1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for email list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Advertisements

Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Center City Connector Transit Study Open House #2 June 6, 2013.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
An Integral Perspective on the S.E. 17 Corridor October 29, 2013 Calgary.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
Agenda Final Modal Assignments Prioritization Supporting Network Financial Analysis.
Joe Olson SW Region Director December 8,  History/Background  Next Steps (Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL)  PEL Process  Schedule  Questions.
1 Monica Bansal and Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB Scenario Study Task Force November 19, 2008 Progress.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Feasibility Study and Alternatives Analysis Public Workshop Wednesday, October 22 nd, :30 – 9:00 pm Battlefield.
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
River to Sea TPO CAC A Presentation to: May 19, 2015.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Transit – Our transit services will provide modern, innovative, and viable travel options. Because transit facilities and services are an essential element.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Connectivity & Mobility
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Eastside Transit Alternatives Kick-Off Meeting Mesquite City Hall September 11, 2013 Kick-Off Meeting Mesquite City Hall September 11, 2013.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Metro South Planning MetroLink in South St. Louis County Metro South MetroLink Extension Alternatives Analysis and Draft Environmental.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
BRT in Pittsburgh: Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Regional Transit Study Final Recommendations March 15, 2010.
Planning For an Upper Valley Transportation Facility October 1 st, 2009 Howe Library, Hanover, NH Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission.
1 Presentation to TAC May 20, 2009 Priority Corridor Network (PCN) Evaluation Project Introduction.
Mercer Corridor Stakeholder Committee November 4, 2015 Sound Transit.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Premium Transit District 4, Office of Modal Development Making the Connection.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #5 MARCH 12 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM Northern Service Center.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
1 Bus Rapid Transit Strategic Plan May BRT Strategic Plan Evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of six BRT corridors Establish framework for.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
Colfax Corridor Connections (Denver) & 15/15L Transit Priority Study (RTD) RTD Board - Planning & Development Committee August 6, 2013.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board May 27, 2015.
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
Central Corridor - Light Rail Transit Metropolitan Council
Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Presentation transcript:

1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM QUESTIONS & ANSWERS OPEN HOUSE7:00 PM

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #2 FEBRUARY 28 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM Neighborhood House

INTRODUCTIONS 3 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority  Consultant Team (led by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.)

PURPOSE OF OPEN HOUSE WHY ARE WE HERE TODAY?  Provide information on:  Project progress since Open House #1  Final Purpose and Need Statement  Preliminary Screening Results  Get your input on:  Preliminary alternatives for detailed evaluation 4

PROJECT UPDATE SEPTEMBER OPEN HOUSE  September 12 & 13  39 attendees  Feedback provided on:  Project Purpose & Need  Project Goals & Objectives  Alignment & Mode Alternatives 5

PROJECT UPDATE WHAT IS A TRANSITWAY? “Transitways include bus and rail transit that enable fast, reliable travel times and an improved passenger experience on high-demand corridors in the region. Transitways help travelers avoid congestion by providing a dedicated right-of-way or other transit advantages such as ramp meter bypasses, signal priority or bus-only shoulders. Transitways link major employment centers and destinations in the region and promote transit- oriented development patterns.” (TPP, Chapter 7 “Transit”) 6

PROJECT UPDATE PROJECT PURPOSE The purpose of the Robert Street Transitway is to provide the necessary transit infrastructure and service to meet the long-term regional mobility and local accessibility needs between downtown St. Paul and areas within Dakota County. PROJECT NEED  Forecasted growth in travel demand  Limited transit service and time-efficient transit options  Needs of people who depend on transit  Roadway congestion and shift toward multimodal investments  Regional objectives for growth 7

SCREENING PROCESS 8 WHAT IS PART OF SCREENING? Describe the initial modes and alignments considered for the Robert Street Transitway AA Describe screening criteria Present screening results Identify next steps for alternatives development

SCREENING CRITERIA 9 SCREEN 1: PROJECT PURPOSE …run north-south within the study area? …fit the preferred context for a transitway? …serve downtown St. Paul? Does the segment…

SCREENING CRITERIA 10 SCREEN 2: RIDERSHIP POTENTIAL …population? …employment? …key activity centers? …transit dependence? Does the segment serve…

SCREENING CRITERIA 11 SCREEN 3: MODE …recommended facility type? …typical system length? …physical needs? Does the alignment match the mode’s…

ALIGNMENTS

SECTORS

UNIVERSE

SCREENING RESULTS

SCREEN 1 RESULTS

SCREEN 2 RESULTS

SCREEN 3 RESULTS

SCREENING RESULTS

20 PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVES AlignmentTermini (North/South)Modes Robert Street Downtown St. Paul/Mendota Road or Dakota County Northern Service Center (DCNSC) Arterial BRT Streetcar TH 52 Downtown St. Paul/Concord Blvd or Inver Hills Community College (IHCC) Highway BRT Dedicated Busway LRT Concord Avenue Downtown St. Paul/494 or Southview Boulevard Arterial BRT Streetcar Potential Service Extension (for sensitivity analysis) Robert Street alignment southern terminus/future site of UMore Park or Dakota County Technical College Express Bus or Highway BRT

PROJECT TIMELINE 21 Conceptual detailing of alternatives Preliminary evaluation of alternatives Spring 2013 Detailed technical analysis Summer 2013 Final evaluation of alternatives Identification of preferred alternative(s) Fall/Winter 2013 Open House #3 is tentatively scheduled for Fall 2013.

NEXT STEPS TODAY WHAT’S NEXT TODAY? We invite you to:  Review materials  Ask questions  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards  Provide feedback on preliminary alternatives 22

TRANSIT PLANNING BASICS WHAT IS SUCCESSFUL TRANSIT?  Transit that carries people  Transit that is a cost-effective use of public funding  Transit that supports efficient development 23

TRANSIT PLANNING BASICS WHAT TO CONSIDER WHEN PLANNING TRANSITWAYS How can the investment…  Improve customer service  Convenient, frequent direct service  Travel time competitive  Cost savings: vehicle, fuel, parking  Improve parking availability and cost  Downtown Minneapolis, Downtown St. Paul, U of M  Relieve congestion  Better serve employment and population densities 24

TRANSIT PLANNING BASICS 25

TRANSIT PLANNING BASICS 26 VEHICLES AND STATIONS Local Bus BRT Streetcar Light Rail

TRANSIT PLANNING BASICS 27 PLATFORM COMPONENTS

TRANSIT PLANNING BASICS 28 PARK-AND-RIDE COMPONENTS

QUESTIONS? 29

SCREEN 1

SCREEN 2

SCREEN 2 CONT…

CROSS SECTION STREETCAR

CROSS SECTION LRT

CROSS SECTION ELEVATED LRT