Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: 2014-01-20 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1100r0 September 2013 Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 HEW SG Progress Review Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1176r0 Submission Sep 2013 Reza Hedayat (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Some Simulation Scenarios for HEW NameAffiliationPhone Reza HedayatCisco.
Doc.: IEEE /1510r0 Submission November 2014 Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)Slide 1 Summary of PAR and CSD Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0309r0 Submission March 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom Next Generation Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0271r4 Submission March 2015 Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)Slide 1 Comments on TGay PAR and CSD Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1167r2 Sept 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax Functional Requirement Discussion Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0287r3 March 2013 Yasuhiko Inoue, NTTSlide 1 Beyond ac – A Very High Capacity WLAN Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /870r2 July 2015 Guido R. Hiertz et al., EricssonSlide ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0323r0 SubmissionRon Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Views on ah Use Cases Date: Authors: March 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0214r2 Submission February 2014 Perahia, Cariou, Cho, Inoue, Liu and TaoriSlide 1 High Efficiency WLAN Overview Date: Authors:
Doc.: Submission January 22, 2014 Rene Struik (Struik Security Consultancy)Slide Privacy & HEW Date: Authors: NameCompanyAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0026r1 January 2014 Yong Liu, et al.Slide 1 Thoughts on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-13/0000r0 Submission July 2013 Dapeng Liu (CMCC)Slide 1 Interference Control Use Case for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 1 Considerations for Partial Band Interference between WLAN Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0214r0 Submission February 2014 Perahia, Cariou, Cho, Inoue, Liu and TaoriSlide 1 High Efficiency WLAN Overview Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0214r1 Submission February 2014 Perahia, Cariou, Cho, Inoue, Liu and TaoriSlide 1 High Efficiency WLAN Overview Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0795r0 Submission HEW Usage Scenarios Categorization July 2013 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0801r1 Akira Kishida, NTT Issues of Low-Rate Transmission Date: Authors:
July 2013 Jinsoo Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Functional Requirements in HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0498r0 Submission April 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Modifications to the 60GHz PAR & 5 C’s Proposal Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Sep 2013 Jinsoo Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on HEW Functional Requirements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1395r2 Simultaneous Transmission Technologies for HEW Date: November 2013 Koichi Ishihara, NTTSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1398r0 Nov 2013 Akira Yamada, NTT DOCOMO, Inc.Slide 1 Requirements for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0821r3 Submission July 2008 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0835r2 July 2014 Joe Kwak, InterDigitalSlide 1 Functional Requirements Discussion Date: Authors:
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0341r2 Submission March 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Usage Cases for ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1158r0 September 2013 William Carney (SONY)Slide 1 Video Traffic and Applications for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
5G. Overall Vision for 5G 5G will provide users with fiber-like access data rate and "zero" latency user experience be capable of connecting 100 billion.
Doc.: IEEE /1366r3 Submission November 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition Date: 2013-xx-11Authors:
Proposed wording revisions to HT PAR Wednesday, March 12, 2003.
Comments on HT PAR & 5 Criteria
PAR Review - Meeting Agenda and Comment slides - San Antonio 2016
VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2017
Requirements Discussion
HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
VHTL6 Tutorial (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
On High Efficiency WLAN (HEW) TG PAR Scope
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
How to Describe ax Functional Requirements
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 Slide 2 Abstract This submission provides comments in response to the Chair’s proposed edits (11-13/1410r3) to the original draft HEW PAR text (11-13/1410r1) –Clarifications –Additions –Rationale William Carney, SONY

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission Proposed “Scope” (5.2b) This amendment defines standardized modifications to both the physical layers (PHY) and the Medium Access Control Layer (MAC) that enable modes of operation capable of supporting at least two (2) times improvements in the average throughput per station (measured at the MAC data service access point) in dense indoor, and pedestrian-speed outdoor, and dense deployment scenarios. The new standard operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency bands. below 6 GHz carrier frequency while ensuring The new amendment shall include a mode of operation ensuring backward compatibility and coexistence with legacy IEEE devices in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz unlicensed bands operating in the same bands. January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 3 2X is not a significant improvement compared with previous MAC/PHY enhancements nor is it adequate, given network traffic forecasts. Not all outdoor environments will have pedestrian speed characteristics (stadium). Interoperability with non-OFDM modes will unnecessarily burden HEW networks and hinder efficiency enhancements.

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission Perspective on Improvement Metric Estimations of network traffic, for example Cisco VNI, show approximately 4x increase between 2014 – 2017 for mobile data [1] Comparing ac (2013) with HEW (2020 in wide deployments), traffic will have increased at least 10x With congested and dense scenarios being identified as a weak spot for WLAN, major capacity improvements are justified In addition, project proposals for 5G are considering 1,000x as the new targets for parameters of throughput, latency, etc. HEW proposed requirements of only 2x or 4x are insufficient and underwhelming since 5G and HEW will release in a similar timeframe January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 4 ~4X

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission Proposed “Scope” (5.2b) (Suggested Changes) This amendment defines standardized modifications to both the physical layers (PHY) and the Medium Access Control Layer (MAC) that enable modes of operation capable of supporting at least ten (10) times improvements in the average throughput per station (measured at the MAC data service access point) in dense indoor, and both dense stationary and pedestrian-speed outdoor, and dense deployment scenarios. The new standard operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency bands. below 6 GHz carrier frequency while ensuring The new amendment shall include a mode of operation ensuring backward compatibility and coexistence with legacy OFDM IEEE devices in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz unlicensed bands operating in the same bands. January 2014 Slide 5William Carney, SONY

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission Proposed “Need for the Project” (5.5) WLAN devices are currently being been deployed in diverse environments scenarios. These environments are characterized by the existence of many access points and many stations in a geographically limited areas. Increased interference from neighbouring devices gives rise to performance degradation. Additionally WLAN devices are increasingly required to support a variety of applications such as video, cloud access, and offloading. With the real-time performance requirements of some of these application, WLAN users demand improved reliability in delivering their applications. Unlike previous amendments where the focus was on improving aggregate throughput, this amendment will focus on improving metrics that are affecting user experience, such as average per station throughput, the 5 th percentile of per station throughput, and area throughput. Previous amendments have focused on increasing peak rates and have shown modes of operation capable of supporting several Gbps rates. This project will focus on the need for efficiency improvements in high density deployments. In addition, Improvements will be made to support environments such as wireless corporate office, outdoor hotspot, dense residential apartments, or stadiums. Improvements will target increasing the area throughput and/or average throughput per station. Quality of experience for the user will be addressed by improving the minimum average data rate, or maximum connection setup delay, or maximum packet transmission delay. January 2014 Slide 6 Video traffic will dominate HEW networks, yet this text does not adequately represent this highly significant factor. With video traffic dominating HEW networks, metric(s) appropriate to demonstrating such improvements to the efficiency of this traffic type are important. William Carney, SONY

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission Proposed “Need for the Project” (5.5) (Suggested Changes) WLAN devices are currently being been deployed in diverse environments scenarios. These environments are characterized by the existence of many access points and many stations in a geographically limited areas. Increased interference from neighbouring devices gives rise to performance degradation. Additionally WLAN devices are increasingly required to support a variety of applications such as video, cloud access, and offloading. In particular, video traffic is expected to dominate HEW networks in all modes of use. With the real-time performance requirements of some of these application, WLAN users demand improved reliability in delivering their applications. Unlike previous amendments where the focus was on improving aggregate throughput, This amendment will focus on improving metrics that are affecting user experience, such as average per station throughput, the 5 th percentile of per station throughput, Video traffic QoS and area throughput. Previous amendments have focused on increasing peak rates and have shown modes of operation capable of supporting several Gbps rates. This project will focus on the need for efficiency improvements in high density deployments. In addition, Improvements will be made to support environments such as wireless corporate office, outdoor hotspot, dense residential apartments, or stadiums. Improvements will target increasing the area throughput and/or average throughput per station. Quality of experience for the user will be addressed by improving the minimum average data rate, or maximum connection setup delay, or maximum packet transmission delay. January 2014 Slide 7William Carney, SONY

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission Proposed Explanatory Notes (8.1)- cntd These scenarios highlight three categories of objectives to improve WLAN efficiency in WLANs: –Significantly increase airtime usage efficiency Efficient use of spectrum resources in scenarios with a high density of STAs per BSS. –Significantly Increase spectral reuse and manage interference between neighboring OBSS in scenarios with a high density of both STAs and BSSs, in cases where they may or may not share the same management entity –Increased robustness to outdoor propagation characteristics and increase uplink transmission reliability The metrics will directly correspond to the user experience in the identified scenarios, including overall throughputs, distribution of throughputs (e.g. 5th percentile of user throughput CDF), and satisfaction of packet delay and latency/jitter/packet loss constraints requirements of applications. This amendment may include the capability to handle multiple simultaneous communications in both the spatial and frequency domains, in both the UL and DL. This amendment may include modes of operation that improve the power consumption of battery- operated devices. January 2014 Slide 8 The tradeoff between power efficiency and performance needs to be clarified. William Carney, SONY

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission Proposed Explanatory Notes (8.1)- cntd (Suggested Changes) These scenarios highlight three categories of objectives to improve WLAN efficiency in WLANs: –Significantly increase airtime usage efficiency Efficient use of spectrum resources in scenarios with a high density of STAs per BSS. –Significantly Increase spectral reuse and manage interference between neighboring OBSS in scenarios with a high density of both STAs and BSSs, in cases where they may or may not share the same management entity –Increased robustness to outdoor propagation characteristics and increase uplink transmission reliability The metrics will directly correspond to the user experience in the identified scenarios, including overall throughputs, distribution of throughputs (e.g. 5th percentile of user throughput CDF), and satisfaction of packet delay and latency/jitter/packet loss constraints requirements of applications. This amendment may include the capability to handle multiple simultaneous communications in both the spatial and frequency domains, in both the UL and DL. This amendment may include modes of operation that improve the power consumption of battery- operated devices without causing significant degradation to data throughput. January 2014 Slide 9William Carney, SONY

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission Potential Straw Polls Do you support 4x replacing 2x in draft PAR text? January 2014 Osama Aboul-Magd, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 10

doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission References [1] Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2012–2017 January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 11