CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED Prof. JANICKE 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2012.
Advertisements

CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE Chap Authentication2 AUTHENTICATION A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS –NEEDED BEFORE DOCUMENTS.
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Judicial Notice and Stipulations
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
Common Trial Procedures United States. Opening Statements.
CHAP. 8: IMPEACHMENT P. JANICKE Chap Impeachment2 DEFINITION AND METHODS IMPEACHMENT IS THE PROCESS OF ATTEMPTING TO WEAKEN THE PERCEIVED.
CHAP. 6 COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES P. JANICKE Chap. 6: Witness Competency2 MODERN VIEW NEARLY EVERYONE IS COMPETENT NEED TO BE HELPFUL BY HAVING SOME.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Mock Trial Modified by Dennis Gerl from Evidence PPT by John Ed-Bishop
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE Prof. JANICKE OPINIONS ARE GENERALLY INADMISSIBLE RULE 602 REQUIRES ACTUAL “KNOWLEDGE” FOR MOST TYPES OF EVIDENCE KNOWLEDGE.
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
Courts and the Case Process. I. The Two Systems of Criminal Courts A. Federal and state courts (more trials take place in state courts) B. Federal Courts.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2008.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 Prof. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 1 2 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN AND CAN’T (MOSTLY)
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE Chap Authentication2 AUTHENTICATION A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS –NEEDED BEFORE.
Unit 6  What needs to be done this week SeminarSeminar QuizQuiz Discussion boardDiscussion board Unit 9 Analysis and ApplicationUnit 9 Analysis and Application.
CHAP. 8: IMPEACHMENT of WITNESSES
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE Prof. JANICKE Chap Best Ev. Rule2 APPLIES ONLY TO: WRITINGS PHOTOGRAPHS RECORDINGS.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 9 (Chapter 12 – Documents and the Right of Discovery) (Chapter.
CHAP. 8: IMPEACHMENT P. JANICKE Chap Impeachment2 DEFINITION AND METHODS IMPEACHMENT IS THE PROCESS OF ATTEMPTING TO WEAKEN THE PERCEIVED.
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE Prof. JANICKE Chap Best Ev. Rule2 APPLIES ONLY TO: WRITINGS PHOTOGRAPHS RECORDINGS.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY II October 11, 2005.
CHAP. 6 COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES P. JANICKE Chap. 6: Witness Competency2 MODERN VIEW NEARLY EVERYONE IS COMPETENT NEED SUFFICIENT ABILITY TO BE HELPFUL:
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 3 (Chapter 5 – Witnesses -- Lay & Expert) (Chapter 6 – Credibility.
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED P. JANICKE 2012.
CHAP. 6: COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES Prof. JANICKE 2015.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 Prof. JANICKE 2016.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Courts and the Case Process
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
CHAP. 6: COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
OBJECTIONS.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2016.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
CHAP. 6: COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE 2010.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 2: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2011.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE 2010.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 6: COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2019.
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED Prof. JANICKE 2015

SCOPE OF CROSS FED. RULE 611(b): GENERALLY LIMITED TO SCOPE OF DIRECT + ISSUES OF WIT. CREDIBILITY COURT CAN ALLOW WIDER SCOPE –OFTEN DOES, TO SAVE TIME OF RECALLING THE WITNESS TEXAS: NO LIMIT ON SCOPE OF CROSS – ANY RELEVANT SUBJECT TEX. R. 611(b) Chap More On Direct and Cross2

2015 LEADING ON DIRECT ALLOWED SOMETIMES – –TIMID WITNESS –MOMENTARY MEMORY LAPSE –ADVERSE WITNESS (ASSOCIATED WITH OTHER SIDE) Chap More On Direct and Cross3

2015 ALSO ALLOWED ON “PRELIMINARY MATTERS” BUT YOU HAVE TO KNOW THE LOCAL PRACTICE ON WHAT IS PRELIMINARY STRICT RULE: ONLY NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION, AND PLACEMENT AT THE SCENE ARE PRELIMINARY Chap More On Direct and Cross4

2015 IN HARRIS COUNTY STATE COURTS, ALL FOUNDATION QUESTIONS ARE REGARDED AS PRELIMINARY EXAMPLES : –AUTHENTICITY OF A DOCUMENT –FAMILIARITY WITH A PERSON’S CHARACTER OR REPUTATION Chap More On Direct and Cross5

2015 MEMORY REFRESHING IS ALLOWED IN LIEU OF LEADING, ANY REASONABLE SILENT MEMORY REFRESHMENT TECHNIQUE IS OK –LOOKING AT A REPORT –CHECKING A BOOK –REVIEWING NOTES THESE ARE NOT PUTTING THE DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE! Chap More On Direct and Cross6

2015 THE WITNESS MUST THEN TESTIFY FROM HIS REFRESHED MEMORY OTHER SIDE IS ALLOWED TO SEE THE REFRESHMENT MATERIAL Chap More On Direct and Cross7

2015 LEADING ON CROSS BROADLY ALLOWED EXCEPTION: YOUR OWN CLIENT –HERE THE RULES ARE REVERSED; ADVERSARY LEADING ON DIRECT IS OK, BUT YOU CAN’T LEAD ON CROSS Chap More On Direct and Cross8

2015 WITNESS PREP. MATERIAL: FEDERAL RULE 612 USED WHILE ON THE STAND: ADVERSE PARTY HAS RIGHT TO SEE IT, AND TO INTRODUCE PARTS PERTINENT TO TESTIMONY USED BEFORE TRIAL: FED. RULE: MAY SEEK AN ORDER TO SEE IT –ROUTINELY GRANTED TODAY Chap More On Direct and Cross9

2015 TEXAS RULE 612 USED WHILE ON THE STAND: ADVERSARY HAS RIGHT TO INSPECT AND TO INTRODUCE PARTS PERTINENT TO TESTIMONY VIEWED PRE-TRIAL: –CRIMINAL CASES: ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO SEE –CIVIL CASES: NEED ORDER, BUT EASY TO GET IN PRACTICE Chap More On Direct and Cross10

2015 WORK-PRODUCT CONTENTION WILL NOT OVERRIDE THE FOREGOING LAWYER-PREPARED MATERIALS SEEN BY WITNESS: –WILL HAVE TO BE HANDED OVER –WORK-PRODUCT IS FLIMSY EVEN IF NOT SHOWN TO WITNESS! [EXPLAIN] Chap More On Direct and Cross11

PROBLEMS/CASES Baker James Julian 2015Chap More On Direct and Cross12

2015 CROSS-EXAM IS AN IMPORTANT RIGHT IF WITNESS FLEES AFTER DIRECT EXAM, OR REFUSES TO COMPLETE CROSS, THE DIRECT WILL BE STRICKEN ON MOTION Chap More On Direct and Cross13

2015 INVOKING “THE RULE” FED. RULE 615; TEXAS RULE 614 RULE SEPARATING WITNESSES SO THEY CAN’T HEAR EACH OTHER’S TESTIMONY THE RULE IS MANDATORY ON REQUEST OF ANY PARTY CUSTOM IS TO MAKE THE REQUEST Chap More On Direct and Cross14

2015 SOME WITNESSES ARE EXEMPTED FROM “THE RULE,” i.e., CAN STAY IN COURTROOM INDIVIDUAL PARTIES ONE CORPORATE WITNESS CAN STAY FOR EACH CORPORATE PARTY PERSONS SHOWN TO BE “NECESSARY” TO PRESENTATION OF THE CASE – USUALLY EXPERTS Chap More On Direct and Cross15

2015 ADDITIONAL PERSONS MAY BE EXEMPTED BY STATUTE –THERE ARE SUCH STATUTES, FEDERAL AND TEXAS >>> Chap More On Direct and Cross16

2015 STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS FROM “THE RULE” FEDERAL: VICTIMS’ RIGHTS ACT 18 USC 3771 [in packet] –VICTIM IS NORMALLY EXEMPT FROM THE RULE UNLESS JUDGE FINDS LIKELY ALTERATION OF VICTIM’S TESTIMONY –ALSO RELATIVES OF AN UNDER-18 OR DECEASED VICTIM Chap More On Direct and Cross17

2015 TEXAS “THE RULE” [614] –EXEMPTS VICTIMS IN CRIMINAL CASES, UNLESS JUDGE FINDS PRESENCE WOULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THEIR TESTIMONY >>> Chap More On Direct and Cross18

2015 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ART EXPANDS THE EXEMPTIONS: –EXEMPTS CLOSE RELATIVES OF DECEASED VICTIM; –EXEMPTS GUARDIAN OF LIVING VICTIM [PARENTS NOT MENTIONED ??] Chap More On Direct and Cross19

2015 DISCRETIONARY TIGHTENING OF THE RULE PRETRIAL ORDER NOT TO DISCUSS EXPECTED TESTIMONY WITH OTHER WITNESSES –ALSO BINDS LAWYERS NOT TO INFORM RE. WHAT OTHER WITNESSES SAY NORMALLY ISSUED ONLY TO FACT WITNESSES COULD ALSO ISSUE TO EXPERTS Chap More On Direct and Cross20

2015 TEXAS STATUTORY TIGHTENING OF THE RULE TEXAS CRIMINAL CASES: –COURT MUST INSTRUCT WITNESSES RE. WHO THEY CAN SPEAK WITH ABOUT THE CASE DURING TRIAL, AND WHO THEY CANNOT SPEAK WITH [TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ART (e)] Chap More On Direct and Cross21

2015 FURTHER DISCRETIONARY TIGHTENING OF “THE RULE” READING TRANSCRIPT OF OTHER WIT. TESTIMONY FORBIDDEN BY COURT ORDER IN SOME JURISDICTIONS; NOT IN OTHERS PENALTY FOR BREACH: –DISCRETIONARY – CAN STRIKE THE OFFENDING WITNESS’S TESTIMONY Chap More On Direct and Cross22

FILM FILM CLIP, A PLACE IN THE SUN 2015Chap More On Direct and Cross23