SEVEN RTI FOUNDATIONS MAMLE Fall 2011 Conference Heidi McGinley, RtI Support System Project Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Winchester School District In Need of Improvement Plan DINI Team: Mel Harrison, Valerie Wilber, Hannah Gagnon, Dee Salonen, Amanda Nordberg, Jane Cardinale,
Developing, Implementing, and Monitoring Interventions Janice Garland Lynn Sodat OSI Focus Schools Conference September 17-18, 2012.
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Why RTI? Understanding Response to Intervention Prepared by Liz Angoff, PhD Response to Intervention Coordinator Oakland Unified School District
RTI & THE MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE MAMLE Fall 2011 Conference Heidi McGinley, RtI Support System Project Director.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development October 9, 2009.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention By: Angelique Gunderson.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Speech Interventions. Universal Screenings Articulation –All Pre-K and K students will be screened by the Speech Therapists –Students in grades 1-4 may.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
California Mini-CorpsOctober 10, Writing SMART Goals In order to become a team – a group of people working interdependently to achieve a common.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
Principal’s Forecast Tangipahoa Parish School System Leadership Focus Strategy June 2015 Gary T. Porter.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Secondary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. RtI Coordinator November 13, 2013.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Elementary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. RtI Coordinator October 30, 2013.
MAISA Annual Conference June 21, 2012  Leadership and vision  Focused and intentional action  Knowledge and capacity building  Accountable for student.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Response to Instruction & Intervention Training Banning High School RtI2.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
District/School Alignment Plan Proposal. Academic Goal 1: Plaucheville Elementary School will meet the Fundamental Practice Level or above in the.
Response To Intervention Framework Greg Frederick 6/4/2011.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.
Medford Public School District Math Intervention Program Elementary Level K-4.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Delta Math Administrator Updates Research Base Tier 1 Screening Recommendation 2015/16 Support
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Scientifically Researched-Based Interventions (SRBI)
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Language Arts/Reading & Math Curriculum Plan Kindergarten Through Sixth Grade School Year Involved Departments: Elementary Curriculum Federal.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Response to Intervention & Positive Behavioral Intervention & Support
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Bixby North Elementary
Ahoskie Elementary School
Response to Intervention
Understanding Student Achievement and Tiered Supports
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
Response to Intervention
English Language Arts Program Update
RTI: Response To Instruction
Response To Instruction
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012
Colchester Public Schools
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
The Literacy Model and Intervention: Bridging the Gap
Student Support Team Process – Pre-CSE Referral
Ahoskie Elementary School
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

SEVEN RTI FOUNDATIONS MAMLE Fall 2011 Conference Heidi McGinley, RtI Support System Project Director

OUTCOMES: 1.Be aware of a simple framework for RtI. 2.Explore models for middle level RtI.

RISS DISTRICTS Two demonstration/pilot RSU’s (RSU 10 and RSU 38):  8 elementary schools  3 high schools  3 middle schools  school August 2009 – June 2011

THE GOAL The goal of a Response to Intervention system is ensuring that 80% of students meet grade level standards and benchmarks in their regular classrooms (Tier 1 Core Program). AND Struggling students receive increasingly more intensive support both in and outside their classrooms.

THE CORE PROGRAM “A school that has significantly less than 75% of its students at or above grade level proficiency has a core program problem, not an intervention problem.” --- Buffum, Mattos, and Weber. Pyramid Response to Intervention. 2009

SEVEN RTI FOUNDATIONS 1.Ensure leadership, structure, coordination, and continuous improvement. 2.Know what all students need to know and be able to do and how well. 3. Use assessment data. 4. Target interventions (evidence-based strategies and programs). 5. Track response to the intervention (progress monitoring). 6. Strengthen the core program. 7. Build shared responsibility.

MIDDLE LEVEL RTI MODELS ONE school: interventionists and ed. techs. for students referred by individual teachers ONE school: Classroom teachers take turns staffing an intervention period for students referred by teams and individual teachers TWO schools: Whole school approach -- “Enrichment” period for all students at least 3 times per week provided by all content area teachers

WHOLE SCHOOL MODELS  When many students need additional support.  Universal screening may not be enough.  Requires a school coordinator.  Is not “cast in stone”.  Significant student achievement increases for many students.  Changes classroom practice.