C/PED 637 Project Process Outline The process of this class from Project Proposal through a Final grade is outlined in this power point.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
Advertisements

RO–103 GRADES REGISTRARS OFFICE. RO-103 GRADES Other Offered Courses RO-101 – Introduction to the Registrars Office RO-102 – Registration RO-103 – Grades.
Midterm Grading in zzusis. Basics of Midterm Grading  Midterm grading is done via a midterm grade roster  Midterm grade rosters are static – once created,
Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
DUTIES OF A SCHOOL CERTIFYING
Course Overview CSE8313 Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Spring 2015 Dr. LiGuo Huang Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering Southern Methodist University.
Project Option Ass Prof Peter Hill School of Population Health.
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 Veterans Retraining Assistance Program (VRAP) 1 VERSION 1.1 (201206xx)
Doctoral Milestones
Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007.
The Registrar’s Office Office of the Registrar RO – 103 Grades.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Challenges of Student Research Columbia University IRB Conference Dean Gallant 31 March 2011 Harvard University Columbia University IRB Conference Dean.
GE Temporary Moratorium on GE Class Approval.
Research Trends in Software Engineering – CS661 Shafay Shamail Malik Jahan Khan.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
WELCOME TO MSA699 TECHNICAL SUPPORT: For more information, go to the tutorial at
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 Veterans Retraining Assistance Program (VRAP) 1 VERSION 1.0 ( )
Assessment and Development Anne Keyes, PhD. And Pat Barbier, Librarian 4/25/ Anne Keyes, Ph.D. Pat Barbier, Librarian.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Guidelines for NHANES Research Proposal Submission by Natalie Dupree Margaret McDowell.
Time Management From Proposal to Dissertation Defense.
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
Grade Change & Incompletes Policy/ Procedure Auburn University Office of the Provost.
JOINING THE TEAMCFA CHARTER SCHOOL NETWORK. BRIEF OVERVIEW One Year Process 300 Point Scale Divided Evenly Between Three Committees (Academics, Business,
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
JEFF WARNER CONTRACT AND GRANT OFFICER FEDERAL UPDATE.
Penn State Electronic Theses and Dissertations Project Graduate Council Library Computing Services Graduate School University Libraries Center for Academic.
Sec 2 Normal Technical Subject Allocation Briefing 25 March 2015.
Fire Instructor I Planning Instruction. Five Step Planning Process Identify Training Needs Select Performance Objectives Design Training Implement the.
Committee Report Senate Academic Affairs Committee (SAAC) November 10, 2015 Derrek B. Dunn, Ph.D. School of Business and Technology 1.
University of North Carolina General Administration Policy: The Code/Policy Manual Responsible: UNC General Administration University Policy Responsible:
Research Problem Part of learning is learning from mistakes, but there is no “safe” mechanism for attempt->failure->reattempt built into most courses where.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Course Overview CSE5319/7319 Software Architecture and Design Spring 2016 Dr. LiGuo Huang Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering Southern Methodist.
Implementation progress of SPD activities within the competence of the Ministry of Education and Science [as at 31/12/2006] EU Structural Funds for Education.
OVERVIEW PRE AWARD From idea generation to study design Proposal development and support Proposal submission POST AWARD Account establishment Monitoring.
Transition to Kean (T 2 K): A Comprehensive Program to Assist Students in Transition Presented by Terry Y. Fung, Ph.D. Director of General Education and.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
California State University, Los Angeles Department of Public Health PH 4960 Internship Course Policies and Site Information Advisor: Behjat A. Sharif,
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Topics Graduation and End of Term or Course
Welcome to MSA699 TECHNICAL SUPPORT:
Projects Time-Line Requirements Deadline Group Selection
Grade Reporting in EIS • All grades are recorded electronically using
California State University, Los Angeles Department of Public Health
Registration and Assessment
Team Up for School Nutrition Success: Next Steps
Doctoral Milestones uwm.edu/graduateschool/doctoral-milestones
Change of Grade Use this form to change the final grade assigned to a student registered in any course in which you are an assigned instructor. This form.
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
KOM5989: PROJECT PAPER (PJJ)
Academic Paper Writing I
Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process
Blogging as a Legal Writing Assignment
Transforming Remediation in the USG -- How We Worked Together to Increase Student Success February 9, 2018 Georgia Association for Developmental Education.
ReggieNet Overview for IT Staff
Doctoral Milestones uwm.edu/graduateschool/doctoral-milestones
Psychology Learner Quick Start Guide:
Proposal Processing Wake Forest University Health Sciences
for Instructors and Roster Contacts
Report Card Updates How confident are we that the grades assigned to our students are consistent, accurate, meaningful, and supportive of learning?
Accessibility Supports Training
Conclusions/ Future Directions
Implementing the Physical Activity Plan
Training for Reviewers Fall 2018
Seven Guiding Principles for U-46 Secondary Grading
Presentation transcript:

C/PED 637 Project Process Outline The process of this class from Project Proposal through a Final grade is outlined in this power point.

Outline  Foundation of the Research Project  Research Question  Research Design  IRB submission  Implementation  Results and Analysis  Sharing – paper and presentation  Grade

Project Foundation  The first step to an action research project is the foundation of the research question: What are your curious about, passion about? What do you want more information on? What part of your counseling/psychology practice do you want to improve?

Foundation Con’t  The foundation material can come from your work in ILD625…. It doesn’t have to.  We establish the foundation of this project and move to the question

Research Question  Your research question comes out of the foundation  Your research question is the pinnacle of this project.  A strong research question will allow for a strong “meaningful” research project.

Research Design  You will work with your instructor on a feasible research design.  You will identify and design your data collection instruments.

IRB  With appropriate training and approval from your C/PED 637 instructor you will apply for approval by the National University IRB.

Project Implementation  Once you get the Project Foundation and proposal successfully completed and approved by the instructor AND receives approval of the IRB Application from National University’s IRB Committee, then your are allowed to implement your action project.

Time frame of project and grades  The action research study can be completed in a 2-12 month period.  Since the action research project often lasts longer than the course’s two months, a student will receive an academic grade ‘IP’ indicating a ‘work In Progress’ if the student has made considerable progress on the project after 2 months. “considerable progress” is generally defined by, approved submission of project to the IRB by the end of the 2 month course; however it is officially determined by the professor.

Grades  The ‘IP’ grade will be converted to the approved letter grade after the successful completion of the action research project, paper reports, and presentation.  After one year, if a Satisfactory grade is not posted the grade will default to a Unsatisfactory (U) grade automatically.