Human Research Protection Program & IRB Responsibilities Marisue Cody, PhD Director Center on Advice & Compliance Help.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Top Ten Investigator Responsibilities When Conducting Human Subjects Research Thanks to Ada Sue Selwitz, Univ. of Kentucky and PRIM&R (Public Responsibility.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Conflict and Consent: Managing Disclosure in Human Subjects Research University of Miami Human Subjects Research Office Conflict of Interest Symposium.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Ethical Principles of Human Subjects Protection
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 19, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Human Research Protection Program 101 July 19-20, 2007 Milwaukee, WI.
Questions: AAHRPP Evaluation Instrument for Use with Final Revised Accreditation Standards Presented by: C. Karen Jeans, MSN, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst,
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
VHA Handbook What’s new. General Requirements for Informed Consent A Legally Authorized Representative may not always qualify as a ‘personal representative’
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator Local Accountability Meeting June 2011.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Office of Research Oversight Office of Research Oversight 1 Human Subject Protection Issues for HSR&D Researchers Tom Puglisi, PhD, CIP Chief Research.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Ethical and Regulatory Oversight of Human Subjects Research in the VA C. Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst September 29, 2010.
VA Central IRB K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs.
Marianne M. Elliott Office of Research Integrity and Ethics Bureau of Medicine and Surgery U. S Navy.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
IRB Minutes Karen Jeans, MSN, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
Conditional IRB Approval
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Conducting Human Subjects Research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Human Research Protection Program & IRB Responsibilities Marisue Cody, PhD Director Center on Advice & Compliance Help

Objectives  Describe the shared responsibilities of a facility Human Research Protection Program  Describe the responsibilities for Human Subjects Protection  Explore risks, privacy, & confidentiality review by the IRB

HRPPP (Human Research Participant Protection Programs)  Institute of Medicine report 2001 Preserving the Public Trust  Broader system with multiple functional elements  Advocated accreditation of the HRPPP

Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)  Shared responsibility Organization Leadership Research Office R&D Committee IT, Privacy, Ethics IRB Investigators and research staff

Old model R&D IRB New model: HRPP Director Patient Advocates HPA RCO Radiation Safety ACOS/Education AO DSMB QA/QI Pharmacy Subjects Grants & Contracts Chief of Staff Medical Records Public Affairs R&D Committee IRB Investigators Study Coordinators Conflict of Interest Committee Privacy Office Clinical managers ACOS/R ISO

AAHRPP Accreditation Standards Domains  Organization  Research Review Unit  Investigator  Sponsored Research  Participant Outreach Obligations of Obligations to

How does accreditation work? Application Site Visit Council on Accreditation Self Evaluation Expert site visitors Tailored to setting Determines Accreditation category

Categories of Accreditation  Full AAHRPP accreditation  Qualified AAHRPP accreditation  Accreditation-pending  Accreditation withheld

AAHRPP Accreditation Update  74 applications (94 FWAs)  72 site visits (92 FWAs)  53 applications reviewed by AAHRPP Council (65 FWAs)  35 HRPPs accredited (40 FWAs)

Institutional Responsibilities

Regulatory Guidelines for the Institution  Dept of Health & Human Services – FWA  FDA – none  VA VHA Directive (funding of the facility HRP) VHA Directive 1200 (Facility R&D program) VHA Handbook (R&D Committee)

Federalwide Assurance (FWA)  This documents your institutional commitment to comply with the Common Rule.  It is required from each institution “engaged” in covered research:

Assurance of Compliance (38 CFR part )  Statement of principles governing the institution  Designation of one or more IRBs  List of IRB members  Written procedures the IRB will follow  Written procedures for reporting unanticipated problems involving risk, and any suspension or termination of IRB approval  Executed by individual authorized to act for the institution

Review by institution (38 CFR part )  Research approved by an IRB may be subject to further review by official of the institution  Those officials MAY NOT approve the research if it is not approved by the IRB

IRB Requirements

Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects  Originally issued in 1974 as Part 46 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations (Subpart A) by DHEW  Adopted in 1991 by 17 federal agencies 38 CFR part 16 refers to the VA 45 CFR part 46 refers to DHHS 21 CFR parts 56 (IRB) and 50 (informed consent) refers to the FDA

Common Rule and VHA Handbook Common Rule = Regulation Establish IRBs and responsibilities Ensure Informed Consent of Subjects VHA Handbook = Policy Medical Center Responsibilities IRB Composition & Responsibilities Investigator Responsibilities Investigational Drugs & Devices in VA Handbook and Federal Regulations Same regulatory weight (not optional)

What is covered?  All research involving human subjects conducted, supported or otherwise subject to regulation by any federal department or agency which takes action to make this policy application. (38 CFR part )  In the VA, that is all research involving human subjects conducted completely or partially in VA facilities, approved off-site locations, facilities, and/or by VA researchers while on official VA duty time (VHA Handbook , p. 6).

… a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to “generalizable” knowledge. (38 CFR part d) Research

Human subject … means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information

IRB Review of Research (38 CFR part )  Authority to: Approve, require modifications to seek approval, or disapprove  Require that information given to subjects is in compliance with informed consent regulations  Shall require documentation of informed consent or waive documentation  Notify investigators in writing of its decision  Conduct continuing review and have authority to observe consent process and research

Additional VHA requirements Prior to initiating research: Research MUST be reviewed and approved by IRB AND R&D, approval must be in writing If approval is contingent on substantive modifications, subsequent review must be by the convened IRB If approval is contingent on specific minor conditions, the IRB chair or designee may approve it on behalf of the IRB

Criteria for IRB Approval (VHA Handbook ) 1.Risks to subjects are minimized 2.Risks are reasonable in relation to benefits 3.Selection of subjects is equitable 4.Informed consent will be sought prospectively 5.Informed consent is appropriately documented 6.Research plan makes adequate provisions for safety monitoring 7.There are adequate provisions to protect privacy and confidentiality 8.Protection of vulnerable subjects 9. Conflict of interest 10. Ensure investigator educational requirements and certifications

Criteria for IRB Approval (VHA Handbook ) 1.Risks to subjects are minimized 2.Risks are reasonable in relation to benefits 3.Selection of subjects is equitable 4.Informed consent will be sought prospectively 5.Informed consent is appropriately documented 6.Research plan makes adequate provisions for safety monitoring 7.There are adequate provisions to protect privacy and confidentiality 8.Protection of vulnerable subjects 9. Conflict of interest 10. Ensure investigator educational requirements and certifications

Risk: What is it?  The probability of harm or injury occurring as a result of participation in a research study  Prediction of some future occurrence of harm  Consideration of probabilities: what has happened before?

Benefit: What is it?  A valued or desired outcome; an advantage  The probability of hoped for benefits

Risk/Benefit Analysis  Risks and benefits are not parallel ideas Risks: often individual, immediate, measurable Benefit: often elusive, future, potential  Need to maintain a favorable balance

The Role of the IRB  Review potential risks, discomforts, hazards, or inconveniences of protocol Probability, magnitude, duration, reversibility of risks  Separate risks of research from standard of care risks e.g. Risks of surgery already scheduled  Give special consideration to risks for research involving vulnerable populations Children, mentally impaired, prisoners, others

The Role of the IRB (cont.)  Consider hoped for benefits Benefits can take the form of therapy, education, information, resources or empowerment Benefits can be directed at participants, their community, society, medical knowledge, medical technology  Consider if risks reasonable in relation to possible benefits Balancing potential risks to participant/others against possible benefits to participant/society

VHA DIRECTIVE November 30, 2007  All human subjects research conducted at the facility is reviewed prior to the research being initiated by an ISO and a Privacy Officer who have been appointed to either the IRB of record or the R&D Committee of record.

Privacy & the IRB (VHA Handbook ) All VHA Investigators conducting VHA- approved research must obtain the authority to use individually-identifiable information as follows: VHA individually-identifiable health information involving non-employee research subjects may be used by a VHA Investigator for research purposes provided there is a prior written authorization. A prior written authorization may be incorporated into an informed consent.

Privacy & the IRB (2) VHA individually-identifiable health information involving non-employee research subjects may be used by a VHA Investigator for research purposes when there is an IRB or Privacy Board waiver of authorization in accordance with 45 CFR (i).

Privacy & the IRB  Authorizations  Recruitment

Data Security & the IRB (VA Handbook 6500)

Data Security & Research  The security policies, procedures, and controls in this handbook apply to all VA employees, contractors, researchers, students, volunteers, representatives of Federal, State, local, or Tribal agencies, and all others authorized access to VA facilities, information systems or information in order to perform a VA authorized activity.

Confidentiality  Collection of data  Data transfer  Data storage  Granting access to data

Key Points Related to Privacy & IT Security  data-security/docs/Key_Points.pdf data-security/docs/Key_Points.pdf

Checklists, Certification Forms & Other Responsibilities  security/checklists.cfm security/checklists.cfm  Check these links for specific information for:  Principal Investigators (PIs) Principal Investigators (PIs)  Associate Chief of Staff for Research & Development (ACOS/R&D) or Research Coordinator Associate Chief of Staff for Research & Development (ACOS/R&D) or Research Coordinator  Medical Center Directors Medical Center Directors  VISN Directors VISN Directors