Impacts of Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Policies Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University Contributors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Climate Change and KS : Mitigation Charles W. Rice Soil Microbiologist Department of Agronomy Lead Author, IPCC AR4 WGIII K-State Research and Extension.
Advertisements

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation Charles W. Rice Soil Microbiologist Department of Agronomy Lead Author, IPCC.
Global biomass availability in light of policy development – iLUC Focus Petr Havlík, Michael Obersteiner, Erwin Schmid, Uwe A. Schneider AND MANY OTHER.
Position of biodiversity in future CAP Nina Dobrzyńska Department for Direct Payments Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Poland Ryn, 29th September.
1 Antonio Soria Head of Unit Economics of Energy, Climate Change and Transport Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Joint Research Centre European.
Enough for all? Bernd Möller, Ph.D. Sustainable Energy Planning & Management Group Department of Development and Planning Aalborg University, Denmark Biomass.
Presentation to Joint Oireachtas Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine on the positive impacts of Coillte on Ireland’s carbon footprint Thursday.
Arno Becker Institute for Food and Resource Economics (ILR), University of Bonn ImpactsMarket development Policy measures Policy objectives Leading to.
© CommNet 2013 Education Phase 3 Sustainable food production.
The Global Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model Uwe A. Schneider Christine Schleupner Kerstin Jantke Erwin Schmid Michael Obersteiner Energy.
The LULUCF sector: land use, land-use change and forestry
IPCC Mitigation Potential and Costs Land-Use Options Daniel Martino (Carbosur, Uruguay) CLA, Chapter 8 (Agriculture), WGIII Bonn, 12 May 2007.
FNU Seminar 15 November 2006 Land-use option conservation: Habitat requirements for wetland species in Europe Kerstin Jantke Research Unit Sustainability.
Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues.
“And see this ring right here, Jimmy?... That’s another time the old fellow miraculously survived some big forest fire.” ENFA/INSEA FORESTRY…..
The European Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (EUFASOM) Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainabilty and Global Change Hamburg University.
ENFA Model ENFA Kick-off Meeting Hamburg, 10 May 2005.
Professor John Agard UWI Environment in Development.
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
Protecting Today’s Investments For Tomorrow’s Innovations.
Evaluation of Economic, Land Use, and Land Use Emission Impacts of Substituting Non-GMO Crops for GMO in the US Farzad Taheripour Harry Mahaffey Wallace.
Presented by Dean Current, PhD Center for Integrated Natural Resources and Agricultural Management (CINRAM) Department of Forest Resources University of.
European Non-Food Agriculture Introduction Uwe Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University 23 April 2008.
Climate and Economic Drivers of Land Use Change John Reilly, Niven Winchester, Adam Schlosser, Qudsia Ejaz MIT Joint Program.
An assessment of the global land use change and food security effects of the use of agricultural residues for bioenergy production Edward Smeets, Andrzej.
« Biofuels » (Enlarged Advisory Group on Pigmeat, 1st April 2011) Andreas Pilzecker, European Commission (Directorate-General for Agriculture, Unit H4)
Michael Obersteiner IIASA Regional Carbon Budgets: From methodologies to quantification. Beijing, China, November 2004 Coupling Carbon Processes.
Inclusion of the agricultural sector in greenhouse gas mitigation policies Problems and potential instruments Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability.
Energy policies and management of carbon balance in Estonia Olga Gavrilova, Tiina Randla, Raivo Vilu Tallinn University of Technology.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
IPC fall seminar, 15 th October 2007 Sustainability in the Food & Agricultural Sector the role of the Private Sector & Government Panel I: Challenges facing.
Putting the Hopes and Fears of Climate Change Legislation in Perspective _________________________________________ Sustainable Agriculture: The Key to.
Assessment of GHG Mitigation Opportunities in the U.S. Forest and Agricultural Sectors Bruce A. McCarl Texas A&M University Collaborators Heng-Chi Lee.
Soil carbon in dynamic land use optimization models Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
European Carbon Sinks Modeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
BIOMASS CARBON ACCOUNTS FOR EUROPE AND GLOBALLY IN GLOBIOM Nicklas Forsell & Stefan Frank, Michael Obersteiner, Petr Havlík….. IIASA – International Institute.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies Q: What is Carbon Sequestration? A: Capture and Storage of Carbon in Sinks Terrestrial (forest, agriculture)
Overview of Economic Methods to Simulate Land Competition Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum National Conservation Training Center.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte The Politics of Food Conference.
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
Agriculture’s Role in Climate Change Mitigation July 18, 2007 (revised) Daniel A. Lashof, Ph.D. Science Director Climate Center Natural Resources Defense.
GIS bioenergy Options for GIS bioenergy projects Andreas Türk 25. April 2008.
CDM and Forestry Sector in India Carbon Pool of Forestry Sector in India The growing stock of the country has been estimated to be 4,740 million m³.
Climate Change and Energy Impacts on Water and Food Scarcity Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division High-level Panel.
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
Can Biofuels be Sustainable in an Unsustainable Agriculture? Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel Chad M. Hellwinckel American Chemical Society.
How to value ecosystem goods and services in agriculture at increasing land use pressure ? Katarina Hedlund Lund university, Sweden.
1 Input by South Africa on responses to climate change Seminar of Governmental Experts 16 & 17 May 2005, Bonn.
Policy Scenario Analyis Chrystalyn Ivie Ramos Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University 23 April 2008.
COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC POTENTIALS of NON-FOOD OPTIONS International Food Security Impacts of European Non-Food Options Chris Llull a, Uwe A. Schneider a,b,
Martin Schönhart 1, Franz Sinabell 2, Erwin Schmid 1 ‘The spatial dimension in analysing the linkages between agriculture, rural development and the environment’
Economic Assessment of GHG Mitigation Strategies for Canadian Agriculture: Role of market mechanisms for soil sinks Presentation to GHG Modeling Forum.
Forest restoration in Brazil Rebecca Mant, Senior Programme Officer, UNEP-WCMC and the REDD-PAC team.
Assessing future impacts of land use policies in Brazil.
Land use in the coming decades Science, Policy and Economics Uwe A. Schneider Sustainability and Global Change Research Unit, Hamburg University.
EUFASOM – Inputs, Outputs, Linkage Options CCTAME – Kick-Off Meeting Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University.
Biofuel Policy: Livestock Emissions Emission reduction (mmtce) Biofuel carbon price (Euro/tce) Total Livestock.
Land Use: Globally consistent national mitigation and adaptation Michael Obersteiner.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
What are the key issues around land use & what are the trade-offs between food security and GHG mitigation objectives on the land? Pete Smith ClimateXChange.
Implications of Alternative Crop Yield Assumptions on Land Management, Commodity Markets, and GHG Emissions Projections Justin S. Baker, Ph.D.1 with B.A.
Makala: the necessary evil
Negative emissions – potential social impacts
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications
Session 4: Biofuels: How Feasible Are Large-Scale Goals for Biofuel Penetration in the US and Canada? Ken Andrasko, EPA Session Objectives: Gauge.
An Agricultural Sector Model to Analyze Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation from Forests and Agriculture Bruce A. McCarl Texas A&M University Uwe A. Schneider.
Agricultural/Forestry Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum October 1-3, 2001
Agriculture’s contribution to a carbon neutral Europe
Presentation transcript:

Impacts of Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Policies Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University Contributors Kerstin Jantke, Ivie Ramos, Christine Schleupner, Timm Sauer, Chris Llull (Hamburg University), Bruce A. McCarl (Texas A&M University), Petr Havlik, Oskar Franklin, Steffen Fritz, Michael Obersteiner (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis), Erwin Schmid (University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna), Juraj Balkovic, Rastislav Skalsky (Soil Science and Conservation Research institute, Bratislava), Martin Weih (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences ), Andre Faaji, Edward Smeets (Utrecht University)

I. Questions & Challenges II. Research Tools III. Policy Analysis IV. Conclusions

Land Use Policies Society Climate (Environment)

Questions Mitigation Potential of Climate Policies? Mitigation Potential of Climate Policies? Land Management Adaptation? Land Management Adaptation? Commodity Market Impacts? Commodity Market Impacts? Environmental Side Effects? Environmental Side Effects? Social Side Effects? Social Side Effects?

Challenges Heterogeneity (Resources, Technologies) Heterogeneity (Resources, Technologies) Complexity (Mitigation Options, Markets, Externalities, Policies) Complexity (Mitigation Options, Markets, Externalities, Policies) Global Scope Global Scope

Land use competition

Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model - FASOM Partial Equilibrium, Bottom-Up Model Partial Equilibrium, Bottom-Up Model Maximizes sum of consumer and producer surplus Maximizes sum of consumer and producer surplus Constrained by resource endowments, technologies, policies Constrained by resource endowments, technologies, policies Spatially explicit, discrete dynamic Spatially explicit, discrete dynamic Integrates environmental effects Integrates environmental effects Programmed in GAMS Programmed in GAMS

FASOM History US (1993) US (1993) EU (2004) EU (2004) Global (2006) Global (2006)

FASOM Structure Resources Land Use Technologies Processing Technologies ProductsMarkets Inputs Limits Supply Functions Limits Demand Functions, Trade Limits Environmental Impacts

FASOM - Spatial Resolution Soil texture Soil texture Stone content Stone content Altitude levels Altitude levels Slopes Slopes Soil state Soil state Political regions Political regions Ownership (forests) Ownership (forests) Farm types Farm types Farm size Farm size Many crop and tree species Many crop and tree species Tillage, planting irrigation, fertilization harvest regime Tillage, planting irrigation, fertilization harvest regime

Altitude: 1.< 300 m m m 4.>1100 m Texture: 1.Coarse 2.Medium 3.Medium-fine 4.Fine 5.Very fine Soil Depth: 1.shallow 2.medium 3.deep Stoniness: 1.Low content 2.Medium content 3.High content Slope Class: 1.0-3% 2.3-6% % % 5.… Homogeneous Response Units DE13 DE12 DE11 DE14

8 69VertebrateWetlandSpecies EUFASOM Biodiversity Scope

2016 cells25 countries6 biogeo-regions Biodiversity - Spatial Resolution

Climate Policy Analysis

I US Agricultural Sector Results Mainly based on McCarl and Schneider (2001). Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S.Agriculture and Forestry. SCIENCE 294:

US Agricultural Mitigation Carbon price (Euro/tce) Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation (mmtce) Technical Potential Competitive Economic Potential

US Mitigation Strategy Mix Carbon price ($/tce) Emission reduction (mmtce) CH4 N2O Decrease Tillage Carbon Sink Afforestation Sink Bioenergy Emission Offsets

US Tillage Carbon Sink Carbon price ($/tce) Soil carbon sequestration (mmtce) Technical Potential Economic Potential Competitive Economic Potential

US Afforestation Sink Carbon price ($/tce) Emission reduction (mmtce) Technical Potential Economic Potential Competitive Economic Potential

US Bioenergy Emission Offsets Carbon price ($/tce) Emission reduction (mmtce) Technical Potential Economic Potential Competitive Economic Potential

US Crop Management Impacts Intensity (Base = 100%) Carbon equivalent price ($/mtce) Fertilization Tillage Irrigation

US Agricultural Markets Fisher index Carbon price ($/tce) Crop prices Livestock prices Livestock production Crop production Crop exports

Billion $ Carbon price ($/tce) US Welfare Changes Gross Producer Surplus Emission Payments Net Producer Surplus Consumer Surplus

US Environmental Co-Effects Pollution (%/acre) Carbon price ($/tce) N Percolation N Subsurface Flow Soil Erosion P Loss

Emission Leakage Fisher’s Ideal Index Carbon price ($/tce) USA Only Annex I Countries All Countries Non-Annex I crop net exports for agricultural GHG mitigation policy in:

II European Agricultural Sector Results Unpublished simulations with EUFASOM

2010 EU Bioenergy Targets 21% Renewable Electricity 21% Renewable Electricity ≈ 610 thousand GWh ≈ 300 million wet tons of biomass 5.75% Bio-Fuels 5.75% Bio-Fuels

Biomass Crop Share for 300 Mt Target

Climate Mitigation vs. Biodiversity Protection

2010 EU Biodiversity Targets 2001: European Council committed to ‘halt the decline of biodiversity by 2010’ in Europe 2001: European Council committed to ‘halt the decline of biodiversity by 2010’ in Europe 2002: EU joined about 130 countries in agreeing ‘to significantly reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010‘ worldwide 2002: EU joined about 130 countries in agreeing ‘to significantly reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010‘ worldwideBUT Biodiversity loss still accelerating Biodiversity loss still accelerating Reservation often ad hoc and uncoordinated Reservation often ad hoc and uncoordinated 2010 only three years away 2010 only three years away

Habitat Needs Simulations with the independent 69 species based habitat module of EUFASOM show that 10, 20, 30, 40 viable populations for each species require 22, 35, 42, and 61 million hectares, respectively, in specific locations

Wetland Area Share for a 40 Mha Target

Biomass Crop Share for 300 Mt Target

EU25 Bioenergy Potentials Marginal Biomass Costs in Euro/ton European Biomass Production in million wet tons 10 Mha 30 Mha Wetland Requirement = 40 Mha

percentage change years Cereal Straw Removal Soil Organic Carbon Yields Unpublished EPIC Simulations by E. Schmid

Conclusions Low mitigation targets, low marginal mitigation costs, more extensive agriculture, water and soil quality benefits Low mitigation targets, low marginal mitigation costs, more extensive agriculture, water and soil quality benefits High mitigation targets, high marginal cost, more intensive agriculture, more pressure on food and biodiversity High mitigation targets, high marginal cost, more intensive agriculture, more pressure on food and biodiversity Simultaneous biodiversity policies increase agricultural mitigation cost Simultaneous biodiversity policies increase agricultural mitigation cost Integrated analysis important (climate, soil, water, biodiversity, fuel, food) to prevent today’s solution becoming the problem of tomorrow Integrated analysis important (climate, soil, water, biodiversity, fuel, food) to prevent today’s solution becoming the problem of tomorrow

Integrated Analysis in CCTAME

Thank you.