The Camperdown Program By: Katie Harke Shannon Olk Jackie Stankowski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Active Participant- Key Process C Evaluate Performance Critically Analyse Comment on strategies and tactics Always compare against the perfect model.
Advertisements

The Stocker Probe Technique Beatrice Stocker, 1976
The Lidcombe Program - a brief introduction By Carissa Coons MSU, Mankato May 2006 For CDis - undergraduate stuttering class.
Family-Focused Treatment Approach Presented By: Brea Huehnerfuss Jodi Paquette.
Articulation Treatment
Generating Fluent Speech: A Comprehensive Speech Processing Approach Barbara Dahm, M.ED., CCC-SLP Maggie Comeau Lindy Mamerow Sarah Skahan.
Cooper Personalized Fluency Control Therapy
Color Me Fluent Sarah Benjamin & Annette Boldt. Introduction Created by Alice Anne G. Farley Incorporates learning theory, behavior modification, and.
The SpeechEasy  Device: Augmentative Communication for Stuttering Presentation by Tim Saltuklaroglu, M.S. East Carolina University March 27, 2003.
Presented by Liz Boettcher, Kate Hintz, and Renee Reetz
H OLLINS C OMMUNICATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE By: Alicia Cruver Kasey Jacob.
Camperdown Program A Behavioral Treatment Program for Adolescents & Adults Who Stutter Kim Corrigall & Laura Schuster.
ASSESSMENT.
Evaluation Purposes of an evaluation –determine if a problem exists –determine the cause, if possible –determine the need for treatment –determine the.
Precision Fluency Shaping Programs. Common Features –Teach skills, all teach easy onset prolongations other skills –Skill progression –May or may not.
The New England Fluency Program Nikki Krenz & Amber Price.
Comprehensive Stuttering Program By Einer Boberg & Deborah Kully (1985)
Stuttering Intervention Program (SIP) by R. Pindzola
Conclusion There is sufficient evidence from this study to conclude that video modeling, when used alone or in conjunction with a script, does appear to.
Jean Spreitzer and Cortney Sorge
Unit II Four Language Skills: Aural and Oral Reading and Writing.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Developed by Richard E. Shine Holds a M.A degree in Speech & Hearing Science from U of Colorado. Holds a Ed.D in Speech- Language Pathology from Penn State.
The Lidcombe Program University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Lorrie Mittelstaedt Stacey Lamers
Improving Spoken English NativeAccent™. What is NativeAccent? New internet-delivered technology that assesses a student’s English pronunciation skills.
Hair re-growth study Dereje ( Dre ) Yalew /MD,IMG/ Observational Case Study Hair Re-Growth Program using an Electro Stimulator.
Learning Disabilities
Cooper Personalized Fluency Control Therapy
Altered Auditory Feedback Some Perspectives... What is Altered Auditory Feedback (AAF)? A definition: “AAF is a collective term for conditions that involve.
Comprehensive Stuttering Program Developed by Einer Boberg Deborah Kully (1985)
CAMBRIDGE CERTIFICATE IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES CELTA.
Precision Fluency Shaping Program
Selective Mutism Presented by: Veronica Rodriguez-Ureña.
Fluency and Stuttering Christy H. Collins, M.Ed., CCC-SLP.
Evidence-based practice in stuttering: The Lidcombe Program
Presenter: Nadiya Destiny Case Study: Andre.
Intensive Residential Treatment (Level III.7, III.5) Long Term Residential Treatment (Level III.3, III.1) Intensive Outpatient Treatment (Level II.1)
1 E-learning Activities for Articulation in Speech Language Therapy and Learning for Preschool Children 報告人 : 潘輝銘.
Chapter 2 Observation and Assessment
Hollins Communication Research Institute. Presented by, Sally Sudmeier and Sarah Schultz Fluency Poster Presentation December 12, 2003.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Critical Review of The Successful Stuttering Management Program (SSMP) An Overview by: Casey Petersen & Brigitta Dahnert.
Forward Moving Speech By Dean Williams.
Language and Communication Definitions Developmental scales Communication disorders Speech Disorders Language Disorders Interventions.
Stuttering Modification Therapy
Behavioral Techniques in the Treatment of Selective Mutism
The Lidcombe Program Heidi Austin Megan Colemer UW- Stevens Point Presented: December 20, 2007.
Treatment Effectiveness: Finding Value in Clinical Data. Part 1. J. Scott Yaruss, Ph.D., CCC-SLP University of Pittsburgh University of Georgia Conference.
Stuttering and Fluency 1 Stuttering Definitions What is stuttering? What causes stuttering? Development of stuttering Factors which contribute to stuttering.
Instructor: Chelsea Jones Teaching English in English (TEE) January 2012 Adapted from: Dr. Scott Phillabaum’s PPT Presentation on Pragmatics.
The Freedom of Fluency By: David A. Daly Presented by: Katie Paulson And Rachel Ursin 1988, Lingui Systems, Inc.
Stuttering Modification Therapy The Van Riper Approach
Illinois State University Future Teachers’ Early Clinical Experience Project Colleen D. Herald Illinois State University Office of Clinical Experiences.
Anne Gibson, Craig Coleman, Tesia Muth, Courtney Moon, Erin Bass, Allison Fisher, Sarah French Background Assessing Clinician-Client Relationship in Stuttering.
Camperdown Program Presented by Josie Kilde and Candace Mariucci.
ENGLISH IMMERSION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS OF ENGLISH.
 Stuttering (also known as stammering) is a communication disorder in which the flow of speech is broken by repetitions, prolongations, or abnormal stoppages.
Linda Jones and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Linda Jones and Lauren Kovesy.
Professional Work Ethics in the Workplace Martha Piear CUR/516 Joan Beckner.
Stuttering Intervention Program (SIP) An Overview by: Jackie Rollins, Danielle Knutson & Signe Ziolkowski.
Group Therapy Susan Boettcher, M.S. CCC-SLP Elise Peltier, M.S. CCC-SLP Clinical Methods 2016.
Effect of Behavior Counseling on Weight Loss in Primary Care Chelsea Carter, BSN, RN, Doctor of Nursing Practice Candidate; Ann Marie Hart, PhD, FNP-BC,
Assessment 10/12/2016.
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Support for English, maths and ESOL Level 3 Award in English for literacy and language teaching Speaking and listening master class.
General Treatment Approaches to Change Speech/Stuttering Behaviors
Selected Fluency Shaping Approaches and Issues
How to use the FoH Tools with Patients/Clients – for use by Clinicians
Get the Best Speech Therapy Treatment for Stuttering or Stammering Source - therapy/stuttering-or-stammering/
Discussion and Future directions
Presentation transcript:

The Camperdown Program By: Katie Harke Shannon Olk Jackie Stankowski

Underlying Process/Rationale  Adult treatment program  Use Prolonged Speech (PS) aspects Reduced speech rate Continuous or extended vocalizations Prolonged words or sounds Soft articulatory contacts Gentle onset of speech and/or voice Breath stream management  Overall goal is to reduce stuttering using any strategy of PS that best suits them while also sounding as natural as possible  A fluency shaping approach

Four Stages 1. Individual Teaching Sessions 2. Group Practice Session 3. Individual Problem Solving Sessions 4. Performance Contingent Maintenance Stage

Individual Teaching Sessions  Done one-on-one, for 3-5 sessions  The client learns how to produce PS by watching a video with exaggerated samples  Client evaluates his/her severity  Client listens to speech samples and rates them

Individual Teaching Sessions Continued  The clinician gives feedback without reference to specific targets  The client moves to stage 2 when their rating is at 2 or less and can produce stutter free speech for 3 minutes  1-9 scale for severity and naturalness  1=no stuttering/highly natural  9= severe stuttering/ highly unnatural

Group Practice Session  1 session (8 hours) with a series of 14 cycles involving 3 phases:  Practicing unnatural speech pattern as in video  Speaking in monologue using PS pattern. Aim to achieve naturalness of 1-3 and severity of 1-2 over several sessions  Evaluating speech produced in the previous phase for stuttering and naturalness  Usually 3 clients and 3 clinicians  Learn to gain control naturally

Individual Problem Solving Sessions  One hour weekly, following the group practice day  Develop strategies to generalize stutter free speech  Individualized practice  Analyzing situations in which control of stuttering is difficult  Client moves to stage 4 when:  One 10 minute within-clinic conversation with severity of 1-2 and naturalness rating of 1-3  Three 10 minute beyond-clinic recorded conversations with severity of 1-2 and naturalness rating of 1-3  Must reach criteria for 3 consecutive weeks in the beyond-clinic recordings

Performance-Contingent Maintenance Stage  Steps scheduled at interval of:  2 weeks, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks  Failure to meet criteria in any step requires that step to be repeated

Research Data: 12 months post treatment  Overall, speech outcome data was favorable  Stuttering severity was low- speakers spoke with minimal stuttering  Speech naturalness rates averaged 4.5 with a range of  Speech rates were within normal range  Some sign of relapse in 3 of the 16 participants within 6-12 months post treatment

Strengths & Weaknesses  Strengths:  Individualized  Incorporates self-evaluation techniques  Responsibility for managing and controlling stuttering is transferred to the client  Clinical hours reduced: real-world experiences increases generalization  Non-programmed and instrument free  Weaknesses:  Client accountability: client is responsible for therapy  Perceived naturalness is low between speakers and listeners

Would We Recommend it?  Yes  It is highly individualized  Provides the client unlimited opportunities to practice – this promotes generalization  Promotes self-evaluation and self-awareness – minimizes clinician’s criticisms  Materials are provided for client reference (video and Manual)  However:  Some speakers and listeners report that this method results in noticeably unnatural speech. It is one of many options available to a client that can be considered.

References  Schaffer, Natalie (2006). Effects of differential prolongations of phrases on the perceptions of speech naturalness. Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 33,  O’Brian, S., Onslow, M., Cream, A., & Packman, A., (2003). The camperdown program: outcomes of a new prolonged speech treatment model. Journal of Speech, language, and Hearing Research, 46,  The Camperdown Program Treatment Manual (2003). ASRC. Retrieved from down_Tmt_Manual.pdf