The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Continuing and Expanding Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools October, 2004 Dr. Susan Leddick.
What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.
1 Improving School Leadership - Guidelines for Country Background Reports - Education and Training Policy Division Directorate of Education.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Office of Professional Preparation and Licensure (OPPL) Annual Report.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Building on Strong Foundations: CAEP Standards 2 & 4 OCTEO Spring Conference,
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Teacher Preparation Family.
How Are Teacher Education Institutions Using Data to Improve Programs? Lessons Learned from the SUNY Teacher Education Program Assessment FIPSE Project,
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
NSAII Annual Conference Las Vegas, Nevada November, 2014 Jane Robb, California Teachers Association Ann Nutter Coffman, National Education Association.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
A Comprehensive Unit Assessment Plan Program Improvement, Accountability, and Research Johns Hopkins University School of Education Faculty Meeting October.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Connect with CAEP Transformation Initiatives Respond to the Needs of the Profession James G. Cibulka, President,
May 1 1 Teacher Education Accreditation Council One Dupont Circle, Suite 320 Washington DC
March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
Graduate School of Education Assessment October 10, 2013.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | The Next Horizon Incorporating Student Perception Surveys into the Continuous.
Re-envisioning Teacher Preparation: Stage II September 16, 2011.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
Transitioning from NCATE to CAEP November 10, 2014 Dr. Lance Tomei Retired (2013) Director for Assessment, Accreditation, and Data Management, University.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Educator Preparation Family.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
University of Minnesota Metrics Framework Working Document: 3/18/2010 Extraordinary Education – Recruit, educate, challenge, and graduate outstanding students.
March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
Opportunity Structures for Preparation and Inspiration (OSPrI): Case Studies of 8 “Exemplar” Inclusive STEM-focused High Schools This work was conducted.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Update Stevie Chepko, CAEP Sr. VP for Accreditation.
CAEP Inquiry Brief Pathway MDE Accreditation Workshop Hope College April 20 & 21, 2016 Dr. Thamizhisai Periyaswamy Dr. Jennifer Palacios-Wirz Klemm Central.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.
Overview of CAEP Guidelines 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014 Presenters: Mark LaCelle-Peterson, CAEP Hilda R. Tompkins, CAEP, Emerson.
CAEP Standard 4: Program Impact Emerson Elliott, CAEP Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter:
The College of Education Beth Kubitskey, Associate Dean EMU prepares caring, professional educators for a diverse and democratic society. Assessment for.
Performance-Based Accreditation
OUR PATH TO THE FUTURE STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 TO 2021.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Michael Kelly, Ed. D. Virginia Tech
Michael Kelly, Ed. D. John Gratto, Ed. D. Virginia Tech
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review
Programmatic Review and Enhancement
Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
April 17, 2018 Gary Railsback, Vice President What’s new at CAEP.
Standard Four Program Impact
Standard one: revisions
Follow-Up Surveys of Graduates and Employers Preparation in the Content Area
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Presentation transcript:

The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval

Session Overview Background Table Discussions Groups Summarize Big Ideas

Media & Political Perceptions New York Times : An Industry of Mediocrity NPR Study : Teacher Prep Programs Get Failing Marks Arne Duncan Teacher education programs are “part of the problem.”

CAEP Strategic Goals 1. To raise the bar in educator preparation. 2. To promote continuous improvement. 3. To advance research and innovation. 4. To increase accreditation’s value. 5. To be a model accrediting body. 6. To be a model learning organization.

Organizational Profile: Environment, Relationships, & Strategic Situation 1 Leadership 2 Strategic Planning 3 Student Focus 5 Workforce Focus 6 Operations Focus 7 Results 4 Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge Management Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence Framework A Systems Perspective

Standard 1: Content and Pedagogical Knowledge Standard 2: Clinical Partnerships and Practice Standard 3: Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity Standard 4: Program Impact Standard 5: Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement

Three Pathways Continuous Improvement Inquiry Brief Transformation Initiative

Evidence Candidates’: Content knowledge Pedagogical knowledge and skills Pedagogical content knowledge Professional knowledge and skills Professional dispositions

Evidence Must Show Completers: Are capable of continuing professional growth Use technology in their work Use their knowledge and skills about diversity to help their P-12 students learn

Programs Must Demonstrate Accomplishments in relation to state and professional standards Analyze the validity and reliability of the results Use the analysis to improve the quality of their work.

Program Capacity Curriculum Program faculty Facilities, equipment, and supplies Fiscal and administrative capacity Student support services Recruiting Admissions practices

Admissions Requirements 3.0 GPA Performance on ACT, SAT, or GRE top 50% top 40% top 33% by 2020

Annual Reporting Data Measures of Program Impact: Impact on P-12 learning and development Indicators of teaching effectiveness Results of employer surveys, including retention and employment milestones Results of completer surveys

Annual Reporting Data Measures of Program Outcome and Consumer Information: Graduation rates Ability of completers to meet licensing (certification) and any additional state requirements Ability of completers to be hired Student loan default rates and other consumer information