Irvington Public Schools Department of Mathematics, Assessment, Data Analysis & Management Matin Adegboyega, Director BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESENTATION OF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Jersey Statewide Assessment Results: Highlights and Trends State Board of Education, February 6, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D., Assistant Commissioner,
Advertisements

* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments Spring 2010 results Presented by: Richard Kirk Assistant Principal Manasquan Elementary School.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
Data Interpretation ACCESS for ELLs® The Rhode Island Department of Education Presented by Bob Measel ELL Specialist Office of Instruction, Assessment,
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Irvington Public Schools Department of Mathematics, Assessment, Data Analysis & Management Matin Adegboyega, Director BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESENTATION OF.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
NJASK 3-5 Report Sean Siet Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 20, 2011.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Ridgefield Public Schools 2016/2017 data presentation
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge
New Jersey Department of Education December 2012
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
2017 State Assessment Highlights
Advancing ELL Progress
2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Irvington Public Schools
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Measuring College and Career Readiness
District Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

Irvington Public Schools Department of Mathematics, Assessment, Data Analysis & Management Matin Adegboyega, Director BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESENTATION OF SPRING 2012 DISTRICT TEST RESULTS WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2012 District Focus Improving Student Achievement District Theme Quality Education: A Community Commitment

Summary of the 2012 New Jersey Proficiency Assessment of State Standards (NJPASS) Test Results for Grade 2 This standards-based test was administered to grade two students district-wide in the content areas of Language Arts Literacy (LAL) and Mathematics. NJPASS Review of Performance for Grade students were tested; 606 students with valid scores in LAL and 596 students with valid scores in Mathematics. Language Arts Literacy: - An increase of 4.8% compared to the performance in An improvement in Florence Avenue, Grove Street, Thurgood Marshall, and Chancellor Avenue Schools. Madison Avenue School also improved. - All schools performed between 49% and 71%; the overall District performance was 55.8%. Mathematics: - A decrease of 0.8% compared to the performance in An improvement in Florence Avenue, Thurgood Marshall, and Grove Street Schools. - All schools performed between 51% and 64%; the overall District performance was 59.2%.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Proficiency Assessments of State Standards (NJPASS) Grade 2 (Level 23) Comparative Analysis Using Performance Level Percentage Includes Advanced and Proficient Levels 2 Level 23 Performance Level Percentage 1 LAL 2 Mathematics District Berkeley Terrace Chancellor Avenue Florence Avenue Grove Street Madison Avenue Mt. Vernon Avenue Thurgood Marshall University Elementary

Grade 3 New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Spring 2012 The NJASK scores are reported as scale scores in each of the content areas. The score range from (Partially Proficient), (Proficient), and (Advanced Proficient). The scores of students who are included in the partially proficient level are considered to be below the state minimum proficiency level and those students may be most in need of instructional support NJASK 3: Review of Performance Language Arts Literacy: - An increase of 8.66% compared to the performance in All schools increased when compared to the performance in A total of three (3) students scored in the advanced proficient category. - Two hundred twenty-seven (227) students out of the five hundred sixty-two (562) total students scored in the advanced proficient and proficient categories. Mathematics: - An increase of 5.24% compared to the performance in All schools but two (2) increased when compared to the performance in A total of three (3) students from Berkeley Terrace and Thurgood Marshall Schools had perfect scores of Seventy-eight (78) students scored in the advanced proficient category; an increase of twenty-one (21) students compared to Three hundred thirteen (313) students out of the five hundred seventy-three (573) total students scored in the advanced proficient and proficient categories.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills & Knowledge - NJASK 3 Comparative Analysis of Performance for Total Students with Valid Scale Scores 1 Language Arts Literacy & Mathematics Spring Performance Level (%) 2 Proficient & Advanced Proficient Language Arts Literacy Mathematics State DFG A (Lowest Socioeconomic) District (Irvington) Berkeley Terrace Chancellor Avenue Florence Avenue Grove Street Madison Avenue Mt. Vernon Avenue Thurgood Marshall University Elementary Excludes students who did not receive a scale score based on the full set of regular items in this content area 2 Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK)* Spring 2012 Grade 3 Schools Language Arts LiteracyMathematics # Proces. LAL Exempt Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. # Proces. Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. Berkeley Terrace Chancellor Avenue Florence Avenue Grove Street Madison Avenue Mt. Vernon Avenue Thurgood Marshall University Elementary Totals – 15 = (41.81%) (+8.66%) = (54.62%) (+5.24%) * Data from All Sections Roster without consideration to TIS < 1

Grade 4 New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Spring 2012 The NJASK scores are reported as scale scores in each of the content areas. The score range from (Partially Proficient), (Proficient), and (Advanced Proficient). The scores of students who are included in the partially proficient level are considered to be below the state minimum proficiency level and those students may be most in need of instructional support NJASK 4: Review of Performance Language Arts Literacy: -A slight decrease of 0.97% compared to the performance in Five (5) students scored in the advanced proficient category. - One hundred seventy-six (176) students out of the five hundred thirty-nine (539) total students scored in the advanced proficient and proficient categories. Mathematics: - A decrease of 6.36% compared to the performance in Four (4) students from Chancellor Avenue, Madison Avenue, and Mt. Vernon Avenue Schools had perfect scores of A total of four (4) students from Grove Street and Madison Avenue Schools had almost perfect scores of Sixty-three (63) students scored in the advanced proficient category. - Two hundred seventy-three (273) students out of the five hundred forty-three (543) total students scored in the advanced proficient and proficient categories. Science: - An increase of 2.05% compared to the performance in Two (2) students from Chancellor Avenue and Mt. Vernon Avenue Schools had perfect scores of Ninety-six (96) students scored in the advanced proficient category. - Four hundred twenty (420) students out of the five hundred forty-three (543) total students scored in the advanced proficient and proficient categories.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills & Knowledge - NJASK 4 Comparative Analysis of Performance for Total Students with Valid Scale Scores 1 Language Arts Literacy, Mathematics, & Science Performance Level (%) 2 Proficient & Advanced Proficient Language Arts LiteracyMathematicsScience State DFG A (Lowest Socioeconomic) District (Irvington) Berkeley Terrace Chancellor Avenue Florence Avenue Grove Street Madison Avenue Mt. Vernon Avenue Thurgood Marshall University Elementary Excludes students who did not receive a scale score based on the full set of regular items in this content area 2 Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK)* Spring 2012 Grade 4 Schools Language Arts LiteracyMathematicsScience # Proces. LAL Exempt Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. # Proces. Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. # Proces. Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. Berkeley Terrace Chancellor Avenue Florence Avenue Grove Street Madison Avenue Mt. Vernon Avenue Thurgood Marshall University Elementary Totals = (32.65%) (-0.97%) 548 – 5 = (50.28%) (-6.36%) 548 – 5 = (77.40%) (+2.05%) * Data from All Sections Roster without consideration to TIS < 1

Grade 5 New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Spring 2012 The NJASK scores are reported as scale scores in each of the content areas. The score range from (Partially Proficient), (Proficient), and (Advanced Proficient). The scores of students who are included in the partially proficient level are considered to be below the state minimum proficiency level and those students may be most in need of instructional support NJASK 5: Review of Performance Language Arts Literacy - The District and five (5) schools outperformed the DFG A: Grove Street, Madison Avenue, Mt. Vernon Avenue, Thurgood Marshall, and University Elementary. - A decrease in percent proficient in most schools except an increase of 8.1% at Madison Avenue, 5.1% at Grove Street, 8.0% at University Elementary, and 29.6% at Thurgood Marshall. - Four (4) students scored in the advanced proficient category. Mathematics: - Three (3) students had perfect scores of 300 from Madison Avenue, Thurgood Marshall, and University Elementary. - Eighty-one (81) students scored in the advanced proficient category. - An increase in percent proficient in all schools except Berkeley Terrace and Florence Avenue.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills & Knowledge - NJASK 5 Comparative Analysis of Performance for Total Students with Valid Scale Scores 1 Language Arts Literacy & Mathematics Performance Level (%) 2 Proficient & Advanced Proficient Language Arts Literacy Mathematics State DFG A (Lowest Socioeconomic) District (Irvington) Berkeley Terrace Chancellor Avenue Florence Avenue Grove Street Madison Avenue Mt. Vernon Avenue Thurgood Marshall University Elementary Excludes students who did not receive a scale score based on the full set of regular items in this content area 2 Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK)* Spring 2012 Grade 5 Schools Language Arts LiteracyMathematics # Proces. LAL Exempt Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. # Proces. Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. Berkeley Terrace Chancellor Avenue Florence Avenue Grove Street Madison Avenue Mt. Vernon Avenue Thurgood Marshall University Elementary Totals = (35.63%) (- 1.05%) = (67.83%) (+7.22%) * Data from All Sections Roster without consideration to TIS < 1

IRVINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS USING MATRIX TO ANALYZE TEST RESULTS NJASK SPRING 2011 & 2012 SCHOOLS LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY NJASK 3NJASK 4NJASK 5 Most Improved Improved No Improve -ment De- creased Most Improved Improved No Improve -ment De- creased Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Berkeley Terrace XXX Chancellor Avenue XXX Florence Avenue XXX Grove StreetXXX Madison Avenue XXX Mt. Vernon Avenue XXX Thurgood Marshall XXX University Elementary XXX Most Improved: Improvement by double-digits Improved: Improvement by at least 0.5 No Improvement: Scores about the same

IRVINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS USING MATRIX TO ANALYZE TEST RESULTS NJASK SPRING 2011 & 2012 SCHOOLS MATHEMATICS NJASK 3NJASK 4NJASK 5 Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Berkeley Terrace XXX Chancellor Avenue XXX Florence Avenue XXX Grove Street XXX Madison Avenue XXX Mt. Vernon Avenue XXX Thurgood Marshall XXX University Elementary XXX Most Improved: Improvement by double-digits Improved: Improvement by at least 0.5 No Improvement: Scores about the same

Grade 6 New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Spring 2012 The NJASK scores are reported as scale scores in each of the content areas. The score range from (Partially Proficient), (Proficient), and (Advanced Proficient). The scores of students who are included in the partially proficient level are considered to be below the state minimum proficiency level and those students may be most in need of instructional support NJASK 6: Review of Performance Language Arts Literacy: - Two (2) students scored in the advanced proficient category compared to four (4) in A decrease in proficiency for both middle schools. Mathematics: - Four (4) students had perfect scores of 300 compared to two (2) students in Thirty-three (33) students scored in the advanced proficient category. - A decrease of 0.8% proficiency for the District. - A decrease of 6.3% proficiency for Union Avenue Middle School. - An increase of 4.9% proficiency for University Middle School.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills & Knowledge - NJASK 6 Comparative Analysis of Performance for Total Students with Valid Scale Scores 1 Language Arts Literacy & Mathematics Performance Level (%) 2 Proficient &Advanced Proficient Language Arts LiteracyMathematics State DFG A (Lowest Socioeconomic) District (Irvington) Union Ave. Middle University Middle Excludes students who did not receive a scale score based on the full set of regular items in this content area 2 Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK)* Spring 2012 Grade 6 Schools Language Arts LiteracyMathematics # Proces. LAL Exempt Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. # Proces. Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. University Middle Union Avenue Middle Totals – 11 = (26.28%) (-9.99%) 517 – 10 = (44.57%) (-0.40%) * Data from All Sections Roster without consideration to TIS < 1

Grade 7 New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Spring 2012 The NJASK scores are reported as scale scores in each of the content areas. The score range from (Partially Proficient), (Proficient), and (Advanced Proficient). The scores of students who are included in the partially proficient level are considered to be below the state minimum proficiency level and those students may be most in need of instructional support NJASK 7: Review of Performance Language Arts Literacy: - An increase of 2.5% proficiency for Union Avenue Middle School. -A decrease in proficiency for the District and University Middle School. - Four (4) students scored in the advanced proficient category. Mathematics: - One (1) student from Union Avenue Middle School had a perfect score of An increase in proficiency for the District and both middle schools. - Twenty-two (22) students scored in the advanced proficient category.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills & Knowledge - NJASK 7 Comparative Analysis of Performance for Total Students with Valid Scale Scores 1 Language Arts Literacy & Mathematics Performance Level (%) 2 Proficient & Advanced Proficient Language Arts LiteracyMathematics State DFG A (Lowest Socioeconomic) District (Irvington) Union Ave. Middle University Middle Excludes students who did not receive a scale score based on the full set of regular items in this content area 2 Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK)* Spring 2012 Grade 7 Schools Language Arts LiteracyMathematics # Proces. LAL Exempt Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. # Proces. Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. University Middle Union Avenue Middle Totals – 16 = (24.23%) (-3.26%) 507 – 8 = (29.86%) (+5.66%) * Data from All Sections Roster without consideration to TIS < 1

Grade 8 New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge Spring 2012 The NJASK scores are reported as scale scores in each of the content areas. The score range from (Partially Proficient), (Proficient), and (Advanced Proficient). The scores of students who are included in the partially proficient level are considered to be below the state minimum proficiency level and those students may be most in need of instructional support NJASK 8: Review of Performance Language Arts Literacy: - Eleven (11) students scored in the advanced proficient category. -The district had a slight increase compared to the performance level in An increase of 1.5% proficiency for Union Avenue Middle and an increase of 0.1% proficiency for University Middle School. Mathematics: -Three (3) students from Union Avenue Middle and one (1) student from University Middle School had a perfect score of Forty-one (41) students scored in the advanced proficient category compared to twenty-seven (27) in An increase of 5.4% proficiency for Union Avenue Middle and a decrease of 11.8% proficiency for University Middle School. Science: -Thirty-five (35) students scored in the advanced proficient category compared to twenty-two (22) in An increase of 12.7% proficiency for Union Avenue Middle School. -A decrease of 5.6% proficiency for University Middle School.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills & Knowledge - NJASK 8 Comparative Analysis of Performance for Total Students with Valid Scale Scores 1 Language Arts Literacy, Mathematics, & Science Performance Level (%) Proficient & Advanced Proficient Language Arts LiteracyMathematicsScience State DFG A (Lowest Socioeconomic) District (Irvington) Union Ave. Middle University Middle Excludes students who did not receive a scale score based on the full set of regular items in this content area 2 Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK)* Spring 2012 Grade 8 Schools Language Arts LiteracyMathematicsScience # Proces. LAL Exempt Not Present / Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. # Proces. Not Present / Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. # Proces. Not Present/ Voids APA # Prof. # Adv. Prof. University Middle Union Avenue Middle Totals ODP = = (48.46%) (+1.02%) ODP = = (34.61%) (-3.09%) ODP = 500 – 8 = (50.20%) (+3.86%) * Data from All Sections Roster without consideration to TIS < 1

IRVINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS USING MATRIX TO ANALYZE TEST RESULTS NJASK SPRING 2011 & 2012 SCHOOLS LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY NJASK 6NJASK 7NJASK 8 Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Union Avenue Middle XXX University Middle XXX Most Improved: Improvement by double-digits Improved: Improvement by at least 0.5 No Improvement: Scores about the same

IRVINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS USING MATRIX TO ANALYZE TEST RESULTS NJASK SPRING 2011 & 2012 SCHOOLS MATHEMATICS NJASK 6NJASK 7NJASK 8 Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Most Improved Improved No Improve- ment De- creased Union Avenue Middle XXX University Middle XXX Most Improved: Improvement by double-digits Improved: Improvement by at least 0.5 No Improvement: Scores about the same

IRVINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS USING MATRIX TO ANALYZE TEST RESULTS NJASK 4 & 8 SPRING 2011 & 2012 SCIENCE SCHOOLS NJASK 4NJASK 8 Most Improved No Improve- ment Decreased Most Improved No Improve- ment Decreased Berkeley Terrace X Chancellor Avenue X Florence Avenue X Grove StreetX Madison Avenue X Mt. Vernon Avenue X Thurgood Marshall X University Elementary X Union Ave. Middle X University Middle X Most Improved: Improvement by double-digits Improved: Improvement by at least 0.5 No Improvement: Scores about the same

2012 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment (NJAPA) The Alternate Proficiency Assessment (APA) is a portfolio assessment designed to measure progress toward achieving New Jersey ’ s state educational standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities who are unable to participate in the general assessments: NJASK 3-8, HSPA, and NJBCT. The APA is not designed as a measure for graduation. Highlights from the 2012 APA Performance Results for NJASK 3-8, HSPA, & NJBCT - 76 students were evaluated for the 2012 APA; an increase of seven students compared to Grade six has the largest number of APA participants (13 students) (about 81.6%) males participated in the APA compared to 14 (about 18.4%) females. - 6 students in grades 9 and 10 were evaluated in Science to meet the NJBCT requirement. Language Arts Literacy (LAL) - An increase in percent proficient for total students in grades 4, 6, and 8 when compared to percent proficient in Percent proficient decreased for grades 3, 5, 7, and 11. Mathematics - An increase in percent proficient for total students in grades 5, 6, 8 and 11 when compared to percent proficient in Percent proficient decreased for grades 3, 4, and 7. Science - A decrease in percent proficient for total students in grades 4, 8, and 11 compared to 2011.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment (NJAPA) Summary of District Performance for 2011 & 2012 Total Number of Students Percent Proficient* LALMathScience Grade N/A Grade Grade N/A Grade N/A Grade N/A Grade Grade 9N/A Grade 10N/A2 0.0 Grade Total # of Students6976 * Includes Advanced Proficient N/A Not Applicable

Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State to State for English Language Learners (ACCESS for ELLs) English Language Proficiency Test Spring 2012 ACCESS for ELLs is a tool to measure ELLs readiness to take part in large-scale state assessments in English with and/or without accommodations. This test is the instrument used by the state to demonstrate that students are meeting the Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) for English Language Proficiency ACCESS for ELLs: Review of Performance students in grades K-12 took the ACCESS for ELLs test, an increase of 86 students when compared to Some students in grades K, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 11 were reported to have completed the entire continuum – the sixth level of Reaching. - Some students in grades K, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12 were in the fifth English Language Proficiency level – Bridging. - A large number of our ELLs overall scores were within the first four English Language Proficiency levels of Entering, Beginning, Developing, and Expanding. - 13% of the ELLs tested in grade 4 were in the sixth level of Reaching. - More students were at the sixth level of Reaching in 2012 compared to 2011.

Irvington Public Schools ACCESS for ELLs - English Language Proficiency Test Comparative Analysis of WIDA Language Proficiency Levels Using Overall Score 1 by Grade Spring 2011 & 2012 Grades Number Tested Cluster Adminis- tered WIDA Language Proficiency Levels 2 EnteringBeginningDevelopingExpandingBridgingReaching K42105K Overall Score is the global indicator of English Language Proficiency and derived by combining the scale scores of the four language domains (Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking) according to their relative weights - 35% Reading + 35% Writing + 15% Listening + 15% Speaking. 2 Numbers within the six levels of Language Proficiency (Entering, Beginning, Developing, Expanding, Bridging, and Reaching) are the % of total tested.

2012 American Diploma Project (ADP) Algebra I End-of-Course The ADP Algebra I EOC exam is designed to determine whether a student has mastered algebra content and whether the student is prepared for higher-level mathematics. A score at or above 450 indicates a mastery of Algebra I skills. Summary of the American Diploma Project (ADP) Algebra I End-of-Course Exam Results Spring was the highest scaled score for 8 th graders, 480 for 9 th graders, 410 for 10 th graders. - Median Scaled Scores by Content Standard for UAMS are better than the scores for the State in all the content standards. - Median Scaled Scores by Content Standard for UMS are comparable with the scores for the State in three content standards; and better by three points in Linear Relationships. - 65% of the students from UAMS performed at either proficient or advanced proficient level; an increase of 29% compared to % of students from UMS performed at either proficient or advanced proficient level; an increase of 20% compared to Percentage achieving mastery by Content Standard is higher for students in 8 th grade than those in 9 th grade.

Irvington Public Schools American Diploma Project (ADP) Algebra I End-of-Course Exam 2011 & 2012 Number of Students by Achievement Level Performance Level State District University M.S. Union Avenue M.S. Irvington High School* Number of Students with Valid Scores NA Advanced Proficient NA Proficient NA Basic NA Below Basic NA NA: State information Not Available ; * Includes students from Alternative H.S. Advanced: 575 – 850 Proficient: 450 – 574 Basic: 387 – 449 Below Basic: 300 – 386

Irvington Public Schools Summary of the New Jersey Biology Competency Test May 2012 Irvington High School Total Number of Answer Booklets Processed ……………………………………………. 417 Not Present …………………………………………………………………………….…… 38 Voids ………………………………………………………………………..…………………. 2 Total Number of students with valid scores …………………………………….……… Number of Advanced Proficient + Proficient ………………………………………………76 (20.16%). An increase of eight (8) students in the proficient category compared to performance in 2011.

Irvington Public Schools New Jersey Biology Competency Test Comparative Analysis of Performance by Demographic Groups % ProficientScale Score Mean Total Students General Education Special Education Limited English Proficient Female Male WhiteNS0.0NS Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Other Economically Disadvantaged Non-Economically Disadvantaged NS: No student in this category

HIGHLIGHTS FROM 2012 HSPA (GRADE 11) TEST RESULTS - For Total Population, there was a decrease of 3.2% in LAL from 68.7% in 2011 to 65.5% proficient or above in However, there was an increase of 12.0% in Math from 23.5% in 2011 to 35.5% in An increase of 0.7% in LAL performance and an increase of 5.8% in Math performance for Special Education students in Overall trend in the performances of General Education students indicates an increase of 1% in LAL and 22.1% in Math in Female students out-performed male students in LAL by 12.6%, while the male students performed higher than their female counterparts in Math by 6.1% - Economically disadvantaged students out-performed the Non-Economically disadvantaged students in LAL by 6.3% and Math by 17.7% - For LEP population, 6.8% proficient or above in LAL and 5.3% proficient or above in Math.

IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENT (HSPA) MARCH TEST ADMINISTRATION FOR FIRST-TIME 11 TH GRADERS ONLY ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE (% PROFICIENT*) Language Arts LiteracyMathematics Total Students Gen. Ed. Students Spec. Ed. Students LEP Students Total Students Gen. Ed. Students Spec. Ed. Students LEP Students (-1.6) 75.9 (+1.1) 3.4 (-1.0) 13.0 (-18.5) 29.8 (+9.2) 37.9 (+12.9) 0.0 (0.0) 9.1 (-4.1) (-7.8) 65.3 (-10.6) 7.8 (+4.4) 11.5 (-1.5) 20.5 (-9.3) 25.3 (-12.6) 2.0 (+2.0) 3.8 (-5.3) (-0.3) 59.8 (-5.5) 10.2 (+2.4) **17.3 (-3.2) 20.3 (-5.0) 2.0 (0.0) ** (+16.6) 80.0 (+20.2) 24.3 (+14.1) (+6.2) 27.6 (+7.6) 0.0 (-2.0) (-3.2) 80.1 (+0.1) 25.0 (+0.7) 30.8 (+6.8) 35.5 (+12.0) 49.7 (+22.1) 5.8 (+5.8) 11.1 (-7.4) * Includes Advanced Proficient ** No Student coded as LEP +/- Increase / Decrease data compared to 2007 data AYP will be computed after the third attempt of HSPA

Irvington Public Schools Comparative Analysis of March 2012 HSPA Performance by Demographic Groups - % Proficient * (Produced for First-Time 11th Graders Only) Language Arts Literacy Performance Data % Statewide Non-Special Needs Special Needs ¹ DFG A ² District ³ Total Students General Ed Special Ed LEP Female Male White Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian Economic Disadvantaged Non-Economic Disadvantaged * Includes Advanced Proficient; 1 Abbott Districts; 2 District Factor Group A (Lowest Socioeconomic Districts) 3 District implies Irvington Township

Irvington Public Schools Comparative Analysis of March 2012 HSPA Performance by Demographic Groups - % Proficient * (Produced for First-Time 11th Graders Only) Mathematics Performance Data % Statewide Non-Special Needs Special Needs ¹ DFG A ² District ³ Total Students General Ed Special Ed LEP Female Male White Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian Economic Disadvantaged Non-Economic Disadvantaged * Includes Advanced Proficient; 1 Abbott Districts; 2 District Factor Group A (Lowest Socioeconomic Districts) 3 District implies Irvington Township