Research Update 10 February 2012 Updated 15 February 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ounding nalog etrieval ystem Ryan Jewell Storm Prediction Center Norman, OK SARS Sounding Analog Retrieval System.
Advertisements

The Effects of Lake Michigan on Mature Mesoscale Convective Systems Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences.
Introduction Air stagnation is a meteorological condition when the same air mass remains over an area for several days to a week. Light winds during air.
The Surface-based Temperature Inversion on the Antarctic Plateau Stephen R. Hudson and Richard E. Brandt University of Washington Contact Information:
Matthew Vaughan, Brian Tang, and Lance Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences University at Albany/SUNY Albany, NY NROW XV Nano-scale.
Ounding nalog etrieval ystem Ryan Jewell Storm Prediction Center Norman, OK SARS Sounding Analog Retrieval System.
What is the convective structural distribution across the NE and how does it compare to the Midwest? What environments support these structures? Where.
Jordan Bell NASA SPoRT Summer Intern  Background  Goals of Project  Methodology  Analysis of Land Surface Model Results  Severe weather case.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
The Structure and Climatology of Boundary Layer Winds in the Southeast United States and its Relationship to Nocturnal Tornado Episodes Alicia C. Wasula.
A Spatial Climatology of Convection in the Northeast U.S. John Murray and Brian A. Colle National Weather Service, WFO New York NY Stony Brook University,
1 Conference Call April 11, 2012 Modeling update Rough draft: slides for Tropical Workshop Climatology: What has been completed/what needs to be done Focuses.
Appalachian Lee Troughs and their Association with Severe Thunderstorms Daniel B. Thompson, Lance F. Bosart and Daniel Keyser Department of Atmospheric.
INTRODUCTORY PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. This is NOT a class about remembering the names, locations, or measures of physical features and natural phenomena around.
Chukchi/Beaufort Seas Surface Wind Climatology, Variability, and Extremes from Reanalysis Data: Xiangdong Zhang, Jeremy Krieger, Paula Moreira,
Downstream weather impacts associated with atmospheric blocking: Linkage between low-frequency variability and weather extremes Marco L. Carrera, R. W.
Radar-Observed Characteristics of the Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation during NAME 2004 Timothy Lang, Steve Nesbitt, Rob Cifelli, and Steve Rutledge Colorado.
A Case Study of Hurricane Formation in Strong Shear: Claudette (2003) Kay Shelton University at Albany, SUNY.
The August 9, 2001 Lake Breeze Severe Weather Event Across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS WFO at Albany.
THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN LARGE- SCALE AND MESOSCALE CONTRIBUTION TO SEVERE CONVECTION: A CASE STUDY EXAMPLE Paper by Charles A. Doswell III Powerpoint by.
A Diagnostic Analysis of a Difficult- to-Forecast Cutoff Cyclone from the 2008 Warm Season Matthew A. Scalora, Lance F. Bosart, Daniel Keyser Department.
Hail Large hail is not a killer, but does considerable damage.
Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS.
Phillip Bothwell and Patrick Marsh-Storm Prediction Center Lindsey Richardson –CIMMS Dry Thunderstorm Forecasting Using Perfect Prog(nosis) Forecast results.
Measures of Central Tendency
Some Preliminary Modeling Results on the Upper-Level Outflow of Hurricane Sandy (2012) JungHoon Shin and Da-Lin Zhang Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair “Telling the ozone story with data”
Horizontal Convective Rolls MPO 551 Paper Presentation Dan Stern Horizontal Convective Rolls : Determining the Environmental Conditions Supporting their.
1 26 April 2013 Future WorkResultsMethodologyMotivation Chip HelmsComposite Analyses of Tropical Convective Systems Composite Analyses of Tropical Convective.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Appalachian Lee Troughs and their Association with Severe Thunderstorms Daniel B. Thompson, Lance F. Bosart and Daniel Keyser Department of Atmospheric.
Forecast Pressure. Pressure Observations ASOS is the best…the gold standard Ships generally the worst.
Synoptic and Mesoscale Conditions associated with Persisting and Dissipating Mesoscale Convective Systems that Cross Lake Michigan Nicholas D. Metz and.
Modeling with sine or cosine functions. Project Overview What do you know about the sine graph? What do you know about the equation of the sine function?
Propagation Trends Dayton 2014 Solar Maximum! But the slow decline to solar minimum in 2020 is likely to begin later this year.
Composite Analysis of Environmental Conditions Favorable for Significant Tornadoes across Eastern Kansas Joshua M. Boustead, and Barbara E. Mayes NOAA/NWS.
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
PREDICTABILITY OF WESTERN NORTH PACIFIC TROPICAL CYCLONE EVENTS ON INTRASEASONAL TIMESCALES WITH THE ECMWF MONTHLY FORECAST MODEL Russell L. Elsberry and.
Development Mechanism of Heavy Rainfall over Gangneung Associated with Typhoon RUSA Tae-Young Lee, Nam-San Cho, Ji-Sun Kang Kun-Young Byun, Sang Hun Park.
Updated Radar-Based Techniques for Tornado Warning Guidance in the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis & Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS Albany, New York.
1 RADAR INTER-COMPARISON AS A REFLECTIVITY CALIBRATION CHECK RADAR MONITORING WORKSHOP ERAD 2010 SIBIU ROMANIA Mike Dixon National Center for Atmospheric.
Using Model Climatology to Develop a Confidence Metric Taylor Mandelbaum, School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook, NY Brian Colle, School.
Evaluating the ability of climate models to simulate extremes Eric Robinson Natalie McLean Christine Radermacher Ross Towe Yushiang Tung Project 6.
Summer Tornadoes – NWA 2015 Statistical Severe Convective Risk Assessment Model (SSCRAM) (Hart & Cohen, 2015) SPC Mesoanalysis Data Every hour from
Statistical Severe Convective Risk Assessment Model (SSCRAM) SPC Mesoanalysis Data every hour from (Bothwell et al. 2002) + CG NLDN Lightning.
GII to RII to CII in South Africa Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Senior Scientist.
On the Challenges of Identifying the “Best” Ensemble Member in Operational Forecasting David Bright NOAA/Storm Prediction Center Paul Nutter CIMMS/Univ.
Quantifying the Significance of the April 2011 Severe Weather Outbreak Matthew S. Stalley, Chad M. Gravelle, Charles E. Graves Saint Louis University.
Examining the Role of Mesoscale Features in the Structure and Evolution of Precipitation Regions in Northeast Winter Storms Matthew D. Greenstein, Lance.
©2011 Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning Elementary Statistics: Looking at the Big Picture 1 Lecture 7: Chapter 4, Section 3 Quantitative Variables (Summaries,
Convective Oscillations in a Strongly Sheared Tropical Storm Jaclyn Frank and John Molinari The University at Albany, SUNY.
Forecast Pressure. Pressure Observations ASOS is the best…the gold standard Ships generally the worst.
Techniques for Decision-Making: Data Visualization Sam Affolter.
Anja Westermayer Tomas Pucik Pieter Groenemeijer Eberhard Faust Robert Sausen Statistical modelling of thunderstorms in the present and future climates.
A new prior distribution of a Bayesian forecast model for small repeating earthquakes in the subduction zone along the Japan Trench Masami Okada (MRI,
Published by the Oregon Dept. of Agriculture (ODA), in cooperation with the Oregon Dept. of Forestry (ODF). Contact: Pete Parsons, ODF Meteorologist
Challenges in Convective Storm Prediction for the Coastal-Urban New York City-Long Island Brian A. Colle 1, Kelly Lombardo 2, John Murray 3, and Harrison.
Subtropical Potential Vorticity Streamer Formation and Variability in the North Atlantic Basin Philippe Papin, Lance F. Bosart, Ryan D. Torn University.
Lecture #3 Tuesday, August 30, 2016 Textbook: Sections 2.4 through 2.6
Stability, Fire Behaviour and the Haines Index
GRAVITATIONAL MOON–EARTH FORCES TRIGGERING EARTHQUAKES IN SUBDUCTION ZONES. ( near Oceans) New or Full moon the tides from the moon added to the ones from.
Antecedent Environments Conducive to the Production of Extreme Temperature and Precipitation Events in the United States Andrew C. Winters, Daniel Keyser,
Michael K. Tippett1,2, Adam H. Sobel3,4 and Suzana J. Camargo4
Administration through the Hollings Scholarship Program
Mean Deviation Standard Deviation Variance.
Warm season convective wind CLIMATOLOGY for the ccafs/ksc area
An Update to the Convective Wind Climatology of
William Flamholtz, Brian Tang, and Lance Bosart
Differences Between High Shear / Low CAPE Environments in the Northeast US Favoring Straight-Line Damaging Winds vs Tornadoes Michael E. Main, Ross A.
Advanced Algebra Unit 1 Vocabulary
Presentation transcript:

Research Update 10 February 2012 Updated 15 February 2012

Background What is the reason for increased number of storm reports with the presence of an ALT? – Background conditions similar, ALT acts as trigger? – ALTs associated with increased CAPE?

Procedure Calculate MUCAPE at 6 different stations at 1800 UTC over the length of the climatology (n=1530) – Stations: CLT, RDU, LYH, RIC, IAD, PHL Each is located in a different section of the domain (SW, SE, WC, EC, NW, NE) – MUCAPE is calculated from most unstable parcel in the lowest 180 hPa of the atmosphere – Dataset used: CFSR – Partitioned into ALT/Non–ALT based on whether or not an ALT was present at 1800 UTC

Whiskers: 10 th and 90 th percentile NARRCFSR

Whiskers: 10 th and 90 th percentile NARR CFSR All median ALT > all median non-ALT at 99% confidence level

Whiskers: 10 th and 90 th percentile CFSR NARR

Whiskers: 10 th and 90 th percentile CFSR NARR

Percentage of Days with MUCAPE > 0 Higher proportion of ALT days are associated with >0 MUCAPE compared to non-ALT days NARR

Whiskers: 10 th and 90 th percentile

Percentage of Days with MUCAPE > 100 Higher proportion of ALT days are associated with >100 MUCAPE compared to non-ALT days

MUCAPE > 0 is more likely on ALT Days Median MUCAPE is mostly higher on ALT Days, especially at RIC, IAD and PHL Median MUCAPE and 75 th /90 th percentiles are highest at IAD and PHL MUCAPE values themselves may be a little low – dataset issues? Could this help explain the maximum in storm reports near IAD? Why are ALTs associated with higher MUCAPE? – ALTs associated with higher low-level θ e ? – ALTs associated with steeper low to mid-level lapse rates? Key Results / Further Questions

Determining CAPE/Shear Phase- Space of First Storm Reports of the Day

Determine CAPE/shear phase space in which severe thunderstorms in ALT Zone occur – This information could be useful to forecasters in determining if severe weather is expected Objective

Procedure Find location and time of first severe report on a certain day (0400–0359 UTC) Calculate MUCAPE and Sfc–500 hPa bulk shear at location of storm report using nearest NARR analysis time 0.5 to 3.5 hours prior to storm report (n=576) First report (UTC)Corresponding NARR analysis time (UTC) 1530– – – First storm report occurred between 1530 and 0029 UTC on 76.3% of all days in climatology

Problems from last time 13 Jan 2012 Items (a), (b) and (c) are addressed in the following slides

Additional Procedures Clustering – attempt to control for inconsistencies in “reports per storm” – Overlay a 0.5° by 0.5° grid box over the domain – If a storm report occurs within a certain grid box on a certain day, that grid box is considered “active” for the day Any subsequent storm reports occurring within the active box are discarded for the day The number of active grid boxes for each day are tallied to measure how widespread the severe weather was on that day

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Active Grid Boxes Some evidence for higher MUCAPE/shear on highly convectively active days, but not likely to be a statistically significant difference

Additional Procedures Subsectioning – attempt to control for CAPE/shear of first storm report not being representative of environment in which most storm reports occur CENTER NORTH SOUTH

North sector shows a higher proportion of days with greater areal coverage of convection

South sector peaks earlier (1800 UTC) than north sector (2000 UTC) Center sector has flat peak between 1800–2100 UTC

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Sectors

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – North Sector Not much to distinguish days with/without large areal coverage of severe weather

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – Center Sector Not much to distinguish days with/without large areal coverage of severe weather

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – South Sector Not much to distinguish days with/without large areal coverage of severe weather

Few first storm reports occurred in this phase- space

No first storm reports occurred in this phase- space

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Month – South Sector Monthly variability exists in CAPE/shear of first storm reports

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Month – Center Sector Monthly variability exists in CAPE/shear of first storm reports

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Month – North Sector Monthly variability exists in CAPE/shear of first storm reports

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – Center Sector, Jun, Jul, Aug Even when broken up by month, still not much to distinguish days with/without large areal coverage of severe weather

1 st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – Center Sector, May & Sep Some evidence of preference toward high shear/low CAPE during May and Sept., but “n” is small

Clustering/subsectioning approaches show: – North sector showed highest proportion of days with greater areal coverage of severe reports – North (south) sector has a peak in time of first severe report at 2000 (1800) UTC, with center sector showing a flat peak between 1800–2100 UTC – First storm reports in north (south) sector occur in environments of greater shear (CAPE), lesser CAPE (shear) than the other sectors – North sector shows an area on the CAPE/shear phase space where severe weather does not happen Key Results / Further Questions

Clustering/subsectioning approaches show: – In all sectors, median CAPE is higher in JJA, while median shear is higher in MS Highest CAPE/lowest shear occurs in August in North/Central sectors; July/August in South sector – Boxplots show that CAPE/shear at first storm report is not a good indicator of how convectively active a particular day will be Why? – Need dataset with better temporal resolution? – Background conditions are of less importance than the strength of forcing for ascent? Key Results / Further Questions

Given the background convective parameters of the ALT Zone, what is the role of the ALT/PFT in triggering convection in the ALT Zone? – We have seen that ALTs are associated with above- average MUCAPE, especially in the North Sector – Where does convection/severe weather occur with respect to the ALT/PFT? – What are the processes by which the ALT/PFT triggers/sustains/enhances convection?