MPPC update including plastic connector T2K experiment collaboration meeting 2007/4/18 (Wed) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MPPC readout electoronics
Advertisements

New test result of MPPC M.Taguchi(kyoto).
Comparison of 3 types of scintillator strips and 2 types of reflector films Miho NISHIYAMA Shinshu-U Light yield of 3 scintillator strips have been measured.
The Multi-Pixel Photon Counter for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jul Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba, Japan 1.Introduction 2.Recent.
Study of the MPPC Performance - contents - Introduction Fundamental properties microscopic laser scan –check variation within a sensor Summary and plans.
Study of Photon Sensors using the Laser System 05/7/12 Niigata University, Japan Sayaka Iba, Editha P. Jacosalem, Hiroaki Ono, Noriko.
1 A proposal of new simple system for testing a large number of MPPC for the R&D phase of GLD calorimeter 2007/Feb/6 ACFA ILC Workshop ICEPP, University.
Mass test of MPPC with a prototype of MEG II liquid xenon detector
Cosmic Ray Test Stand with Scintillating Cells for Digital Hadron Calorimeter As of 9am 05/28/2003.
Yannick Geerebaert LLR Ecole Polytechnique CNRS IN2P3 Palaiseau France INGRID Meeting / March 2008 / France March 2008 status MPPC TEST LLR S.
Measurement of the absolute efficiency,
6mm 【 Development of Readout Electronics for MPPC 】 We report the read out electronics of MPPC( Multi-Pixel Photon Counter ). MPPC is a new photodetector.
GLD Calorimeter Status Oct 学術創成会議 S. Uozumi Shinshu University FJPPL meeting held at the end of September. Preparation underway toward the ECAL.
Selection of Silicon Photomultipliers for ILC Analogue Hadron Calorimeter Prototype Lay-out * ILC Hadron Calorimeter prototype with SiPM readout * Selection.
Status of scintillator KLM study P. Pakhlov (ITEP)
1 System Description (2-4) Gains from single photo-electrons in vacuum at room temperature (5-8) Linearity Test at V in vacuum at room temperature.
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
Evaluation of Silicon Photomultiplier Arrays for the GlueX Barrel Calorimeter Carl Zorn Radiation Detector & Medical Imaging Group Jefferson Laboratory,
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL Adil Khan International Linear Collider Workshop 2010 LCWS10 & ILC10, Beijing, China CALICE Scintillator ECAL group.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
Uni Bergen:G. Eigen, E. van der Kraaij, J. Zalieckas FZU Prague: J. Cvach, J. Kvasnička, I. Polák Linear Collider Workshop, Tokyo 13/11/2013.
R&D of MPPC for T2K experiment PD07 : Photosensor Workshop /6/28 (Thu) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama H.Kawamuko ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira.
Study of the MPPC performance - R&D status for the GLD calorimeter readout – Nov 6-10.
MEG II 実験 液体キセノンガンマ線検出器に用いる 光検出器 MPPC の 実装に向けた最終試験 家城 佳 他 MEG II collaboration + 九大の方々.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
1 NIU Integrated Readout Layer Kurt Francis NICADD Northern Illinois University March 19, 2014.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group May 29 – Jun 4 DESY Introduction.
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
MPPC Measurements at LSU Brandon Hartfiel LSU Hardware Group Thomas Kutter, Jessica Brinson, Jason Goon, Jinmeng Liu, Jaroslaw Nowak Sam Reid January 2009.
1 MPPC update S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira (KEK) Nov KEK.
KEK BT Summary &Plan Shinshu University Miho Nishiyama.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) Feb Beijing Introduction Basic performances Future.
MPPC status M.Taguchi(kyoto) T2K ND /7/7.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters(MPPC) Makoto Taguchi Kyoto University.
Trip-t testing progress report
Performance of SiPM Ryuhei Nakamura (Kobe Univ.) GLC calorimeter group (KEK, Kobe, Konan, Niigata, Shinshu, Tsukuba) Contents ・ Introduction ・ Test results.
Status of photon sensor study at Niigata University -- SiPM and MPPC -- Photon sensor mini workshop 05/9/16 University Niigata University.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters and readout electronics Makoto Taguchi High Energy Group.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group (KNU, Kobe, Niigata, Shinshu, ICEPP.
Multipixel Geiger mode photo-sensors (MRS APD’s) Yury Kudenko ISS meeting, KEK, 25 January 2006 INR, Moscow.
DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.
1 Japan-US Research Budget 2007 & SciBooNE Upgrade T. Nakaya (Kyoto) SciBooNE 16, 2007.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Fumihiko Ukegawa University of Tsukuba, Japan 6th Joint Korea-Japan ScEcal Meeting September 3, 2010 Kobe University Photo-sensor studies.
Performance of new MPPC Nov. 21 Korea-Japan joint meeting Takashi Maeda Hideki Yamazaki Yuji Sudo (University of Tsukuba) --- Contents ---
The Multi-Pixel Photon Counter for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jul Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba, Japan for the GLD Calorimeter.
Study and Development of the Multi-Pixel Photon Counter for the GLD Calorimeter Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu, Japan) on behalf of the GLD Calorimeter Group Oct-9.
Status of NEWCHOD E.Guschin (INR), S.Kholodenko (IHEP), Yu.Kudenko (INR), I.Mannelli (Pisa), O.Mineev (INR), V.Obraztsov (IHEP), V.Semenov(IHEP), V.Sugonyaev.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
Development of UV-sensitive MPPC for upgrade of liquid xenon detector in MEG experiment Daisuke Kaneko, on behalf of the MEG Collaboration µ γ Liquid xenon.
Silicon Photomultiplier Development at GRAPES-3 K.C.Ravindran T.I.F.R, OOTY WAPP 2010 Worshop On behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
Performance of 1600-pixel MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jan. 30(Tue.) Korea-Japan Joint Shinshu Univ. Takashi Maeda ( Univ. of Tsukuba)
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Plans for this week MWPC: wire stretching today
NUV-SiPM short technology description
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
ITEP&MEPhI status report on tile production and R&D activities
R&D of MPPC for T2K experiment
Efficiency Study of Prototype Scintillator for INGRID
MPPC for T2K Fine-Grained Detector
T2K experiment collaboration meeting S.Gomi ( Kyoto University )
T2Kロシアグループに向けたMPPC(SiPM)の性能評価
R&D of MPPC in kyoto M.taguchi.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

MPPC update including plastic connector T2K experiment collaboration meeting 2007/4/18 (Wed) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira ( KEK )

MPPC test gain photon detection efficiency (PDE) noise rate cross-talk rate

3 Measurement of gain pedestal 1p.e signal 2p.e 3p.e 4p.e … Definition of gain of MPPC ADC distribution MPPC No ℃ 69.7V We can define gain of MPPC by this difference. V V BD 0 ΔV Bias voltage

4 Gain  V : 400pixel 20 ℃ 100samples Gain : 400pixel 20 ℃ 100samples ~7×10^5 ~10×10^5 ×10^3 Result of measurement of gain ( 100 samples ) 100 MPPC samples have same gain-ΔV relation. 1×10^ Bias voltage (V)ΔV (V)

5 ±2% Capacitance/e : 400pixel 100samples VBD 20 ℃ : 400pixel 100samples Distributions of Capacitance and Breakdown voltage  Difference of gain come from difference of V BD. About 100 samples, MPPC have same capacitance.  Difference of gain come from difference of V BD Capacitance (×e 10^5) Break-down voltage (20 ℃ ) (V) ~ 0.4 V ~ 1.5 V The slope of gain- ΔV relation

6 Measurement of PDE paper Blue LED HV ( p.e. = # of photo electron ) The ratio of p.e of MPPC to that of PMT is taken as relative PDE of MPPC. MPPC PMT ( reference )

7 PDE : 400pixel 20 ℃ 100samples PDE  V : 400pixel 20 ℃ 100samples ~1.37 ~1.80 1×PMT ΔV (V) Result of measurement of PDE ( 100 samples ) 100 MPPC samples have same PDE-ΔV relation. Bias voltage (V) Difference of PDE come from difference of V BD 2×PMT

8 Measurement of noise rate Number of pedestal event Poisson distribution MPPC No.050 Gate=800nsec without Light source MPPC No.050 Gate=800nsec without Light source pedestal 1p.e 2p.e ・ ・・ free to cross-talk estimated 1p.e value = P(1) estimated 2p.e value = P(2) ≠ because of cross-talk

9 Noise rate [kHz] : 20 ℃ 100samples Noise rate [kHz]  V : 20 ℃ 100samples ~190kHz ~365kHz 300kHz ΔV (V) Result of measurement of noise rate ( 100 samples ) Noise rate looks like contain another factor. Bias voltage (V)

Measurement of cross-talk rate The number of pedestal is free to cross-talk Poisson distribution The number of >2p.e : N >2p.e ( estimated by pedestal ) || Without cross-talk The number of >2p.e : N >2p.e ( measurement ) || With cross-talk measurement In this measurement, we define cross-talk as all events that make 1p.e signal to 2p.e signal. (This definition of cross-talk include the influences of after pulse.) The cross-talk rate is determined. This difference corresponds to the decrease by cross-talk.

11 cross-talk rate : 20 ℃ 100samples cross-talk rate  V : 20 ℃ 100samples ~18 % ~29 % 30% ΔV (V) Result of measurement of cross-talk rate ( 100 samples ) 100 MPPC samples have same cross-talk rate-ΔV relation. Bias voltage (V) Difference of cross-talk rate come from difference of V BD

12 The influence of “1p.e  2p.e” In this measurement the definition of cross-talk contain the influence of after pulse. Those 2 are unable to distinguish in ADC distribution. 1p.e noise 0.5p.e 1.5p.e 0.5p.e 1.5p.e Those 2 are able to distinguish by Scalar measurement. 1 gate After pulse Cross-talk

13 After pulse rate & Cross-talk rate  The influence of after pulse is larger % After pulse Cross-talk 6.64% 10.55% 14.11% 3.08% After pulse rate : 400pixel Cross-talk rate [Scalar] : 400pixel All 1p.e  2p.e 6.64% Please refer to the presentation in March Photosensor Meeting for details.

14 2. Plastic connector for MPPC fiber coupling connect Fiber housing MPPC housing Fiber housing MPPC housing Prototype of Connector Further tune necessary !

15 Summary The device-by-device variation of basic performances come from the device-by-device variation of breakdown voltage. –Noise rate, however, looks like contain another factor. We obtain the prototype of plastic connector.  We have to start tuning and testing.  ΔV control gain, PDE, and cross-talk rate.

16 Back up

17 Trip-t chip test board for T2K experiment Trip-t MPPC signal input That is the one of the purposes for this measurement, to confirm whether 16 MPPCs those basic performances become complete can be chosen. Trip-t chip, that can be used for reading out signals from many MPPC at same time was used in this measurements. Trip-t is planed to use in T2K experiment. In T2K experiment, signals from 16 MPPCs are read out by 1 Trip-t chip.

18 2p.e noise rate We can define 1p.e noise rate. When we measure noise rate by ADC distribution, however, we cannot distinguish the influences of 2p.e noise rate from all influences those make 1p.e signal to 2p.e signal. We cannot define 2p.e noise rate 1p.e noise 0.5p.e 1.5p.e 0.5p.e 1.5p.e we can distinguish those by differences of threshold in Scalar. we cannot distinguish those in ADC distribution. 1 gate After pulse Cross-talk

19 Light source Light source in this measurement –Shade off the light from blue LED×1. –Separate light source and MPPC as possible. paper Blue LED Scan by PMT(Φ1mm) and measure the value of light that inject to each MPPCs.

20 Measurement of PDE We define PDE by the ratio of the value of light that inject each MPPCs measured by PMT. (relative PDE) 。 We set another MPPC for reference and check the stability of light source. Position 1+24mm Position 2+14mm Position 3-14mm Position 4-24mm Result of scanning by PMT

21 MPPC base board We make new base board for this measurement that can fix each MPPCs in each points. We can measure 4 MPPCs at same time. This base board has 2 layer. Read out electronics set on under layer, and top layer fix MPPCs. HV Read out ×4 MPPC ×4 50mm

22 MPPC base board stage It must have reproducibility. Stop by this point. Put and remove MPPCs

23 Set up of this measurement Set up of this measurement. Light source is stable because we never touch this. MPPC base board stage is also stable because it is heavy. In this measurement, we did not use movement stage because it is one of the origin of noise.

24 Gain : 400pixel No.50 Gain  V : 400pixel No.50 Gain  V : 400pixel 20 ℃ 100samples Gain : 400pixel 20 ℃ 100samples ×10^3

25 The relation between Breakdown voltage and HPK recommendation voltage (400pixel) Vop (HPK) versus VBD we can estimate breakdown voltages from data of HPK recommendation voltage. blue : 15 ℃ blue : 15 ℃ green : 20 ℃ green : 20 ℃ red : 25 ℃ red : 25 ℃ Gain of MPPC is about ℃ ) in HPK recommendation voltage. We plot HPK recommendation voltage in horizontal axis, and breakdown voltage at each temperature in vertical axis.

26 PDE : 400pixel No.50 PDE  V : 400pixel No.50 PDE : 400pixel 20 ℃ 100samples PDE  V : 400pixel 20 ℃ 100samples

27 Noise rate [kHz] : 400pixel No.50 Noise rate [kHz]  V : 400pixel No.50 Noise rate [kHz] : 20 ℃ 100samples Noise rate [kHz]  V : 20 ℃ 100samples

28 cross-talk rate : 400pixel No.50 cross-talk rate  V : 400pixel No.50 cross-talk rate : 20 ℃ 100samples cross-talk rate  V : 20 ℃ 100samples

29 Measurement of noise rate ・・・ 5/Time time If 1p.e noise is defined as the integral value of signals over the threshold on 0.5p.e, noise rate is changed by the gate length that used in measurement. On the other hands, P(n) is defined as the integral value of n p.e signals and if noise is defined as Σn ・ P(n), we cannot distinguish 2 noise from the influences of cross-talk. MPPC has cross-talk, so it is impossible to distinguish when we use ADC distribution. ・・・ 4/Time ・・・ 3/Time Time or 6/Time Cross-talk(1p.e  2p.e)

30 The definition of noise rate If that definition of noise rate is right, noise rate is not depend on the gate length. ■ ・・・ 800nsec ● ・・・ 200nsec 2 are corresponding Same differences come when the ΔV became high. Noise [ kHz ] : No.50 (Scalar) 800nsec & 200nsec

31 Gain : 100pixel No.1 Gain  V : 100pixel No.1 Gain : 100pixel 20 ℃ 12samples Gain  V : 100pixel 20 ℃ 12samples

32 C/e : 100pixel 12samples VBD 20 ℃ : 100pixel 12samples Distributions of C/e and VBD about MPPC(100pixel) 12 samples at 20 ℃ We have to measure all samples. The conclusion cannot be put now. Vop (HPK) 100pixel

33 PDE : 100pixel No.1 PDE  V : 100pixel No.1 PDE : 100pixel 20 ℃ 12samples PDE  V : 100pixel 20 ℃ 12samples

34 Noise rate [kHz] : 100pixel No.1 Noise rate [kHz]  V : 100pixel No.1 Noise rate [kHz] : 20 ℃ 12samples Noise rate [kHz]  V : 20 ℃ 12samples

35 cross-talk rate : 100pixel No.1 cross-talk rate  V : 100pixel No.1 cross-talk rate : 20 ℃ 12samples cross-talk rate  V : 20 ℃ 12samples

36 Noise rate [ kHz ] (Scalar measurement) Noise [kHz] : 400pixel No.50 Scalar Noise [kHz]  V : 400pixel No.50 Scalar Noise [kHz] : 100pixel No.1 Scalar Noise [kHz]  V : 100pixel No.1 Scalar

37 cross-talk rate = (2p.e noise / 1p.e noise) cross-talk rate : 400pixel No.50 cross-talk rate  V : 400pixel No.50 cross-talk rate : 100pixel No.1 cross-talk rate  V : 100pixel No.1

38 Comparison of noise rate, Scalar and ADC distribution Noise rate measured by Scalar is higher than noise rate measured by ADC distribution. 1p.e Noise [kHz] MPPC 400pixel No.50/100samples ■ ・・・ Scalar ● ・・・ ADC distribution blue : 15 ℃ blue : 15 ℃ green : 20 ℃ green : 20 ℃ red : 25 ℃ red : 25 ℃

Noise rate Why noise rate is differ when we measured noise rate by 2 methods, Scalar and ADC distribution?  the influence of after pulse Noise rate measured by ADC distribution is the rate of 1p.e pulse come from the Geiger discharge by thermo electron. The other hands, noise rate measured by Scalar may contain the influence of after pulse, and therefore this value is higher. After pulse 0.5p.e In Scalar, it seem to be 2 noises. In ADC distribution, it seem to be 1 noise.