NSF Tribal College Workshop Award Management November 14, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Documentation Transactions posted to sponsored funds Sponsored Programs Administration October 2012.
Advertisements

Nuts & Bolts of Award Management March 14, 2012 ISE PI Meeting Division of Grants and Agreements.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
1 This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via at:
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
Compliance Issues Mr. Rashawn Farrior ATE Financial Management Grant Workshop October 23, 2012 Hosted by: American Association of Community Colleges.
Discovery Research K-12 DGA Overview for New PIs Laura Buckley Grant and Agreement Specialist.
What You Need to Know To Ensure Compliance October 2014.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Managing Your Grant: A Roadmap to the Finish Line Carol Gelormine Manager of Grant Accounting Division of Finance & Treasury Catherine Bruno Post-Award.
Alliance Meeting May 18, 2006 National Science Foundation Division of Grants and Agreements Al Wilson, Grants Management Specialist (703)
National Science Foundation Workshop Proposal Preparation Basics, Part 2 NSF Webinar Series September 14, 2010.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Negotiating Federal Awards April 17, Negotiating Federal Awards Vincent (Bo) A. Bogdanski Assistant Director, Office of Sponsored Projects, University.
What You Need to Know To Ensure Compliance January 2015.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
NSF Tribal College Workshop Award Monitoring & Business Assistance November 14, 2008.
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum September 5, 2002.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Award Management NSF Workshop for Sponsored Project Administrators
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Pathway to Success December 16, 2013 MSP Annual Conference Division of Grants and Agreements.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
Audit-Readiness Riverside Community College District Grants Office.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Got the Grant What’s next??????????? Joy R. Knipple Team Leader, National Institute of Mental Health July 26, 2006.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
10/16/2015 Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/ Program Directors/ Project Directors.
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
Debra Murray, Georgetown University Tolise Miles, Children’s National Medical Center Clairice Lloyd, Georgetown University Medical Center Pre-Award and.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
Lifecycle of an Award Reporting, Close-outs and Audits Michelle Vazin, Vanderbilt University Michele Codd, George Washington University.
Washington University Hilltop Campus Research Administrators Forum August 23, 2002.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
AISL PI Conference February 29, 2016 Division of Grants and Agreements.
Administering Your Proposal
HBCU-UP PI/PD CONFERENCE Bowie State University
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Session One – NSF Grants 101 May 23, :00 am – 12:00 pm EST
Session Three – Post Award Management May 25, 2018
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Managing Federal grants
Results of NSF Data Analytics and Other Audits
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

NSF Tribal College Workshop Award Management November 14, 2008

Ask Early, Ask Often! NameTitleContact Jean FeldmanHead, Policy Office Division of Institution & Award Support (DIAS); Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management (BFA) (703) Pamela HawkinsTeam Leader for Education & Human Resources Division of Grants & Agreements; Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management (BFA) (703) Jeffrey VieceliSenior Technology Specialist; Division of Institution & Award Support (DIAS); Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management (BFA) (703)

NSF Award Management Philosophy Assistance Agency Research Carried Out by Awardee Integrated Oversight Enterprise: –Program Oversight of Scientific Progress –BFA Oversight of Compliance and Business Assistance Audit Responsibility Reside with OIG End to End Award Management Risk Based Review

Award Administration – Relevant Roles of Awardee & NSF Awardee Role –Awardee has full responsibility for the conduct of project or activity and for adherence to the award conditions –Awardee agrees to comply with the applicable Federal requirements and for the prudent management of all expenditures and actions –Expenditures must be allowable, allocable, and reasonable

Award Administration – Relevant Roles of Awardee & NSF (Continued) Awardee Role (Continued) –All actions must also be: Consistent with award terms and conditions; Consistent with NSF and awardee policies; Represent effective utilization of resources; and Do not constitute a significant project change. NSF Role –Hands off project and minimal monitoring (except for Cooperative Agreements)

Types of Awards Grants & Cooperative Agreements –Relationship is of assistance –Principal purpose is to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation Contracts –Relationship is one of procurement –Principal purpose is for the direct benefit or use of the Federal government

The NSF Award Grants –Award Letter, Research Terms & Conditions, Grant General Conditions (GC-1), occasional special conditions, and other documents incorporated by reference –Electronic dissemination of Award Letter to AOR –Awardee Distribution of Terms & Conditions –Also available electronically via FastLane Cooperative Agreements –Financial & Administrative Terms and Conditions –Programmatic Terms and Conditions

Please Be Aware…. Cooperative agreements have added conditions due to substantial involvement of NSF –Be aware that there is generally more reporting and oversight required for a cooperative agreement than a grant –There should be ongoing dialogue with the cognizant Program Officer to fully understand the conditions of this type of award

A revised set of terms and conditions that implement the OMB administrative procedures contained in 2 CFR Part 215 (OMB Circular A-110) Originally developed for use in the Federal Demonstration Partnership in July, Intended to be a “model” implementation of OMB Circular A-110. What are the Research Terms & Conditions?

What are the Research Terms & Conditions? (Continued) These revised conditions: –Are not considered by OMB to make substantive changes to the provisions of A-110 (2 CFR Part 215) –Incorporate sections from A-110 verbatim, where necessary –Provide clarifying or supplemental language, where appropriate –Indicate agency action, when necessary. Incorporate by reference a matrix of relevant grant-related statutes and regulations – “National Policy Requirements”.

What are the Research Terms & Conditions? (Continued) Incorporate by reference a document that identifies, by agency, which guidance applies to a specific types of subrecipients. Are accompanied by a prior approval matrix that summarizes all participating agencies prior approval requirements. Are also accompanied by a set of agency specific requirements.

Terms and Conditions – By Organization Type Research Terms & Conditions & NSF Agency Specific Requirements –US Academic Institutions of Higher Education –Other Non-profit organizations –Hospitals Grant General Conditions (GC-1) –For profit organizations (other than Small Business Innovation Research awardees) –State and local Governments

Awardee-Approved Notifications to NSF Single 12 Month No Cost Extension – This is not to be used for awards that contain a zero balance – Does not include Cooperative Agreements Significant Changes in Methods & Procedures* Unusual Occurrences* Short Term Absences (less than 90 days)* Conflict of Interest Not handled by Awardee * Note that these three items are notifications that are sent directly from PI to the AOR and then to NSF.

Awardee-Authorized Approvals Virtually All Budget Changes are PI’s Prerogative – Subject to Organizational Approval – Note: Unless such changes constitute a change in objective or scope – Exception for Participant Support 90 Day Pre-Award Costs

NSF Prior Approval Requirements (Technically Related) Change in Objective or Scope Change in Expiration Date (no-cost extension) PI/co-PI Changes –Withdrawal or Change of PI/co-PI –Long-term Absence: Defined as 90 days or more –Reduction in PI Level of Effort: Defined as a reduction of 25% or more in time devoted to project

NSF Prior Approval Requirements (Financially Related) Transferring the Project Effort via: –Subaward –Transfer of the Award to a New Organization (“PI Transfers”) Reallocation of Participant Support Alterations and Renovations over $25,000 (Construction) Change in Cost Sharing Amount Identified on Line M of the Cumulative Award Budget Pre-award costs more than 90 days prior

Award Transfers The award is made to the university –Organization has the discretion of appointing a substitute PI or terminating the award If willing to transfer the award to another university be sure to: –Reconcile final expenditures –Accurately determine what funds are to be transferred –Funds transferred cannot be changed –NSF cannot intervene or redo a transfer after it is made Consider making a subaward rather than transferring the whole award

Publication & Data Sharing Requirements Acknowledgement of Support Disclaimer Copyrightable Material Sharing of Data

Data Sharing by NSF Awardees Data access: –Helps promote scientific research by permitting other qualified scientists to replicate results; –To reinterpret data or extend research methods to new areas; –Thus build upon the existing base of scientific knowledge

Implementing Data Sharing GC - 1, No. 38: Sets a basic standard for expected data sharing by NSF awardees –NSF Programs may implement this sharing policy in ways appropriate to the scientific field and to specific circumstances –Specific data sharing policies – including data “pooling” – are particularly appropriate where for example, research transcends national boundaries, and/or where “pooled” data promotes discovery of patterns or interrelationships that would not be evident from individual research data Examples include: OPP, GEO/Ocean Sciences, and SBE

Other Administrative Requirements Use of Consultants Equipment Travel Program Income

Travel Requirements Expenses for transportation, lodging, subsistence and related items incurred by project personnel and by outside consultants employed on the project who are in travel status on business related to an NSF-supported project are allowable as prescribed in the governing cost principles. Except as provided in the governing cost principles, the difference between economy airfare and a higher-class airfare is unallowable. A train, bus or other surface carrier may be used in lieu of, or as a supplement to, air travel at the lowest first-class rate by the transportation facility used. If such travel, however, could have been performed by air, the allowance will not normally exceed that for jet economy airfare.

Use of U.S. Flag Air Carriers Any air transportation to, from, between or within a country other than the U.S. of persons or property, the expense of which will be assisted by NSF funding, must be performed by, or under a code- sharing arrangement with, a U.S.-Flag air carrier if service provided by such a carrier is “available.” –Deviations from the U.S-Flag air carrier policy are described in detail in the Award and Administration Guide at: 1b 1b

Other Statutory & Regulatory Requirements Nondiscrimination Animal Welfare Recombinant DNA Molecules Clean Air and Water Human Subjects Investigator Financial Disclosure Debarment and Suspension

Technical Reports Required Technical Reports –Annual Project Reports Due No Later Than 90 days prior to Expiration Date Required for ALL Standard & Continuing Grants and Cooperative Agreements –Final Project Reports Due Within 90-days after the Expiration of an Award Required for ALL Standard & Continuing Grants and Cooperative Agreements Required for Individual Research Fellowships per Program Solicitation

Technical Reports Report Contents Include: –Participants –Activities & Findings –Publications & Products –Contributions –Special Requirements Technical Monitoring – Program Officer Site Visits – Participation in required Outreach activities

Interim Project Reports (Not required) Significant Events Per special conditions of the award No submission/preparation after grant is closed No Business Process Associated, Information only No Publication Citations

Project Report Tracking & Notification System Projects Report System Edits –Provides set reporting reports – annual and final divisible by 12 months –Tracking System includes: periods, status, and due/overdue dates –External & Internal Communities Ability to Track On Line –Notification reminders automatic to PIs and SPOs –Award Notices – URL with pass through to Project Report Module on FastLane

NSF Back-office Edits No future funding if overdue annual/final reports No PI changes or no cost extensions No changes after final report approval by PO PO can return final report up to 30 days after approval date Report status can’t be re-set for annual reports

Project Reporting Facts Extending the grant period does not relieve PIs of reporting requirements In the last year of a grant, the PI owes only a final report Final Report submission means final action – no further activity If the PI leaves prior to submitting a required report, the organization must still fulfill reporting obligations The organization is responsible for submission of required reports; not the PI Reports cannot be submitted prior to period start date No publication citations after final report approved, grant closed

And when things really go wrong… The award may be suspended or terminated in whole or in part in any of the following situations: –By NSF when: the awardee has materially failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant; the Foundation has other reasonable cause; ordered by the Deputy Director under NSF's Regulation on Research Misconduct (45 CFR §689);

And when things really go wrong… (Continued) By NSF (Continued) –NSF and the awardee by mutual agreement (if NSF and the awardee cannot reach an agreement, NSF reserves the right to unilaterally terminate the grant); or By the awardee on written notice to NSF

Audit Requirements Grant General Conditions (GC-1) –Article 23 Research Terms & Conditions (RTC) –Article 26 Award & Administration Guide (AAG) –Chapter II.F NSF Office of Inspector General Activities

Accessing Documents on the NSF Website Proposal Preparation – Grant Proposal Guide – Grants.gov Application Guide – Frequently Asked Questions Award Administration – Award & Administration Guide – Grant & Agreement Conditions – Frequently Asked Questions