RUC Development - Applications to National C/V John Brown NOAA Forecast Systems Lab 19 April 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating parameterized variables in the Community Atmospheric Model along the GCSS Pacific cross-section during YOTC Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson,
Advertisements

The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
Semi-direct effect of biomass burning on cloud and rainfall over Amazon Yan Zhang, Hongbin Yu, Rong Fu & Robert E. Dickinson School of Earth & Atmospheric.
Rapid Refresh and RTMA. RUC: AKA-Rapid Refresh A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of off-time or continuous observations.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Global Forecast System (GFS) Model Previous called the Aviation (AVN) and Medium Range Forecast (MRF) models. Global model and 64 levels Relatively primitive.
CPC’s U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook & Future Plans April 20, 2010 Brad Pugh, CPC.
Nesting. Eta Model Eta Coordinate And Step Mountains MSL ground  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Operational Global Model Plans John Derber. Timeline July 25, 2013: Completion of phase 1 WCOSS transition August 20, 2013: GDAS/GFS model/analysis upgrade.
A Radar Data Assimilation Experiment for COPS IOP 10 with the WRF 3DVAR System in a Rapid Update Cycle Configuration. Thomas Schwitalla Institute of Physics.
NCEP Production Suite Review: Land-Hydrology at NCEP
GLFE Status Meeting April 11-12, Presentation topics Deployment status Data quality control Data distribution NCEP meeting AirDat display work Icing.
The NOAA Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) 1-h assimilation cycle WWRP Symposium -- Nowcasting & Very Short Range Forecasting – 8 Sept 2005 – Toulouse, France Stan.
Testing and Upcoming Implementation of the 20km RUC Stan Benjamin NOAA / FSL Georg Grell Steve.
Outline Background Highlights of NCAR’s R&D efforts A proposed 5-year plan for CWB Final remarks.
Experiences with 0-36 h Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model Morris Weisman (Wei Wang, Chris Davis) NCAR/MMM WSN05 September 8, 2005.
Potential Benefits of Multiple-Doppler Radar Data to Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting: Assimilation of Simulated Data Using WRF-3DVAR System Soichiro.
P1.85 DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATED GOES PRODUCTS FOR GFS AND NAM Hui-Ya Chuang and Brad Ferrier Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP, Washington DC Introduction.
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
WRF Problems: Some Solutions, Some Mysteries Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
2006(-07)TAMDAR aircraft impact experiments for RUC humidity, temperature and wind forecasts Stan Benjamin, Bill Moninger, Tracy Lorraine Smith, Brian.
RICO Modeling Studies Group interests RICO data in support of studies.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Friday 2/8/2013 Quiz & Assignment 2 Results Finish Thermal Wind MOS decoding (Assignment) New England weather.
1 National HIC/RH/HQ Meeting ● January 27, 2006 version: FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS.
WRF Version 2: Physics Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
Evaluation of radiance data assimilation impact on Rapid Refresh forecast skill for retrospective and real-time experiments Haidao Lin Steve Weygandt Stan.
1 Impact of the NAME04 Soundings on the NCEP data assimilation systems Wesley Ebisuzaki Kingtse Mo, Eric Rogers, Wesley Ebisuzaki, R. Wayne Higgins, Jack.
GSI applications within the Rapid Refresh and High Resolution Rapid Refresh 17 th IOAS-AOLS Conference 93 rd AMS Annual Meeting 9 January 2013 Patrick.
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
Initial Results from the Diurnal Land/Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (DICE) Weizhong Zheng, Michael Ek, Ruiyu Sun, Jongil Han, Jiarui Dong and Helin Wei.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
1 RUC Land Surface Model implementation in WRF Tanya Smirnova, WRFLSM Workshop, 18 June 2003.
August 6, 2001Presented to MIT/LL The LAPS “hot start” Initializing mesoscale forecast models with active cloud and precipitation processes Paul Schultz.
Recent and Future Advancements in Convective-Scale Storm Prediction with the High- Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Forecast System NOAA/ESRL/GSD/AMB Curtis.
Status of the Regional OSSE for Space-Based LIDAR Winds – July 2002 Steve Koch Adrian Marroquin Tom Schlatter John Smart Steve Weygandt Graham Feingold.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Assimilation of AIRS SFOV Profiles in the Rapid Refresh Rapid Refresh domain Haidao Lin Ming Hu Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Assimilation and Modeling.
Update on progress with the implementation of a new two-moment microphysics scheme: Model description and single-column tests Hugh Morrison, Andrew Gettelman,
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC. RUC A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of offtime or continuous observations (not a 00.
Satellite Data Assimilation Activities at CIMSS for FY2003 Robert M. Aune Advanced Satellite Products Team NOAA/NESDIS/ORA/ARAD Cooperative Institute for.
Representation of low clouds/stratus in Aladin/AUT: Ongoing work and Outlook.
Slides for NWS/SR meeting John, Two of the graphics have specific background color schemes, the rest will inherit whatever scheme you choose for the master.
Land-Surface evolution forced by predicted precipitation corrected by high-frequency radar/satellite assimilation – the RUC Coupled Data Assimilation System.
2004 Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC Stan Benjamin Steve Weygandt NOAA / Forecast Systems Lab NY Courtesy:
Proposed RUC Change - September 2004 Stan Benjamin – NOAA/FSL Geoff Manikin – NOAA/NCEP/EMC Modifications to RUC analysis Improved surface / CAPE analyses.
WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.
Mesoscale Assimilation of Rain-Affected Observations Clark Amerault National Research Council Postdoctoral Associate - Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey,
RUC Convective Probability Forecasts using Ensembles and Hourly Assimilation Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Forecast Systems Laboratory NOAA.
GLFE Real-time TAMDAR Impact Experiments with the 20km RUC Stan Benjamin,Tracy Lorraine Smith, Bill Moninger, Brian Jamison NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
Aircraft weather observations: Impacts for regional NWP models
NWS Forecast Office Assessment of GOES Sounder Atmospheric Instability
Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Aircraft-based Observations:
Group interests RICO data required
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC Rapid Refresh-RR High Resolution Rapid Refresh-HRRR RTMA.
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Initialization of Numerical Forecast Models with Satellite data
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Group interests RICO data in support of studies
Status of the Regional OSSE for Space-Based LIDAR Winds – Feb01
Presentation transcript:

RUC Development - Applications to National C/V John Brown NOAA Forecast Systems Lab 19 April 2001

2 Key goals for 20km RUC Take advantage of increased computer power  higher spatial resolution Improve RUC performance for QPF, especially for convective precipitation Improve RUC initial conditions Incorporate new advances in model and assimilation Eliminate bugs

OperationsSpring 2001 Operations Resolution40 km, 40  levels20 km, 50  levels AnalysisOptimal interpolation on3-d variational technique on generalized on generalized  surfaces  surfaces, hydrometeor analysis w/ GOES…, use raw instead of interp. obs AssimilationIntermittent 1-h cycleIntermittent 1-h cycle Stable cloudsMixed-phase cloud microphysics MM5),New version of MM5/RUC / precipitation explicit fcst of cloud water, rain water, microphysics (FSL and NCAR), snow, ice, graupel, much shorter microphysics time step no. concentration of ice particles Sub-grid-scaleGrell (1993)New Grell scheme w/ ensemble cloud, precipitation shallow convection, detrainment of cloud water to microphysics TurbulenceBurk-Thompson explicit TKE schemeBurk-Thompson, e-  parameterization under development RadiationMM5 LW/SW scheme, f(hydrometeors)MM5 scheme with fix to SW lag error Land-sfc processes6-level soil/veg model (Smirnova, 2-layer snow model, 1997, 2000) w/ frozen soil, 1-layer snow improved cold season processes, improved diurnal cycle Sfc conditionsDaily 50km SST/14 km LST,Add high-res USGS land-use/soil type, 0.14  monthly NDVI veg frac, cycled soil albedo moisture/temp, snow depth/temp Boundary condsEta model initialized every 12hEta model initialized every 6h Forecast durationHourly output to  3h, 12h fcst every 3hHourly output to  6 h, 12h fcst every 3h Rapid Update Cycle – Present and Next Version

4 Subset of full domain 20km RUC/MAPS topography

5 40km RUC 40 levels 20km RUC 50 levels 10 new levels 7 – upper levels – 330 – 500 K 3 – lower levels – 270 – 290 K RUC native coordinate levels

OperationsSpring 2001 Operations Resolution40 km, 40  levels20 km, 50  levels AnalysisOptimal interpolation on3-d variational technique on generalized on generalized  surfaces  surfaces, hydrometeor analysis w/ GOES…, use raw instead of interp. obs AssimilationIntermittent 1-h cycleIntermittent 1-h cycle Stable cloudsMixed-phase cloud microphysics MM5),New version of MM5/RUC / precipitation explicit fcst of cloud water, rain water, microphysics (FSL and NCAR), snow, ice, graupel, much shorter microphysics time step no. concentration of ice particles Sub-grid-scaleGrell (1993)New Grell scheme w/ ensemble cloud, precipitation shallow convection, detrainment of cloud water to microphysics TurbulenceBurk-Thompson explicit TKE schemeBurk-Thompson RadiationMM5 LW/SW scheme, f(hydrometeors)MM5 scheme with fix to SW lag error Land-sfc processes6-level soil/veg model (Smirnova, 2-layer snow model, 1997, 2000) w/ frozen soil, 1-layer snow improved cold season processes, improved diurnal cycle Sfc conditionsDaily 50km SST/14 km LST,Add high-res USGS land-use/soil type, 0.14  monthly NDVI veg frac, cycled soil albedo moisture/temp, snow depth/temp Boundary condsEta model initialized every 12hEta model initialized every 6h Forecast durationHourly output to  3h, 12h fcst every 3hHourly output to  6 h, 12h fcst every 3h Rapid Update Cycle – Present and Next Version

OI 3DVAR OBS Riverton, WY sounding 12 UTC 18 Aug 2000

8 Data for 20-km RUC 3dVAR at NCEP Data Type~NumberFreq. Rawinsonde (inc. special obs) 80/12h NOAA 405 MHz profilers 31/ 1h (better use) VAD winds (WSR-88D radars) / 1h (3h currently) Aircraft (ACARS) (V,temp) / 1h Surface/METAR - land (V,p sfc,T,T d ) / 1h Buoy / 1h GOES precipitable water / 1h (closer fit) GOES cloud drift winds / 1h (closer fit) GOES cloud-top pressure ~40km res / 1h SSM/I precipitable water /2-6h GPS precipitable water ~65  / 1h Boundary-layer (915 MHz) profilers ~24/ 1h RASS (WPDN and PBL) 15/ 1h Ship reports 10s/ 3h Reconnaissance dropwinsonde a few/ variable New for 20km RUC at NCEP

9 Initial RUC cloud analysis technique Uses GOES/NESDIS cloud-top pressure (sounder-based) Uses RUC 1-h hydrometeor fcst (cloud water, ice, snow/rain/graupel) as first guess Performs cloud clearing and cloud building Uses observations to build 3-d cloud yes/no/unknown field surface cloud obs, radar reflectivity assimilable with same code structure/logic Goal – Improve RUC precipitation, cloud, icing forecasts

10 3h 20km RUC cloud-top fcst w/ GOES cloud assim Verification Cloud-top pressure based on NESDIS product Effect of GOES data on 3-h RUC cloud forecasts 2100 UTC Wed 21 March h 40km RUC cloud-top fcst No GOES cloud assim

11 Cloud water analysis – cross-section Without GOES With GOES Ice mixing ratio analysis – cross-section Without GOES With GOES

12 RUC cloud analysis status Technique developed combining GOES sounder-based cloud-top data with RUC explicit cloud forecasts Current version – impact on forecasts –Cloud top – more improvement in 1-h forecasts, smaller but consistent improvement in 12-h cloud-top forecasts –Slight improvement in RH bias and standard deviation, especially in mid-troposphere –Slight improvement in QPF at larger thresholds

OperationsSpring 2001 Operations Resolution40 km, 40  levels20 km, 50  levels AnalysisOptimal interpolation on3-d variational technique on generalized on generalized  surfaces  surfaces, hydrometeor analysis w/ GOES…, use raw instead of interp. obs AssimilationIntermittent 1-h cycleIntermittent 1-h cycle Stable cloudsMixed-phase cloud microphysics MM5),New version of MM5/RUC / precipitation explicit fcst of cloud water, rain water, microphysics (FSL and NCAR), snow, ice, graupel, much shorter microphysics time step no. concentration of ice particles Sub-grid-scaleGrell (1993)New Grell scheme w/ ensemble cloud, precipitation shallow convection, detrainment of cloud water to microphysics TurbulenceBurk-Thompson explicit TKE schemeBurk-Thompson, e-  parameterization under development RadiationMM5 LW/SW scheme, f(hydrometeors)MM5 scheme with fix to SW lag error Land-sfc processes6-level soil/veg model (Smirnova, 2-layer snow model, 1997, 2000) w/ frozen soil, 1-layer snow improved cold season processes, improved diurnal cycle Sfc conditionsDaily 50km SST/14 km LST,Add high-res USGS land-use/soil type, 0.14  monthly NDVI veg frac, cycled soil albedo moisture/temp, snow depth/temp Boundary condsEta model initialized every 12hEta model initialized every 6h Forecast durationHourly output to  3h, 12h fcst every 3hHourly output to  6 h, 12h fcst every 3h Rapid Update Cycle – Present and Next Version

14 Key changes in 20km RUC forecast model for QPF Fixes to bugs in vertical advection of moisture Fix to bug for effect of vertical velocity on convective precipitation 20km/50 level resolution – resolved precipitation improved – grid volumes are now ~5 times smaller Improved land-surface parameterization New ensemble cumulus parameterization – Grell Revised version of MM5/RUC microphysics

15 Deep convection parameterization – new Grell scheme Inclusion of cloud water/ice detrainment (interaction with microphysics scheme) Ensemble of closure and feedback assumptions

16 Cloud and precipitation microphysics New version of Reisner et al (1998, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.) "option 4" mixed-phase, bulk microphysics scheme ("EXMOISG") Initially developed at NCAR for MM5, and implemented with RUC-2 at NCEP in April 1998 New version removes the most egregious faults with version of EXMOISG currently in the operational RUC-2 at NCEP

17 MM5/RUC Cloud and precipitation microphysics scheme Main aspects of EXMOISG scheme Predicted quantities: - Mixing ratios of water vapor cloud liquid water rain water cloud ice snow graupel - Number concentration of cloud ice Water and ice permitted to coexist for -40  C < T  0  C. Inverse exponential (Marshall-Palmer) particle size distribution assumed.

18 St. Lawrence valley/ New England ice storm - 9h RUC2 fcst valid 2100z 9 Jan 98 N-S cross sections of RUC2 microphysics | YUL/Montreal Water vapor mixing ratio /  Cloud water mixing ratio Graupel mixing ratio Rain water mixing ratio Excessive graupel production

19 PRINCIPAL CHANGES TO EXMOISG Bug fixes (including one major one involving graupel at cold temps) Reduce interval between calls to EXMOISG Formation of new ice crystals ("nucleation") constrained via "Cooper curve" rather than by "Fletcher Curve" (both empirical) Improve consistency of ice particle number calculations. Different criteria for formation of graupel as result of collisions between snowflakes and drops of cloud liquid water (temp < 0  C) Allow larger concentrations of cloud water to be present before raindrops are formed Very small rainwater contents are regarded as being composed of drizzle-sized drops

20 Changes to MM5/RUC microphysics with 20km RUC SW-NE vertical cross-section across WA /Olympic Peninsula into BC and Alberta - 12h forecast valid 0300z 5 January km operational RUC at NCEP 20km test RUC w/ microphysics fixes Bug fixes Changes for formation of ice and graupel - result – less “ice friendly” Change in time step from 10 min to 2 min Result: More realistic supercooled liquid water Improved precip type

21 Outlook for RUC microphysics NCEP implementation -- Ongoing validation of real-time QPF, precipitation-type forecasts Longer term -- Continued work to improve model guidance for icing prediction will be needed well into the future. -- Possible further upgrade to EXMOISG in RUC within ~ 12 months -- Use of EXMOISG in RUC cloud assimilation -- Continued collaboration with NCAR for MM5, RUC and WRF application -- Further improvements for air quality and regional climate applications (e.g., air chemistry, radiation, land surface) NOAA-NCAR collaboration has been vital to improving EXMOISG.

22 Purpose – Improve near-sfc, precip, cloud fcsts Ongoing cycle of soil moisture, soil temp, snow cover/depth/temp) 2-layer snow model RUC/MAPS Land-surface Process Parameterization New in 20km - change in thermal conductivity – better diurnal cycle - frozen soil physics, 2-layer snow model

23 RUC/MAPS cycling of soil/snow fields - soil temperature, soil moisture - snow water equivalent, snow temperature MAPS snow water equivalent depth (mm) 9 December UTC NESDIS snow cover field 9 December UTC

24 Snow water equivalent depth (RUC-20) Snow depth (USAF) Snow coverage (NESDIS) 28 November UTC RUC-20 NESDIS USAF

25 Further modifications of RUC land-surface model Johansen (1975) parameterization of thermal conductivity in soil – improvements against the previous parameterization (McCumber 1980) especially for saturated soils Refreezing of 13% of melted water inside the snow pack (Koren et al. 1999)

26 Improved 1-d (PILPS 2d – Valdai, Russia) total runoff and snow water equivalent forecasts with improved snow and soil physics in MAPS land- surface model Total runoff Snow water equivalent

27 CHANGES TO SURFACE INPUT FIELDS IN RUC-20 Soil type 1-km CONUS-SOIL, 16 classes ( 1-degree Zobler soil types in current RUC) Vegetation type 1-km data, 24 USGS classes (1-degree vegetation types in current RUC) Albedo monthly data, NESDIS (1-degree seasonal climatology in current RUC) Sea-surface temperatures daily 50km analyses Vegetation fraction data – NESDIS – NDVI-based

Soil types in 40 km RUC Soil types in 20 km RUC

29 Vegetation types in 40km RUC (12 classes) High-resolution vegetation types in 20km RUC (24 USGS classes)

30 Albedo in 40 km RUC Albedo in 20 km RUC Albedo in 20 km RUC -monthly NESDIS data 18 May 2000

31 RUC Cloud-Base Height Height above surface where q c + q i first exceeds g/kg

32 RUC derived visibility Relative humidity and hydrometeors are considered separately: Hydrometeors: Stoelinga and Warner (1999) with ad hoc addition of graupel Relative humidity: > 95%  visibility of 8 km < 15%  visibility of 60 km. Lowest visibility value is used.

33 40 km RUC 3h fcst 20 km RUC 3h fcst 28 August UTC GOES visible image Vis  1 mi Vis – 3-5 mi RUC visibility forecasts

34 Summary - the 20km RUC Schedule for implementation –April 2001 – Get new code/scripts running at NCEP – test mode Available for 20km RUC seminars at NWS Regions, NCEP Centers –May – Real-time testing at NCEP – evaluation in field, retrospective runs –June – Consideration for CAFTI approval –Late June – early July - planned operational implementation 20 km/50 level 1 hr version –with model improvements including cloud microphysics, convection, land-surface, hourly fcsts out to  6h –3-d variational analysis, cloud/hydrometeor analysis using satellite combined with explicit cloud fcsts in RUC –Improvements in warm- and cold-season precipitation and cloud/icing forecasts, also in surface forecasts RUC web site km test RUC products

35 RUC C&V Future Work * Understand and correct deficiencies in model physics (particularly PBL, microphysics). [ongoing] * Translation algorithms– development, evaluation [ongoing] * Addition of aerosols, simple chemistry. [2002 and later] * Use of ensembles => probability forecasts of restrictive conditions [future] * Shift to WRF as rapid-update medium [future] … All activities will involve interactions with other groups.