DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August 2005 1 Model Mission: Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Goal “To study the microphysics of three.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSUS I-Scan Group California State University, Sacramento
Advertisements

Geospace Electrodynamic Connections (GEC) Mission The GEC mission has been in the formulation phase as part of NASA’s Solar Terrestrial Probe program for.
Distributed Multimedia Systems
TM Breakout Sessions Interactive and discussion-oriented Six major topic areas Sign up sheets Moderator designated for each session Recorder needed Discussion.
Polar Highly Elliptical / Molniya Orbit Science (PHEMOS) Mission Phase 0/A Studies Mid-Term Review Meetings January 12-14th, 2011.
PHEOS PSRR Concept of Operations. 2 Scope The purpose of the PCW-UVI Concept of Operations (ConOps) is to communicate how mission systems will operate,
Tsunamis Detection The Mission  Tsunamis Detection can help to minimize loss of life and property from future tsunamis. Mission Introduction Mechanism.
Automated File Transfer and Storage Management Concepts for Space Gary Meyers - GSFC Ed Criscuolo - CSC Keith Hogie - CSC Ron Parise - CSC Revised 6/14/2004.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
Blue Bear Systems Research Hardware Architectures for Distributed Agents Dr Simon Willcox 24 th Soar Workshop 9 th – 11 th June 2004 Building 32, Twinwoods.
The Frequency Agile Solar Radiotelescope Current Status & Plans T. S. Bastian NRAO.
Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH ESA Wireless Sensor Motes Study George Prassinos, SSC, University of Surrey.
Safeguarding the Three Corner Sat Constellation By Stephen Levin-Stankevich Stephen Nauman.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
JPL Autonomous Space Mission Simulation Flight Team Bob Hoffman Josh Ruggiero Adam Nikolic Dusty Terrill.
ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Section GLAST Large Area Telescope ISOC Peer Review Test Bed Terry Schalk GLAST Flight Software
.NET Mobile Application Development Introduction to Mobile and Distributed Applications.
1 EVALUATING INTELLIGENT FLUID AUTOMATION SYSTEMS USING A FLUID NETWORK SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT Ron Esmao - Sr. Applications Engineer, Flowmaster USA.
SensIT PI Meeting, January 15-17, Self-Organizing Sensor Networks: Efficient Distributed Mechanisms Alvin S. Lim Computer Science and Software Engineering.
Event Metadata Records as a Testbed for Scalable Data Mining David Malon, Peter van Gemmeren (Argonne National Laboratory) At a data rate of 200 hertz,
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
INDIN' Perth, Australia Multi-Agent Based Information Access Services for Condition Monitoring in Process Automation Teppo Pirttioja 1, Antti.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
An Integration Framework for Sensor Networks and Data Stream Management Systems.
Aquarius Project Status 7 th Aquarius/SAC-D Science Team Meeting 11 April 2012.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
June 2004 SIW-4 - IP in Space Implementation Guide 1 Handbook for Using IP Protocols for Space Missions James Rash - NASA/GSFC Keith Hogie, Ed Criscuolo,
1 SpaceOps 2002 Autonomous Operations For The Swift Mission T3-47 John Ong/Swift Software Systems Manager NASA/GSFC Code 582/ Mike Rackley/Swift.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
1 EnviroStore: A Cooperative Storage System for Disconnected Operation in Sensor Networks Liqian Luo, Chengdu Huang, Tarek Abdelzaher John Stankovic INFOCOM.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Mission/Science Operations Irene Bibyk Tim Rykowski Bob Schweiss June 28, 2001.
ONE Concept. ONE Work area & lab setup ONE Goals Provide single network interface regardless of physical link Provide reliable, isochronous message transport.
1 Mars Micro-satellite Mission Japanese micro-satellite mission to Mars to study the plasma environment and the solar wind interaction with a weakly-magnetized.
Time Triggered Networks: use in space 2015 CCSDS spring SOIS Plenary 23 March 2015 Glenn Rakow/NASA-GSFC.
PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 PACS Data Flow1 PACS Data Flow, Instrument Modes and Operations Helmut Feuchtgruber MPE.
Space Operations as a Guide for a Real-World Scheduling Competition Eduardo Romero Marcelo Oglietti
Real-Time Systems Presented by: Stuart D Fowell CCSDS Time Critical Onboard Application Services Stuart D. Fowell, Keith L. Scott, Chris.
Bio-Networking: Biology Inspired Approach for Development of Adaptive Network Applications 21 May 2005Ognen Paunovski Bio-Networking: Biology Inspired.
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
1 UML Modeling of Spacecraft Onboard Instruments Takahiro Yamada, JAXA/ISAS April 2005.
World Representation for Vehicle Navigation and Standards for Cooperative Vehicles Dr Javier Ibanez-Guzman 31st, January 2007 Orbassano.
March /5/2016 At A Glance STARS is a real-time, distributed, multi-spacecraft simulation system for GN&C technology research and development. It.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
ADASS the Planning and Scheduling Perspective Roadmap: - How planning and scheduling fits in at ADASS - ADASS planning and scheduling posters and presentations.
Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.
Space Research Institute BMSW - Fast Monitor of Solar Wind Plasma Parameters for current and future missions. M. Riazantseva 1,2, G. Zastenker 1, J. Safrankova.
Laboratory 2 Group 19 The Group of Destiny. User Interface - Debugging Objectives:  Display: Sensor data (telemetry) – including IR sensors, status of.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
Tiered Imaging Aman Kansal,Mohammad Rahimi. High Resolution Imaging Design Objective: Maximize spatial coverage Maximize resolution –Sensing performance.
Van Allen Probes Extended Mission Science Themes (1 of 3) 1.Spatial and temporal structures of injections and other transient phenomena and their effects.
Company LOGO Network Management Architecture By Dr. Shadi Masadeh 1.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
Cyberinfrastructure Overview of Demos Townsville, AU 28 – 31 March 2006 CREON/GLEON.
Autonomy: Executive and Instruments Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nicola Muscettola NASA Ames Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon.
SECAS Dec 01 MISSIONS: POLAR, WIND, GEOTAIL, CLUSTER Jim Sharber MISSION STATUS.
1 Science Goal Monitor (SGM) Code 588 / Jenny Geiger.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Radiation Environment Monitor Kevin Hargrave EO
for Lomonosov-GRB collaboration
JMA Report on Satellite-based Space Weather Activities in Japan
Future SWE Missions Workshop ESA SSA/SWE State-of-Play
INSTRUMENT DATA PROCESSING UNIT (IDPU) REQUIREMENTS
Alexis Maldonado & Georg Bartels
Fault Protection Techniques in JPL Spacecraft
Remote Operations and Online Processing
Colorado Space Grant Consortium
CubeSat vs. Science Instrument Complexity
In Distributed Systems
Presentation transcript:

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Model Mission: Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Goal “To study the microphysics of three fundamental plasma processes: magnetic reconnection, energetic particle acceleration, and turbulence*” Constellation composed of 4 identical spacecraft maintaining a tetrahedral formation in regions of scientific interest within the magnetosphere Each spacecraft has a suite of 4 primary payload sensors/subsystems (FPI, FIELDS, HPCA, EPD) * SWRI MMS webpage

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August MMS Mission (cont.) Plasma processes under investigation are inherently transient (magnetic reconnection in particular) Specific need for reactive on-board autonomy to enable high temporal and spatial resolution data acquisition during transient events (i.e. changes in particle, ion, and electromagnetic field measurements) Limited intra-constellation communication dedicated to coordinating reactive data acquisition –Only a measure of the “quality” of scientific data is transmitted (1 byte every 10 seconds) by each spacecraft –Quality byte is used as a trigger for the other spacecraft in the constellation to start high resolution data acquisition

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Operating Modes Each spacecraft has three modes of operation –Slow Survey –Fast Survey –Burst Slow Survey Mode is entered when a spacecraft is outside the regions of scientific interest (approx 60% of orbit) –Only a subset of payload sensors are active, providing a minimal amount of data (primarily for health monitoring) –Acquired data is not stored for downlink Fast Survey Mode is entered when a spacecraft is inside a region of interest (approx 40% of orbital period) –All payload sensors are active, and data taken at moderate rates –Acquired data is analyzed for quality on-board and stored for later downlink –Quality data is communicated throughout the constellation

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Operating Modes (cont.) Burst Mode is initiated by time-triggered commands or autonomously when measured conditions satisfy a set of rules –It can only be triggered while the spacecraft is already in Fast Survey Mode –Approximately 40 min allowable per day (due to storage constraints) –All sensors acquire high temporal resolution data –Acquired data is analyzed for quality and stored for downlink –Transition to Burst Mode is communicated throughout the constellation via the quality byte Does not necessarily force Burst Mode transition in other spacecraft Transition based on weighted combination of conditions, local data quality, and communicated quality

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Phases of MMS Mission Three phases of operation targeting different regions of the magnetosphere Priority of payload data dependent on phase of mission as well as location in orbit Image from SWRI MMS CSR p. F-16

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Payload Sensor Specifications Image from SWRI MMS CSR p. E-18

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Demonstration Scenarios based on MMS Mission Model Simplifying assumptions –Only three spacecraft in a triangular formation (allowing potential use of Microbots as hardware testbed) –Simulate payload sensor data and orbital information for operating mode transitions –Use representative algorithms for compression, on-board processing, etc. Three potential scenarios of increasing complexity –Nominal “Day in the Life” of MMS –Support of science community requests for alternate on-board processing –Management of solid-state storage overflow conditions

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Demonstration Scenarios (cont.) “Day in the Life” scenario will demonstrate several aspects of mission operations under nominal conditions –Mode transitions based on orbital location (Slow/Fast) –Mode transition based on burst trigger commands, measured conditions, and inter-constellation communication –Ground station interaction with the constellation “User Request” scenario will demonstrate support for multiple scientific user requests beyond the nominal operations –Users can modify or add to the on-board processing Alternate data rates Compression schemes Quality of data for downlink/storage –Users can set time triggered commands to control mode transitions based on time (i.e. location in orbit)

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Demonstration Scenarios (cont.) “Storage Overflow” scenario will demonstrate autonomous management of a fault or off-nominal conditions –Limited data storage space could be filled (by entering Burst Mode often) or fail, while sensors/processors still operational –Several potential methods of managing situation Overwrite low quality or priority data Balance stored data across constellation during Slow Survey Mode Stream acquired data in realtime to other spacecraft for storage (assuming communication bandwidth sufficient) –Specific methods to be implemented still under consideration

DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Science Agent Architecture

11 Adaptive Network Architecture (ANA) Current LMCO ANA Configuration Sensors Actuators Science Instrument e.g. Camera Science Payload SpaceWire/ USB/ /Legacy Gizmo Agent CCM Layer CORBA Notification Service Component (Data/Message Filtering for local Delivery) CORBA Federated Naming Service (Agent Locator) Agent Registration InterAgent Messages (FIPA ACL) SpaceWire/USB/ /Legacy Gizmo Agent CCM Layer Executive Agent CCM Layer Science Agent CCM Layer Comm. Agent CCM Layer CORBA Notification Service Component (Data/Message Filtering for Remote Delivery) GNC Agent CCM Layer