Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan Polk Transportation Planning Organization

2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Topics Introduction Project Prioritization Transit Highways Non-Motorized Facilities Financial Resources Draft Cost Feasible Plan

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Introduction The Draft Cost Feasible Plan is a financially constrained version of the 2035 Needs Plan based on available revenue (federal, state & local) through the year The Draft Cost Feasible Plan contains the most important projects (priorities) indentified in the Needs Plan. These projects are the source for the TPO’s future priority projects.

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Introduction Staff is requesting the Board to review and approve the 2035 Draft Cost Feasible Plan. Public Review and Comment Period August 12 th through December 9 th MVP Public Hearing and Final Adoption is scheduled for December 9 th.

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Transit Prioritization

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Eight Scoring Criteria: Previous Plans (2060 Plan, PTA Expansion) Regional Connectivity and Accessibility (Transit Centers/Park and Ride Lots) Transit Potential Urban Form and Planned Growth Public Input Transit Evaluation Criteria & Scoring

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Additional Considerations PTA Plan represents first five years of cost affordable transit improvements Subsequent phasing will be based on project ranking with the following considerations emphasized: –Anticipated route productivity (ridership) –Available projected revenues –Public input –Timing of growth – implement improvements in growth areas concurrent with anticipated development

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Highway Prioritization

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Yellow indicates Change Since March

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 State Intermodal System (SIS) Cost-Feasible Projects in Polk County RoadFromToImprovement Type PhaseCost (YOE $M) Period US 98Manor DrCR 540-AWiden to 6LConst US 27N of SR 540N of SR 542 Widen to 6LConst US 98CR 540ASR 540Widen to 6LConst US 27Richie RdBarry RdWiden to 6LROW & Const US 27Barry RdLake Co Line Widen to 6LROW & Const Source: SIS Long Range Capacity Plan (Approved 2009)

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Highway Project Prioritization – Non-SIS Roads Based on Approved 2035 Goals & Objectives Multi-Modal System Development Environmental Sustainability Regional Support Freight & Goods Movement Efficiency & Interconnectivity Safety & Security Public Input

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d) Candidate projects evaluated by whether they would: –Complete or fill gap(s) in system –Connect directly to desired destinations or facilities –Lie within specific designated areas –Address problems or enhance designated facilities –Satisfy need(s) expressed by public

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-motorized Transportation

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-motorized Facilities Top 100 Projects identified for: –Bicycle Improvements – typically done as part of road projects –Sidewalk Improvements – done as part of road projects or stand-alone enhancements Multi-Use Trail Projects –Typically done as funding & opportunities arise

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 PRIORITYROADFROMTOCOST 5CR 557*US 17/92I-4$1,560, US 17/92 (SEVENTEENTH ST)*HINSON AVECR 547$126, US 98*EDGEWOOD DRLAKE PARKER AVE$379, US 98*SR 540EDGEWOOD DR$355, US 98*LYLE PKWYCR 540A$812, CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)*US 9210TH ST$634, US 98*CR 540ASR 540$961, SR 35 (BARTOW RD)*LAKE PARKER AVE SMAIN ST$152, $4,983, Cumulative Total for Top 100 Sidewalk Projects$51,750, Less Projects Included in Highway Needs$4,983, $46,766,733.13

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 PRIORITYROADFROMTOCOST 3CR 557*US 17/92I-4$1,721, WABASH AVE S*ARIANA STUS 92$284, US 17 (SIXTH ST NW)*6TH ST AVE A SWSR 544$465, CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)*US 9210TH ST$675, $3,147, Cumulative Total for Top 100 Bike Projects$39,960, Less Projects Included in Highway Needs$3,148, $36,812,784.92

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Financial Resources

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Total Funding = $2,109 M (YOE) DRAFT

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Highway Capacity Needs Estimated Costs (2016 – 2035, in PDC) Total Needs$5,918 M Cost Feasible Projects$1,819 M Difference$4,099 M DRAFT

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Central Polk Parkway PD& E study underway $30 to $36M needed to fund Design in Cost Feasible Plan Right-of-Way & Construction Unfunded Seek Additional Funding through: –Next SIS Plan- TRIP –Federal Earmark(s)- Private Sources –Toll Revenues

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Total Funding = $1,320 M (YOE) DRAFT

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Transit Needs (2011 – 2035)Estimated Costs (PDC) Total Needs*$3,214 M Cost Feasible Projects$1,004 M Difference$2,210 M DRAFT * Assumes operating needs phased in over life of plan

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Funding Set-Aside for Other Projects $80 M reserved for For Congestion Management Projects, to be determined: –Sidewalk Projects –Multi-Use Trail Projects –Intersection Improvements –Intelligent Transportation System Enhancements

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Public Involvement – Outreach Public Workshops being scheduled for August & September Newsletter & Survey on Cost Feasible Projects Website -

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010  Project Schedule Sept 2009 DecMar 2010 JuneSeptDec Draft GOPs Draft Needs Plan Project Eval./Priorities Draft Cost Feasible Plan TPO Approves Draft Community Workshops TPO Adoption Final MVP Document August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010  Questions / Comments  Action Requested: Approve Draft Cost Feasible Plan for Public Distribution & Feedback  The Citizens and Technical Advisory Committees recommend that the TPO Board approve the 2035 MVP Draft Cost Feasible Plan.

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 End Presentation

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Project Evaluation CriterionAssessmentScoring (Points) Project Completes: Sidewalk Top 100In Top 100 = Y1 Sidewalk GapFills Sidewalk Facility Gap/Need = Y1 Bicycle Top 100In Top 100 = Y1 Bicycle Facility GapFills Bicycle Facility Gap/Need = Y1 Project Connects Directly to: AirportY=Direct Connection/Access1 Park & Ride LotY=Direct Connection/Access1 Transit CenterY=Direct Connection/Access1 Regional Intermodal HubY=Direct Connection/Access1 Regional Activity CenterY=Direct Connection/Access1 Freight Activity CenterY=Direct Connection/Access1 High Speed Rail StationY=Direct Connection/Access1 Project is Within: Environmental Justice (EJ) AreaF=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None F=2, P=1, N=0 Multimodal LOS DistrictDistrict I, II or IIIIII=3, II=2, I=1 Transit Supportive Development Area F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None F=2, P=1, N=0 Transit Corridors and Centers Overlay F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None F=2, P=1, N=0 100-Year Flood Hazard AreaH = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low H=0, M=1, L=2 ETDM Environmental Screening Tool Analysis: Potential Cumulative Degree of Effect H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low (see EST Results tab) H=0, M=1, L=2 Project Evaluation CriterionAssessmentScoring (Points) Project Enhances or Improves: Evacuation RouteY = Evac Route1 Regional Road NetworkY = on Regional Network1 Regional Transit RouteY = Serves regional or inter-county transit route 1 Strategic Intermodal System FacilityY = on SIS1 Major Truck RouteY = on Truck Route1 Major Road Network ConnectivityY = Makes New Connection between Major Roads 1 Current CongestionLOS D; LOS E; LOS F; all others = A- C (based on 5 yr LOS) F=5, E=3, D=1, A- C=0 Future CongestionVolume to Capacity Ratio (based on 2035 E+C Network V/C) >1.50 = 5, 1.25 to 1.50 = 3, 1.00 to 1.24 = 1, <1.00 = 0 SafetyTop 50 Crash Locations ( )# = Number of Locations intersected by project Public Involvement: Public Input on ProjectPublic comments received on facility or corridor (as of April 2010) # = Number of times cited as need in surveys Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology (Cont’d.) Environmental Screening GIS Tool Used to Evaluate Potential Degree of Effect on Natural & Man-Made Environment Analyzed project impact within 500’ buffer Scores based on # of features found or % of buffer area falling within: Wetland AreasRecreational Areas Wildlife & Habitat AreasPrime Farmlands Flood Hazard AreasHistoric/Arch. Sites Special Areas (e.g. Green SwampContaminated Sites

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August TRIP2035 MVP CriteriaRelative WeightCriteriaRelative Weight Existing Congestion 12.5%Efficiency & Interconnectivity 20% Future Congestion12.5% Freight/Economic Competitiveness 20%Freight & Goods Movement 15% Community Impacts 10%Multi-Modal System Dev. 15% Environmental Impacts 10%Environmental Sustainability 20% Safety20%Safety & Security20% Project Status10%Regional Support5% Short-Term Need5%Public Input5% Total100%Total100%

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d) Relative Weight (%) assigned to each category divided by maximum points for that category to arrive at weighted scores Ranking based on weighted scores Ranked project list divided into Tiers I, II and III

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Yellow indicates Change Since March

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Yellow indicates Change Since March

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 FDOT Costing Tool Examples Project AreaDescriptionConstr. Cost Estimate RuralNew 2L Undivided Road w/ 5’ Paved Shoulder $4,524,370 per Centerline Mile UrbanWiden 2L to 4L w/ 4’ Bike Lane & 6’ Sidewalk $5,763,328 per Centerline Mile UrbanWiden 4L to 6L w/ 4’ Bike Lane & 6’ Sidewalk $6,349,351 per Centerline Mile RuralDiamond Interchange over Rural Divided Crossroad $24,659,686 per Interchange

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 CapitalOperating State Hwy. Projects $5,117 M Local Road Projects$2,031 M Bus Transit Projects $180 M$51.9 M* Rail Transit Projects$1,824 M$21.4 M* Bike/Ped/Trail Projects Preliminary Cost Estimates (2010 $) * Annual Operating Costs At Build-Out