flow Constrained Areas AMS Seattle Yi-Hsin Lin.
Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen): Wx Integration Ray Moy New Weather Concept Development Branch FAA, Aviation Weather Division, ANG-C62.
Air Traffic By Chris Van Horn.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
Air Traffic Control System Team #3. Introduction The purpose of air-traffic control is to assure safe separation between en-route aircraft and the safe.
CTFM Joint Training Team Purpose –We are redefining the mission and goals in the context of new CTFM, ATO organization and system goals Participants –Get.
1 AvMet Applications, Inc Alexander Bell Dr., Ste. 130 Reston, VA Applying FAA Aviation Weather Metrics Program Research to Operational Benefits.
Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.
Federal Aviation Administration FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Public availability to be determined under 5USC 552) Data Communications Program DCL Benefits Modeling.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.
Federal Aviation Administration Valuation of NextGen Capacity Benefits A Consumer Surplus Approach to the Monetization of NASPAC Results For: INNOVATIONS.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
Ames Research Center Cleveland New York Boston Washington Philadelphia TRACON TMA-MC Overview TMA-MC Overview Tom Davis, Chief, Terminal Area ATM Research.
Presented to: NWS Aviation Weather Users By: Danny Sims, Manager of Traffic Flow Management Weather Programs, FAA Date: 18 November 2008 Federal Aviation.
© 2014 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Alex Tien, Christine Taylor, Craig Wanke Using Ensemble Forecasts to Support NAS Strategic Planning.
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
Simplified Subs Update A&D Meeting April 18, 2001 Rick Oiesen, Volpe Center.
LMINET2: An Enhanced LMINET Dou Long, Shahab Hasan December 10, 2008.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
ASIA PACIFIC Air Traffic Flow Management
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.
Presented By Evan Demick  Sector Traffic Control (R-Side) and Sector Traffic Planning (D-Side).  Facility Flow Planning (TMU).  National Flow Planning.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Weather System Engineering Issues Friends & Partners in Aviation Wx Raymond Moy, Air Traffic Organization,
Moving toward Arrival-Departure GDP Bill Hall December 1999.
© 2015 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Dr. Christine Taylor Principal Simulation and Modeling Engineer 25 August 2015 Automation to Support.
NY Airport Delay Reduction Presented by Ralph Tamburro.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
1 REAL-TIME INTER-MODAL SUBSTITUTION (RTIMS) AS AN AIRPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Mark Hansen Yu Zhang University of California Berkeley.
Scenario on airport works Session 5 Presentation 1.
Weather Impacts on System Operations Importance of the Forecast in TFM Planning Jim Ries Oct 19, 2006.
How do we mitigate weather impacts to the NAS?
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Using Simulation in NextGen Benefits Quantification
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Tradeoff Optimization at STL: a Case Study Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo tel.: (617) CDM.
Analysis of Demand Uncertainty in Ground Delay Programs Mike Ball University of Maryland.
LGA before and after AIR-21 December 13, 2000 Metron Inc.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Quantification of Benefits of Aviation Weather A discussion of benefits Friends and Partners in.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration New York Center System Operations Traffic Flow Management Operations Weather Users Workshop Tom.
Metron Aviation CE Overview for TFM Research Board Mark Klopfenstein Oct,
F066-B © 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Predictability and Uncertainty in Air Traffic Flow Management Len Wojcik, Josh Pepper,
RAPT EAK 6/18/2016 MIT Lincoln Laboratory Route Availability Planning Tool: A case study Rich DeLaura and Shawn Allan
1 A General Approach to Equity in Traffic Flow Management and Its Application to Mitigating Exemption Bias in Ground Delay Programs Michael Ball University.
Metron, Inc. 12/7/19991 RTO-37: En route User Deviation Assessment Mark Klopfenstein* Phil Smith** Dennis Gallus* Roger Chapman** Christine Lambert* Jodi.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Collaborative Decision Making “Collaborative Tools and Technology”
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Cockpit participation in
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Presentation transcript:

GDPs in Support of SWAP Initial Concepts CDM A&D Meeting. January 24, 2001

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting2 zThere are Two Goals in the Use of GDPs in Support of SWAP yReduce Airspace Demand yReduce Arrival Rates to Avoid Airport Gridlock Background

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting3 Airspace Demand Reduction zWhen Severe Weather requires Flight Re- Routes, the overall airspace capacity in the region around the weather is reduced yFlight Demand on the Airspace must be Reduced yThis only affects flights near the weather

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting4 Airport Demand Reduction zHowever, Severe Weather that is Close to a Major Terminal Area can Severely Limit the Departure Flow from the Airport ySince this can lead to Gridlock, the Entire Flow to the Airport must be Slowed yThis affects all flights destined for one of the affected Terminal Areas

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting5 Solutions zPotential Solutions have been described by Rick Oisen yIncluding Various Uses of FSM or SMT zFocus Here on Specific Uses of FSM and Airport GDPs yWhat Can We Do to Improve GDPs in Support of SWAP With the Tools that we Have Today?

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting6 Approach – Previous zGDP/SWAP Decision Guidance Flowchart zHistorical Airspace Demand Including Arrival/Departure Airports xBetween Centers xThrough Arcs xThrough Sectors xThrough Common FCAs zSuggested Airport GDPs with Rates xWhich Airports & What Rates Between Centers Through Common FCAs

Sample Reference Table for ZOB to ZNY Flows

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting8 ATCSCC Personnel Input zCannot Readily Determine % Reduction of Airspace Capacity zMajority of SRV WX Events Become An Airport Event zNeed to Determine Departure Rate to Set Arrival Rate zKnown Factors Are Route Status / MIT

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting9 Approach – Revised zHistorical Departure Demand yFrom Major Terminal Areas yBroken-Down by Departure Route zPredicte Departure Delays, based on yDeparture Fix/Route Closures yMiles-in-Trail Restrictions on Departure Fixes/Routes zAllow Determination of GDP Rate Based on Predicted Departure Delays

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting10 Approach zUse Historical and ATCSCC Data to Provide Guidance for Specialists yAdditions to Playbook or other non-Software Product for Summer ‘01 yThe Guidance Can Be Used by Specialists to Determine xWhich Airports Need a GDP to Support SWAP xWhat Rates Should Be Used yReview & Revise

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting11 Proposed Products zThe Guidance Will Cover Both the Airspace Problem and the Airport Problems zThe Following List Describes the Proposed Guidance Products: yGDP/SWAP Decision Guidance Flowchart yHistorical Airspace Demand Including Arrival/Departure Airports xBetween Centers xThrough Arcs xThrough Sectors xThrough Common FCAs ySuggested Airport GDPs with Rates xWhich Airports Should Have GDPs and What Rates Should be Used Between Centers Through Common FCAs Airspace Problem

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting12 yHistorical Departure Demand xFrom Major Terminal Areas xBroken-Down by Departure Route yPredicted Departure Delays, based on xDeparture Fix/Route Closures xMiles-in-Trail Restrictions on Departure Fixes/Routes Proposed Products (cont.) Airport Problem

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting13 Schedule zSpring 2001 yQuick Development of Paper Based Guidance zIn the Future / Summer ‘02 yGuidance can be Added to Existing or New Tools

ZOB to ZNY Flow

Sample Reference Table for ZDC to ZNY Flows

Sample Reference Table for ZOB to ZNY Flows with Excluded Centers

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting17 What are the Scenarios? zAirport Problem - Whole Airport yStrategy: Run a GDP zAirport Problem - Single Fixes yStrategy: Run an Arrival Fix GDP zAirport Problem - Multiple Fixes yFSM Can’t Handle This Yet yStrategy: Run a Whole Airport GDP and Exclude Centers yMaybe Send an Advisory to Airlines to Avoid Substitutions between Fixes? zAirspace Problem - Away From Major Airport Flows yFSM Can’t Do Airspace GDPs ySMT is not Coordinated with FSM GDPs yStrategy: Run GDPs for Multiple Airports with FSM and Exclude Centers yEach Airport GDP Separate zAirspace Problem - Also Limiting Departures from Major Airports ySame Limits as Above yStrategy: Run GDPs for Multiple Airports without Exclusions yEach Airport GDP Separate

24 Jan 01CDM A&D Meeting18 Identify the Traffic Management Issue Is This a Single Airport Arrival Rate Reduction? Y N Is This an Airspace Capacity Reduction? Y N Run a Single Airport GDP TBD Will Airport Arr / Dept Flows be Reduced? N Y Run Multiple Airport GDPs by Airport Demand to Meet Airspace Cap Red (Use GDP/SWAP Tables) Run Multiple Airport GDPs to Avoid Gridlock at Vulnerable Airports Sample Decision Guide