Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD 2001-02.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

I I. B.- T R E A T M E N T P L A N: DOCETAXEL 75 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 THORACIC RT (66 Gys: 180 cGy/d) CISPLATIN 40 mg/m2 Days E V A L U A.
CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
A pooled analysis of the final results of the two randomized phase II studies comparing Gemcitabine (G) vs Gemcitabine + Docetaxel (G+D) in patients (pts)
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Vascular issues associated with bevacizumab Stuart M. Lichtman, MD, FACP 65+ Clinical Geriatric Program Associate Attending Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in elderly and/or frail patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: MRC trial FOCUS2 M. T. Seymour 1, T. S. Maughan 2, H.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC.
ESMO/ECCO Presidential Session III
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
The treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anal canal: A single institution experience P. Pathak, B. King, A. Ohinata, P. Das, C.H.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Shows Superior Efficacy in Comparison to Bendamustine.
EORTC Tumor response to pre-operative chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFOX-4 for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM) Interim results of the EORTC.
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Charles D. Blanke, M.D., F.A.C.P. OHSU Cancer Institute Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: What to Use (or not), How to Prevent Toxicity (or not) and Whom to.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
EMR Optimal dose of cetuximab given every 2 weeks (q2w): a phase I pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of weekly (q1w) and q2w.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
ABRAMYO Phase I-II study of weekly nab paclitaxel in combination with liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin in patients with HER2 negative MBC Alessandra.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Presentation transcript:

Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD trial. Results of a planned interim analysis. E Mitry, JM Phelip, F Bonnetain, S Lavau Denes, X Adhoute, M Gasmi, JL Jouve, F Khemissa, T Lecomte, T Aparicio

Introduction (1) CRC is a disease of elderly –Median age at diagnosis: 73 years (SEER) A Public Health problem –US population ≥65 y. : x2 in 2030 –Suboptimal management –No improvement in survival

Introduction (2) Palliative CT in elderly –Standard regimens not prospectively validated –Subgroup analyses, phase II trials suggest feasibility in fit elderly Which optimal regimen in 1 st line ? –Tolerance/Efficacy –Combination with IRI/OXA or 5FU only ?

Study design R1 mCRC ≥ 75 years Stratification criteria Center Charlson index (0 vs 1-2 vs 3+) Karnofsky index (100 vs vs 70-60) Previous adjuvant CT Sex Age (< 80 vs.  80 yrs) Alkaline phosphatases (≤ 2N vs. > 2N) LV5FU2 R2 0 IRINOTECAN LV5FU2s

Study design LV5FU2s FOLFIRI LV5FU2-IRI LV5FU2 5FU arm IRI arm LV 200 mg/m² D1+2 5FU 400 mg/m² IV bolus D1+2 5FU 600 mg/m² 22h infusion D1+2 LV 400 mg/m² D1 5FU 400 mg/m² IV bolus D1 5FU 2400 mg/m² 46h infusion D1-2 LV5FU2s Irinotecan IV 90mn D1 LV5FU2 Irinotecan IV 90mn D1 Irinotecan mg/m² for C1 and C mg/m² ≥ C3 if toxicity ≤ grade 2 (except. alopecia)

Main inclusion criteria Histologically confirmed unresectable mCRC Age ≥75 years Karnofsky index ≥60 Estimated life expectancy > 6 months ≥ 1 bi-dimensionally measurable lesion (RECIST) No previous CT for metastatic disease Adjuvant therapy allowed if stopped at least months before randomization Adequate organ and bone marrow function Creatinin clearance ≥ 45 ml/mn (Cockroft) Signed informed consent

Study endpoints Primary endpoint –Progression-free survival 5FU arm vs IRI arm as assessed by blinded independent review events : progression or death

Study endpoints Secondary endpoints –Objective response rate (independently reviewed) –Overall survival (events: deaths all causes) –Quality of life (Spitzer scale) –Geriatric assessment (IADL, Mini Mental State Examination, Geriatric Depression Scale) –Safety –Comparison of simplified vs. non simplified regimen

Statistical considerations Assumption for sample size calculation –240 progressions or deaths (282 pts) –increase of median PFS from 5.5 to 8 months in the IRI arm, HR 0.70 –bilateral 5% type I error, 80% power Planned interim analysis –After inclusion of 140 pts with ≥ 8 weeks of follow-up –Tolerance and response (investigators) –Only descriptive, no statistical comparisons –IDMC

Population 06/2003 – 12/2007 : –209 pts included Interim analysis 08/2007 –166 pts included –142 pts with ≥ 8 weeks of follow-up

Baseline characteristics (1) 5FUIRI n7567 Median age years [range] 79 [74-90]80 [75-91] Age group (%) <80 yrs5251 ≥80 yrs4849 Gender (%) Male/Female53/4751/49 Karnofsky index (%) 100/80-90/60-70/missing19/51/29/110/61/25/3 Charlson index (%) 0/1-2/3+/missing48/43/7/363/33/3/1

Baseline characteristics (2) 5FU IRI Alkaline Phosphatases (%) ≤ 2N / > 2N88/1285/15 Adjuvant CT (%) 176 Metastatic sites (%) Liver7784 Lung3946 Distant lymph nodes2724 Peritoneum1518

Administration All pts received at least one cycle (%) 5FUIRI Bolus 5FU8167 Continuous 5FU8087 Irinotecan-87 Pts with ≥75% of the planned CT dose during cycles 1 to 4

Deaths 81 deaths –5FU: 43 (57% of pts) –IRI: 38 (57% of pts) Causes of death –Progression 5FU: 37/43 (86%) IRI: 33/38 (87%) –2 toxic deaths 60d mortality rate: 12.7%

Toxicity (1) (%) All gradesGrade 3-4 5FUIRI5FUIRI Any Anemia Neutropenia Febrile neutropenia1919 Maximal toxicities by patient observed during cycles 1 to 4

Toxicity (2) (%) All gradesGrade 3-4 5FUIRI5FUIRI Nausea Vomiting Diarrhea Thromboembolic event1313 Asthenia Mucositis Myocardial infarction1010 Maximal toxicities by patient observed during cycles 1 to 4

Tumoral response As estimated by investigators RECIST criteria Best observed response after 1 st or 2 nd evaluation (%) 5FUIRI CR11 PR1730 SD5157 PD259 NE

Conclusion Preliminary and descriptive A phase III trial specific to elderly patients with mCRC is feasible Results suggest that patients aged of 75+ years can be treated with standard CT regimens with manageable toxicity

Introduction (3) « The major challenge in caring for older adults with cancer rests with the lack of data from prospective clinical trials » « incorporation of a geriatric assessment in oncology clinical trials » JCO December , editorial from Arti Hurria

Serious adverse events –During treatment or < 30 days after the end of treatment –Results in death –Is immediatly life threatening –Requires hospitalisation or prologation of existing hospitalisation –Results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity

Serious adverse events 68 SAE among 54 pts All5FUIRI SAE Death 1486 Not related752 Unlikely related202 Possibly related220 Related21 *1° ND101 * Febrile neutropenia, ° severe diarrhea