1/28 Challenge the future Haptic feedback on the steering wheel to maximize front axle grip Joop van Gerwen BioMechanical Design & Precision and Microsystems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELECTRONIC STABILITY PROGRAM (ESP) LECTURER NAME: MR
Advertisements

1 VEHICLE DYNAMICS. 2  Increase “track driving” vehicle performance:  Lap time  Stopping distance  Standing start acceleration  Increase “road driving”
Vehicle Dynamics – It’s all about the Calculus… J. Christian Gerdes Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Stanford University.
Optimization of Global Chassis Control Variables Josip Kasać*, Joško Deur*, Branko Novaković*, Matthew Hancock**, Francis Assadian** * University of Zagreb,
The Story Skid Marks Tell
Case Study Continued. Steering Consideration To design the steering system we must consider the 3-Dimensional geometry of the system.
Ackerman Steering Theory
1 Brake-by-Steer Concept Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Brake-by-Steer Concept Steer-by-wire application with independently.
Light Vehicle Rollover Background on NHTSA’s Activities in this Area.
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Automotive Technology, Fifth Edition James Halderman ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL SYSTEMS 108.
System identification of the brake setup in the TU Delft Vehicle Test Lab (VTL) Jean-Paul Busselaar MSc. thesis.
Skin Deformation Display for Enhanced Driver Situational Awareness Chris Ploch.
Tyre and Vehicle Model Identification using Identifying Kalman Filters
Dynamic Traction Control By: Thiago Avila, Mike Sinclair & Jeffrey McLarty.
Bond Graph Simulation of Bicycle Model
Vehicle dynamics simulation using bond graphs
1 of 22 Measurement And Control Of Slip In a Continuously Variable Transmission B. Bonsen, T.W.G.L. Klaassen, K.G.O. van de Meerakker M. Steinbuch, P.A.
Performance Guarantees for Hazard Based Lateral Vehicle Control
Traction Control Michael Boersma Michael LaGrand 12/10/03.
D D L ynamic aboratory esign 5-Nov-04Group Meeting Accelerometer Based Handwheel State Estimation For Force Feedback in Steer-By-Wire Vehicles Joshua P.
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
Driving Intelligence Robert R. Arguelles Continental Teves, N.A. February 2 nd, 2004 Active Vehicle Safety: Advanced Vehicle Mobility and Stability Control.
POWER STEERING SYSTEM IN AUTOMOBILE
Electronic Braking and Aid to Vehicle StabilityBradford University1 GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group Electronic Vehicle Stability Control “Trailers” 25 – 26 November.
Chapter 5 Natural Laws and Car Control. Gravity What is gravity? the force that pulls things towards the earth the force that pulls things towards the.
Spinning Out, With Calculus J. Christian Gerdes Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Stanford University.
1 Vehicle Stability Function ● Directional Control ● Roll-over Control A functional overview with regard to commercial vehicles AMEVSC-03-04e August 2010.
Safety All The Time Oyuki Ogawa Executive Vice President DENSO CORPORATION.
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
AUTOTRONICS (VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM)
Human factors of braking Dean Southall Ergonomist Dean Southall Ergonomist Dean Southall Consultancy Dean Southall Consultancy.
 ABS – Function, Design & Working  ABS types  Recent Advancements  Effectiveness & Limitations  Testing & Validation  Job of the Driver  Closing.
ESP Electronic Stability Programs
DIFFERENCES IN STEERING BEHAVIOUR BETWEEN EXPERTS, EXPERIENCED AND NOVICE DRIVERS: A DRIVING SIMULATOR STUDY NAMAN SINGH NEGI Precision and Microsystems.
Powertrain Matching John Bucknell DaimlerChrysler Powertrain Systems Engineering September 30, 2006.
Sensorless Sliding-Mode Control of Induction Motors Using Operating Condition Dependent Models 教 授: 王明賢 學 生: 謝男暉 南台科大電機系.
Automotive Steering, Suspension and Alignment, 5/e By James D. Halderman Copyright © 2010, 2008, 2004, 2000, 1995 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle.
Active Front Wheel Steering System (AFS) Chapter 2.
ATE wheel speed sensors. 2 Why ATE wheel speed sensors? Growing trend to comfort and safety: ABS is the standard today in all cars newly registered in.
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
Steer-by-Wire: Implications for Vehicle Handling and Safety
Vehicle Dynamics under Longitudinal Forces ME5670
ANTILOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
Electronic Stability Control Systems 25 © 2013 Pearson Higher Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall - Upper Saddle River, NJ Advanced Automotive.
DRIVER MODEL B. Vineeth ME13B1007 K. Kiran Kumar ME13B1020 N. Sai Krishna ME13B1024 S. Gurucharan ME13B1031 T. Krishna Teja ME13B1034.
Marko Jets Lecturer Faculty of Transport Ecology and Safety as a Driving Force in the Development of Vehicles IP Radom, 02 March – 15 March, 2008 TECHNICAL.
Vehicle Balance, Traction Loss, Roadway and Vehicle Technology Driver Education.
Geometry and Linkage Lecture 1 Day 1-Class 1. References  Gillespie, T., The Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale,
By : Rohini H M USN : 2VX11LVS19.  This system includes sensors for measuring vehicle speed; steering input; relative displacement of the wheel assembly.
Fundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
The Story Skid Marks Tell
SUVs born from SUVs 1936 – 1953 – 1978 – 1982 – … A Pedigree.
The Story Skid Marks Tell
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Anti-lock Braking System.
OBJECTIVES Discuss the need for electronic stability control (ESC).
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
ESP Electronic Stability Programs
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL SYSTEMS
From: A Hybrid Physical-Dynamic Tire/Road Friction Model
All You Need To Know About 4Matic Transmission System.
OBJECTIVES Discuss the need for electronic stability control (ESC).
Josh Switkes Eric J. Rossetter Ian A. Coe J. Christian Gerdes
Contents Contets 1 Development Background 2. Technical Presentation
Department of Mechanical
Chapter 1 Introduction.
Maximum allowable Override Force
Presentation transcript:

1/28 Challenge the future Haptic feedback on the steering wheel to maximize front axle grip Joop van Gerwen BioMechanical Design & Precision and Microsystems Engineering, Automotive

2/28 Challenge the future Contents Introduction Methods Concept Experiments Data analysis Results Discussion

3/28 Challenge the future Introduction

4/28 Challenge the future Introduction Reduces loss of control Effect: Reduces fatal single vehicle crashes by [1] 30-50% among cars and 50-70% among SUVs Best since seat belt! Developed from ABS But: large impact on velocity Active Front Steering (AFS) ESC systems [1] S.A. Ferguson, The Effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control in Reducing Real-World Crashes: A Literature Review, 2007 [2] [3]

5/28 Challenge the future Introduction Related research on lateral vehicle dynamics guidance Lanekeeping Principle: shared control Controller is capable of controlling the system Actuator power not strong enough for full control Haptic feedback [1] J. Switkes, E. Rosetter, I. Coe, Handwheel force feedback for lanekeeping assistance: combined dynamics and stability

6/28 Challenge the future Introduction Goal : Use haptic feedback to let the driver take the corrective AFS action Guide to maximum front axle grip Idea & title explanation

7/28 Challenge the future Methods

8/28 Challenge the future Methods Concept – Controller structure Purpose: Guide the driver to the proper steering action

9/28 Challenge the future Methods Concept – Upper controller structure

10/28 Challenge the future Pacejka combined slip tire model Methods Concept – Lower controller structure

11/28 Challenge the future Methods Concept – How does it feel?

12/28 Challenge the future Methods Concept – How does it feel?

13/28 Challenge the future Methods Experiments – Vehicle

14/28 Challenge the future Methods Experiments – Tracks [1]

15/28 Challenge the future 9 drivers 2 tracks Wet skid-pad 7 runs of 35 second Task: follow inner line as fast as possible Adverse track 3 runs of 70 second (approximately 2 laps) Task: take the corners as quick as you can NASA Task Load Index 2 experiment days Methods Experiments – Procedures

16/28 Challenge the future Methods Experiments – Pictures & video

17/28 Challenge the future Methods Filtered: Driver torque and accelerations (3Hz anti-causal low pass) Removed: unwanted data Wet skid-pad RMS data Adverse track Translation of data One full, running lap isolated Analysis – Filtering & preparation

18/28 Challenge the future Methods Performance metrics Example: velocity Driving behavior metrics Example: steering wheel angle Feedback controller metrics Example: feedback torque Analysis – Metrics

19/28 Challenge the future Results

20/28 Challenge the future Results Significance Two data sets T-test to calculate chance that data sets originate from the same source Chance < 5% is significant Influence of external factors P-value = e-007

21/28 Challenge the future Results Wet skid-pad

22/28 Challenge the future Results Adverse track – Velocity

23/28 Challenge the future Results Adverse track – One corner Steering angle Yaw rate Driver torque Steering angle error Significantly lower Significantly higher

24/28 Challenge the future Results Adverse track – Road position

25/28 Challenge the future Results Variables: Mental demand Physical demand Temporal demand Performance Effort Frustration No significant changes Small test group NASA Task load index

26/28 Challenge the future Discussion

27/28 Challenge the future Discussion Room for improvements: State estimation & sensing Tire model vs. force sensing bearing Haptic feedback philosophy Desired yaw rate determination very simple Corrective yaw torque controller Possible negative stiffness of steering system Do not prevent drivers from steering back to neutral Conclusions – Improvements

28/28 Challenge the future Discussion Haptic feedback caused: Driving behavior change Vehicle eager to steer Higher driver torque Increased yaw rate Drivers were drawn to a trajectory Potential, but unsafe in current form Conclusions – Significant changes

29/28 Challenge the future