Child Care Quality Study: Does Partnering with Head Start Make a Difference? Diane Schilder, Benjamin Chauncey, Ashley Smith, Candy Miller and Sheila Skiffington.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Audience: Parents, families, local community members
Advertisements

1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
SAC Needs Assessment. Background One goal of the Massachusetts State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care (SAC) Identify the needs of.
Introduction to the Environment Rating Scales
CHILD CARE PROGRAM COMPARISON
Kinship Care – Client Complexity Preliminary Research Findings ACWA Presenters: Marita Scott & Lynne McCrae.
Family Involvement 1a.  a broadly defined concept that includes activities connecting children’s home and classroom learning experiences, as well as.
1 Using Research to Assess, Build and Collaborate with Partners in Child Development Friday, January 28, 2011 Southern Early Childhood Association Savannah,
A Weighty Proposition What is Known Regarding Childhood Obesity Learning Session #1.
Child Care Quality and Children’s Development in Indiana Low Income Working Families James Elicker, Carolyn Clawson, & Soo-Young Hong Purdue University.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
STEPS TO EXCELLENCE PROJECT Promoting Quality Child Care Provider Information Session September 2007 A Project of the Policy Roundtable for Child Care.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultants Early Childhood Consultation Partnership® Funded and Supported by Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families.
Center on Early Learning Spring Symposium Bobbie Weber Wednesday, April 15, 2015.
Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation AGAIN in 2010 Data Driven Decisions: Separating Fact from Fiction in Building Early Care and Education Systems.
Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.
CESA 10 February,  Overview of the the legal requirements  Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) formerly known as No Child Left Behind.
School Readiness Initiatives: Assessing Their Yield Craig T. Ramey, Ph.D. & Sharon L. Ramey, Ph.D. Georgetown University Center on Health and Education.
ENHANCE Update Research Underway on the Validity of the Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process ECO Center Advisory Board Meeting March 8, 2012 Arlington,
Dr. Sheryl Davenport Executive Director, EC/ECSE.
Potential Preschool Provider Info Session April 2015 – Part 1.
Teachers: How to Engage Parents _________ Parental Involvement
Literacy Tidbit Bites Creating Partnerships. Components of Family Literacy 1.Parents as 1 st Teacher—Training for parents on how to be the primary teacher.
The Duval County Pilot Early Learning Quality Rating System: Cost Assessment Prepared by Ann Collins Frederic Glantz Jeremy Luallen August 30, 2006 Abt.
A Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) for Early Care and Education Settings.
Department of Early Education and Care Rate Reform/Cost of Quality Discussion November 2011.
About the Initiative Strengthening Science Education in California brings together educators, researchers, and others to examine the status of science.
ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSION Background: Georgia rates the quality of early childcare learning centers using a tiered quality improvement system.
Quincy School District “Ready to ROAR" Parent, Family and Community Engagement Program.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
CHILD CARE PROGRAM COMPARISON. PROS & CONS OF DAY CARE PROS CONS.
Nursing By Summer Boyd. Pay The median annual wage of registered nurses was $64,690 in May The median wage is the wage at which half of the workers.
KIDS HOPE USA is a National Ministry. Over 450 Church/School Partnerships in 27 States.
Seeing the Forest AND the Trees: Customer Satisfaction and Comprehensive Family Services November 14, 2003 Child Welfare League of America “Tools that.
Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Phase-In Planning and FY08 Expansion EEC Board Meeting Tuesday, October 9, 2007.
Understanding Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care Programs in Massachusetts Findings from the Preschool Program Quality Study and Highlights.
1 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Scope of FY08 Evaluation Activities December 11, 2007.
Child Care Center Job Descriptions
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Quality Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents Qualitative State Research Team Kristin Gansle Louisiana State University and A&M College Value-Added.
Early Childhood Profiles: Joe Roberts & Elizabeth Whitehouse Governor’s Office of Early Childhood.
Great Start Collaborative-Wayne Collaborative Meeting November 16, 2015.
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Legislative Requirements from General Assembly August 2, 2012.
Linking the DRDP to Instruction: Using the DRDP (2015) Reports
TITLE I ANNUAL PARENT MEETING ROGERSVILLE CITY SCHOOL.
Teaching Leah Nature of the Work Teachers act as facilitators to help students learn and apply concepts to math, science, english, and history. Teachers.
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
Transforming School Families with TS GOLD. Agenda Items ‒ T he Plan ‒ I mplementation ‒ 1 st Year Supports ‒ Analyzing the Data ‒ 1 st Year Outcomes ‒
Massachusetts Universal Pre- Kindergarten Program Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Pilot Initiative Alyssa Rulf Fountain Barbara Goodson September.
Jefferson County Public Schools Kindergarten Readiness Camps Kentucky Joint House/Senate Education Committee November 9, 2015.
Quality Rating Systems: A Study of Differing Models and Methodologies The Annual Meeting of the Child Care Policy Research Consortium March 8 – 11, 2005.
Community Outreach Update Parent/Family Engagement Month 1 October 1, 2015 Rena Anderson Director, Community Engagement.
Regression Discontinuity Design Case Study : National Evaluation of Early Reading First Peter Z. Schochet Decision Information Resources, Inc.
New Mexico Early Care and Education Cost Model New Mexico Early Childhood Development Partnership December, 2014.
S. W. E. E. T. School Social Work Effectiveness Evaluation Tool Laura Richard, ABD, LCSW Louisiana State University 6/13/ LSU School of Social.
NEFEC EARLY READING FIRST REACH Raising Expectations for Niblack Elementary.
SUN Community School Alder Building a Common Understanding and Vision.
JUDY CALLOWAY EDU 671 MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTATION MARCH 27, 2014 NEWTON, MILLER.
What is Title I? Title I is a federally funded program to help children get a quality education and meet academic standards.
Evaluation of Indiana's Pilot Public Pre-Kindergarten Program: First Year Results James Elicker, Katrina Schmerold, David Purpura, Sara Schmitt, Amy Napoli,
Indiana Paths to QUALITY™ Child Care Quality Rating and Improvement System: Outcomes for Children and Child Care Providers James Elicker, Zachary Gold,
Head Start in the States:
Muncie public library Brings early literacy into the home
CHILD CARE PROGRAM COMPARISON
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
The Relationship between Fidelity of Implementation and Classroom Quality in Early Childhood Education Katerina Sergi, M.A.1, Giorgio Carlo Cappello, Ph.D.1,
Legislative Requirements from General Assembly
Using Early Care and Education Administrative Data
Presentation transcript:

Child Care Quality Study: Does Partnering with Head Start Make a Difference? Diane Schilder, Benjamin Chauncey, Ashley Smith, Candy Miller and Sheila Skiffington Education Development Center, Inc. Newton, MA Description of the Research Research questions: Do child care providers that partner with Head Start provide higher quality services than comparison providers not in partnership? Do child care center classrooms at partnering centers have higher scores on observational measures than comparison centers? Do children attending partnering programs perform better on assessments of school readiness than comparison children? Do family child care homes have higher scores on observational measures than comparison homes not in partnership? What is the relationship between structural variables of quality and observed quality? And children’s school readiness? Definition of partnership: Child care providers that have a contract with Head Start to provide a combination of child care and Head Start services.Design: Survey, observational, and child assessment data collected from a randomly selected sample of Ohio child care providers engaged in partnership and comparison providers.Sample: Stratified random sample of child care providers in Ohio partnership with Head Start, and comparison providers not in partnership.  44 classrooms of programs in partnership with Head Start  28 comparison classrooms  1515 parents within centers (data collected between and is now in existing database)  324 teachers within centers (data collected between and is now in existing database)  78 Family child care programs partnering with Head StartMethods/Measures Description of Partnerships Why Ohio? Many child care centers and family child care homes are partnering with Head Start. Demographics are typical of the nation. Child care licensing standards are about in the middle in terms of group size, ratios, teacher educational requirements, etc. Researchers are building on a previous study conducted in Ohio-- Partnership Impact study. Status EDC received a field-initiated child care research grant from the Child Care Bureau in October 2004 to begin the work on the new study With researchers at Ohio State University, EDC researchers are collecting data from sample of children at partnership centers and comparison centers In the Spring 2005, researchers will: collect observational data from the sample of selected classrooms; pilot test survey of family child care providers In late spring/early summer researchers will: collect child assessment data In the summer 2005 researchers will analyze the relationship between observed classroom quality, school readiness data and structural variables of quality from the existing database developed from the Partnership Impact study Description of Partnership Impact study Background Research question: Is there a relationship between partnering with Head Start and child care center quality and provision of comprehensive services? Design: Three-year longitudinal survey research with data collected from a randomly selected sample of Ohio child care centers engaged in partnership and comparison providers. Methods/Measures: Surveys of child care directors, teachers, and parents of children attending the centers. Reviews of state child care licensing records. Definition of partnership: Child care providers that have a contract with Head Start to provide a combination of child care and Head Start services. Sample: Stratified random sample of child care providers in Ohio partnership with Head Start, and comparison providers not in partnership. Centers include 78 centers in partnership with Head Start and 63 comparison classrooms. Sample of 1515 parents and 324 teachers within centers. Description of Partnerships Duration of partnerships varies Range of partnership duration is less than 1 year old to more than 9 years old. Median partnership is 2.9 years Findings from Partnership Impact study Directors of Partnership Centers Report Receiving Additional Resources from Head Start Nearly 90 percent of partnering child care centers receive funds directly from Head Start Nearly all of the partnering centers receive between $1,400 and $3,000 per year per child from Head Start Most partnering centers (70 percent) use funds for equipment such as science centers or bookshelves and supplies such as art supplies and curriculum materials Many partnering centers (over half) use funds for training or to enhance teachers’ salaries Head Start also provides equipment, supplies, training, and materials directly to centers Half of the partnering centers receive equipment directly from Head Start 60 percent receive supplies from Head Start 90 percent receive training from Head Start Head Start hires and supervises teachers who work in the child care centers About a third of partnering centers report that Head Start hires teachers to work in their centers Well Defined Goals/Good Communication Predict Benefits of Partnership Both well-defined goals and levels of communication were found to be significantly related to benefits for centers overall (F=39.11; p<. 001). Together these two variables explain 43 percent of the variation in benefits for centers overall (r 2 =. 43). (See Figure 1) Both well-defined goals and levels of communication were also found to be significantly related to benefits for staff (F=15.86; p<. 001). Together these two variables explain 24 percent of the variation in benefits for staff (r 2 =. 24). (See Figure 2) Figure 1: Figure 2: Good Communication/Benefits to Staff Predicts Benefits of Partnership to Families The level of communication together with benefits and improvements for staff were found to be significantly related to benefits and improvements for families (F=37.28; p<. 001). Together these two variables explain 48 percent of the variation in benefits for centers overall (r 2 =. 476). (See Figure 3) Figure 3: Centers in Partnership are More Likely to Offer Screenings, Referrals, and Services to Children and Families  The number of child screenings, referrals, and services that child care centers in partnership provided was 7.88 compared with 3.86 at comparison centers. (See Figure 4)  The number of parent referrals and services that centers in partnership provided was 5.65 compared with 3.05 at comparison centers. Figure 4: Partnership Related to Some Improvements in Teacher Satisfaction Teachers from partnership centers were significantly more likely to report greater satisfaction with job quality. (See Figure 5) Figure 5: Next Steps Finalize Partnership Report Continue to collect data from child care centers and begin family child care home data collection Contact information: Diane Schilder, Benjamin Chauncey, Child care classroom-level data:  ECERS  ELLCO Child-level data:  PPVT-3 or TVIP  PALS  PLS  PreLAS Existing Center Survey Data:  Directors  Teachers  Parents Family Child Care Homes:  Provider Surveys  Observations---- FDCRS & ORCE