Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Using deductive reasoning. Objective.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 2 Review Lessons 2-1 through 2-6.
Advertisements

Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional.
Chapter 2 Geometric Reasoning
The original conditional and its contrapositive are logically equivalent. Example. If the bird is Red, then the bird is a Robin. AND If the bird is not.
Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional. 1. A mapping that is a reflection is a type of transformation. 2. The quotient of two.
Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.5 Reasoning in Algebra and Geometry
Warm Up Make a conjecture based on the following information.  For points A, B and C, AB = 2, BC = 3, and AC = 4. A, B, and C form an equilateral triangle.
Objective Understand the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
Holt Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Welcome to our Unit on Logic. Over the next three days, you will be learning the basics.
Chapter 2.1 Common Core G.CO.9, G.CO.10 & G.CO.11 Prove theorems about lines, angles, triangles and parallelograms. Objective – To use inductive reasoning.
Chapter Two Emma Risa Haley Kaitlin. 2.1 Inductive reasoning: find a pattern in specific cases and then write a conjecture Conjecture: unproven statement.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Holt Geometry Warm Up Warm Up.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Determine if each conjecture is true or false. If false, provide a counterexample.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Honors Geometry Intro. to Deductive Reasoning. Reasoning based on observing patterns, as we did in the first section of Unit I, is called inductive reasoning.
Chapter 2 Section 5. Objective  Students will make a connection between reasoning in Algebra and reasoning in Geometry.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Students will… Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical.
C HAPTER Using deductive reasoning. O BJECTIVES Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.5 Postulates Geometry R/H Students will be able to distinguish between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning, and to determine the.
Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Holt Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Welcome to our Unit on Logic. Over the next three days, you will be learning the basics.
Holt Geometry 2-4 Biconditional Statements and Definitions Write and analyze biconditional statements. Objective.
CONFIDENTIAL 1 Grade 9 Algebra1 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures.
Reasoning, Conditionals, and Postulates Sections 2-1, 2-3, 2-5.
TODAY IN GEOMETRY…  Learning Goal: 2.5 Use Algebraic Properties to form logical arguments  Independent Practice  Retake Ch. 1 Test before Friday! 
Ch 2-5 Reasoning in Geometry and Algebra
Holt Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Chapter 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning.
Reasoning in Algebra & Deductive Reasoning (Review) Chapter 2 Section 5.
2-5 Reasoning in Algebra and Geometry 2.5 Reasoning in Alg and Geo.
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz
Drill: Tuesday, 10/14 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.
Reasoning Proof and Chapter 2 If ….., then what?
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Chapter 2 Reasoning and Proof.
Applying Deductive Reasoning
M1 Lesson 4.4 January 21, 2009 Deductive Reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.5 Reasoning in Algebra and Geometry
Warmup Write the two conditionals(conditional and converse) that make up this biconditional: An angle is acute if and only if its measure is between 0.
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:
Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Drill: Wednesday, 11/1 Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. Write the contrapositive.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
2-4 Deductive Reasoning 8th Grade Geometry.
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Learning Target Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2-1: Logic with Inductive Reasoning
Geometry Wed 10/15/14 Warm-ups….Complete Guided Reading Slide
Presentation transcript:

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Using deductive reasoning. Objective

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning deductive reasoning Vocabulary

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning is the process of using logic to draw conclusions from given facts, definitions, and properties.

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Is the conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? Example 1A: Media Application There is a myth that you can balance an egg on its end only on the spring equinox. A person was able to balance an egg on July 8, September 21, and December 19. Therefore this myth is false. Since the conclusion is based on a pattern of observations, it is a result of inductive reasoning.

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Is the conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? Example 1B: Media Application There is a myth that the Great Wall of China is the only man-made object visible from the Moon. The Great Wall is barely visible in photographs taken from 180 miles above Earth. The Moon is about 237,000 miles from Earth. Therefore, the myth cannot be true. The conclusion is based on logical reasoning from scientific research. It is a result of deductive reasoning.

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Check It Out! Example 1 There is a myth that an eelskin wallet will demagnetize credit cards because the skin of the electric eels used to make the wallet holds an electric charge. However, eelskin products are not made from electric eels. Therefore, the myth cannot be true. Is this conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? The conclusion is based on logical reasoning from scientific research. It is a result of deductive reasoning.

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Syllogism Some problems require students to use the law of detachment (If p→q is a true statement and p is true, then q is true) and the law of syllogism (If p→q and q→r are true statements, then p→r is a true statement) to draw conclusions from given statements.

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Another valid form of deductive reasoning is the Transitive Property (or Law of Syllogism). It allows you to draw conclusions from two conditional statements when the conclusion of one is the hypothesis of the other. Law of Syllogism (Transitive relation) If p  q and q  r are true statements, then p  r is a true statement.

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Properties of Equality and Real Numbers Addition Property: Subtraction Property: Multiplication Property: Division Property: Substitution Property: Distributive Property:

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Properties of Congruence Reflexive Property: Symmetric Property: Transitive Property:

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Determine if each conjecture is valid? 2. Given: If n is a natural number, then n is an integer. If n is an integer, then n is a rational number is a rational number. Conjecture: is a natural number. not valid Lesson Quiz: Part II 3. Given: If an American citizen is at least 18 years old, then he or she is eligible to vote. Anna is a 20-year-old American citizen. Conjecture: Anna is eligible to vote. valid

Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Homework: Page-50 Problems 1-10