GVDA-051906 1 NEES Field Facilities: A Resource for Earthquake Engineering (and Seismology) Research and Practice Bob Nigbor UCLA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
Advertisements

Pore-Pressure Generation During CPT Probe Advancement By Michael Fitzgerald.
Direct Evaluation of Effectiveness of Prefabricated Vertical Drains in Liquefiable Sand Wen-Jong Chang, National Chi Nan University Ellen M. Rathje, University.
Mechanical Wave Measurements Electromagnetic Wave Techniques
Advanced Site Monitoring and Characterization of Site Dynamic Properties Mourad Zeghal, Tarek Abdoun and Vicente Mercado Department of Civil and Envir.
Lessons Learned and Need for NEES Instrumented Liquefaction Sites T. Leslie Youd Brigham Young University.
Time-dependent increase in CPT tip resistance following explosive compaction. Time-dependent increase in V s following explosive compaction, as measured.
Neuromuscular Engineering 11 Neuromuscular Engineering & Technology InteliShirt.
Millikan Library Demonstration Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory November 12, 2004 Case Bradford
Recent Enhancements and Research Highlights at the Permanently Instrumented Field Sites Jamison H. Steidl.
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
The Use of Full Flow Penetrometers in an Intermediate Soil; Silt By: Alan Abad & Mark Jones.
Characterization of Glacial Materials Using Seismic Refraction and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves Glenn Larsen Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
Data centres and observablesModern Seismology – Data processing and inversion 1 Data in seismology: networks, instruments, current problems  Seismic networks,
Liquefaction: Behavior Evidence, Prediction, and Prevention.
Mobile Online Intelligent Decision Support System Rick Smith, Dr. Stacey Lyle and Dr. Patrick Michaud-Division of Nearshore Research Conrad Blucher Institute.
UC Davis 1 A NEES Geotechnical Centrifuge Facility at Davis
T24 Wireless Telemetry Advanced Intelligent Instrumentation.
1 Part II: Data Transmission The basics of media, signals, bits, carriers, and modems Fall 2005 Qutaibah Malluhi Computer Science and Engineering Qatar.
4 th NEES Annual MeetingKenneth H. Stokoe, II Washington, DCJune 22, 2006 Collaborative Activities of a NEES Equipment Site: Examples from
Monitoring Structural Response to Earthquakes using Wireless Sensor Networks Judith Mitrani June 18, 2002.
ICS Annual Report Doug Burbank, Director F NEES initiative F Educational projects: Computer animations F Global project base F Researchers become.
Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles 7 NCEEJuly 21-24, 2002 George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake.
Performance University of California, Los Angeles Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance NSF NEES Awardee Meeting September 28, 2001.
RECORDING WATER TABLE DYNAMICS T & D Project No. 1E11EM35 USDA FOREST SERVICE Technology & Development Center 444 East Bonita Avenue San Dimas, CA
SOIL, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Bob Nigbor In 1973, EERI formally initiated the Learning from Earthquakes (LFE) Program. This program, funded by the U.S. National Science.
S. California Real Time GPS Networks
The Use of MASW in the Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential Chih-Ping Lin C-C Chang, I-L Chen, T-S Chang National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan November.
Foundation Flexibility and Damping from Forced Vibration Testing of Field Structure Lisa M. Star Michael J. Givens George Mylonakis Jonathan P. Stewart.
Trends in seismic instrumentation Based on the book Instrumentation in Earthquake Seismology Jens Havskov, Institute of Solid Earth Physics University.
Esci 411, Advanced Exploration Geophysics (Micro)seismicity John Townend EQC Fellow in Seismic Studies
CONSIDERATIONS FOR FUTURE SEISMIC SYSTEMS Bob Nigbor USC.
ABSTRACT provides equipment and personnel for the dynamic monitoring and testing of structures in the field. As we have done in previous earthquakes,
NEESR-SG: High-Fidelity Site Characterization by Experimentation, Field Observation, and Inversion-Based Modeling Dominic Assimaki 2 (Co-PI), Jacobo Bielak.
Work Area 1: Railway foundations / sub-base
High Value Research Sweet Sixteen Maryland State Highway Administration Allison Hardt.
University of Missouri - Columbia
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory Experimental and Micromechanical Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced.
Mr.Santosh Kumar Scientist Web:
Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization
Napa Earthquake - Results Strong shaking in epicentral area, low-level shaking throughout Bay area Recorded strong motion: 340 ground response stations.
© TAFE MECAT 2008 Chapter 6(b) Where & how we take measurements.
Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles CPT Truck and RSA Jonathan P. Stewart, co-PI NSF Site VisitJune.
Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles Project Overview John Wallace, PI NSF Site VisitJune 17-18,
June 21, NEES 4 th Annual Meeting Instrumentation for the NEESR Sand Aging Field Experiment David A. Saftner University of Michigan PhD Student.
Seismic Hazard in the Eastern & Southern Alps: State of the Art and New Challenges S. Parolai / M. Pilz (M. Weber) GFZ-German Research Centre for Geosciences.
Rotation Workshop 2/16/20061 Observational Experience with Rotational Strong Motion Robert Nigbor UCLA.
A NON-TRADITIONAL HIGH PERFORMANCE BROAD-BAND SEISMOMETER PMD/eentec, USA
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,
Wireless monitoring of structures Wireless monitoring of structures Monitoring and numerical modeling of Factor building motions Monitoring and numerical.
Experiment-Based Deployment With the Four Seasons Building Steve Kang Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of California, Los Angeles.
CAP in Earthquake Damage Messaging. Presentation Outline Automated Post-earthquake Building Damage Assessment The GSense system at a glance Architecture.
1 Wind, Thermal, and Earthquake Monitoring of the Watts Towers Initial Results Ertugrul Taciroglu, UCLA Engineering Bob Nigbor, Jackson English,
Buildings That Resist Earthquakes Better Abstract Structural engineers attempt to overcome the issues caused by earthquakes by designing buildings that.
Advanced LIGO UK 1 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Modal testing facility for Advanced LIGO Caroline Cantley University of Glasgow Advanced LIGO SUS Workshop,
1.Accelerometer:Accelerometer in an iPhone. Definition: An accelerometer is a sensor which measures the tilting motion and orientation of a mobile phone.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Instrumentation Symposium 10/9/2010 Nigbor 1 Instrumentation Selection Strategies Robert Nigbor
UNDERWATER WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
The data-logger for STEM Education VinciLab.
U.S.-Taiwan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction
Strong Motion Network in Taiwan
QuakeCoRE Project Update
REF TEK Technology Overview
Requirements, needs, wants:
Vibration based structural damage detection for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure system.
Drilling Technology.
Presentation transcript:

GVDA NEES Field Facilities: A Resource for Earthquake Engineering (and Seismology) Research and Practice Bob Nigbor UCLA

GVDA

3 3D Geotechnical Arrays at 2 permanent field sites in Southern California Soil-Foundation-Structure- Interaction (SFSI) Test Structure  Real earthquake data  Test bed for geotechnical and geophysical methods  Location for active experiments in a well-characterized field setting

GVDA large mobile building shakers Extensive field-deployable instrumentation system CPT truck for research applications  Large-amplitude excitation of structures  Field testing/monitoring of structures  Site characterization and installation of subsurface sensors using CPT

GVDA Large unidirectional shaker

GVDA kip Linear Shaker

GVDA High Performance Mobile Network

GVDA Mobile Command Center  Originally data acquisition trailer 8’ x 16’  Upgraded to self propelled vehicle 2003 Chevy Crew cab 8’ x 15’ van body

GVDA Wireless Network Wireless Backbone Workgroup Access points Sensor stations Data Concentrator

GVDA Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) Truck  Vendor: Hogentogler, Inc.  Site characterization Tip resistance Sleeve resistance Inclination Pore pressure Geophone for shear wave velocity

GVDA Retrievable Subsurface Accelerometer  Insert with CPT truck  Compatible with Q330 data loggers  Retrievable with winch  Silicon Designs MEMS triaxial accelerometer  Downhole signal conditioning to reduce noise contamination  Micro-controller for built in sensor intelligence Drive shoe Probe Triaxial accelerometer Cable

GVDA Q330 RSA Installation

GVDA Shaker RSA Q330 To Command Center Monitoring Concept

GVDA Opportunities  Experimental modal analysis of buildings & other structures  Nonlinear excitation of structures  Verification of computer models of structures  Field verification of response modification devices (active & passive control)  Full-scale SFSI studies  ????

GVDA D Geotechnical Arrays at 2 permanent field sites in Southern California Soil-Foundation-Structure- Interaction (SFSI) Test Structure  Real earthquake data for pure & applied research  Test bed for geotechnical and geophysical methods  Location for active experiments in a well-characterized field setting

GVDA Acknowledgements  Principal Investigators are: Les Youd, BYU Jamie Steidl, UCSB Bob Nigbor, USC  UCSB (led by Jamie Steidl) operates the two sites

GVDA Location of Garner Valley Digital Array (GVDA) and Wildlife Array (WLA)

GVDA GVDA Permanent Array

GVDA GVDA Permanent Surface Array

GVDA Upgraded Instrumentation  24-bit real-time dataloggers (Q330)  On-site data concentrator computer (Antelope ORB)  High-speed wireless data communications via HPWREN  Concrete instrument building (instead of trailer)

GVDA SFSI Test Structure at GVDA 4mx4mx4m 35 tons Structural stiffness~soil stiffness Configurable bracing to modify stiffness Can add mass at roof 10 Hz fixed-base frequency without bracing, 15Hz with Can bolt large shakers from UCLA to roof

GVDA F4: Natural Earthquake Native Soil Water Table 0-3 m Pore Pressure Accelerometer F1 F2 F3 5m F1 : Permanent Shaker F2 : Shaker F3 : Shaker SFSI Structure Testing

GVDA Measured Properties

GVDA Uni-axial AccelerometerTri-axial Accelerometer Rotation SensorDisplacement Transducer Pressure Cell and Sensor Instrumentation

GVDA SFSI Data System 24-bit resolution 1000 sps/channel maximum Real-time data output via TCP/IP Multiple remote clients can observe and record data

GVDA Potential Research Uses Passive study of the effect of a structure upon ground shaking (What is “Free-Field”?). The existing GVDA array has recorded many small to moderate earthquakes, allowing detailed characterization of the site with no building. After addition of the 120-ton test building, it will be possible to study how the simple structure affects the earthquake ground motions at this simple site. Differences will be due to SFSI effects. Active study of liquefaction. Both the Wildlife and GVDA sites are on liquefiable soils, especially during the winter wet season. At both sites we will add concrete pads on which large shakers from the NEES University of Texas mobile shakers can be mounted. These shakers should be powerful enough to cause localized liquefaction. Data from such an experiment could then be used to verify predictive models of both liquefaction and ground shaking. Active study of SFSI physics. At GVDA, the reconfigurable test structure will have significant SFSI in the soft soil. The instrumentation can be used to measure structure and soil motion, soil pressures, and pore water pressures during active shaking of the structure by the UCLA NEES equipment. Such data will be invaluable for verification of predictive physics-based models of SFSI.