June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex 2015 1 Ultra-fast Silicon Detectors June 3, 2015 Abe Seiden UC Santa Cruz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sci-Fi tracker for IT replacement 1 Lausanne 9. December 2010.
Advertisements

Trapping in silicon detectors G. Kramberger Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Slovenia G. Kramberger, Trapping in silicon detectors, Aug , 2006,
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
28 June 2002Santa Cruz LC Retreat M. Breidenbach1 SD – Silicon Detector EM Calorimetry.
July 2003American Linear Collider Workshop Cornell U. Development of GEM-based Digital Hadron Calorimetry Andy White U.Texas at Arlington (for J.Yu, J.Li,
Ultra-Fast Silicon Detector 1 This report is a summary of what was shown at IEEE. Nicolo Cartiglia, INFN, Torino - UFSD - Timing Workshop CERN 2014 Nicolo.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
TOF at 10ps with SiGe BJT Amplifiers
Semiconductor detectors
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski,Beam Test of LGADs, 10th Trento, Feb Beam Test of LGADs Hartmut F.W. Sadrozinski with Astrid Aster, Vitaliy Fadeyev, Patrick.
LCWS2002G/H Joint Session Fabrication of a Silicon Pixel/Pad for dE/dx Measurement H. Park (Kyungpook National U.) I.H. Park (Ewha Womans U.)
Peter Križan, Ljubljana March 17, 2006 Super B Workshop, Frascati Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Aerogel RICH and TOP: summary.
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run (update) G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
11 th RD50 Workshop, CERN Nov Results with thin and standard p-type detectors after heavy neutron irradiation G. Casse.
Semi-conductor Detectors HEP and Accelerators Geoffrey Taylor ARC Centre for Particle Physics at the Terascale (CoEPP) The University of Melbourne.
ALBA Synchrotron – 17 June 2010 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona First Measurements on 3D Strips Detectors.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
1 G. Pellegrini The 9th LC-Spain meeting 8th "Trento" Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors 3D Double-Sided sensors for the CMS phase-2 vertex.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Time Resolution of Thin LGADs Results from the Nov 2014 Beam Test at CERN Improvement in hand: Sensor Capacitance Measurements with  Front TCT 1 Hartmut.
Scintillator tile-SiPM system development for CALICE Engineering AHCAL Prototype Michael Danilov, ITEP & CALICE LCWS10 Beijing March 2010 Outline New scintillator.
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
Ultra-Fast Silicon Detector 1 Aide memoire: we are exploring the possibility of using silicon detectors with moderate gain to achieve ~ 20 ps time resolution.
CERN, November 2005 Claudio Piemonte RD50 workshop Claudio Piemonte a, Maurizio Boscardin a, Alberto Pozza a, Sabina Ronchin a, Nicola Zorzi a, Gian-Franco.
Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors (UFSD)
65 nm CMOS analog front-end for pixel detectors at the HL-LHC
1 Nicolo Cartiglia, INFN, Torino - RD50 - Santander, 2015 Timing performance of LGAD-UFSD 1.New results from the last CNM LGAD runs 2.A proposal for LGAD.
Charge Collection and Trapping in Epitaxial Silicon Detectors after Neutron-Irradiation Thomas Pöhlsen, Julian Becker, Eckhart Fretwurst, Robert Klanner,
9 th “Trento” Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors Genova, February 26-28, 2014 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica.
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
Timing in Thick Silicon Detectors Andrej Studen, University of Michigan, CIMA collaboration.
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
Status of CNM RD50 LGAD Project27th RD50 Workshop, CERN 2-4 Dec Centro Nacional del MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona Status.
Time Resolution of UFSD 1 Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, UFSD Timing RD50 Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski Z. Galloway, B. Gruey, H. Grabas, Z. Liang, S. N. Mak,
Simulation of new P-Type strip detectors 17th RD50 Workshop, CERN, Geneva 1/15 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
CERN PH MIC group P. Jarron 07 November 06 GIGATRACKER Meeting Gigatracker Front end based on ultra fast NINO circuit P. Jarron, G. Anelli, F. Anghinolfi,
Ultra-Fast Silicon Detector 1 The “4D” challenge A parameterization of time resolution The “Low Gain Avalanche Detectors” project Laboratory measurements.
Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski
A novel two-dimensional microstrip sensor for charge division readout D. Bassignana, M. Lozano, G. Pellegrini CNM-IMB (CSIC) M. Fernández, R. Jaramillo,
A novel two-dimensional microstrip sensor with charge division readout M. Fernández, R. Jaramillo, F.J. Muñoz, I. Vila IFCA (CSIC-UC) D. Bassignana, M.
- Herve Grabas - Ecole Superieure d’Electicite 1 Internship presentation - University of Chicago – 3 sept
Comparison of the AC and DC coupled pixels sensors read out with FE-I4 electronics Gianluigi Casse*, Marko Milovanovic, Paul Dervan, Ilya Tsurin 22/06/20161.
SiPM Workshop EU-FP7(HP3), Vienna, 16 Feb F.G. H.O. Study of scintillator detectors time resolution with different SiPM readout on T10 test beam.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Timing capabilities of Ultra-Fast Silicon Detector 1 A parameterization of time resolution A program to calculate Time resolution UFSD Timing capabilities.
Beam detectors in Au+Au run and future developments - Results of Aug 2012 Au+Au test – radiation damage - scCVD diamond detector with strip metalization.
TCT measurements of HV-CMOS test structures irradiated with neutrons I. Mandić 1, G. Kramberger 1, V. Cindro 1, A. Gorišek 1, B. Hiti 1, M. Mikuž 1,2,
Ultra-Fast Silicon Detector 1 This report is a summary of what was shown at IEEE. Nicolo Cartiglia, INFN, Torino - UFSD - RD50 CERN 2014 Nicolo Cartiglia.
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
Prospect of SiPM application to TOF in PANDA
Radiation damage studies in LGAD detectors from recent CNM and FBK run
The timing upgrade project of the TOTEM Roman Pot detectors
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
First production of Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors at FBK
Saikat Biswas, A. Abuhoza, U. Frankenfeld, C. Garabatos,
Position Sensitive TCT Measurements with 3D-stc detectors
Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, UFSD, 28th RD50 Meeting
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Signal Formation & Timing in Conventional P-I-N Diodes
ILC Detector Activities in Korea
Vladimir Cindro, RD50 Workshop, Prague, June 26-28, 2006
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Forward TOF Anton A. Izotov, PNPI.
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Ultra-fast Silicon Detectors June 3, 2015 Abe Seiden UC Santa Cruz

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Outline General Idea for Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors. Measurements made. Plans for the future. Goal is a detector that combines excellent timing and position measurement. Acknowledgments: My thanks to RD50 and particularly the groups at: UC Santa Cruz Torino Barcelona and CNM Trento and FBK Ljubljana

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors: Detectors with Gain and Large Electron Drift Velocity Goal: Gain field ~ 300 kV/cm. Bulk field ~ 20 kV/cm, gives a saturated electron drift velocity ~ 10 7 cm/sec. Want to have gain for electrons but not holes, leads to gain ~ 10.

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Signal Amplitude – Measured with Laser Reference, ordinary sensor Gain ~ 10 Plot of signal for several sensors (~ 8mm pads, 285  m thickness, from CNM) shows the modest sensitivity of the gain to the detector voltage.

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Measuring the Time The timing capabilities are determined by the characteristics of the signal at the output of the pre-Amplifier and by the TDC binning:  Total 2 =  Time-Walk 2 +  Jitter 2 +  TDC 2 Single Comparator: Time is set when the signal crosses the comparator threshold. The time-walk term is due to amplitude variations, the jitter term is due to noise. To do better likely will want to use a constant fraction discriminator (to reduce time-walk) or to sample the signal in time-bins and fit the start time (reduces time-walk and averages jitter).

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Time Resolution and Slew Rate To minimize the time resolution, we need to maximize the slew-rate, dV/dt of the signal, for a given noise value. This minimizes the error in extrapolating back to the start time of the signal. Need both large and fast signals. We choose the slew-rate as a good figure of merit to use. It is enhanced by gain and its impact is shown in later slides showing simulations. Slew rate is determined by intrinsic detector signal characteristics and the amplifier rise time (t r ). Other important factor is the noise for which the ENC 2 has terms which depend on the amplifier details, and detector characteristics: Current Noise 2 ~ detector leakage current x t r Voltage Noise 2 ~ C det 2 /t r ~ C det for t r ~ C det To minimize the voltage noise we need to keep the detector capacitance small, which also minimizes shot noise from the leakage current (small collection area) and rise time (gives large slew rate).

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Detector Thickness and Signal Shapes Typical signal characteristics versus detector thickness for pad detector with saturated drift velocities. Conventional detector: Rise time similar for thick and thin, same slew rate. Detector with a gain of 10: Rise time (and slew-rate) are different. Rise time ~ electron collection time, is proportional to detector thickness.

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Slew-rate as a Function of Sensor Thickness Weightfield2 simulation N. Cartiglia, F. Cenna 2014 IEEE NSS- MIC 50 micron: ~ 3x improvement with gain = 10 Significant improvements in time resolution expected for thin detectors.

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Signal Simulations: n-on-p pad detector Components making up signal (50  m thick detector): primary e- signal collected in about 0.5 nsec, gain signal peaks at about 0.5 nsec.

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Have performed two beam tests of the pad detectors. The first at Frascati using electrons, with timing for two pad detectors compared (constant fraction discriminators were used to reduce time-walk). Second at CERN using a high energy pion beam. Start time provided by SiPM trigger. Occcasional events that have 2 or 3 particles in a beam spill provide events with large pulses. For CERN beam test the Detector Capacitance = 11 pF, gain about 10. Scanning the detector with a laser indicates that the gain is constant over the pad face to about 3%. Some Results from Recent Beam Tests

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Typical pulse. 50 psec bins. 20 bins smoothing. Both overlapped. Simulation, no electronic noise included. Pulse Shapes in Pion Beam Test

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Time Resolution MIP Fixed threshold = 10 mV, approximately 15% of MIP. Mean is average time referenced to trigger, sigma is the variation around mean. Data indicate importance of having a pulse height correction. Sigma for MIP is about 170 psec. 12

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Weightfield2 simulation shows that changing to smaller sensors increase the slew rate and significantly improves the time resolution. Effect of Detector Capacitance Blue: Measurements from electron beam test or laser. Red: Simulation.

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Latest Detectors from CNM Gain

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Comparison to Conventional PIN Diode

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Next Step: Program to Make Detailed Measurements for Pad Detectors of Varying Dimensions ( For details of fabrication from CNM see talk of Pellegrini at Trento Workshop, Feb. 2015). Array of pads of size varying from 300x300  m to 1x1cm. Thickness is 300  m. Next run: same pad sizes, thickness 200  m, due shortly. For Summer/Fall production of 100  m and 50  m arrays. Plan is to do detailed measurements of performance, especially establish correlation of timing accuracy with sensor thickness and sensor capacitance

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex AC Coupling to Achieve Segmentation (Ideal Configuration) gain layer AC coupling n+ electrode Detector AC coupling The signal is briefly frozen on the resistive sheet, and is AC coupled to the electronics.

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex FBK Fab: Next Fall, Winter. DC Single diodes: mm 2 single diodes, reading either the n- or p- side. DC read-out. p-side n-side p-side n-side p-side n-side AC p-side n-side AC p-side n-side AC AC Single diodes: AC with different metal pads. Fixed oxide thickness (250 nm). Two different sheet resistance values: kOhm. (For details see: G.-F. Dalla Betta, et al., NIM A (2015)).

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Layout - Multipads 6x6 mm2, 1 mm pixels (36 channels). DC or AC p-side readout. 6 mm n-side p-side n-side p-side AC 10x10 mm 2, several pixels of different width (~ 20 channels). DC readout on the p-side. 10 mm

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Other Applications: Forward Calorimeter Calorimeter with layers providing excellent timing to pin down vertices by timing differences. Optimized design will depend on whether used as pre-shower or inside shower. An example: Possible unit cell made of 4 pads, each 3mm x 3mm, 4 pads readout by one chip at center. 3 mm

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Protons of 200 MeV have a range of ~ 30 cm in plastic scintillator. The straggling limits the WEPL (water equivalent path length) resolution. Replace calorimeter/range counter by TOF: Light-weight, combine tracking with WEPL determination Future: 4-D UFSD Detector in pCT

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Radiation Hardness Question Detectors tested so far have the gain-generating implant made with boron. Radiation tests indicate an ~20%, drop in gain after a fluence of n/cm 2 equivalent dose. This can be compensated for to a degree by raising the voltage but it would be much better to have a more radiation hard device since the problem will worsen at larger fluences. Plan is to try replacing the boron with gallium. The larger atomic mass is expected to lead to more radiation hardness according to the experts. Will be testing this in the future.

June 1-5, Santa Fe N. M. Vertex Conclusions Detectors fabricated with gain layer show that stably operating detectors with gain ~ 10 can be made with good gain uniformity. These are capable of high rate operation. Simulation program (Weightfield2) allows prediction of performance based on detector and electronics parameters In the coming year expect to perform extensive tests to establish dependence of timing accuracy on detector capacitance and thickness and to develop a pixel version of the detector to allow much better position measurement than with small pads, while maintaining the timing accuracy.