LINC Principal Preparation Program Continuous Improvement Process Symposium May 27, 2014 Parke Hotel, Bloomington, Illinois.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
Elementary School Counselor
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Illinois Principal Preparation Program Internship Assessment Rubric
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
E-RDG 598\698 Portfolio Let’s Begin Department of Reading and Language Arts Program Portfolio Central Connecticut State University Name: Date Submitted:
Teacher Performance Assessment
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
E-Program Portfolio Let’s Begin Department of Reading and Language Arts Program Portfolio Central Connecticut State University Name: Date Submitted: Program.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. 6 leadership standards what are they? 3 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders.
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.
PLC & RTI Tammy Rasmussen Southern Oregon RTI Dean Richards Oregon RTI.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
EDAD 5389 Domains and Competencies. Domain I—School Community Leadership Domain II—Instructional Leadership Domain III—Administrative Leadership.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Olympia High School.  “The question confronting most schools and districts is not, ‘What do we need to know in order to improve?’ but rather, ‘Will we.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Child Development Parent Training Jessica Amezcua-Gallegos.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Program Learning Outcomes
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Targeted District Review Report
D:\Student Guide Booklet fall 2008.doc
Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Administrators Leadership and Vision.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
February 21-22, 2018.
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

LINC Principal Preparation Program Continuous Improvement Process Symposium May 27, 2014 Parke Hotel, Bloomington, Illinois

Developing Program Cohesion Among Program Faculty Dr. Alison Reeves Assistant Professor and Program Director Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

Increased Collaboration Working group Comprised of all the faculty who teach in the principal preparation program Revised original curriculum maps for non-internship courses Monitors short term goals Review of course syllabi, assignments, and assessments

The Process PLC Model School Reform Initiative and National School Reform Faculty Protocols

An Example of Protocol in Use Tuning Protocol EDAD 535a Curriculum Leadership: Theory and Research RtI Self-Assessment Assignment (SAPSI-Building Version)

Feedback Students need to be more critical Students’ use of evidence would make assignment more robust Goal or objective seems muddy. Program evaluation or knowledge of RtI?

Action Steps for Continuous Improvement Consider moving project to the internship Limit the scope, limit what they evaluate, limit what they analyze and comment on Consider how much program evaluation will be taught in this class vs. a different class (EDAD 530a, Data-driven Decision Making and Accountability: Theory and Research)

Individualized Candidate Development Plans Dr. Vicki VanTuyle Assistant Professor Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

Principal Preparation Program Admission Portfolio Purpose Admission Candidate Development

Required Admission Portfolio Aligned to ISLLC Standards in which State requirements were embedded Assessed based on Summary Statement and Artifacts Exceeds, Meets, Does Not Meet with point range

Admission Portfolio Prompt What evidence demonstrates your understanding of… ISLLC #1 …ability to facilitate the development articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by stakeholders?

Admission Portfolio Prompt What evidence demonstrates your understanding of… ISLLC #2 …ability to advocate nurture, sustain a culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth …support for all students achieving high standards of learning? …accomplished classroom instruction, which shall include data evidencing two years of student growth and learning within the last five years? …analytic abilities needed to collect and analyze data for student improvement? …knowledge of curriculum and instructional practice?

Portfolio Assessment o Criteria o Comments o Points o In preparing portfolios, students are asked to submit a Summary Statement and Artifacts. The Summary Statement answers the prompt associated with each criterion. Each prompt begins with “What evidence can you supply and explain that demonstrates your… o ISLLC Standard 1 o …ability to facilitate the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all stakeholders?

Moving to Developmental Assessment At what point in our program has this student demonstrated having the knowledge and dispositions to perform these activities and display a level of performance that is emergent, developing, or accomplished? EmergentDevelopingAccomplished Standard or RequirementTarget Course What do we need to see? Target Course What do we need to see? Target Course What do we need to see? Analytic abilities needed to collect and analyze data for student improvement EDAD 500EDAD 535aEDAD 535 b

From Pages in a Binder to Electronic Portfolios on Blackboard to Taskstream Student Data