Tom Powers LLRF Systems for Next Generation Light Sources LLRF Workshop 2011 18 October 2011 Authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL/Kovar/March 1, 2007 Page 1 Determining Loaded-Q for SRF Cavities Used In ERLs (What do you mean it is.
Advertisements

Mostly by Gwyn Williams and the JLab Team, Presented by D. Douglas Working Group 4 Diagnostics & Synchronization Requirements Where we are and what needs.
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
Power Requirements for High beta Elliptical Cavities Rihua Zeng Accelerator Division Lunds Kommun, Lund
1 ALICE rf project meeting Kai Hock, Cockcroft / Liverpool 19 May 2008.
RF Synchronisation Issues
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
A fast RF kicker for the MEIC electron cooler Andrew Kimber Amy Sy 31 st March 2015 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is managed by Jefferson.
Linac Marx Modulator Update Trevor Butler 5/20/2015.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Stefan Simrock, DESY LLRF-ATCA Review, Dec. 3, 2007 Requirements for the ATCA based LLRF.
Holger Schlarb, DESY Normal conducting cavity for arrival time stabilization.
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
LLRF Cavity Simulation for SPL
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
1 FNAL SCRF meeting 31/10/2015 Comments from LLRF Shin Michizono (KEK) Brian Chase (FNAL) Stefan Simrock (DESY) LLRF performance under large dead time.
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
Cavities Auto Recovery with Beam RF&Linac Section - ALBA Accelerators Division Francis Perez Angela Salom.
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing J. Frisch 7/22/15.
W. 5th SPL collaboration Meeting CERN, November 25, 20101/18 reported by Wolfgang Hofle CERN BE/RF Update on RF Layout and LLRF activities for.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
Cornell digital LLRF system S. Belomestnykh LLRF05 workshopCERN, October 10, 2005.
John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
T. Limberg Position of the 3rd Harmonic System. Injector (with first Bunch Compression Stage) 2 European XFEL MAC May 2010 T. Limberg.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
First Electrons at the Fermilab superconducting test accelerator Elvin Harms Asian Linear Collider Workshop 2015, Tsukuba 24 April 2015.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Wojciech Jalmuzna, Technical University of Lodz, Department of Microelectronics and Computer.
Performance of the cERL LLRF System Takako Miura (KEK) LLRF'15, Shanghai, Nov 4, 2015 (T. Miura) 1 Compact ERL (Energy Recovery LINAC)
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 6 March.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
1 Tuner performance with LLRF control at KEK Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) Dec.07 TTC Beijing (Michizono) S1G (RDR configuration) - Detuning monitor - Tuner control.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Overview Step by step procedure to validate the model (slide 1 and 2) Procedure for the Ql / beam loading study (slide 3 and 4)
SRF Cavities Resonance Control. CW mode of operation (FNAL’s experience). Yu. Pischalnikov W. Schappert FNAL TTC CW SRF Meeting, Cornell University, 12June,
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
Microphonics Discussion For LLRF Design Review Tom Powers 13 June 2016 Not for release outside of JLAB There are several MSWord documents located at: M:\asd\asddata\C100Microphonics2016.
Microphonics Discussion For LLRF Design Review Tom Powers 13 June 2016 Not for release outside of JLAB There are several MSWord documents located at: M:\asd\asddata\C100Microphonics2016.
RF System for C100 Cryomodule C100 GDR mode – Original/Modified Tuner Phase noise 25.6 deg rms /14 Hz rms Phase noise 7.5 deg rms /4 Hz rms.
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
Outlook of future studies to reach maximum gradient and current
LLRF Functionality Stefan Simrock How to edit the title slide
Experience with High Loaded Q cavity Operation at JLAB
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Operational Experience with LCLS RF systems
USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linear Accelerators
CEBAF Pulsed Operation for JLEIC Electron Injection
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
RF Issues in Energy Recovery Linacs
Strategic Communications at TRIUMF
Comments to the Report of the Community Review of EIC Accelerator R&D for the Office of Nuclear Physics, February 13, 2017 (60 pages) By Haipeng Wang,
Presentation transcript:

Tom Powers LLRF Systems for Next Generation Light Sources LLRF Workshop October 2011 Authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR The U.S. Government retains a non- exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce this manuscript for U.S. Government purposes.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Cornell X-ray light source Near perfect energy recovery, i.e. first and second pass 180° out of phase from each other. Moderate Gradient of 15 – 20 MV/m Requires on the order of 2 MW of linac RF power to produce 500 MW of electron beam power. Image Copied from

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Standard Linac Approach Accelerate off-crest in L1 to induce a phase-energy correlation along the bunch Use harmonic RF to linearize the longitudinal phase space (Extract energy from beam) Implement a laser heater (LH) to increase intrinsic energy spread (optional) Partially compress the bunch in BC1 Intermediate acceleration in L2 Fully compress the bunch in BC2 Accelerate to final energy and de-chirp in L3 C. Tennant, IPAC 2011

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Combination Recirculator and Linac C. Tennant, IPAC Inject beam at E inj 2.Accelerate through linac (f L1 ) to induce a phase-energy correlation along the bunch 3.Perform the first bunch compression and linearization in recirculator arcs 4.De-chirp the beam through linac on the second pass by running near zero-crossing (f L2 ) 5.Accelerate on-crest through the afterburner (f L3 ) 6.Perform the final bunch compression

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 General Phase and Gradient Stability Requirements Gradient and phase stability determined during beam physics sensitivity studies. Subject to be different from machine to machine. In general Phase stability 0.03º to 0.01º rms (60 fs to 18 fs at 1500 MHz) (folks talk about 10 fs for synchronization of final beams to end stations.) Gradient stability 0.05% to 0.005% rms ? ? cavity by cavity stability or ensemble of cavities ? ? Temperature stabilized LLRF systems probable. For slow drifts remember one bad cable can ruin years of design and implementation.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011  Loop phase and amplitude control signals available in control room.  Tuner control algorithm -- may need fast adaptive controls for pulsed machines or ERLs.  Loop gains, bandwidths, etc. control available in the control room.  Filter for rejection of the first π mode frequency below the fundamental frequency.  First fault buffers.  Interface to fast feedback control system.  Quench detection  SEL for cavities with high loaded-Q  One button turn on of cavities even if they are not properly tuned. Some of the “Necessary” Features

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Other uses of LLRF Drive and seed laser phase control. Using optical detector along with a PZT and pico motor controls. Lock laser fundamental frequency to sub-harmonic of cavity RF. Switch to or augment phase feedback loop with a higher harmonic of laser frequency. Check harmonic content, phase noise, etc. as an on line task. Receiver for beam based phase feedback for seed laser phase. As part of a fast feedback system for energy stability. For commissioning the cryomodules and their tuners after installation into the machine. * Caution must be used when choosing frequency for optical and electron beam based detectors in order to avoid interference from high power RF systems.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 ERL or Beam Off Crest Effects Ideally energy recovering linacs (ERLs) operate with second pass beam 180° out of phase with respect to first pass beam. In real machines you don’t always get that. Errors in path length Intentional modes of operation with different phase settings. Changes in second pass phase due to issues like lasing and not lasing in an FEL. Often times one needs to run cavities off crest in machines that are not ERLs. Some examples are: Putting a chirp on the beam. Using cavity focusing and non-relativistic beams in an injector. Bunch compression using 3 rd order harmonic cavities.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Basic Equations For RF Source Power

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 THE EFFECTS OF TUNING ON OFF-CREST CW BEAM LOADING On beam turn on the forward power increases the phase shifts and microphonics effects are multiplied The tuner operates with a goal of making ψ Kly equal to zero by shifting the frequency by δf S which compensates for the I 0 R C sinψ B term. Thus ψ Kly → 0 and P Kly is minimized to : Where δf M is the frequency shifts due to microphonics Thus, assuming that you can wait for the tuner, in this case: 0

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 THEORETICAL EXAMPLE OF TUNERS COMPENSATING FOR OFF CREST BEAM LOADING CEBAF 7-Cell Cavity L = 0.7 m (r/Q) = 960 E = 8 MV/m Q L = 2 x 10 7 δf = 10 Hz I 0 = 10 mA Pass one ψ B = -10º Pass two ψ B = 166º Resultant Beam 0.7 mA at 78°

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 THEORETICAL EXAMPLE OF TUNERS COMPENSATING FOR OFF CREST BEAM LOADING

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 PREDICTED AND MEASURED FORWARD POWER IN AN ERL The solid lines indicate the predicted values based on: Q L = 2 x 10 7 E = 5.6 MV/m. Δf = 10 Hz Test Process: Tune the cavity with no current. Disable the mechanical tuners. Ramp the current up and record the forward power and phase. Repeat with Tuners enabled.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Predicted and Measured RF Drive Phase In an ERL

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Multiple Cavities Using a Single Source It can be a desirable to use a single source to drive multiple cavities. Reduced cost per Watt at higher RF –Power levels. Availability of klystrons or IOTs at desired levels for multiple cavities. Unavailability of klystrons, IOTs at desired power levels for single cavities. Reduced number of LLRF systems to drive cavities.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Multiple Cavities Using a Single Source It can work in a straight forward manner when: The cavities are operated near crest. The beam is not sensitive to minor variations in gradient and phase. Loaded-Qs are well matched. Gradients are close to the same for all cavities. The loaded-Qs are relatively low as compared to pressure sensitivity and microphonics. You have the advantage of a large number of cavities and individual errors are corrected by statistics.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Multiple Cavities Using a Single Source It can present problems when: The beam is sensitive to errors in gradients or phase. Detuning becomes significant as compared to the FPC bandwidths. Cavities are operated at different gradients. Cavities have different loaded-Qs Cavities are operated at different beam phases with respect to crest. Induced phase shifts are comparable to that required for putting an energy chirp on the beam. While linacs are an area where this concept can be very practical, injectors are an area where the problems become important especially when space charge and cavity induced beam focusing are important.

Stability in 6300 sec. LLRF stability study with 7 cavities operation at 25MV/m Field Waveform of each cavity - Vector-sum stability: MV/m ~ MV/m (~0.03%) - Amplitude stability in pulse flat-top: < 60ppm=0.006%rms - Phase stability in pulse flat-top: < degree.rms vector-sum gradient amplitude stability in pulse flat-top phase stability in pulse flat-top 7-cavity operation by digital LLRF A. Yamamoto, SRF Advances in ILC-SRF 19

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Stability in 6300 sec. LLRF stability study with 7 cavities operation at 25MV/m Field Waveform of each cavity - Vector-sum stability: MV/m ~ MV/m (~0.03%) - Amplitude stability in pulse flat-top: < 60ppm=0.006%rms - Phase stability in pulse flat-top: < degree.rms vector-sum gradient amplitude stability in pulse flat-top phase stability in pulse flat-top 7-cavity operation by digital LLRF Individual cavity gradients vary during the pulse. Even with this, the vector sum of 7 cavities has very good phase and amplitude stability (i.e. the system works as designed.) Note that the gradients have not yet achieved their steady state values as would be necessary in a CW machine. If you fix the gradient what happens to the phase errors?

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Some Questions What happens when cavities are operated CW? What happens when you have to tune the machine at one current and operate at another current?

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Simulation Method for CW Applications  Use the basic complex RF voltage to complex gradient equation to calculate the field in each cavity, including beam phase and cavity detune angle.  Sum the real and imaginary parts of the electric field signals for each of the cavities.  Compare the vector sum to the desired vector sum and calculate the error in the vector sum.  Add, with gain, the complex error to the complex RF voltage from the current pass.  Use this sum to calculate gradient in each cavity.  Repeat until the real and imaginary parts of the vector sum error are below a threshold. Where ψ is the cavity detune angle.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Phase Error In When The Phase of the Beam Relative to the Cavity Field In 1 of 3 Cavities Is Different

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Phase Error In When The Phase of the Beam Relative to the Cavity Field In 1 of 3 Cavities Is Different Tune Beam Ops Beam

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Gradient Error When the Beam Phase in 1o f 3 Cavities is Different

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Gradient Error in When the Loaded-Q of 1 of 3 Cavities is Higher Than the Others

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 ERROR IN GRADIENT AND PHASE WHEN 1 OF 3 CAVITIES IS DETUNED Q L = 2e6 F 0 = 1497 MHz (r/Q) = 960 Ω/m L = 0.5 m β = 3000

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 Comments on Errors  Beam phase being different between cavities comes up in at least three places. Injectors where cavities are frequently operated with beam phases that are tens of degrees different. When setting the phase of cavities within a linac or an injector. Effects change with different beam loading conditions.  Detuning Effects Effects become more important at increased values of loaded-Q. Cavity detuning is a function of helium pressure which is seldom completely stable. For beams operated off crest the cavity tuners respond to changing beam conditions. Determining the proper forward to reflected power phase set point is, in general, a +/- 3° operation.

DISTRIBUTION STATE A T. Powers, LLRF Workshop 2011 ? ? ? Conclusion? ? ? I hope that I have given you something to think about with respect to the requirements for LLRF used in the next generation light sources as well as some topics for further discussion during this workshop.