UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 1 LRD – Phase 2C (3 - 30 Days)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disaster Management Civil-Military Coordination
Advertisements

Emergency Management Emergency Planning Emergency Preparedness Disaster Management Disaster Recovery Coordination Primary Functions.
Kentucky Impact Overview Capstone 14 Exercise. General Impact Overview Total Structures Damaged68,400 Total Injured6,000 + Total Fatalities300 Total Seeking.
US&R Planning. US&R Planning Issues Establish authority and responsibility Assess vulnerability and hazards Identify resources Coordination of response.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Suburban Flooding: Finding regional solutions to a growing problem Imad Samara Project Manager and Silver.
@TxSchoolSafety Continuity of Operations Planning Workshop Devolution & Reconstitution.
Emergency Management in Washington State: Our Capabilities, Our Challenges.
INTERAGENCY COOPERATION CONFERENCE SOFIA,BULGARIA Fall Creek Falls, Tennessee.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Ty Brumfield (LNO to FEMA –RSF-IS National Coordinator Office of Homeland Security Directorate of Contingency.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Public Law (PL) Advanced Measures Contingency Operations Directorate.
All-hazards readiness in the United States Learning to communicate and build a culture of preparedness David Passey Senior Representative U.S. Federal.
BUILDING STRONG ® USACE/FEMA 2011 Remedial Action Program Workshop December 6-9, 2011 Orlando, FL.
BUILDING STRONG ® USACE/FEMA 2011 Remedial Action Program Workshop December 6-9, 2011 Orlando, FL.
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-37; and Army
Business Continuity and You! The Ohio State University Business & Finance Enterprise Continuity Program Quarterly Update October 2008Business and Finance.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Flood Task Force (MRFTF) Concept Briefing
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® NMSZ TTX Operations/Navigation Response.
ESF #1 Transportation.
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY Continuity of Operations Planning (COOP)
District Planning Council Program Overview. District Planning Concept Local Elected Officials Emergency Managers Emergency Responders Local Business Community.
1 Preparing Texas Today... Texas Preparedness Workshop November 16-17, 2005 Austin, Texas A Texas Community Partnership...for Tomorrow’s Challenges Governor’s.
National Preparedness All Hazards Consortium Corey Gruber Assistant Deputy Administrator, National Preparedness National Preparedness.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE New Madrid Earthquake OPLAN.
Infrastructure Challenges in Kentucky Carey Johnson Kentucky Division of Water 2014 Governor’s Conference on Energy and the Environment.
A 21 ST CENTURY LOOKBACK WILL SUSTAIN A COMMUNITY’S FOCUS ON DISASTER RESILIENCE Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
1 A Bridge to Inspection… CDR Lee Boone Chief, Domestic Vessel Division Mr. Patrick Lee Towing Vessel, National Program Coordinator.
National Earthquake Program Managers Meeting 1 May 2013 Region X Cascadia Subduction Zone Planning Effort.
Spencer Stevens FHWA Office of Planning Michigan Transportation Planning Association 2011 Annual Conference July 14, 2011.
ESF #3 – Public Works and Engineering IS-803 – February 2009 Visual 1 Public Works and Engineering ESF #3.
New Developments in Red Cross Emergency Services.
Survivor Centric Emergency Management Integrating the Access and Functional Needs of the Whole Community Before, During and After Disasters August 2015.
UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 1 LRD Navigation Scenario.
1 The “New FEMA” The National Logistics Coordination Forum March 27, 2008 Eric Smith Assistant Administrator Logistics Management Directorate FEMA LOGISTICS.
UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 1 NMSZ ROC Exercise-2015 NAD MISSION – MAIN EFFORT:  Deploy requested response personnel ISO LRD (per OPLAN 2014 to assists.
National Levee Safety Act, Title IX, WRDA 2007 Update for Levee Summit Eric Halpin, P.E. Special Assistant for Dam and Levee Safety Headquarters, US Army.
NMSZ Event Overview: Roles, Responsibilities, and the Marine Transportation System Recovery Unit (MTSRU) 22 April 2015 Semper Paratus United States Coast.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Debris Management Mobile District.
New Madrid Earthquake Scenario Water Sector – Impacts & Federal Support CAPT David M. Apanian, P.E., MSCEE U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region.
Disasters and the Economy: Preparing and Rebuilding EDA Seattle Regional 2012 Conference April 3-5, 2012 Presented by : Gerard E. Bautista, A.C.E.
Earthquake Response and Recovery Planning at a Major Canadian Electric Utility Presented by Doug McLeod Disaster Preparedness Coordinator BC Hydro British.
USACE O PERATIONS C ENTER (UOC) Update 14 September
UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 1 Focus on Navigation – deliberate mission analysis  Integration with MTSRU (Marine Transportation Systems Recovery Unit)
Planning the Path Forward Institute for Water Resources Website Communications.
Disaster Planning Workshop Hosted By: Pleasantview Fire Protection District.
Haiti Earthquake Earthquake in Haiti. Haiti Earthquake – After Action Review Search and rescue operations Overall safety and law enforcement Sustainment.
Environmental Officer Course Introduction Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011 Name//office/phone/ address UNCLASSIFIED 12/24/2015.
Welcome U.S. Coast Guard Response Operations
Austere Challenge 2009 (AC09) Planning Lessons Learned S/CRSEUCOM JCISFA Joint Center for International Security Force Assistance COL Scott Wuestner Chief,
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Division of Emergency Operations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
0 FEMA Region 6 Floods: The Response and the Costs Bob Bennett Response Division FEMA Region 6.
2015 USACE Exercise – December 1, 2015 New Madrid Seismic Zone – Earthquake FEMA Mission, Legal Authorities and Regional Capability Overview Gus Wulfkuhle.
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2011 Flood Recovery The Benefits of Collaboration Maria de la Torre Chief, Emergency Management Baltimore.
Communications Coordination Group (CCG). MISSION To facilitate interagency coordination and collaboration to provide efficient and effective pre-planning.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquake Response OPLAN USACE DCO/G3 14 June 2016.
USACE OPLAN New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquake
Eric Smith Assistant Administrator Logistics Management Directorate
Michigan National Guard CBRN Response Exercise NORTHERN EXPOSURE 17 Overview June 2017.
Mississippi Valley Division Phase 2c (3-30 days)
Mississippi Valley Division New Madrid Earthquake Concept of Operations St. Louis District 14 June 2016.
Mississippi Valley Division New Madrid Earthquake Concept of Operations Memphis District 14 June 2016.
MVD NEW MADRID EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE PLAN
SWD Response Overview NMSZ TTX April 2015
SWD Response Overview NMSZ TTX April 2015
Northwestern Division New Madrid Seismic Zone Response Plan
Presentation transcript:

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 1 LRD – Phase 2C ( Days)

- State EOC - USACE Office/RFO - Installation Support Base (ISB) LRD HQ - Cincinnati, OH O6 (LRD) LRD FWD - Nashville, TN O7 (LRD CDR), O5 (LRE CDR) RFO TN; Jackson, TN Phase 2C: O6 (LRH CDR) RFO KY; Greenville, KY Phase 2B: O6 (LRL CDR) Phase 2C: O6 (NAD) RFO IN; Indianapolis, IN Phase 2B: O6 (LRC CDR) Phase 2C: O5-O6 (NAD) RFO OH; WPAFB, OH Phase 2B: O5 (LRH) Phase 2C: O5-O6 (NAD) ISB KY; Greenville, KY O6 (NAD), O4-O5 (LRL) ISB TN; Arnold AFB O5 (NAD), O4-O5 (LRP) ISB IN; Grissom AFB Phase 2B: O6 (NAD) Phase 2C: O4-O5 (NAD) ECCV8 MCV HQ USACE FWD - D.C. O6 (LRB CDR) LRD – Phase 2C ( Days) ECCV RFI RFI ECCV ECCV MCV RFI ECCV MCV RFI

NAB PRT LRD HQ LRH O6LRP PRTLRB PRTLRN O6NAD SP RFO TN RFO TN – Phase 2C ( Days) LRD CG

LRD HQ LRH O6 LRLLRE LRP PRT LRL O6 + PRTLRD CG LRB PRTNAD SP LRN O6 NAB PRTNAN PRT RFO TN NAD O6 + SPSAS PRTLRH PRT LRC LRB PRT RFO KY RFO KY - Phase 2C ( Days)

NAD PRT (2)NAD O6NAD SP LRD HQ LRH O6 LRP PRT LRL O6 + PRT LRB PRTNAD SP LRN O6 RFO TN NAD O6 + SPSAS PRT LRH PRT LRB PRT RFO KY NAN PRT NAB PRT LRE LRC O6 LRC NWW PRTLRH PRT RFO IN RFO IN – Phase 2C ( Days) LRD CG

NAD PRT (2)NAD SPNAD O5-O6 LRD HQ LRH O6 LRLLRE LRP PRT LRL O6 +PRT LRD CG LRB PRTNAD SP LRN O6 NAB PRTNAN PRT RFO TN NAD O6 + SPSAS PRT LRH PRT LRC LRB PRT RFO KY LRH O5 + PRT NAD PRT (2) NAD O6 NAD SP NWW PRT RFO IN LRC O6 LRH PRT RFO OH - Phase 2C ( Days) NWW PRT RFO OH

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 7 Mission – Main effort  Civil Works assessment and restoration  Re-establish commercial navigation on Ohio, Tennessee and Cumberland rivers  ESF #3 missions in TN, KY, OH, IN - RFO/EFO are established - PRT deployment  Temp emergency power missions throughout NMSZ  Fully integrated into TN/KY response capabilities and recovery planning  Regional collaboration with State, Federal and industry stakeholders Specified, Implied and Essential Tasks  E - Initiate emergency Contracting activities  S – Integration with USCG MTRSUs  S - Active RSOI procedures  I - Perform route clearance missions with debris PRT  I – Creation of emergency civil works supplemental funding requests  I – Conduct 24/7 operations Movements  RFO/EFO establishments  LRH – TN RFO  NAD – KY RFO  NAD – OH RFO  NAD – IN RFO  PRT Deployments – TN/KY RFO  Full integration of NAD support (LRD/Districts/RFOs)  LNO Deployments  Support to MTSRU  Sustainment operations Command, Control, Communication  Full integration of NAD’s leadership and support  Reorganizational change with TN SEOC, TN RFO, KY SEOC, KY RFO as separate reporting entities to report directly to LRD HQ  MTSRU fully established and supported  ISBs established and under LRD control  State-level integration (District, SEOC, RFO coordination)  Long-term Sustainability planning LRD – Phase 2C ( Days)

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 8 Constraints 1. WWPC capability gap creating limited ability to acquire generators 2. PRT sustainment/coverage past initial deployment 3.Transition plan for recovery operations from region to national 4.Lack of national navigation priorities 5.Require economy of force/risk management planning– can’t do everything 6.Capability to sustain long-term efforts Gaps/Concerns/Recommendations 1.HQ/LRD - Task force power continues planning with FEMA 2.HQ – Create a ready-reserve plan through ESF 3 Cadres/SMEs  SME/Cadres produce and expand PRTs just in time  Regional efforts toward on-the-job training  IN/OH do not have temp power PRT (low risk) 3.HQ - Addresses national recovery plan in future OPORD 4.HQ/LRD – continued planning and ultimate creation of playbook (navigation center of expertise) 5.HQ/LRD – CDRs need to identify and manage risk 6.HQ/LRD – Required deliberate sustainment planning and new personnel tools and initiatives  Schedule - employees  Rehired annuitant’s  Contractor assistance  Just-in-time training LRD – Phase 2C ( Days)

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 9 North Atlantic Division support to LRD during NMSZ response 1.Essential for level of response required and sustainability of effort 2.Requires senior leader C2 effort, RFO operations, technical and staff support (LRD and Districts) to navigation and civil works, administrative 3.Fully integrated into response/recovery plans – two Division fight 4.Specified Missions: a)TN SEOC Liaison Cell (NAD CG and support staff) b)KY SEOC C2 c)KY RFO d)OH RFO e)IN RFO f)OH RFO g)TF Recovery (SES) Lead h)TF Civil Works (SES) Lead i)TF Special Projects Lead j)TF ESF #3 Lead k)TF ESF #3, Debris OIC l)LRD G3 and G33(x2) m)ISB (x4) C2

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 10 North Atlantic Division (NAD) support LRD during NMSZ response Rank# Required Location 0-71 TN EOC SES2 LRD G LRD G-3/RFOs 0-51 LRD G-3/RFOs 0-46 ISBs Civilians86 LRD G-3 Engineers84 LRD Districts Rank# Required Location Ft. Leonard Wood Support from school house to support LRD during NMSZ response

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 11 PURPOSE: Conduct a Rehearsal of Concept exercise focusing on navigation on LRD lakes and rivers. FOCUS: Primary focus will be on transportation of commodities (coal, petroleum, grains) across ~400 miles of navigable waterways (Ohio, Tennessee to include the Great Lakes) post 7.6+ magnitude destructive earthquake and related aftershocks while concentrating on port and waterway restoration, bridge and utility obstruction removal and hazardous waste recovery and disposal as well as debris recovery and disposal to include emergency dredging operations to maintain the required navigation channel. SCOPE: Host a half day NMSZ discussion for USACE only with focus NMSZ planning for FY16 through FY 18 in support of FEMAs National – Regional Planning Strategic Intent Host a one (1) day ROC drill for LRD Area of Operations of all major players and organization. Focus on earthquake, preparedness, response, preparedness and recovery activities with focus on Navigation DATE: TBD – Fall 2015 in Cincinnati, Ohio area LRD Fall 2015 NMSZ Navigation Focus Exercise

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 13  Channels river miles - Loss of width and depth  Bridges - 10 bridges  Aerial Power - 15 crossings  Power Generation - Cumberland City Steam Plant  Commercial Docks - One downstream of Barkley - Six upstream of Barkley  Tennessee River - Canal at CRM 33 - Loss of pool for 184 miles from Kentucky Dam to Pickwick Landing Dam LRD – Navigation Mission Analysis DistrictFlood Risk Mgmt NavigationOther † Total Buffalo11*02* Chicago01*1 Detroit91010 Huntington Louisville2015*944* Nashville7**4**010** Pittsburgh CELRD Total8854*30171* *Include Locks without Dams **Barkley is both FRM and Navigation † Levees & Retention Ponds

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 14 LRD Request for Information (RFIs) to HQ USACE  Request LRD be relieved of specified task to provide HQ USACE Power LNO  Recommend HQ USACE pre-designate additional DTOS assets to support efforts in TN, KY, IN, and OH  US&R and Infrastructure Assessment PRTs integration process  Using Debris PRT for Route Clearance  Expiration of World Wide Power Contract (WWPC) impact  Task and purpose for USACE FWD element  Provide guidance for Long-Term Recovery Concept of Operation (post phase 2C ~30 days)  Procedure for Battle Captain request – (21 O3’s from Fort Leonard Wood Captain’s Career Course) - Process to request Title 10 (Active Duty/USAR) / FEST teams to support LRD Operations - Use of DOD/NORTHCOM Assets/Habitual Associations - Integration of 416 th TEC, USAR  Adjudication of Permanent Cadre/Team Leaders/Assistant Team Leaders/ Local Government Liaisons  USACE acreage at projects for joint use as staging area for ARNG/USAR missions  Integration of dual status commanders in USACE HQ OPLAN  Rules of Engagement (ROE) for earthquake aftershocks  Navigation Assessments priority  Timeline for updated HQ OPLAN dtd 21 DEC 2010 “USACE Response to a Catastrophic Earthquake in the New Madrid Seismic Zone”