Muon Catalyzed Fusion (µCF) K. Ishida (RIKEN) Principle of µCF Topics D2/T2 α-sticking, dtµ formation T2tt-fusion, He accumulation µCF with high intensity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the ECEC candidate daughter 112 Cd P.E. Garrett University of Guelph TRIUMF Excellence Cluster “Universe”, Technische Universität München.
Advertisements

Γ spectroscopy of neutron-rich 95,96 Rb nuclei by the incomplete fusion reaction of 94 Kr on 7 Li Simone Bottoni University of Milan Mini Workshop 1°-
Radiation Detectors / Particle Detectors
First measurement of kaonic hydrogen and nitrogen X-rays at DA  NE J. Zmeskal Institute for Medium Energy Physics, Vienna for the DEAR Collaboration LNF.
Einstein’s Energy Mass Equivalence Powers the Sun!
LCLS Atomic Physics with Intense X-rays at LCLS Philip H. Bucksbaum, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Roger Falcone, University of California, Berkeley,
Alpha decay parent nucleus daughter nucleus Momentum conservation decides how the energy is distributed. r E 30 MeV 5 MeV.
Recent development of a point positive muon source by laser excitation of muonium atoms Introduction Experiment at the RIKEN-RAL Muon facility Future prospect.
4th July, 2002NuFact 2002 Workshop at Imperial College, London Possibility on a point positive muon source for a neutrino factory by laser excitation of.
Nuclear Physics Year 13 Option 2006 Part 2 – Nuclear Fusion.
10-1 CHEM 312 Lecture 10: Part 1 Radiation Reactions: Dosimetry and Hot Atom Chemistry Readings: §Reading: Modern Nuclear Chemistry, Chap. 17; Nuclear.
55. Jahrestagung der ÖPG, September 2005 Pionischer Wasserstoff: Präzisionsmessungen zur starken Wechselwirkung J. Marton Stefan Meyer Institut der ÖAW.
Spectroscopy of Heavy Quarkonia Holger Stöck University of Florida Representing the CLEO Collaboration 6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Frictional Cooling Studies at Columbia University/Nevis Labs Raphael Galea, Allen Caldwell + Stefan Schlenstedt (DESY/Zeuthen) Halina Abramowitz (Tel Aviv.
Experiments in X-Ray Physics Lulu Liu Partner: Pablo Solis Junior Lab 8.13 Lab 1 October 22nd, 2007.
Frictional Cooling MC Collaboration Meeting June 11-12/2003 Raphael Galea.
Particle Interactions
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April.
6-1 RFSS: Lecture 6 Gamma Decay Part 2 Readings: Modern Nuclear Chemistry, Chap. 9; Nuclear and Radiochemistry, Chapter 3 Energetics Decay Types Transition.
Radiology is concerned with the application of radiation to the human body for diagnostically and therapeutically purposes. This requires an understanding.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Muon Catalyzed Fusion (µCF) - Recent progress and future plan K. Ishida (RIKEN) Introduction dd  formation: wider range of temperature, phase and ortho/para.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Radiation Sources Heavy nuclei are unstable against spontaneous emission.
How cold is cold fusion? Janne Wallenius Associate professor Department of Reactor Physics Royal Institute of Technology.
HYP03 Future Hypernuclear Program at Jlab Hall C Satoshi N. Nakamura Tohoku University 18 th Oct 2003, JLab.
NuFact04 July26-August 1, 2004 Osaka University, Osaka, Japan Columbia University & the Max-Planck-Institute Review & Status of Frictional Cooling A. Caldwell,
WG4 Summary -Intense Muon Physics- Conveners Y. Semertzdis (BNL), M. Grassi (Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN) summary-1 for muon applications by K. Ishida.
Welcome to the CHARMS See – Tea Sunday, October 11, 2015 Release of Light Alkalis (Li, Na, K) From ISOLDE Targets Strahinja Lukić,
Moriond QCD, Mar., 2007, S.Uehara 1 New Results on Two-Photon Physics from Belle S.Uehara (KEK) for the Belle Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond, QCD.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Radiation Nonionizing Ionizing
Study of hadron properties in cold nuclear matter with HADES Pavel Tlustý, Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež, Czech Republic for the HADES Collaboration ,
Light and Matter Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 6.
Omega meson in nucleus, experimental study K. Ozawa (Univ. of Tokyo)
abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1 ]  70% transmission SIS – FRS  ε trans transmission.
Nuclear Medicine 4103 Section I Basic Chemistry. Structure of The Atom Nucleus: contains Protons (+) and Neutrons (0) Electron (-) orbiting the nucleus.
International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion June 2004 Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University “Stopping.
Polarized Proton Solid Target for RI beam experiments M. Hatano University of Tokyo H. Sakai University of Tokyo T. Uesaka CNS, University of Tokyo S.
1 Alpha Decay  Because the binding energy of the alpha particle is so large (28.3 MeV), it is often energetically favorable for a heavy nucleus to emit.
Possible calibration methods for the final LXe calorimeter A. Papa 01/20/2004.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
1 Beam and Target Issues Chris Booth 5 th May 2004.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electron pick-up. ~1/E What about fission fragments????? Bragg curve stochastic energy.
Radiation Detectors In particular, Silicon Microstrip Detectors by Dr. Darrel Smith.
Status Report of the LISOL Laser Ion Source Yu.Kudryavtsev, T.Cocolios, M.Facina, J.Gentens, M.Huyse, O.Ivanov, D.Pauwels, M.Sawicka, P.Van den Bergh,
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Determining Radiation Intensity
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
FLAIR meeting, GSI March Positron Ring for Antihydrogen Production A.Sidorin for LEPTA collaboration JINR, Dubna.
A.Yu. Chirkov1), S.V. Ryzhkov1), P.A. Bagryansky2), A.V. Anikeev2)
Study of Light  -Hypernuclei by Spectroscopy of Two Body Weak Decay Pions Liguang Tang Department of Physics, Hampton University Jefferson National Laboratory.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.
INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER. twCshttp:// twCs
Lecture 28 Nuclear Energy Chapter 30.1  30.3 Outline Controlled Fission Reaction Fusion in Stars.
Univ. Tokyo & RIKEN Y. Yamazaki 2008/7/17 EMMI kick-off
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Past Fermilab Accumulator Experiments Antiproton Source Accumulator Ring (Inner Ring) Debuncher Ring (Outer Ring) AP50 Experiment Area PRECISION Precision.
Reinhard Kulessa1 Polish-German Meeting on the New International Accelerator Facility at Darmstadt Present Polish-German Collaborations at GSI.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
(on behalf of SIDDHARTA-2 collaboration)
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Outside the nucleus, the beta decay {image} will not occur because the neutron and electron have more total mass than the proton. This process can occur.
Experimental Particle Physics
Status of CCD Vertex Detector R&D for GLC
Presentation transcript:

Muon Catalyzed Fusion (µCF) K. Ishida (RIKEN) Principle of µCF Topics D2/T2 α-sticking, dtµ formation T2tt-fusion, He accumulation µCF with high intensity muon beams in collaboration with K. Nagamine 1,2 *, T. Matsuzaki 1, S. Nakamura 1 **, N. Kawamura 1 *, Y. Matsuda 1, A. Toyoda 3*, H. Imao 3, M. Kato 4, H. Sugai 4, M. Tanase 4, K. Kudo 5, N. Takeda 5, G.H. Eaton 6 1 RIKEN, 2 KEK, 3 U. Tokyo, 4 JAERI, 5 AIST, 6 RAL present address *KEK, **U. Tohoku NuFact02 4 July 2002 Imperial College, London

Principle of Muon Catalyzed Fusion (µCF) 1. Muon injected in D 2 +T 2 mixture behaving like heavy electron 2.Coulomb barrier shrinks in small dtµ molecule (nuclear distance ~ 1/200 of DT molecule) 3.Muon released after d-t fusion and find another d-t pair to fuse →Muon working as catalyst of d-t fusion

µCF (Motivation) Exotic atoms and molecules atomic physics in small scale rich in few body problems dt fusion and alpha-sticking dtµ levels and formation atomic collisions, muon transfer cooperation between experiment and theory ~40%:60% in µCF01 Conference Prospect for applications (fusion neutron source, fusion energy) muon production cost (~5 GeV) vs fusion output (17.6 MeV x 200?) very close to breakeven

Maximizing µCF Cycle Observables (1) Cycling rate c ( ↑ ) (vs 0: muon life) rate for completing one cycle dtµ formation tµ + D2 →[(dtµ)dee] (2) Muon loss W (↓ ) muon loss per cycle muon sticking to  -particle is the main loss Number of fusion per muon Yn = φλc/λn = 1/ [(λ 0 /φλ c )+W] ( ↑ )

Present status of µCF understanding dtµ molecule formation unexpectedly high dtµ formation rate (10 9 /s) was understood by Vesman mechanism of resonant molecular formation still many surprises density dependence low temperature & solid state effect

Present status of µCF understanding  Sticking probability main source of muon loss from µCF cycle discrepancy between theory and experiments  n free muon (~10keV) initial sticking:  thermalized  effective sticking:  s =(1-R)  s 0 reactivation 3.5MeV 14.1MeV  -  - R~0.35  s 0 ~0.9%  s 0 : Theory  s : Theory

Muon to alpha sticking and X-rays Main loss process of muons W = ω s +... Ultimate obstacle for µCF ( Yn < 1/ω s ) Previous experiments: determine W from fusion neutron and subtract possible other losses Final Sticking ( ← neutron yield )  s = (1-R)  s 0 Initial sticking  s 0 ← dt-fusion in dt  Reactivation R ←  (3.5MeV) atomic process X-ray measurement Y(K  ) =  Ka  s 0, Y(K  ) =  K   s 0 Direct measurement of initial sticking  s 0  excited states and its time evolvement ( K  /K  ratio, Doppler width)

µCF at RIKEN-RAL Muon Facility RIKEN-RAL Muon at ISIS (1994~) Intense pulsed muon beam (70ns width, 50 Hz) 800MeV x 200µA proton 20~150MeV/c µ + /µ - muon 10 5 µ - /s (55MeV/c) µCF experiment Proton beam line µSR Slow µ µA* etc

µ CF Experiment at RIKEN-RAL Use of strong pulsed muon beam Tritium handling facility Detectors with calibration (fusion neutrons, X-rays) Stopping muon number( µ e decay and µ Be X-ray) Determine basic parameters and find the condition for improving efficiency λc, W, X-ray emission → α sticking probability and other loss processes reaction rates (dt µ formation rate, muon transfer etc)

Muon to alpha sticking Observation of x-rays from  sticking under huge bremsstrahlung b.g. with intense pulsed muon beam at RIKEN-RAL Y(K  ),Y(K  ):  x-ray per fusion

Measure neutron (effective sticking) and αμX-ray (initial sticking) in the same experiment

Result of X-ray and neutron measurement M. Kamimura (EXAT98)  s 0 Increased Ionization PSI-87 PSI-84 LAMPF-92 PSI (Ct=0.04%) RIKEN-RAL Theories ~’88 Effective sticking  s (0.52%) < theoretical calculations (0.60%) X-ray yield Y x (Ka) (0.27%) ~ calc.

 -stiking Understanding the result (1) ionization from n ≧ 3 are much faster than radiative transition or (2) initial sticking to n ≧ 3 only is anomalously smaller (???) next step improving sticking x-ray data from dd  [PSI], tt  [RIKEN] to compare reactivation effect Excita- tion Deexcita- tion Ionization 1S n=3 n>3 Initial Sticking   K   s % 0.10% 0.03% 2p 2s 0.09%  K  Effective Sticking effective sticking  s =0.52 % < calc 0.6 %  X-ray Y x (Ka) 0.27 % ~ calc Y(K  )/ Y(K  ) =7+-1% <<calc(12%)

Muon transfer to helium-3 (Another important loss process) (x 3 Heµ)* (X=p,d,t) molecule formation (xµ) + He -> (xHeµ) theoretically predicted [Popov, Kravtsov] first observed in D He [KEK 1987] then also in D He [KEK 1989] and T He [RIKEN 1996] formation rates radiative & non-rad decay [Kamimura, KEK/RIKEN] fusion in d 3 He  (Dubnaa, PSI)  t µ

µCF in pure T 2 1) tt-fusion at very low energy t + t →α+n+n(Q=14MeV) one neutron carries more energy than statistical dist. strong  correlation ( 5 He resonance state) 2) t 3 Heµ decay mode etc radiative decay branch (competition with particle decay) ~20% d 3 Heµ ~50% d 4 Heµ >90% t 3 Heµ 3) sticking from ttµ fusion t 3 Heµ 

dt µ, dd µ formation (Nonequilibrium and ortho/paraeffect) Effect of D 2, DT, T 2 molecular composition in dtµ-formation tµ + D 2 -> [(dtµ)dee] tµ + DT -> [(dtµ)tee] D 2 + T 2 ⇄ 2DT proceeds gradually (~56 hours at 20K) after D+T mixture gradual decrease of fusion neutron yield λ dtµ 0,D2 / 2 = 208 µs -1 psi) λ dtµ 0,DT = 94 µs -1 psi) (preliminary!) Ortho-para effect ( at RAL & TRIUMF ) [Toyoda, Ishida, Nagamine] Ortho D2 (J=0,2,..) & normal D2 (ortho:para=2:1) dµ + D 2 -> [(ddµ)dee] fusion proton Ortho vs normal: 15~30% reduction in ddµ formation first indication of ortho-para effect Opposite to a simple theory based on gas model λc D2+T2 D2+T2+DT p d µ E1(ΔE) E2(E-ΔE)

µCF by other groups PSI strongest muon beam fusion neutron, ion chamber, X, ,... TRIUMF thin solid layer target, energetic dµ, tµ Dubna fusion neutron, high temperature, high pressure, H/D/T mixture LAMPF fusion neutron, high temperature, high pressure

µCF and exotic atoms Conferences International Conference on  CF April, 2001 (Shimoda, Japan) was hosted by RIKEN ~100 participants following Tokyo (1986), Leningrad(1987), Florida(1988), Oxford(1989), Wien(1990), Uppsala (1993), Dubna (1995), Ascona (1998) there will be EXA02 in Wien in Nov

µCF with High Intensity Muon Beam 1) Measurement and control of µCF with expanded target condition ( dtµ formation,  sticking) high temperature, high density D/T target naturally more µ CF expected plasma (reducing dE/dx) atomic and molecular states (vibrational & rotational levels by laser, ortho-para)

µCF with High Intensity Muon Beam 2) Precise measurement of X-rays with improvement of beam, detectors, and target system 1) X-ray intensity ratio (  L) transition between levels 2) Doppler shift αμ velocity ( dE/dx ) 3) 2keV d µ, t µ K  X-rays q1s problem, radiationless transition Detectors : pileup → segmentaiton (Ge ball, Strip Si) 、 flash ADC energy resolution →diffraction spectrometer, calorimeter low energy ( 2keV ) →thin window ( or solid layer ) Intense muon beam sharp and monochromatic beam -> good S/N ratio  

MuCF with High Intensity Muon Beam 3) exotic (  ) + beam extraction and interaction For systematic study of atomic process and stopping power (dE/dx) to solve  sticking mystery Atomic collision of (  ) + was estimated only by scaling from normal atomic collision or purely by theoretical calculation we can measure reactivation 、 excitations (X-rays) Estimation of (  ) + beam yield at RIKEN-RAL 1000  stop in (5cm x 5cm x 4 mg/cm 2 ) X 20 fusion/  (?) X 0.01 (sticking) X 0.01 (spectrometer) = 2 /sec (  ) + of 3.5MeV energy

Exotic beams with µCF 4) applications of µCF keV µ- beam extract 10keV µ - released after dt-fusion [K. Nagamine, P. Strasser] keV µ - collector incoming muons solid D/T

µCF with High Intensity Muon Beam 5) Applications of µCF Intense fusion neutron source MUCATEX-ENEA design d beam production target D-T target irradiated materials

µCF with High Intensity Muon Beam 6) µCF for power generation [K. Nagamine]

Summary with High Intensity Muon Source further understanding of basic processes precise X-ray measurement towards break-even with extreme target conditions more exotic beams (  µ beam, slow µ - etc) generation of fusion neutrons & power