David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

Tom Rye, Professor of Transport Policy and Mobility Management Transport Research Institute Napier University Edinburgh Transports contribution to GHG.
Changing Travel Behaviour Phil Goodwin Centre for Transport and Society, UWE Bristol.
Transport Policy And The Environment Professor David Gray The Centre for Transport Policy The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen.
June 2004Tim Ryley - Lancaster seminar1 Identifying the population segments most likely to cycle Tim Ryley Transport Research Institute Napier University.
Better Accessible Transport to Encourage Robust Intermodal Enterprise Work Package 6 Dr John Harrison.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Transport Assessment – what it is and why we do it Tom Rye, Professor of Transport Policy and Mobility Management Transport Research Institute Edinburgh.
COST 355 Madrid mai Estimating total mileage at the national level Estimating total mileage at the national level Modelling versus mobility survey.
Motoring towards 2050: Shopping, Parkering og Transport Sentrums Konferansen OSLO Wednesday 26 th September Edmund King – Executive.
Abcdefghijkl Some results of new SHS Transport questions (2005 Q1-3) Frank Dixon and Mairi MacAskill, Transport Statistics branch, Scottish Executive.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
David Connolly & Lucy Barker MVA TRPG and SHS Topic Report Long Distance Commuting.
Feb Travel Time and Sustainable Travel Behaviour David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
Lec 7. Ch.3P3 Characteristics of urban travel Trip types (purposes) Three approaches for modeling trips Travel behaviors of men and women Trip purpose/temporal,
 Travel patterns in Scotland Frank Dixon and Stephen Hinchliffe, Transport Statistics branch, Scottish Executive.
Recent Evidence on Mass Transit Demand Ian Savage Northwestern University.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
Real Estate & Planning Henley Business School The influence of office location on commuting behaviour Peter Wyatt.
Community attitudes to transportation Commuting behaviour and attitudes to government involvement and policies Australasian Railways Association Australian.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Presentation at the Pro Walk/Pro Bike Conference, Victoria BC, 9 September Making children healthier through walking Roger Mackett Centre for Transport.
The First International Transport Forum, May , Leipzig INDUCING TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE BEHAVIORIAL CHANGES IN KOREA: A Quantitative Analysis.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
D/TTAS - Transport policy data needs Transport Statistics Liaison Group 19 th September 2013.
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Regional Transport Modelling Review. Who’s doing what? Planning National Planning Framework Strategic Development Plans Local Development Plans Transport.
Attitudes towards Active Travel to School among schoolchildren in Scotland Jo Kirby and Jo Inchley Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit (CAHRU), University.
UKHLS Consultation Launch, 19/06/07, RSS Attitudes and Behaviours related to Environmental Issues Peter Lynn ISER
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
Scottish Household Survey Jonathan Waite SHS Research Officer Communities Analytical Services.
Evaluating the Factors Affecting Student Travel Mode Choice A Methodology to Prioritize Safe Routes to School Programs Meead Saberi, Portland State University.
Considering land use as a transport policy tool: A London perspective Isabel Dedring, Transport for London IMPACTS Vienna, March 2006.
How do people travel in Peja? Results from the Peja Household Travel Survey, 2010 MobKos II - Mission 2 - September Kobe Boussauw.
Fundamentals on transport and energy FUNDAMENTALS ON TRANSPORT & ENERGY.
Road pricing. Why ? What is it ? How might it be introduced ? Where and when ? How might it work? Why ? What is it ? How might it be introduced ? Where.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
EMME/2 Conference Gautrain Rapid Rail Link: Forecasting Diversion from Car to Rail 8 September 2004 Presented by Johan De Bruyn.
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS Key Transport Facts: Trend 1: Growth in passenger transport and freight compared with.
Www-civil.monash.edu.au/its Institute of Transport Studies National Urban Transport Modelling Workshop, 5 March 2008 Travel Demand Management Geoff Rose.
Scrutiny Presentation Local Transport Plan and Active Travel Strategy 24 th October 2013 Andy Summers and David Burt.
Urban Transport: background, problems and challenges
1 Acceptability of the use of new technologies by interviewees in surveys Sophie Roux Jimmy Armoogum Philippe Marchal NTTS 2009 Brussels 20/02/2009.
Changes to the collection of short walk data in the NTS Glenn Goodman, DfT.
59 ½ Southwark Street London SE1 0AL (UK) ++44 (0) / Travel Plan Monitoring and Evaluation: London PIMMS-transfer.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Transport Model for Scotland SHS-based inputs and forecast trends SHS User Day David Connolly and Lucy Barker| November 2007.
Local Government and Public Body Analysts Survey Conference Scottish Household Survey Survey Review March 2010 Hugh Munro SHS Project Team.
Nestrans Regional Parking Strategy NETCF 31 st October 2011.
David Sutton, Chief Officer Integrated Transport Strategy Directorate.
Measuring road traffic volume through passenger mobility surveys Vasilis Nikolaou AGILIS SA Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle-kilometres),
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Some results of new SHS Transport questions Frank Dixon, Transport Statistician SHS User Day – 26 November 2007.
Preconditions for the introduction of free public transport in Tallinn Dago Antov Tallinn University of Technology Professor on transport planning 1 Tasuta.
City Centres: Understanding the Travel Behaviour of Residents and the Implications for Sustainable Travel Firas H.A. Asad Ph.D. Student – CSE School -
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document Gourock 23 August 2010 Judith Ainsley.
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
Antonia Roberts, #bikeshare2017
Evidence for impacts and market research for bike share
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Members’ Workshop Wednesday 17th April 2019 Woodhill House Aberdeen
Presentation transcript:

David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift

SHS Topic Report – Modal Shift Aims of the research are: summarise key statistics on current ‘mode choice’ and perceptions of alternative modes Identify factors which affect behaviour of travellers in making mode choice. The topic report will cover: Car Ownership Car vs Public Transport Motorised vs Non Motorised Modes Travel to School

SHS Topic Report. Background Traffic and congestion are growing. This has implications for economic, environmental and social costs, including longer journey times for people and products, reduced air quality, road accidents, impacts on health and contribution to climate change. The Scottish Executive recognises that more needs to be done to encourage modal shift. Scottish Household Survey data shows that among those who travel to work by car, 47% could use PT, but choose not to. The main reasons are Inconvenience, journeys take too long, lack of direct routes, the need to have a car at work and the cost.

Car Ownership Travel Diary Data (1999 to April 2003) shows car mode share is: 20% from non-car owning household 76% from households with one car 86% from households with two or more cars Using the SHS data it is possible to define car ownership in three ways: Household Car Ownership Car competition between adults in household Car competition between licence holders in the household The two forms of car competition, ‘Adults versus car’ gives a better (i.e. wider) partition than ‘Licence holders versus cars”, but neither are significantly different from the simple car ownership (C0, C1 and C2+) partition.

Car Versus PT The attitudes and attributes of travellers with a realistic choice exists are key to understanding and explaining car vs PT mode choice Our approach is to identify the set of SHS Travel Diary journeys where there is a ‘realistic’ choice. This combines the following data: Distance from nearest bus stop (SHS data) Journey length (SHS data) Car ownership (SHS data) Car/PT Generalised costs (TMfS) Parking charges by journey purpose (TMfS)

Car versus Public Transport A ‘relative cost’ variable (PT/Car generalised cost) has been attached to each record in the travel diary data set PT Generalised costs include: walk time, effective wait time, in vehicle run time, boarding/transfer penalties, fares Car Generalised costs include: in-vehicle time, Vehicle Operating Costs (fuel and non-fuel) and tolls

Car Versus Public Transport The extended SHS Travel Diary data set would be partitioned on the basis of variables strongly correlated with mode choice. CHAID will be used (Chi Squared Automatic Interaction Detection) Partition could include Car ownership; Relative cost of PT; Purpose; Age; Income; Day of week.

Non-Motorised Modes Analysis will focus on short trip lengths where walking and cycling offer significant alternative modes

Non-Motorised Modes CHAID analysis will partition the set of short trips. Variables expected to be included in the partition are: Car ownership; Age; Day of week; Month (surrogate for weather effects); and Journey purpose.

Travel to School Travel to School is an important area of cross cutting policy research involving education, health, environmental, road safety and transport. It has been estimated that one in five cars in the AM week day peak is taking children to school SSTAG (Scottish Schools Travel Advisory Group) is already carrying out research on mode choice for trips to school The SHS data provides a number of questions about the usual means of travel to school, reasons for choosing this mode and availability of public transport.

Other recent uses of SHS data CEC Land Use and Transport Interaction Model (CEC LUTI) Return home proportions by time of day; Cycling and Walking demand matrices; Trip lengths by journey purpose Analysis of simple tours. Transport Model for Scotland (TMfS) Inputs into the demand matrices (mode * purpose * time for HB/NHB trips)