Cointegration in Single Equations: Lecture 6 Statistical Tests for Cointegration Thomas 15.2 Testing for cointegration between two variables Cointegration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multivariate Cointegartion
Advertisements

Cointegration and Error Correction Models
Autocorrelation Functions and ARIMA Modelling
Introduction Describe what panel data is and the reasons for using it in this format Assess the importance of fixed and random effects Examine the Hausman.
Regression Analysis.
Dynamic panels and unit roots
Nonstationary Time Series Data and Cointegration
Econometric Modeling Through EViews and EXCEL
Using SAS for Time Series Data
STATIONARY AND NONSTATIONARY TIME SERIES
Nonstationary Time Series Data and Cointegration Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University.
Unit Root Tests: Methods and Problems
Lecture 24 Univariate Time Series
COINTEGRATION 1 The next topic is cointegration. Suppose that you have two nonstationary series X and Y and you hypothesize that Y is a linear function.
Economics 20 - Prof. Anderson1 Testing for Unit Roots Consider an AR(1): y t =  +  y t-1 + e t Let H 0 :  = 1, (assume there is a unit root) Define.
Advanced Time Series PS 791C. Advanced Time Series Techniques A number of topics come under the general heading of “state-of-the-art” time series –Unit.
Economics 20 - Prof. Anderson1 Time Series Data y t =  0 +  1 x t  k x tk + u t 2. Further Issues.
1 MF-852 Financial Econometrics Lecture 11 Distributed Lags and Unit Roots Roy J. Epstein Fall 2003.
Financial Econometrics
Unit Roots & Forecasting
Time Series Analysis Materials for this lecture Lecture 5 Lags.XLS Lecture 5 Stationarity.XLS Read Chapter 15 pages Read Chapter 16 Section 15.
Regression with Time-Series Data: Nonstationary Variables
Chapter 11 Autocorrelation.
Time Series Building 1. Model Identification
1 Lecture 4:F-Tests SSSII Gwilym Pryce
Economics Prof. Buckles1 Time Series Data y t =  0 +  1 x t  k x tk + u t 1. Basic Analysis.
Economics 20 - Prof. Anderson1 Time Series Data y t =  0 +  1 x t  k x tk + u t 2. Further Issues.
Time Series Model Estimation Materials for this lecture Read Chapter 15 pages 30 to 37 Lecture 7 Time Series.XLS Lecture 7 Vector Autoregression.XLS.
1Prof. Dr. Rainer Stachuletz Testing for Unit Roots Consider an AR(1): y t =  +  y t-1 + e t Let H 0 :  = 1, (assume there is a unit root) Define 
Topic 3: Regression.
1Prof. Dr. Rainer Stachuletz Time Series Data y t =  0 +  1 x t  k x tk + u t 2. Further Issues.
12 Autocorrelation Serial Correlation exists when errors are correlated across periods -One source of serial correlation is misspecification of the model.
Centre of Full Employment and Equity Slide 2 Short-run models and Error Correction Mechanisms Professor Bill Mitchell Director, Centre of Full Employment.
The Properties of Time Series: Lecture 4 Previously introduced AR(1) model X t = φX t-1 + u t (1) (a) White Noise (stationary/no unit root) X t = u t i.e.
Lecture 12 Time Series Model Estimation
How do we identify non-stationary processes? (A) Informal methods Thomas 14.1 Plot time series Correlogram (B) Formal Methods Statistical test for stationarity.
Time Series Analysis Lecture 11
AUTOCORRELATION: WHAT HAPPENS IF THE ERROR TERMS ARE CORRELATED?
I271B QUANTITATIVE METHODS Regression and Diagnostics.
EC208 – Introductory Econometrics. Topic: Spurious/Nonsense Regressions (as part of chapter on Dynamic Models)
Previously Definition of a stationary process (A) Constant mean (B) Constant variance (C) Constant covariance White Noise Process:Example of Stationary.
TESTING FOR NONSTATIONARITY 1 This sequence will describe two methods for detecting nonstationarity, a graphical method involving correlograms and a more.
2/25/ lecture 121 STATS 330: Lecture 12. 2/25/ lecture 122 Diagnostics 4 Aim of today’s lecture To discuss diagnostics for independence.
Cointegration in Single Equations: Lecture 5
Lecture 5 Stephen G. Hall COINTEGRATION. WE HAVE SEEN THE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS OF USING NON-STATIONARY DATA, BUT THERE ARE ALSO GREAT ADVANTAGES. CONSIDER.
1 Lecture Plan : Statistical trading models for energy futures.: Stochastic Processes and Market Efficiency Trading Models Long/Short one.
Lecture 12 Time Series Model Estimation Materials for lecture 12 Read Chapter 15 pages 30 to 37 Lecture 12 Time Series.XLSX Lecture 12 Vector Autoregression.XLSX.
Ch5 Relaxing the Assumptions of the Classical Model
Financial Econometrics Lecture Notes 4
ECO 400 Vector Error Correction Models (VECM)
Engle granger 2 step procedure
Lecture 12 Time Series Model Estimation
REGRESSION DIAGNOSTIC III: AUTOCORRELATION
Nonstationary Time Series Data and Cointegration
26134 Business Statistics Week 5 Tutorial
An Assessment of Climate Change
Kakhramon Yusupov June 15th, :30pm – 3:00pm Session 3
STATIONARY AND NONSTATIONARY TIME SERIES

Chapter 12 – Autocorrelation
Serial Correlation and Heteroskedasticity in Time Series Regressions
COINTEGRATION AND ERROR CORRECTION MODELS
Unit Roots 31/12/2018.
Serial Correlation and Heteroscedasticity in
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Tutorial 6 SEG rd Oct..
Autocorrelation Dr. A. PHILIP AROKIADOSS Chapter 5 Assistant Professor
Autocorrelation MS management.
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Serial Correlation and Heteroscedasticity in
Presentation transcript:

Cointegration in Single Equations: Lecture 6 Statistical Tests for Cointegration Thomas 15.2 Testing for cointegration between two variables Cointegration is useful since it identifies a long-run relationship between I(1) variables. Nelson and Plosser (1982) argued that many variables in economics are I(1). Cointegration avoids the problem of spurious regressions. We test to see whether there is a cointegrating relationship between our variables.

Cointegration in Single Equations Main Task First establish that two series are I(1) i.e. difference stationary. If both Y t and X t are I(1), there exists the possibility of a cointegrating relationship. If two variables are integrated of different orders, say one is I(2) and other is I(1), there will not be cointegration. Assuming both Y t and X t are I(1), we estimate regression of Y t on a constant and X t Y t = β 0 + β 1 X t + u t (1)

Cointegration in Single Equations Main Task We have both formal and informal methods of establishing cointegration based on the regression residuals u t from equation Y t = β 0 + β 1 X t + u t (1) (a) Informal: Plot the time series of the regression residuals u t and correlogram (i.e. autocorrelation function). Are they stationary? (b) Formal:Test directly if the disequilibrium errors are I(0). u t =Y t - β 0 - β 1 X t If u t is I(0) then an equilibrium relationship exists. And hence we have evidence of cointegration.

Testing for Cointegration (1) Cointegrating Regression Durbin Watson (CRDW) Test Suggested by Engle and Granger (1987). Makes use of Durbin-Watson statistic – similar to Sargan and Bhargava (1983) test for stationarity. Test residuals from regression Y t = β 0 + β 1 X t + u t using DW stat. Low Durbin-Watson statistic indicates no cointegration. Similar to spurious regression result where the Durbin-Watson statistic was low for non-sense regression.

Testing for Cointegration (1) Cointegrating Regression Durbin Watson (CRDW) Test At 0.05 per cent significance level with sample size of 100, the critical value is equal to Ho: DW = 0 => no cointegration (i.e. DW stat. is less than 0.38) Ha: DW > 0 => cointegration (i.e. DW stat. is greater than 0.38) Ho: u t = u t-1 + z t-1 Ha: u t = ρu t-1 + z t-1 ρ < 1 N.B. Assumes that the disequilibrium errors u t can be modelled by a first order AR process. Is this a valid assumption? May require a more complicated model.

Testing for Cointegration (2) Cointegrating Regression Dickey Fuller (CRDF) Test Again based on OLS estimates of static regression Y t = β 0 + β 1 X t + u t We then test regression residuals u t under the null of nonstationarity against the alternative of stationarity using Dickey Fuller type tests. Stationary residuals imply cointegration.

Testing for Cointegration (2) Cointegrating Regression Dickey Fuller (CRDF) Test Use lagged differenced terms to avoid serial correlation. Δu t = φ* u t-1 + θ 1 Δu t-1 + θ 2 Δu t-2 + θ 3 Δu t-3 + θ 4 Δu t-4 + e t Use F-test of model reduction and also minimize Schwarz Information Criteria. Critical Values (CV) are from MacKinnon (1991) Ho: φ* = 0 => no cointegration (i.e. TS is greater than CV) Ha: φ* cointegration (i.e. TS is less than CV)

Testing for Cointegration Advantages of (CRDF) Test Engle and Granger (1987) compared alternative methods for testing for cointegration. (1) Critical values depend on the model used to simulated the data. CRDF was least model sensitive. (2) Also CRDF has greater power (i.e. most likely to reject a false null) compared to the CRDW test.

Testing for Cointegration Disadvantage of (CRDF) Test - Although the test performs well relative to CRDW test there is still evidence that CRDF have absolutely low power. Hence we should show caution in interpreting the results.

Testing for Cointegration Example: Are Y and X cointegrated? First be satisfied that the two time series are I(1). E.g. apply unit root tests to X and Y in turn.

Testing for Cointegration Once we are satisfied X and Y are both I(1), and hence there is the possibility of a cointegrating relationship, we estimate our static regression model. Y t = β 0 + β 1 X t + u t EQ( 1) Modelling Y by OLS (using Lecture 6a.in7) The estimation sample is: 1 to 99 Coefficient Std.Error t-value t-prob Part.R^2 Constant X sigma RSS R^ F(1,97) = 3.935e+004 [0.000]** log-likelihood DW 2.28 no. of observations 99 no. of parameters 2 CRDW test statistic = 2.28 >> 0.38 = 5% critical value. This suggests cointegration - assumes residuals follow AR(1) model.

Testing for Cointegration After estimating the model save residuals from static regression. (In PcGive after running regression click on Test and Store Residuals) Informally consider whether stationary.

Testing for Cointegration Using CRDF we incorporate lagged dependent variables into our regression Δu t = φ* u t-1 + θ 1 Δu t-1 + θ 2 Δu t-2 + θ 3 Δu t-3 + θ 4 Δu t-4 + e t And then assess which lags should be incorporated using model reduction tests and Information Criteria. Progress to date Model T p log-likelihood SC HQ AIC EQ( 2) 94 5 OLS EQ( 3) 94 4 OLS EQ( 4) 94 3 OLS EQ( 5) 94 2 OLS EQ( 6) 94 1 OLS Tests of model reduction (please ensure models are nested for test validity) EQ( 2) --> EQ( 6): F(4,89) = [0.5450] EQ( 3) --> EQ( 6): F(3,90) = [0.5672] EQ( 4) --> EQ( 6): F(2,91) = [0.3628] EQ( 5) --> EQ( 6): F(1,92) = [0.1863] Consequently we choose Δu t = φ* u t-1 + e t All model reduction tests are accepted hence move to most simple model

Testing for Cointegration The estimated results from our model Δu t = φ* u t-1 + e t are as follows EQ( 6) Modelling dresiduals by OLS (using Lecture 6a.in7) The estimation sample is: 6 to 99 Coefficient Std.Error t-value t-prob Part.R^2 residuals_ sigma RSS log-likelihood DW 1.95 Which means Δu t = u t-1 + e t (-11.3) CRDF test statistic = << = 5% Critical Value from MacKinnon. Hence we reject null of no cointegration between X and Y.

Testing for Cointegration: Summary To test whether two I(1) series are cointegrated we examine whether the residuals are I(0). (a) We firstly use informal methods to see if they are stationary (1) plot time series of residuals (2) plot correlogram of residuals (b) Two formal means of testing for cointegration. (1) CRDW - Cointegrating Regression Durbin Watson Test (2) CRDF - Cointegrating Regression Dickey Fuller Test

Next Lecture: Preview In the next lecture we consider - the relationship between cointegration and error correction models. - we illustrate how the disequilibrium errors from a cointegrated regression can be incorporated in a short run dynamic model. - What happens when we have more than two variables. Do you have one cointegrating relationship between say three variables? Do we have more than one cointegrating relationship?