Metrics-Driven Quality Management Mamta Trivedi Global Sr. Director, Quality Assurance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Why, What and How of Disaster Recovery Plan Testing Presented By: Ed Deveau.
Advertisements

1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
HIV Drug Resistance Training
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Grade “A” Laboratory Evaluation Program Ronald G. Brown Dairy Product Specialist/Laboratory Evaluation Officer NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets.
The key steps in an annual cycle Produce the annual work programme Create an annual Internal Audit plan for approval by the Audit Committee, typically.
Requisition Process. Requisitioning Procedures Words to live by: Massachusetts Uniform Procurement Act, M.G.L. c.30B requires the following on all purchases.
David Cloutier Director, Research Center Management and Development Budgeting for Industry Sponsored Clinical Trials.
PMI - SFBAC 19 April 2007Alison Wellsfry Project Rescue Crisis Management to Project Success Alison Wellsfry, PMP 19 April 2007.
Date: 03/05/2007 Vendor Management and Metrics. 2 A.T. Kearney X/mm.yyyy/00000 AT Kearney’s IT/Telecom Vendor Facts IT/Telecom service, software and equipment.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Chapter 7 Revenue and Collection Cycle “What at first was plunder assumed the softer name of revenue.” Thomas Paine McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2008 by.
Tipologie di Audit e loro caratteristiche Riunione sottogruppo GCP-GIQAR 21 Marzo 2006 Francesca Bucchi.
Readiness Index – Is your application ready for Production? Jeff Tatelman SQuAD October 2008.
ISO 9001:2015 Revision overview - General users
(Host Club) CLUB QUALIFICATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THE ROTARY FOUNDATION.
Stanley Estime, MSCI December 9, 2014 Record Keeping: What is Regulatory Documentation and how should it be maintained? Tel:
Copyright © 2013 Quintiles Quintiles Site Management Kim Davis, SSRM June 17, 2014.
World Health Organization
Project Management: Madness or Mayhem
ILearningCampus.com Understanding by doing and learning by talking.
Project Management Process Overview
Joint Meeting: Department Grant Administrators Budget Managers January 26, 2011.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
Using Metrics to Drive Research Administration Performance
PRODUCT TRANSFER.
Evidence and Documentation
Unit 3 Accounts & Finance Budgeting. Learning Objectives Understand the importance of budgeting for organisations Calculate and interpret variances Analyse.
Laboratory Ethics Matthew George, Jr., Ph.D.
1 What’s Next for Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB)? AGA/GWSCPA 6 th Annual Conference Dianne Copeland, Director, FSIO May 8, 2007.
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
CONFIDENTIAL Presentation to Erin K. Bennett July 10, 2012 Central Laboratory Services.
AUDITING THE REVENUE CYCLE AND RELATED ACCOUNTS
1 Copyright © 2004, Manugistics, Inc. All rights reserved. Objectives At the end of this section you will be able to:  Understand the key pains and challenges.
Building Services Committee Member Meeting Update #2 June 7, Building Services Committee.
P1 External Quality Assessment (EQA) Proficiency Testing.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
1 CRCID Funding 1. CRCID Funding Criteria 2. Program Funding 3. Project Funding.
Microsoft Partner Conference Invalid Agreement Trends  Top 5 Reasons  Critical Fields on Contract  Select  Enterprise  Campus  School.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Combining Supply Chain Integration with Sales & Operations Planning Mark Williams – Professional Services Consultant, Supply Chain Solutions Center – Demand.
1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Business Process Management
January 21, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Initial Approach Discussion.
Grant Management Seminar Session 4 1 Session 4 QUALIFICATION 10/12/2013.
Stanley Estime, MSCI October 19, 2015 Record Keeping: What is Regulatory Documentation and how should it be maintained? Tel:
Request for Service (RFS) Process and Metrics Update June 24, 2008.
Powered by Stakeholder Engagement Feedback Pam Kaur, Group Finance Manager University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust.
RIHES-II: H ANDLING A UDITS AND I NSPECTIONS E FFECTIVE D ATE 25 D ECEMBER 2006 V ERSION : 3.0 บุญเหลือ พรึงลำภู 15 มกราคม 2557.
Internal Auditing Effectiveness
Grid Operations Report To ERCOT Board Of Directors December 16, 2003 Sam Jones, COO.
United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2010 World Programme on Population and Housing Censuses: Census Evaluation and Post Enumeration Surveys, Asunción,
1 TenStep Project Management Process ™ PM00.5 PM00.5 Project Management Preparation for Success * Manage Scope *
1 Best Practices Audit and Assurance Office of the State Comptroller.
Public Libraries Survey Data File Overview. 2 What We’ll Talk About PLS: Public Library Survey State level data Public library data (Administrative Entities)
Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) Open Forum Session 19.
Claims Procedures Presented by: Charity Makela Associate Chief Claim Counsel.
FIMS Data Quality FIMS Annual Training May 10-12, 2016 Prepared by: Mark Gordy and Gayle Smith.
IEEE Central Texas Section CTS PACE Fawzi Behmann CTS PACE Professional Activities Committees for Engineers 09/07/2013 Fawzi Behmann l Current Status l.
Presented By: W. Andrew Powell, CPA Principal Halt, Buzas & Powell, Ltd.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Internal Auditing Responsibilities of the Faculty and Staff
CBI - Clinical Trials Budgeting and Forecasting
[Project Name] Project Report
[Project Name] Project Report
Proof of concept 29 September 2010
Presentation transcript:

Metrics-Driven Quality Management Mamta Trivedi Global Sr. Director, Quality Assurance

2 Current MCC Metrics MetricCategoryMetrics TitleDefinition 1General Operations Project Management Turnover MCC Definition: The percentage of the project management turnover in the central laboratory that have direct communication with sponsor for protocols. Quintiles Interpretation: Total # key staff who have left team (GPM, PM, DM, GSM) / Total staff on the team. 2Protocol Initiation Percentage first supplies shipped on time to the first site for first patient MCC Definition: The percentage of protocols that have the first supplies to first site shipped date met based on the defined expectations between sponsor and central laboratory. Not currently reported by Quintiles. 3Site InitiationPercentage first supplies shipped on time for all sites (all regions) MCC Definition: The percentage of protocols that have the first supplies shipped date met for all sites (all regions) based on the defined expectations between sponsor and central laboratory. Quintiles interpretation: Percentage of kits shipped on time to all sites in all regions 4Data CleaningPercentage of queries from central laboratory to site based upon requisitions received MCC Definition: The number of queries generated between the central laboratory and the sites, compared to the number of requisitions received by a central laboratory. Quintiles Interpretation: Percentage of samples leading to queries from Central Lab to investigator site based upon number of samples in data clarification queue (DCQ).

3 MCC (cont’d) MetricCategoryMetrics TitleDefinition 5Data CleaningAverage turnaround for resolution of queries from central laboratory to site MCC Definition: Average time required for resolution of queries from central laboratory to site based on the requisitions received by a central laboratory. Quintiles Interpretation: Total number of DCQs resolved 48 hours / Total number of DCQs. 6Site Support Services Percentage of queries from site to central laboratory based upon requisitions received with average turnaround time MCC Definition: The number of queries generated between the site and the central laboratory, compared to the number of requisitions received for a sponsor and central laboratory, and the average time to resolution. Quintiles Interpretation: This is called our DCQ Rate which is the total number of samples in DCQ / Total number of samples reported. 7Site Support Services Average turnaround time on queries from site to central laboratory MCC Definition: The average time required to resolve queries generated between the site and the central laboratory for a sponsor and central laboratory. Quintiles Interpretation: Number of DCQ entries that were resolved during the reporting period.

4 MCC (cont’d) MetricCategoryMetrics TitleDefinition 8SafetyPercentage of panics that had both 1st attempt made and were successfully communicated to the sites within the defined turn around times MCC Definition: Percentage of panics that had both 1st attempt made and were successfully communicated to the sites within the defined turn around times - overall by sponsor and central laboratory. Quintiles Interpretation: Total alerts responded <24 hours / Total number of alerts. 9Laboratory Operations Percentage specific test(s) reported within expected turnaround time MCC Definition: Percentage of specific test(s) as defined by the sponsor and service provider which reported "results available" or were reported to the investigator sites within the defined turnaround time as agreed upon by the sponsor and service provider -overall by protocol, sponsor and central laboratory. Quintiles Interpretation: Percentage of tests within stability which are performed and approved within 24 hours of receipt. 10Laboratory Operations Percentage tests not reportableMCC Definition: The percentage of tests not reportable for any reason by "general areas of concerns" overall by sponsor and central laboratory. Not Reportable is defined as tests cancelled for any reason (e.g. QNS, stability, etc). Quintiles Interpretation: Percentage of tests cancelled due to lab errors.

5 MCC (cont’d) MetricCategoryMetrics TitleDefinition 11Data Management Percentage on time accepted file transfers MCC Definition: The percentage of “on time” accepted file transfers as defined by the sponsor and service provider for sponsor and central laboratory. Quintiles Interpretation: Total number of on-time transfers / Total transfers for that reporting period. 12Financial Management Plan, Forecast and Actual Financial Report MCC Definition: An overview report provided by protocol, which compares the original forecasted budget (Request for Budget Pricing), the updated projected budget (after signature of the Statement of Work) and final 'actual' invoices for the protocol. Not currently reported by Quintiles. 13Financial Management Comparison of budgeted and actual transportation costs by region and/or country MCC Definition: The transportation costs will be added by region and/or country to each of the segments. Not currently reported by Quintiles. 14Quality Assurance Percentage of audit findings closed within sponsor and central laboratory agreed upon timeframe MCC Definition: The percentage of the audit findings (including Financial, Quality Assurance and Computer Systems Quality) closed prior to or by the original timeline agreed upon between the sponsor and service provider by sponsor and central laboratory. Not currently reported by Quintiles.

Future Goals  Create standardized set of Sponsor-specific metrics  Partner to develop risk-based approach  Use data to understand Voice of Customer  Define Critical to Quality  Focus improvements  Establish “trust” and “confidence”  Position as partner in “resource constraint” age 6

7 Metrics Storyboard

8

9

10