Uncertainty in Shock and Vibration Design for Navy Ships Jay Warren Hull Engineering Newport News Shipbuilding Newport News, VA Predictability and Uncertainty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHIP LOADS AND STRESSES
Advertisements

Course Introduction to virtual engineering Óbuda University John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering Systems Lecture.
Thrust bearings  Support the axial thrust of both horizontal as well as vertical shafts  Functions are to prevent the shaft from drifting in the axial.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
MEEG 5113 Modal Analysis Set 3.
Analysis and Design of Blast Resistant Underground Shelters Supervisor: Prof. T.K. Datta Abhinav Agrawal.
Internal – External Order We described symmetry of crystal habit (32 point groups) We also looked at internal ordering of atoms in 3-D structure (230 space.
Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis
The Effect of T-Stiffener Web and Flange Tilt on Frame Stress Evaluated using Finite Element Analysis by Dean Pasquerella MASTER OF ENGINEERING Major Subject:
Hydraulics.
HAZARD ANALYSIS The process of defining a hazard … Walter G. Green III, Ph.D., CEM Emergency Management Process Series No. 1 Copyright 2008 by Walter G.
Chapter 16 Wave Motion.
Ship Structural Response: Loads
Pre-isolator Update 18 th MDI Meeting F. Ramos, A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, N. Siegrist December 17, 2010.
Nonlinear Thermal/Structural Analysis of Hypersonic Vehicle Hot Structures NASA Workshop on Innovative Finite Element Solutions to Challenging Problems.
Linear Momentum and Collisions
Chapter 5 Vibration Analysis
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews.
Finite Element Study of Structural Discontinuities Presented By: Ike Lee and Nick Lin Project Advisor: Ioannis Korkolis.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
The Stress-Velocity Relationship
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
Chapter 24 Electric Current. The electric current I is the rate of flow of charge through some region of space The SI unit of current is Ampere (A): 1.
Current and Direct Current Circuits
Engineering Doctorate – Nuclear Materials Development of Advanced Defect Assessment Methods Involving Weld Residual Stresses If using an image in the.
Mechanical Vibrations In many mechanical systems: The motion is an oscillation with the position of static equilibrium as the center.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S16-1MAR120, Section 16, December 2001 SECTION 16 HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS.
Linear Buckling Analysis
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Lesson 13 Mechanical Shock 第 13 课 机械冲击. Contents Introduction The Free Falling Package Mechanical Shock Theory Shock Duration Shock Amplification and.
FUNDAMENTALS OF METAL FORMING
IPC Stress Relief Lands and terminals shall be located by design so that components can be mounted or provided with stress relief bends in.
INTERACTION AND COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN PROPULSIVE PLANT AND ENGINE ROOM / DOUBLE BOTTOM STEELWORK.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
Copyright © 2009 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Practical FEM Analysis  What do you need to run a FEM analysis?
Lesson 14 Test Method for Product Fragility 第 14 课 产品脆值试验方法.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Machine Design I (MCE-C 203) Mechatronics Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University Dr. Ahmed Salah Abou Taleb Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering.
Organizational Design, Competences, and Technology.
Linear Buckling Analysis Chapter Seven. Training Manual Linear Buckling Analysis March 29, 2005 Inventory # Chapter Overview In this chapter,
Ship Computer Aided Design Displacement and Weight.
7-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. February 23, 2009 Inventory # Workbench - Mechanical Introduction 12.0 Chapter.
Finite Element Solution of Fluid- Structure Interaction Problems Gordon C. Everstine Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Div. Bethesda, Maryland
Opportunities for Optimization in Ship Design Jay Warren Hull Engineering Newport News Shipbuilding Newport News, VA MAD Center Advisory Board Meeting.
ΕΥΣΤΑΘΕΙΑ ΒΑΣΙΚΕΣ ΑΡΧΕΣ. STABILITY STABILITY GEOMETRICAL MANUALS WEIGHT MANUALS STATICAL OR DYNAMIC DAMAGEINTACT LONGITUDINALTRANSVERSE LIST < 10 O LIST.
Ground Vibrations and Air Blasts: Causes, Effects and Abatement.
1 Linear Wave Equation The maximum values of the transverse speed and transverse acceleration are v y, max =  A a y, max =  2 A The transverse speed.
Contact Stiffness Chapter Three. Training Manual October 15, 2001 Inventory # Contact Stiffness A. Basic Concepts Review: Recall that all ANSYS.
High Rise Design High Rise Design (Notes prepared by A. Hira – modified by N. Haritos) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Copyright © 2004 Alliance Spacesystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary Material of ASI. Reproduction without prior written permission.
RELIABLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Mehdi Modares, Robert L. Mullen and Dario A. Gasparini Department of Civil Engineering Case Western.
Vibration control of ship
Finite element mesh and load definition
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
Project COMP10: Designing for Blade Aeromechanical Integrity
Optimization design of the vibration isolation of AC magnet girder
FEA Introduction.
Thermal analysis Friction brakes are required to transform large amounts of kinetic energy into heat over very short time periods and in the process they.
Tuned Mass Damper Investigation for Apache Struts
ENGINEERING MECHANICS
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS SEYE NIGUSSIE. Introduction WHAT IS STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS ?  Dynamics concerned with the study of force and motion which are time dependent.
OVERVIEW OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
ENGINEERING MECHANICS
Considerations About UN38
Realistic multiphysics analysis
Presentation transcript:

Uncertainty in Shock and Vibration Design for Navy Ships Jay Warren Hull Engineering Newport News Shipbuilding Newport News, VA Predictability and Uncertainty Quantification Workshop November 14, 2003 © Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News – All Rights Reserved This document is protected by United States Copyright Law and shall be treated as proprietary to Northrop Grumman Newport News under the Trade Secrets Act and other applicable laws. This document may not be disclosed to, copied by, or used in any manner by others without the prior express, written permission of Northrop Grumman Newport News. For further information, contact Northrop Grumman Newport News Legal Department, 4101 Washington Ave., Newport News, Virginia This document also may contain information that is export-restricted under United States Export Control Laws; therefore, it shall not be exported or otherwise disclosed to foreign persons without an appropriate export license, if required, from the United States Department of State. Distribution within Northrop Grumman Newport News is limited to employees with a genuine need to know.

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 2 of 18 Presentation Overview Description of the Navy shock and vibration problem Identification of major sources of uncertainty Current state of predictability for the Navy shock and vibration problem

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 3 of 18 Description of Shock and Vibration for Navy Ships The Navy shock problem involves protection of equipment (machinery, electronics, weapons, …) from the effects of a near miss underwater explosion The Navy vibration problem involves protecting equipment from environmental vibration caused by main propulsion or seaway loads

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 4 of 18 Description of Shock and Vibration for Navy Ships R For a large standoff underwater explosion the resulting pressure- time history is approximated by: P(t) = P max e (-t/  ) where, P max = K 1 (W 1/3 /R) A 1  = K 2 W 1/3 (W 1/3 /R) A 2 K 1, K 2, A 1, A 2 = Constants that depend on the type of explosive material W = Charge weight R = Standoff distance Explosive Charge

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 5 of 18 Description of Shock and Vibration for Navy Ships Underwater explosion produces a pressure loading on the wet surface of the ship The pressure loading is transferred from the outer shell to major transverse bulkheads and stanchions The resulting motion of the transverse bulkheads and stanchions excites the structure throughout the rest of the ship

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 6 of 18 Description of Shock and Vibration for Navy Ships u(t) m1m1 m2m2 mnmn x(t) The motion of the ship structure acts as a base excitation to the equipment The two basic approaches for shock design are: –Mitigate the base excitation by using shock isolation –Harden the equipment to resist the worst case shock event

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 7 of 18 Identification of Major Sources of Uncertainty u(t) m1m1 m2m2 mnmn x(t) Uncertainty for the Navy shock and vibration problem can be broken into two major parts: –Uncertainty in the base motion input u(t) –Uncertainty in the fragility and behavior of the equipment

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 8 of 18 Identification of Major Sources of Uncertainty Simplifying the problem, the base motion input can be thought of as the uncertain variable Q (load) and the fragility of the equipment as the uncertain variable R (resistance) Any overlap of Q and R is defined as failure

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 9 of 18 Identification of Major Sources of Uncertainty Uncertainty in the base motion input u(t) –Damping / Energy Loss Structural complexity causes energy conversion from bending to membrane and vice versa as the energy moves through the ship Frequency/strain-rate dependent Local yielding –Mass Detailed mass distribution Values for mass moments of inertia Location of center of gravity

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 10 of 18 Identification of Major Sources of Uncertainty Uncertainty in the base motion input u(t) (continued) –External pressure loading Charge location/configuration/geometry Bulk cavitation caused by free surface reflections Local cavitation from reflections near the hull –Stiffness Typical physical properties like thickness, variation in modulus of elasticity, geometric imperfections, …

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 11 of 18 Identification of Major Sources of Uncertainty Uncertainty in the behavior and fragility of the equipment –There are two distinct types of equipment on Navy ships Hardened Navy/combat specific equipment Rugged off-the-shelf equipment often referred to as modified off-the-shelf (MOTS) equipment –Testing of Navy equipment is performed in accordance with MIL-S-901D for shock and MIL-STD-167 for vibration Standard shock and vibration tests attempt to provide a worst case environment for the equipment No attempt is made to modally characterize the equipment No attempt is made to determine the fragility of the equipment If the equipment passes the test no other work is done –Excessive costs prevent further testing

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 12 of 18 Predictability for Navy Shock and Vibration u(t) m1m1 m2m2 mnmn x(t) Predictability for the Navy shock and vibration problem can also be broken into two major parts: –Predictability of the base motion input u(t) –Predictability of the behavior and fragility of the equipment Prediction of higher frequency response causes many problems

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 13 of 18 Predictability for Navy Shock and Vibration Predictability for shock and vibration problems implies the use of numerical methods (Usually FEA!!!) Useful to think of predictability in terms of how well damping, mass, external loading, and stiffness can be modeled

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 14 of 18 Predictability for Navy Shock and Vibration Predictability issues associated with damping/energy loss –No consistent method for predicting/modeling damping for a generic structure Recent analyses are using damping values from tests on similar ships –Damping is very frequency dependent and current analysis methods do not allow the user to control damping over the entire frequency range of interest Users are forced to fit values of  and  over an entire frequency range which usually results in too much damping at higher frequencies and/or too little damping at lower frequencies

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 15 of 18 Predictability for Navy Shock and Vibration Predictability issues associated with mass –Mass distribution affects the modal characteristics of the structure and becomes a major issue at higher frequencies –Incorrect mass distribution can cause filtering of the response throughout the ship –Detailed mass distribution is usually not well understood Predictability issues associated with UNDEX loading –Bulk cavitation due to free surface reflections of the shock wave require the analyst to model some of the external fluid –Propagating a high frequency shock event through an acoustic finite element mesh requires a dense mesh –Coupled Lagrangian/Eulerian methods are promising but tend to require more solution time

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 16 of 18 Predictability for Navy Shock and Vibration Predictability issues associated with stiffness –Most stiffness issues are related to problem size/mesh density Even at moderate frequencies the required mesh density causes the modeling effort and problem solution to grow out of control Local changes in geometry and materials properties are difficult to model without significant mesh refinement Resort to other analysis methods like SEA and Energy Finite Elements –Higher strain-rate materials properties and failure models are not available for many ductile materials and their welds

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 17 of 18 Predictability for Navy Shock and Vibration Predictability of equipment fragility –Finite element analyses can provide some insight into fragility if the equipment is made from components having moderate frequency content Higher frequency components require dense meshes and the size of the problem can become very large Damping can have a significant impact on the results and is almost impossible for the user to predict –Most heavy machinery can be successfully analyzed using FEA Higher frequency attachments may cause problems –Assemblies of electronic components are extremely difficult to analyze

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 18 of 18 Summary Navy shock is caused by large standoff underwater explosions Uncertainty for the Navy shock problem falls into two categories: –Uncertainty in the shock environment below the equipment –Uncertainty in the fragility of the equipment Predictability for the Navy shock problem also falls into two categories –Predictability of the shock environment Nearly impossible to correctly model damping for a complex problem Mass distribution and stiffness may require very dense meshes for higher frequencies –Predictability of equipment fragility Make reasonable approximations for fragility of machinery but electronics can cause problems

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 19 of 18 Summary State of UQ Poor to very poor What questions are answered by predictive capability Allow surrogate testing How close to failure we really are Helps to locate uncertainty What stands in the way of predictability Physics Ability to test at lethal level

© Copyright 2003 by Northrop Grumman Newport News - All Rights Reserved Refer to restrictions on the first page of this document. 11/14/03 20 of 18 Summary What can be done to mitigate obstacles Enhanced awareness Benefits of improved predictability Method for managing risk Lower cost Contents of predictability-aware model Ability to predict results with a certain level of confidence