Special Education Meeting January 14th 3:30 ASC- Tennessee Room.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Advertisements

EC Referrals Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer.
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Best Practices in IEP writing September 26, 2012.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Help for Struggling Students. “RTI” stands for “Responsiveness to Instruction” Tier 1: Core instruction, sufficient for 80-90% of students.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Does this look like your RTI team?. Maybe this looks like your team!
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Transition Assess Interests, Preferences, Strengths and Needs by age 14*** Add Post Secondary Goals and Transition Activities by age 16 At age 16 advise.
Monthly Special Education Coordinator Meeting November 13, 2012.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving model that addresses individual student need.  This.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
EC CHAIRPERSON/PSYCHOLOGIST MEETING Helpful Tips re: Interventions.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Conducting Re-evaluations Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework Director of Special Education Eligibility, Theresa Nicholls | Fall 2015.
New Eligibility Requirements for Special Education Karen Johnson Leigh Ann Roderick August 1, 2012.
Monthly Special Education Coordinators’ Webinar March 9, 2015.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Special Education Timelines
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Special Education Meeting
Feedback Results from Teacher PSW Worksheet(s) SUBJECT AREA:  Basic Reading  Math Calculation  Oral Expression  Reading Fluency  Math Problem Solving.
April 14 th,  End of Year Checklists- cleaning things up!- Brian Cinnamon  Extended School Year- Lenore Kilgore  IEPs- Services/Schedules- Lenore.
New Special Education Teacher Meeting August 27, 2013.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
5/16/13 Special Education Meeting. Happy Retirement!!! O We wish Peggy Rochelle and Melodie Stice a Happy, Exciting, Wonderful Retirement…. Thank you.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
March’s Special Education Coordinator Meeting March 12, 2013.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
12/15/2015LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children Mid Year Update Leslie County Schools.
EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx March 22, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
RTI RTI for Articulation RTI for Language Parish-wide Screening Form Changes in Bulletin 1508 Procedures for Initial Evaluations RTI for Fluency If.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Evaluation for Eligibility l 8/26/05 3 Evaluation2 Objectives  To ensure that school staff are aware of evaluation /reevaluation procedures under IDEA.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
Using the Pyramid of Intervention for Special Education Referrals.
Special Education Procedures Information from Illinois Rules and Regulations Part 226 Special Education
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
The Evaluation and Re-evaluation Process Guidelines for Parents Karen Finigan, Director of Special Education & Michelle Giovanola, Lead School Psychologist.
PSRC EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Compliance issues and suggestions that will help with case management.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
Tier 2 & Tier 3 Meetings. MTSS Focus Team The purpose of the MTSS Focus Team: To analyze school-wide and class-wide data for attendance, behavior, and.
Response to Intervention
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
Special Education Process
Post-Secondary Transition
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Special Education Meeting January 14th 3:30 ASC- Tennessee Room

Agenda  Inclusion Presentations RNR and Roosevelt  Evaluation Timeline- Brian Cinnamon  Reevaluations- Paula Nickels  Monitoring Update

Evaluation Timeline  The rule change concerning the time frame for completion of an initial evaluation will take effect Jan. 29, Therefore, on and after Jan. 29, 2014, an initial evaluation for determination of eligibility for special education must be conducted within sixty (60) “calendar days” of the LEA's receipt of informed parental consent, and an initial meeting to develop an IEP must be conducted within thirty (30) “calendar days” of the determination of eligibility.

Evaluation Timeline cont.:  All evaluations in progress due to informed consent being received prior to Jan. 29, 2014 must continue to adhere to the forty (40) “school days” timeline (LEA's receipt of informed parental consent for an initial until eligibility is determined and, if the child is eligible, a placement is made)

New timeline and EIEP  EasyIEP will be programmed to reflect the 60 calendar day rule on Jan. 29, This change will impact the projected eligibility determination due dates for initial consents signed between Nov. 12, 2013 and Jan. 28, 2014; however, the 40 school day rule still applies for these evaluations.  For example, if we get consent to test a student on 1/8/14 it is due 3/7/14 (40 days). However, after Jan. 29 th EIEP will automatically change the due date to 3/9/14, even though the real due date is still 3/7/14.  We will develop a master list of students that had consent signed prior to Jan. 29th and therefore will be following 40 school days prior to the change on Jan. 29, There may be cases where EasyIEP will indicate noncompliance (stop sign) when in fact the we have additional time to complete the evaluation. However, the error check is turned off for these timelines.

Timeline FYI  Parent consent for initial assessment must be obtained by March 17 in order to have your IEP meeting by the end of the school year; otherwise, IEP teams will have to convene in the summer (including, parents, gen ed teacher, sped teacher, assessment rep, LEA, etc.)  SST teams should complete their work for initial referrals by March 3-6 to allow time for SPED teachers to get parent consent by March 17.

Reevaluations for Learning Disabilities (Elementary/Middle School)  Student should be receiving intensive, research-based intervention in area of LD (Tier 3 or beyond)  Special Ed Teacher continues to gather progress monitoring data in area(s) of LD, and before reevaluation is due obtains sufficient data:  If weekly, data points required  If biweekly, 9-10 data points required  School Psychologist analyzes progress monitoring data for Rate of Improvement (ROI) and Gap Analysis

Reevaluations for Learning Disabilities (Elementary/Middle School)  IEP Team convenes & reviews existing data through the Reevaluation Summary Report  IEP Team considers the following in determining continued eligibility:  Rate of Improvement (ROI)  Gap Analysis  Evidence of meeting IEP goals  Current classroom based & state assessments  Observations  Further evaluation (if needed)

Progress Monitoring: Reading  Use DRA Progress Monitoring Assessments  Determine area of greatest need for intervention (e.g., Decoding/Word Analysis; Fluency; Comprehension)  Use Progress Monitoring Chart to record weekly (12-15) or biweekly (8-10) data points  Record Oral Reading Fluency (number of words read correctly per minute) and DRA Level  Can use Leveled Readers or running records in addition to DRA Progress Monitoring assessments; record Oral Reading Fluency (wpm) and reading level of the material (should match DRA level)  Send copy of completed Progress Monitoring Chart to School Psychologist for analysis of Rate of Improvement and Gap Analysis

Other Tools for Progress Monitoring  Go to  Click on CBM and choose:  LNF/SNF: Directions & Norms; also, Letter Name Fluency Generator (for K-1)  Maze: Directions & Norms; also, Maze Passage Generator (for reading comprehension, Grades 1-6)  Writing: Directions & Norms; also, Writing Probe Generator (for written expression, Grades 1-6)  Math Computation Directions & Norms; also, Math Worksheet Generator (for Grades 1-6)

Reevaluations for Learning Disabilities (High School)  Full RTI postponed for one year at high school level - Continue using discrepancy model for LD initial eligibility  Reevaluations for LD: Complete Reevaluation Summary Report as usual  You to not have to collect RTI progress monitoring data for Reevaluations for LD at the high school level  Review the following to determine continued eligibility  Prior test data  Progress toward IEP goals  TCAP/PARCC, End-of-Course, EXLPLORE, PLAN, ACT scores, etc.  Observations  Further evaluation (if needed)

Monitoring Update  Currently we have 10 files that are being monitored-  Five for Initial Evaluation to include IEP Processes, 15- Invitation to Meeting, 20- Source /Date of information and exceptional areas, 23- Annual Goal and Short Term Objectives: Address all Present Levels of Performance Areas, 10- Consent for Initial Evaluation/Signed by parents, 13a- Prior Written Notice for Initial Placement  Five for Secondary Transition to include IEP Processes, 52- Transition- Measurable Postsecondary Goals, 54- Transition- Age-appropriate Transition Assessment, 56- Course of Study

Monitoring continued:  Other areas of monitoring and compliance  Invitation to Meeting- Ten days notice  Present levels of performance either inappropriate or old  PWN- not checking all necessary boxes  Transition- Course of Study, Transition Assessments, Measurable Postsecondary Goals