ALTO BOF Charter Discussion. Charter Iterated (twice) on the list  Several comments on the first version Terminology, caching  No complains on current.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OASIS OData Technical Committee. AGENDA Introduction OASIS OData Technical Committee OData Overview Work of the Technical Committee Q&A.
Advertisements

Scope Discussion Seems to be a good deal of interest in moving this toward a working group If we want to work toward this, we need to have a clearly defined.
Gap Analysis of Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions (SUPA) Presenter: Jun Bi draft-bi-supa-gap-analysis-02 IETF 92 SUPA BoF Dallas, TX March 23, 2015.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ Chedar P2P platform InBCT 3.2 Peer-to-Peer communication Cheese Factory -project Research Assistant.
Can ISPs and P2P Users Cooperate for Improved Performance? Vinay Aggarwal, Anja Feldmann (German Telecom Laboratories) Christian Scheideler (TU, Munchen)
Responder Anonymity and Anonymous Peer-to-Peer File Sharing. by Vincent Scarlata, Brian Levine and Clay Shields Presentation by Saravanan.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ Resource Discovery Using NeuroSearch Presentation for the Agora Center InBCT-seminar Mikko Vapa, researcher InBCT 3.2.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ Resource Discovery in Unstructured P2P Networks Distributed Systems Research Seminar on Mikko Vapa, research student.
Infrastructure to Application Exposure - USE CASE: CDN – Jan Seedorf IETF 83, Paris i2aex BoF Monday, March
Mobile Communication Congestion Exposure Scenario Version 01
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
1 MultimEDia transport for mobIlE Video AppLications 9 th Concertation Meeting Brussels, 13 th February 2012 MEDIEVAL Consortium.
P2PSIP Charter Proposal Many people helped write this charter…
1IETF 63, Remote UI BoF WiDeX Problem Statement Dean Willis Vlad Stirbu RUI BoF, IETF 63, Paris August 2 nd, 2005.
ALTO Problem Statement draft-marocco-alto-problem-statement-02 Enrico Marocco Vijay Gurbani 72 nd IETF Meeting.
ALTO Problem Statement draft-marocco-alto-problem-statement-03 Enrico Marocco Vijay Gurbani 73 rd IETF Meeting.
Draft-campbell-dime-load- considerations-01 IETF 92 DIME Working Group Meeting Dallas, Texas.
Draft-engelstad-manet- name-resolution-00.txt IETF 57, Vienna MANET WG meeting Paal Engelstad, Telenor R&D / UniK.
P2P Traffic Localization by Alias Tracker for Tracker-based P2P applications (ATTP) draft-zhang-alto-attp-02 Yunfei Zhang China Mobile.
DNS based IP NetLocation Service China Telecom Guangzhou Institute
BitTorrent enabled Ad Hoc Group 1  Garvit Singh( )  Nitin Sharma( )  Aashna Goyal( )  Radhika Medury( )
DIME WG IETF 82 Dime WG Agenda & Status THURSDAY, November 17, 2011 Jouni Korhonen & Lionel Morand.
The PROXIDOR Service draft-akonjang-alto-proxidor-00.txt S. Previdi O. Akonjang A. Feldmann
IETF – ECRIT Emergency Context Resolution using Internet Technologies ESW 5 – Vienna October 2008 Marc Linsner.
CDN Interconnection Problem Statement draft-jenkins-cdni-problem-statement-02 Ben Niven-Jenkins Francois Le Faucheur Nabil Bitar.
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 1 Survey of P2P Streaming HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Ning Zong, Johnson Jiang.
Enabling Peer-to-Peer SDP in an Agent Environment University of Maryland Baltimore County USA.
ALTO Protocol draft-penno-alto-protocol-03 Presenters: R. Alimi, R. Penno Current Design Team working on the draft: Richard Alimi, Reinaldo Penno, Stefano.
Around the IETF Other IETF Work Of-Interest to ICCRG Wesley Eddy MTI Systems Internet Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG) IETF.
Doc.: IEEE /595r2 Submission May 2002 Lily Yang, Tyan-Shu JouSlide 1 Mesh Relevance in CAPWAP and AP Functional Descriptions L. Lily Yang (Intel.
RPL Applicability Statement for AMI IETF #81, IETF ROLL WG Québec City, Canada July 25-29, 2011 Jorjeta Jetcheva
CDNI Requirements (draft-lefaucheur-cdni-requirements-02) CDNI Working Group IETF 81 Quebec City, Canada July 28, 2011 Kent Leung Yiu.
Peer to Peer Streaming Protocol (PPSP) BOF Gonzalo Camarillo Ericsson Yunfei Zhang China Mobile IETF76, Hiroshima, Japan 13:00~15:00 THURSDAY, Nov 12,
Introduction to Grids By: Fetahi Z. Wuhib [CSD2004-Team19]
1 Software Design Lecture What’s Design It’s a representation of something that is to be built. i.e. design  implementation.
SRI International 1 Topology Dissemination Based on Reverse-Path Forwarding (TBRPF) Richard Ogier September 21, 2002.
SDP Simple Capability Negotiation (SDP Simcap) draft-andreasen-mmusic-sdp-simcap-reqts-00.txt draft-andreasen-mmusic-sdp-simcap-01.txt 50th IETF - March.
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
Transport Layer Security- based Mobile IPv6 Security Framework for MN Node to HA Communication IETF#80 MEXT WG, 1-April-2011 draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-00.
Moving towards an IRS WG Charter Ross Callon IETF 85, Atlanta.
Virtualized Network Function (VNF) Pool BoF IETF 90 th, Toronto, Canada. BoF Chairs: Ning Zong Melinda Shore
August 2, 2005 IETF 63 – Paris, France Media Independent Handover Services and Interoperability Ajay Rajkumar Chair, IEEE WG.
Draft-melia-mipshop-mobility-services-ps-01.txt. From IETF #66 Discuss MIH PS (as expressed by the WG chair) Need a single PS at WG level (several drafts.
Design Considerations for the Common MIH Protocol Functions draft-hepworth-mipshop-mih-design-considerations-01 Ele Hepworth (*), Robert Hancock, Srinivas.
Company LOGO Network Architecture By Dr. Shadi Masadeh 1.
CMSC 691B Multi-Agent System A Scalable Architecture for Peer to Peer Agent by Naveen Srinivasan.
Layer 2 Control Protocol BoF (L2CP) IETF 65, Dallas, TX Wojciech Dec Matthew Bocci
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Pre-authentication Activity Date Submitted: February 26, 2006.
Interdomain Multicast BCP Draft IETF 84 Vancouver, BC Robert Sayko
ALTO: A Multi Dimensional Peer Selection Problem IETF 73 Saumitra Das
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: EAP Pre-authentication Problem Statement in IETF HOKEY WG Date Submitted: September,
Page 1 IETF DRINKS Working Group Data Model and Protocol Requirements for DRINKS IETF 72 - Thursday July Tom Creighton -
IETF68 DIME WG Diameter Applications Design Guidelines Document (draft-fajardo-dime-app-design-guide-00.txt)
WREC Working Group IETF 49, San Diego Co-Chairs: Mark Nottingham Ian Cooper WREC Working Group.
Extension of the MLD proxy functionality to support multiple upstream interfaces 1 Luis M. Contreras Telefónica I+D Carlos J. Bernardos Universidad Carlos.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Greg Bernstein Young Lee
Thierry Ernst (INRIA and WIDE) Hesham Soliman (Ericsson)
IEEE 802 OmniRAN Study Group: SDN Use Case
SUPA/YMCA (Yang Models for Configuration and topology Abstraction)
Teemu Savolainen (Nokia) MIF WG IETF#75 28-July-2009
Content Aware Overlay Networks
L1VPN Working Group Scope
CHAPTER 3 Architectures for Distributed Systems
SUPA Policy-based Management Framework (SUPA: Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions) draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-01 Will Liu, John.
Mesh Relevance in CAPWAP and AP Functional Descriptions
WebDAV Design Overview
Network Architecture By Dr. Shadi Masadeh 1.
Presentation transcript:

ALTO BOF Charter Discussion

Charter Iterated (twice) on the list  Several comments on the first version Terminology, caching  No complains on current version (2 weeks old)‏ Charter structure  Problem description  Working Group description  Work items  Scope  Goals

The Problem Significant part of the traffic is peer-to-peer  P2P applications access distributed resources available in multiple instances  Resources may be files, media relays, mirrors... The problem consists in optimizing peer selection

The Working Group Will produce protocol(s) to enable communications between P2P systems and “informed” external services  Tracker-based, tracker-less, structured, unstructured... Mechanisms will be general, to address today's and tomorrow's applications

Work Items (Support)‏ Survey and taxonomies  Existing solutions (coordinate systems, ISP-P2P collaboration...)‏  Discovery mechanisms  Applications which would benefit Requirements document

Work Items (Protocols)‏ Discovery mechanism for locating the oracle  “Oracle” (not referred to any particular solution) is the proper server Query/Response protocol for communicating with the oracle

Work Items (Node Location)‏ Discovery mechanism for locating “special” nodes  Caches, media relays...  Possibly reusing existing mechanisms  In-line discovery Applications provide additional information (application protocol, content-id...) and the oracle returns new nodes  Off-line discovery Applications use separate discovery mechanism and put the results in the ALTO query

In and Out of Scope Focus on the interface  Algorithms for actually implementing the service (provisioning, coordinate systems, routing protocol extensions) are out of scope Information will be about network topology and characteristics of involved peers  E.g. AS numbers, coordinates, priority are in scope  Congestion is out of scope Issues related to the content are out of scope  I.e. legal issues are out of scope

Goals Submit a problem statement document Submit a survey document describing existing solutions/approaches Submit a document defining requirements for a standard solution Submit a document specifying a discovery mechanism for locating an oracle Submit a document specifying a protocol for querying the oracle Submit a document specifying a discovery mechanism for locating chaches

Is this a problem the IETF should work on?

Should the IETF form a WG with the charter discussed today?

Who would be willing to contribute (edit, review, discuss) in such a WG?