Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
Head of Learning: Job description
THREE HANDBOOKS TEACHER PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM EDUCATIONAL SPECIALISTS PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
GAPSS Report. STRANDS NOT ADDRESSED NOT EVIDENTEMERGENTEMERGINGOPERATIONAL FULLY OPERATIONALEXEMPLARY Curriculum.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
1 Handout #1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Language Arts)  Performance Indicator Progression  Scope and Sequence  Instructional Guide  Language.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Elementary Professional Development Day August 31, 2010 Gar-Field High School Dr. Steven L. Walts Superintendent of Schools.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT
Presentation transcript:

Distinguished Educator Initiative

2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students to achieve at high levels by creating schools that are safe academically, socially, emotionally and physically.

What It’s All About…

GOALS RANDOM ACTS OF IMPROVEMENT RANDOM PROCESSES PROGRAMS INTERVENTIONS

GOALS ALIGNED ACTS OF IMPROVEMENT ALIGNED PROCESSES PROGRAMS INTERVENTIONS

Focus Area 1: Vision Vision is a clear and compelling picture of school District effectiveness that includes proficiency for all students. Focused on student achievement, the vision inherently sets guidelines and boundaries for discussion, decision-making, policies, action, and performance at all levels throughout the school District. A clearly articulated, data-informed, lived vision of proficiency for all students and attainment of Adequate Yearly Progress guides all processes in the School District as a standards-based system.

Focus Area 1: Reflections on Vision How can we focus administration, faculty, staff and community on a shared vision for student achievement? How can we embed the PA academic standards and assessment anchors into effective teaching and learning practices? How can we build District capacity to create lasting systemic change in keeping with NCLB?

Focus Area 2: Data Data drives decision-making, instructional design, delivery of instruction, and the professional development necessary to ensure student achievement. Individual student proficiency as measured by performance on PSSA and District attainment of Adequate Yearly Progress are at the forefront of data usage and contemplation.

Focus Area 2: Reflections on Data How can we consistently communicate data to all constituencies? How can data be analyzed, interpreted and applied to the design and delivery of instruction? How can we use technology to describe, design, deliver data and to develop people and document progress? How can we guide students in managing their own achievement data?

11/3/2015Wilkinsburg Borough School District Quality Review 10 Focus Area 3: Quality Teaching Quality Teaching results when qualified, effective teachers deliver rigorous curriculum and execute reliable assessments using standards-based instructional materials and research-proven methods. Evidence-based instruction (including data verifying student achievement) is routinely used to ensure all students learn. Targeted assistance is provided for individual students (or subgroups of students) who lack prior knowledge and understanding or who struggle with more traditional methods of instruction.

Focus Area 3: Reflections on Quality Teaching How can we collaborate to develop a consistent, unified strategy to improve student achievement? How can we develop curriculum guides that are standards-based, aligned with assessment anchors and articulated across the grade levels? How can we use differentiated instruction to include students with disabilities into regular education classrooms?

Focus Area 4: Quality Leadership Leadership is strategic and deliberate in sustaining focus on student achievement and implementing a standards-based system to ensure teaching effectiveness. A strong and capable instructional leadership team builds a culture of trust, continuous improvement, and accountability for performance. The sequence of data-design-delivery-development- documentation is used to build consensus and a shared vision among teaching professionals to cultivate the relentless pursuit of individual student accomplishment.

Focus Area 4: Reflections on Quality Leadership How can we focus the leadership team on student achievement? How can we attract, retain, motivate and strengthen the leadership team? How can we help the leadership team to conduct formative and summative classroom observations?

Focus Area 5: Artful Use of Infrastructure Artful use of infrastructure requires the strategic alignment and utilization of faculty, staff, facilities, time, fiscal resources, and available technology to realize the District vision of proficiency, achievement, and success for all students. Infrastructure plays a vital role in creating conditions that support effective teaching and learning, and assists faculty members in holding high expectations for one another. It provides intensive supports for students who may struggle and supports learning teams, staff members, or schools adjusting to a realigned District vision.

Focus Area 5: Reflections on Artful Use of Infrastructure How can we contribute to a plan for optimizing and improving District facilities? How can we structure data and galvanize resources to ensure student achievement? How can we maximize communication among all internal and external District constituents?

Focus Area 6: Continuous Learning Ethic A continuous learning ethic is exhibited in a school culture of standards and evidence-based, collaborative practice, continuous professional learning, and collective professional accountability. Teachers and staff are actively engaged while accepting responsibility for student success and demanding a high quality of work from one another. A problem-solving approach is evident when facing challenges; change is the norm as an anticipated component of continuous improvement; and adult learning is expected and embraced.

Focus Area 6: Reflections on Continuous Learning Ethic How can we enhance teachers’ knowledge and skill in standards-based teaching and learning strategies? How can we develop customized, job-embedded professional development plans that support both individual and District goals? How can we use data in non-judgmental ways to inform teaching? How can we help ancillary staff recognize their role as District ambassadors to the community at large?

Focus Area 7:Community Community partnerships are sought and engaged by teachers and school leaders. Authentic relationships with students, families, businesses, higher education institutions, and the community-at-large are cultivated and viewed as resources for the schools. A strategy and system for communicating with the community is in place. Community health and social services regularly interact with the schools or are invited and provided space in school buildings to work in partnership with the District.

Focus Area 7: Reflections on Community How can we strengthen collaboration between community agencies and the District? How can we maintain and improve the working relationship between municipal authorities and the school community? How can we enhance, communicate and promote the District’s positive aspects so that families keep their children enrolled?