Overview of the Current Threats and Water Protection Efforts in the Region Presented by Dr. Jon F. Bartholic, Director October 26-27, 2009 Pilot House,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protecting Michigans Water Resources James Clift, Michigan Environmental Council October 23, 2008.
Advertisements

Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.
Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Public Health - Always Working for a Safer and Healthier Washington Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Governor’s State Water Law Review Committee Recommendations 1982: Implementation Update David G. Baize Bureau of Water.
0 James Kennedy, Ph.D., P.G. State Geologist Georgia Environmental Protection Division Georgia Comprehensive State-Wide Water Management Plan Assessment.
A PRESENTATION BY: GYNNIE ROBNETT OMB Watch.  Reviews the expansion of natural gas drilling  Examines evidence on health risks of drilling  Lays out.
Restoration of the Rio Grande Between El Paso, Texas and Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua Restoration of the Rio Grande Between El Paso, Texas and Ciudad Juarez,
Environmental Impact Assessment: A Land Use Planning Tool Diane Sherman, Ben Purdy, and Sara Felker Department of Resource Development Introduction Environmental.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Availability, Water Use, and the Great Lakes Compact Jim Nicholas, Director USGS Water Science.
Aligning Methods for Assessing Wetland Ecosystem Services Anthony Dvarskas NOAA Assessment and Restoration Division/IMSG CNREP 2010 New Orleans, LA.
National Freshwater Ecosystem Priority Areas Project (NFEPA)
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
WEBINAR SERIES: March 12: General overview of WHP Planning Process March 19: In depth discussion and review of the Data Elements March 26: Requirements.
State of Michigan. Michigan Legislature
©2002 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Institute of Water Research, Michigan State University Great Lakes Protection Fund Project Restoring.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 26 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
Recommendations.  Use Inventory to serve as a valuable tool to support local, regional and statewide decision makers on issues involving water-dependant.
ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.
Restoring Great Lakes Basin Waters Through the Use of Conservation Credits and an Integrated Water Balance Analysis System Institute of Water Research,
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
The Water Withdrawal Assessment Process Context within regional water policy discussions Context within regional water policy discussions –Aquatic ecosystems.
Wellhead Protection Strategies: Keys to Success Prepared by: Mr. Brian Oram, PG, Licensed Driller, PASEO B.F Environmental Consultants and Wilkes University.
Permits to Take Water: What you need to know.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Sustainability of Ground-Water Use in the San Pedro River Basin, Cochise County, Arizona James Leenhouts,
Rule 62-40, F.A.C. – What is it? The Water Resource Implementation Rule (State Water Policy). Required by Sec , F.S. Goals, objectives and guidance.
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 19 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 10 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography,
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Partnership Demonstrations. ◦ High Impact Targeting of NPS Pollution – GLRI, MSU ◦ Pesticide Drift Registration (“Drift Watch”), Purdue ◦ LID—LTHIA/ Fort.
Upper Colorado River Basin spatial analysis of water demand Olga Wilhelmi Kevin Sampson Jennifer Boehnert Kathleen Miller NCAR, Boulder.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Senate Enrolled Act No. 369 Update Indiana’s Water Shortage Plan.
Water for America Initiative Eric J. Evenson Advisory Committee on Water Information February 20, 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Jack Eggleston and Verne Schneider June 22-23, 2013 Groundwater Science Potential.
Senate Environment & Natural Resources Committee Groundwater Management in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area April 9, 2013 Keith Buttleman Metropolitan.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative December 4, 2009 Dr. Benjamin Tuggle and Steve Guertin Regional Directors,
History and Progress of DEQ’s Mercury Programs Albert E. Hindrichs.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Study For Malad and Bear Rivers Drainages, Box Elder County Bear River Water Conservancy.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jim Nicholas, Center Director USGS Michigan Water Science Center U.S. Department of the Interior.
WHAT COULD IT INCLUDE? JOHN ZAMBRANO JANUARY 28, 2009 A MITIGATION PLAN.
1 Water Resources Management - DEQ’s Role in Water Supply - State Water Commission October 1, 2002.
Drinking Water Source Protection Ministry of the Environment Source Protection Programs Branch March 2010.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection March, 2005 PROTOTYPE FOR SPRING SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS.
NESC – RCAP Smart Water Program August 4, 2008 Review of West Virginia’s Source Water Assessment and Protection Program A State Perspective A State Perspective.
An Improved Model for Risk Management NCSHA Conference 2015 September 28, 2015 Leslie McKnight, Director of Loan Servicing & Asset Management.
Brenda Bateman, Senior Policy Coordinator House Interim Committee on Energy & the Environment Oregon Water Supply & Conservation Initiative Update December.
ASTRA Applied Science and Technology for Reservoir Assessment A research and service program of A research and service program of The Kansas Biological.
South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe Source Protection Region Source Water Protection.
Indicators of Sustainability: A Report on the Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable California Water Plan Sacramento October 22, 2007.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update #7 October 15 – November 15.
State Water Resources Plan October 28, Active monitoring and reporting of water resources Active SWCB Planning Efforts – Watershed plans.
Groundwater related research Dr Shafick Adams 21 July 2010.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Mark Rude Executive Director Southwest Kansas Groundwater Management District No. 3.
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
Integrated Natural Resource Management in the Baikal Basin Transboundary Ecosystem Russian Federation and Mongolia First year budget Dr. Sergey Kudelya.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Wellhead Protection on Tribal Lands
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
Fall Low Level Waste Forum Meeting
Integrated use of numerical models to support water resources decision making in Michigan Thankful to Great Lakes Protection Fund who provided us the.
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Current Threats and Water Protection Efforts in the Region Presented by Dr. Jon F. Bartholic, Director October 26-27, 2009 Pilot House, Discovery World Milwaukee, WI Great Lakes Craft Brewers & Water Conservation

Applying Science to Decision-making Case Study: Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Tool

Topics Great Lakes Compact Process leading to the WWAT Components of the WWAT Slides of the operational system Conclusion and next steps

The Water Withdrawal Assessment Process Oversee the design and development of a “water withdrawal assessment tool” Develop methods, criteria, and definitions for establishing ‘adverse resource impacts’ for streams and lakes. Make recommendations on the policy aspects of the model. Adverse Resource Impact Means: Decreasing that part of the flow such that the streams ability to support Characteristic Fish Populations is Functionally Impaired. Groundwater Stream Flow Fish Populations science policy

1. The Withdrawal Model Model needs to know how much water is in the local aquifer Automatically determines where several nearest streams are. –Apportions the withdrawal effect among streams Calculates the likely reduction in flow due to the proposed withdrawal Rain and Snow – Recharge to area

Index Flow Stressful, low flow period

Characteristic Species Remaining Thriving Species Thriving 90% 80% Adverse Resource Impact Determining Impact For New & Expanding Uses GO GO w/local education Site review and conservation Site review & mitigation? Lawsuit?

Water Withdrawal Assessment Tool Conceptual Model System User Retrieve Location Specific Data Withdrawal Information Water Source Pumping Frequency Pumping Capacity Aquifer Type Input Information Real-time Modeling ABCD Adverse Resource Impact Zones Registration Administrative Agency Real-time Updates Water Accounting Updated Water Availability Rerun Model

Next Steps

Water Legislation cont. Senate Bill 860 (as enacted) PUBLIC ACT 185 of 2008 Require the DEQ, on October 1, 2008, to make available for testing and evaluation an internet- based waterwithdrawal assessment tool. House Bill 4343 (as enacted) PUBLIC ACT 184 of 2008 Require the DEQ to notify certain local entities by if a proposed withdrawal falls into a particular category. Allow the notified entities to form a water resources assessment and education committee in order to assess trends in water use in the withdrawal's vicinity and educate water.

1986-Amendments to the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) 1994-State program was developed by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) & Michigan Department of Public Health (MDPH) Protect Public Water Supply Wells through proactive land-use planning and management Wellhead Protection Program

Delineation

Source Water Protection

High Impact Targeting (HIT) System Use of the High Impact Targeting (HIT) GIS Web-accessible System is demonstrated in the following figures. Over the web, sediment risk maps can be examined and “zeroed” in on to locate high potential sediment delivery sources (fields).

17

Questions & Answers