1/41 Electronic Noise Spectroscopy of InGaAs QDs Tim Morgan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tuning eigenstate-energies of InGaAs Quantum-Dots using lateral electric fields W. Prestel, H. Krenner, J. J. Finley St. Petersburg – JASS 2004.
Advertisements

CHAPTER 4 CONDUCTION IN SEMICONDUCTORS
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Electron Devices Microelectronics, BSc course Basic semiconductor physics.
COST Action MP0805 Meeting, Istanbul, April 12-13, 2010 University of Nottingham, UK Effects of Hydrogen Irradiation on Deep Levels in MBE Grown Dilute.
Semiconductor Device Physics Lecture 3 Dr. Gaurav Trivedi, EEE Department, IIT Guwahati.
Semiconductor Device Physics
Electrical Techniques MSN506 notes. Electrical characterization Electronic properties of materials are closely related to the structure of the material.
Tin Based Absorbers for Infrared Detection, Part 2 Presented By: Justin Markunas Direct energy gap group IV semiconductor alloys and quantum dot arrays.
EE 230: Optical Fiber Communication Lecture 11 From the movie Warriors of the Net Detectors.
Metal Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors
Magneto-optical study of InP/InGaAs/InP quantum well B. Karmakar, A.P. Shah, M.R. Gokhale and B.M. Arora Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai,
Optics on Graphene. Gate-Variable Optical Transitions in Graphene Feng Wang, Yuanbo Zhang, Chuanshan Tian, Caglar Girit, Alex Zettl, Michael Crommie,
Studies of Minority Carrier Recombination Mechanisms in Beryllium Doped GaAs for Optimal High Speed LED Performance An Phuoc Doan Department of Electrical.
Advanced Semiconductor Physics ~ Dr. Jena University of Notre Dame Department of Electrical Engineering SIZE DEPENDENT TRANSPORT IN DOPED NANOWIRES Qin.
Dr. Nasim Zafar Electronics 1 EEE 231 – BS Electrical Engineering Fall Semester – 2012 COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Virtual campus Islamabad.
Quantum Dots. Optical and Photoelectrical properties of QD of III-V Compounds. Alexander Senichev Physics Faculty Department of Solid State Physics
Quantum Dots: Confinement and Applications
Modeling of Energy States of Carriers in Quantum Dots
Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting (TCSPC) Scott Thalman Brigham Young University Advisor: Dr. John Colton Dr Haeyeon Yang USU Physics Help from Mitch.
Optical properties and carrier dynamics of self-assembled GaN/AlGaN quantum dots Ashida lab. Nawaki Yohei Nanotechnology 17 (2006)
Growth and Characterization of IV-VI Semiconductor Multiple Quantum Well Structures Patrick J. McCann, Huizhen Wu, and Ning Dai* School of Electrical and.
1/f noise in devices 전광선.
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 96, , 2010
Slide # 1 SPM Probe tips CNT attached to a Si probe tip.
(Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy) II. Advanced Techniques
InAs on GaAs self assembled Quantum Dots By KH. Zakeri sharif University of technology, Spring 2003.
Optical Characterization of GaN-based Nanowires : From Nanometric Scale to Light Emitting Devices A-L. Bavencove*, E. Pougeoise, J. Garcia, P. Gilet, F.
(In,Ga)As/(Al,Ga)As quantum wells on GaAs(110) R. Hey, M. Höricke, A. Trampert, U. Jahn, P. Santos Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Berlin.
Techniques for determination of deep level trap parameters in irradiated silicon detectors AUTHOR: Irena Dolenc ADVISOR: prof. dr. Vladimir Cindro.
Brad Gussin John Romankiewicz 12/1/04 Quantum Dots: Photon Interaction Applications.
LW4 Lecture Week 4-1 Heterojunctions Fabrication and characterization of p-n junctions 1.
AlGaN/InGaN Photocathodes D.J. Leopold and J.H. Buckley Washington University St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A. Large Area Picosecond Photodetector Development.
Absorption Spectra of Nano-particles
ENE 311 Lecture 9.
Chap. 41: Conduction of electricity in solids Hyun-Woo Lee.
InAs Inserted HEMT 연성진.
D.-A. Luh, A. Brachmann, J. E. Clendenin, T. Desikan, E. L. Garwin, S. Harvey, R. E. Kirby, T. Maruyama, and C. Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Terahertz waves base on SiGe Alloy NTU 林楚軒. Introduction Structure a.SiGe QW intersubband transition b.SiGe QW with dopant helping c.Si with dopant Summary.
© Fraunhofer IAF Mechanisms of 1/f noise and Gain Instabilities in metamorphic HEMTS D. Bruch; M. Seelmann-Eggebert; S. Guha Fraunhofer Institute for Applied.
STANFORD Advanced LIGO Photodiode Development ______ David B. Jackrel, Homan B. Yuen, Seth R. Bank, Mark A. Wistey, Xiaojun Yu, Junxian Fu, Zhilong Rao,
Introduction to Semiconductor Technology. Outline 3 Energy Bands and Charge Carriers in Semiconductors.
An Investigation into the Effects of n-type Doping in InAs Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetectors Steven P. Minor Group: Brandon Passmore, Jiang Wu, Dr. Manasreh,
Gad Bahir – Technion Nanotechnology Workshop Quantum Dots Infrared Photodetectors (QDIPs) Gad Bahir Collaboration: E. Finkman, (Technion) D. Ritter.
Radiation effects in nanostructures: Comparison of proton irradiation induced changes on Quantum Dots and Quantum Wells.* R. Leon and G. M. Swift Jet Propulsion.
Growth and optical properties of II-VI self-assembled quantum dots
4.12 Modification of Bandstructure: Alloys and Heterostructures Since essentially all the electronic and optical properties of semiconductor devices are.
MIRTHE Summer Workshop 2014, August Four-zone quantum well infrared photodetector with a confined state in the continuum G. M. Penello, A. P. Ravikumar,
MRS, 2008 Fall Meeting Supported by DMR Grant Low-Frequency Noise and Lateral Transport Studies of In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As/GaAs Studies of In 0.35 Ga.
C. Kadow, J.-U. Bae, M. Dahlstrom, M. Rodwell, A. C. Gossard *University of California, Santa Barbara G. Nagy, J. Bergman, B. Brar, G. Sullivan Rockwell.
Semiconductor Device Physics
Substrate dependence of self-assembled quantum dots
J.Vaitkus et al. PC spectra. CERN RD50 Workshop, Ljubljana, "Analysis of deep level system transformation by photoionization spectroscopy"
Issued: May 5, 2010 Due: May 12, 2010 (at the start of class) Suggested reading: Kasap, Chapter 5, Sections Problems: Stanford University MatSci.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Band profile and local density of states of a 40-nm GaAs pin junction solar cell.
Application of photodiodes
Contents GaAs HEMTs overview RF (Radio Frequency) characteristics
QUANTUM-EFFECT DEVICES (QED)
Contact Resistance Modeling and Analysis of HEMT Devices S. H. Park, H
Chapter 6. pn Junction Diode
Metal Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors
Contact Resistance Modeling in HEMT Devices
Strong infrared electroluminescence from black silicon
へき開再成長法により作製された(110)GaAs 量子井戸における表面原子ステップの観察
Annealing effects on photoluminescence spectra of
Basic Semiconductor Physics
Semiconductor Device Physics
Quantum Dot Lasers ASWIN S ECE S3 Roll no 23.
Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator
Presentation transcript:

1/41 Electronic Noise Spectroscopy of InGaAs QDs Tim Morgan

2/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Outline Motivation Noise Theory Discussion & Results Conclusions Future Work

3/41 Quantum Dot Devices Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Infrared Detectors cqd.eecs.northwestern.edu Igor L. Medintz, et. al. Nature Materials 2003 Biosensors Single Photon Emitter byz.org QD Laser

4/41 Infrared Photodetectors cqd.eecs.northwestern.edu Passmore, B.S.; Jiang Wu; Manasreh, M.O.; Kunets, V.P.; Lytvyn, P.M.; Salamo, G.J.; Electron Device Letters, IEEE Volume 29, Issue 3, March 2008 Page(s): Quantum Dot Devices Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

5/41 The Nature of Noise in QDs What is the source of noise in QDs? Does noise in QDs differ from bulk? Can noise be lowered by optimization of QDs? Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

6/41 The Plan Noise Spectroscopy in QDs MBE: Grow In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As QDs AFM: How does noise depend on morphology? Photoluminescence: How noise depend on Electronic structure? Hall Effect: How does Noise depend on Carrier Conc. & Mobility? Noise Spectroscopy: Noise Measurements & Analysis

7/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Noise Spectroscopy

8/41 Thermal Noise Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Due to random fluctuations of electron motion from lattice vibrations. No Bias S V,thermal

9/41 1/ f noise Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Arises from both carrier and mobility fluctuations in the conductivity. The Hooge Parameter (α) is an indicator of crystal quality. 1/f Bias Added

10/41 Generation-Recombination Noise Noise Spectroscopy in QDs g-r, τ 1 g-r, τ 2 Bias Added

11/41 Total Noise Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

12/41 The Plan Noise Spectroscopy in QDs MBE: Grow In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As QDs

13/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Sample Creation MBE Growth –Solid Source Riber 32 P –RHEED monitoring

14/41 The Structure Noise Spectroscopy in QDs GaAs (001) SI 5000 Å GaAs: Si N D = 6 × Å GaAs: undoped InGaAs QD layer 200 Å GaAs: undoped 1500 Å GaAs: Si N D = 6 × Å GaAs buffer 13S5 11S4 9S3 6S2 0S1 # MLsSample QDs QW Bulk RHEED

15/41 The Plan Noise Spectroscopy in QDs MBE: Grow In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As QDs AFM: How does noise depend on morphology?

16/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Morphology 9 ML Height: 33 ± 2.8 Å Density: 3.8 × cm ML Height: 47 ± 2.8 Å Density: 8.4 × cm ML Height: 53 ± 2.8 Å Density: 7.2 × cm -2

17/41 AFM Trends Noise Spectroscopy in QDs QD Height increases with number of monolayers. QD Density increases with number of monolayers.

18/41 The Plan Noise Spectroscopy in QDs MBE: Grow In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As QDs AFM: How does noise depend on morphology? Photoluminescence: How noise depend on electronic structure?

19/41 Photoluminescence Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Width of energy well is the height of the QD.

20/41 PL Trends Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Peak position decreases in energy with increase in height. FWHM shows increase Integral Intensity shows decrease with increase in height 9 ML 11 ML 13 ML

21/41 The Plan Noise Spectroscopy in QDs MBE: Grow In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As QDs AFM: How does noise depend on morphology? Photoluminescence: How noise depend on electronic structure? Hall Effect: How does Noise depend on carrier conc. & mobility?

22/41 Sample Preparation Noise Spectroscopy in QDs 20 µm Greek Cross 75 nm AuGe 20 nm Ni 270 nm Au

23/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Finished Structures 13 ML # MLsR C (Ω) R S (Ω) All samples meet

24/41 Mobility Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

25/41 Carrier Concentration Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

26/41 The Plan Noise Spectroscopy in QDs MBE: Grow In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As QDs AFM: How does noise depend on morphology? Photoluminescence: How noise depend on electronic structure? Hall Effect: How does Noise depend on carrier conc. & mobility? Noise Spectroscopy: Noise Measurements & Analysis

27/41 DLNS: Setup & Experiments Setup –Shielded sample –Power supply: battery pack and series of resistors –Low noise preamplifier with band filter –Noise spectrum analyzer Experiments –Temperature dependence: 82 K – 390 K, fixed bias –Room temperature: several biases –Low temperature (82 K): several biases Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

28/41 Noise Curves Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Series of spectra at fixed temperatures and various biases Fit each specturm with all components of noise Extract fit parameters for component breakdown analysis 0 ML 300 K

29/41 Curve Fittings Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

30/41 Flicker Noise Fit Parameter: Determine the Hooge Parameter at 300 K and 82 K Noise Spectroscopy in QDs 0 ML Sample at 300 K

31/41 Hooge Comparison Noise Spectroscopy in QDs 300 K

32/41 QD Comparisons Noise Spectroscopy in QDs 300 K 9 ML 11 ML 13 ML 9 ML 11 ML 13 ML

33/41 Two Views Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Shoulders Peaks 0 ML

34/41 Bulk to QDs Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

35/41 GR Analysis A different expression: Peaks reveal the activation and ionization energy –ln S max vs ln ω  ionization energy –1/k B T max vs ln ω  activation energy Capture cross section: Trap density: Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

36/41 Analysis Plots Noise Spectroscopy in QDs 11 ML Position of Fermi Energy compared to Trap Position Activation Energy

37/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs GR Summary S0S6S9S11S13 Ref6 ML9ML11 ML13 ML defect A S max slope E 1 (eV) E 0 (eV) σ 0 (cm 2 )2.09E E E E E-11 N t (cm -3 )3.68E E E E E+14 defect B S max slope E 1 (eV) σ 0 (cm 2 )2.86E E E E E-12 N t (cm -3 )7.05E E E E E+13 defect C S max slope E 1 (eV) σ 0 (cm 2 )1.95E E E E E-13 N t (cm -3 )4.71E E E E E+12 defect D S max slope E 1 (eV) σ 0 (cm 2 ) 2.67E E E-18 N t (cm -3 ) 9.42E E E+11

38/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Conclusions Sources of Noise in QDs –GR Traps with activation energies of 0.74, 0.49, 0.34, 0.18 and 0.1 eV Noise in QDs does differ from bulk –Flicker noise decreases with the insertion of In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As and the formation of QDs Optimization of QDs to lower noise –Increase in height and density lowers flicker noise –QDs do have an additional trap associated with them

39/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Impact Reveal additional unknown defect associated with QDs QDs leads to lower flicker noise Lateral noise technique is sensitive tool to feel nanoscale objects MRS Fall 08: “Low-frequency noise and lateral transport studies of In 0.35 Ga 0.65 As/GaAs quantum dot heterostructures” Pending Publication: “Noise spectroscopy of deep traps in GaAs/InGaAs heterostructures: transition from quantum well to quantum dots.”

40/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Future Work Study Gated QD samples –Change where current flows to determine which layer noise arises from Vary doping to change Fermi level –Enhance noise when in resonance with traps Inject minority carriers with light into QD samples –Determine energy positions relative to conduction band QDIPs –Look at noise in a QD device and show its limitations because of the noise

41/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Thanks Dr. Greg Salamo Dr. Vasyl Kunets Professor Ken Vickers Dr. Bill Brown Dr. Huaxing Fu Rob Sleezer

42/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs

43/41 What is a Quantum Dot? Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Single AtomMany Atoms A Few Atoms Confined Single atom: Discrete energy level transitions Many atoms: continuum of energy levels A Few Atoms Confined: lower energy levels discrete because of confinement ~30 nm

44/41 QD Formation Noise Spectroscopy in QDs GaAs substrate 2D InGaAs wetting layer Strain has built up! - I’m very uncomfortable!! When critical thickness is reached, the strain is relaxed and thus 3D islands (quantum dots) are formed. - I’m now happy!! InGaAs fluxes Used with permission of Jihoon Lee

45/41 Atomic Force Microscopy Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Surface data Height Diameter Density

46/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Photoluminescence

47/41 Hall Effect Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Transport Info Mobility Carrier Concentration Hall Coefficient Conductivity Primary Carrier

48/41 Contact Optimization Annealing: minimize barrier to create Ohmic contacts IV Testing: Verify Ohmic contacts made TLM Measurements: determine contact resistance Noise Spectroscopy in QDs AuGe/Ni/Au Dopant lTlT d dx cc cc x 0-l rsrs RsRs RsRs

49/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Hall Measurements –Mobility –Carrier concentration Resistance measurements

50/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Noise Spectroscopy V bias V noise S V is the average change in voltage squared in a bandwidth of 1 Hz.

51/41 Why 1/ f Dependence? Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Sum the noise of all the tail states together. Tail States (Defects)

52/41 Hooge Comparison Noise Spectroscopy in QDs 82 K

53/41 Noise Spectroscopy in QDs Noise Spectroscopy V bias V noise