The FLUKA high energy cosmic ray generator: predictions for the charge ratio of muons detected underground G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIERRAS: an AIRES package to simulate high energy cosmic ray showers underground and underwater Matías Tueros Instituto de Física La Plata – Universidad.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
Anomalous Pion Production in High Energy Particle Collisions Alexander Bylinkin, Andrey Rostovtsev XV Moscow School of Physics XXXX ITEP Winter School.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
New developments in FLUKA
Cosmic Rays with the LEP detectors Charles Timmermans University of Nijmegen.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Presented by Steve Kliewer Muon Lifetime Experiment: A Model.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Constraints of hadronic interaction models from the cosmic muon observations. L.G. Dedenko, A.V. Lukyashin, G.F. Fedorova, T.M. Roganova M.V. Lomonosov.
Preliminary validation of computational procedures for a New Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation (AIR) model John M. Clem (1), Giovanni De Angelis (2,3), Paul.
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
The FLUKA high energy cosmic ray generator: predictions for the charge ratio of muons detected underground G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli.
FLUKA Rechnungen für das CBM Experiment an FAIR
Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.
Omega meson in nucleus, experimental study K. Ozawa (Univ. of Tokyo)
TAUP Conference, Sendai September The primary spectrum in the transition region between direct and indirect measurements (10 TeV – 10 PeV)
Inter-comparison of Medium-Energy Neutron Attenuation in Iron and Concrete (8) H. Hirayama and Attenuation Length Sub-Working Group in Japan.
Extending the Bertini Cascade Model to Kaons Dennis H. Wright (SLAC) Monte Carlo April 2005.
Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W.
Modeling Production, Interactions and Transport Fermilab November 14, 2005 Fermilab ILC-CAL Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Neutron enrichment of the neck-originated intermediate mass fragments in predictions of the QMD model I. Skwira-Chalot, T. Cap, K. Siwek-Wilczyńska, J.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
FLUKA as a new high energy cosmic ray generator G. Battistoni 2, A. Margiotta 1, S. Muraro 2, M. Sioli 1 University and INFN of 1) Bologna and 2) Milano.
FLUKA as a new high energy cosmic ray generator G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli (University and INFN of Bologna and Milano) for the FLUKA.
C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.
The muon component in extensive air showers and its relation to hadronic multiparticle production Christine Meurer Johannes Blümer Ralph Engel Andreas.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Charged Kaon Production Yield Studies with Stretcher Sergei Striganov Fermilab Future of Kaon Physics at Fermilab August 21, Fermilab.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
Towards comparisons between TFluka and TGeant3 ( within CbmRoot Framework) Denis Bertini (IT-GSI) Antonin Maire (IPHC Strasbourg)
Study of the Atmospheric Muon and Neutrinos for the IceCube Observatory Ryan Birdsall Paolo Desiati, Patrick Berghaus,
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Interfacing the JQMD and JAM Nuclear Reaction Codes to Geant4 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Koi, Tatsumi
Nucleon-Nucleon collisions. Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal.
“The Cosmic Ray composition in the knee region and the hadronic interaction models” G. Navarra INFN and University, Torino, Italy For the EAS-TOP Collaboration.
Bartol Flux Calculation presented by Giles Barr, Oxford ICRR-Kashiwa December 2004.
School of Cosmic-ray Astrophysics, Erice, July 4, 2004 Thomas K. Gaisser Role of particle interactions in high-energy astrophysics Uncorrelated fluxes.
School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.
What we do know about cosmic rays at energies above eV? A.A.Petrukhin Contents 4 th Round Table, December , Introduction. 2. How these.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Icarus: a multipurpose.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Atmospheric Muon Simulation using the FLUKA MC Model G.Battistoni, A.Ferrari, S.Muraro, T.Montaruli P.R. Sala INFN & Univ.Milano, CERN, Madison Univ. of.
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
Influence of diffractive interactions on cosmic rays air showers ABSTRACT: A comparative study of commonly used hadronic collision simulation packages.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
All lepton generation and propagation with MMC Dmitry Chirkin, UCB/LBNL AMANDA meeting, Uppsala, 2004.
Preliminary validation of computational procedures for a New Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation (AIR) model John M. Clem, Giovanni De Angelis, Paul Goldhagen.
Atmospheric Neutrino Fluxes Giles Barr XXIst International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics Neutrino 2004 Paris.
Muon-induced neutron background at Boulby mine Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev University of Sheffield UKDMC meeting, ICSTM, London, 27 June 2002.
Physics whit ACORDE (ALICE Cosmic ray detector) Arturo Fernández for ACORDE-ALICE group.
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Improvements of microscopic transport models stimulated by spallation data for incident energies from 113 to MeV Umm Al-Qura University and King.
Ali Ahmad FLUKA code validation of nuclear data required for the spallation target design in Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactors ThorEA Meeting – Daresbury.
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
High Energy and Prompt Neutrino Production in the Atmosphere
Direct Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Spectrum with IceCube
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
Event generators.
Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) & Troy A
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Hadronic Interaction Model Analysis Air Shower Development
The Measurement of Forward Particle Production in LHC
Understanding Neutrino Events at Liquid Argon Detectors
Presentation transcript:

The FLUKA high energy cosmic ray generator: predictions for the charge ratio of muons detected underground G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli (University and INFN of Bologna and Milano) for the FLUKA collaboration 44 th Rencontres de Moriond Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe

2 In the environment of the FLUKA Monte Carlo code application to cosmic rays physics, a new generator for high energy cosmic rays is under development, with the aim of extend the existing FLUKA cosmic rays library to include the TeV region. The application of FLUKA in cosmic ray physics arises from the interest in applied physics topics (radioprotection in space or in atmosphere) and in basic research (calculation of atmospheric neutrino fluxes). Generator dedicated to: physics of high energy underground muons exploiting the full integration in the calculation of both air shower development and muons transport in the rock. Aim: predict multiple muon rates for different primary masses and energy within the framework of a unique simulation model.

3 Work under way within the ICARUS and OPERA collaborations at Gran Sasso. First application: Analyze the predictions for the charge ratio of underground muons. Compare preliminary results with data from an ongoing experiment (MINOS).

4 Authors: A. Fasso` 1, A. Ferrari 2, J. Ranft 3, P.R. Sala 4 1 SLAC Stanford, 2 CERN, 3 Siegen University, 4 INFN Milan Interaction and Transport Monte Carlo code FLUKA is a general purpose tool for calculations of particle transport and interactions with matter, covering an extended range of applications (Shielding, Radiobiology, High energy physics, Cosmic Ray physics, Nuclear and reactor physics). Built and maintained with the aim of including the best possible physical models in terms of completeness and precision. Continuously benchmarked with a wide set of experimental data from well controlled accelerator experiments. FLUKAFLUKA Hadronic interaction models: based on a theoretical microscopic approach (no parametrizations). Free parameters are set (thin target experiments at accelerators) and kept fixed for all projectile-target combinations and energies. => High predictivity also in regions where experimental data are not available.

5 The FLUKA hadronic Models for a detailed study of the validity for CR studies see hep-ph/ and Hadron-Hadron Elastic,exchange Phase shifts data, eikonal P<3-5GeV/c Resonance prod and decay low E π,K Special High Energy DPM hadronization Hadron-NucleusNucleus-Nucleus E < 5 GeV PEANUT Sophisticated GINC Preequilibrium Coalescence High Energy Glauber-Gribov multiple interaction s Coarser GINC Coalescence E< 0.1GeV/u BME Complete fusion+ peripheral 0.1< E< 5 GeV/u rQMD-2.4 modified new QMD E> 5 GeV/u DPMJET DPM+ Glauber+ GINC Evaporation/Fission/Fermi break-up  deexcitation > 5 GeV Elab DPM: soft physics based on (multi)Pomeron exchange DPMJET: soft physics of DPM plus 2+2 processes from pQCD Relevant for HE C.R. physics

6 The underground muons generator: main features Geometry setup Earth: sphere of radius R = km Atmospheric geometry & profile: 100 concentric spherical shells whose density and composition is varied according to the U.S. Standard Atmospheric Model. Gran Sasso mountain: spherical body whose radius is dynamically changed, according to the primary direction and to the Gran Sasso mountain map. LNGS laboratory: experimental underground halls ICARUS and OPERA detectors volumes rock box where muon–induced secondary are activated (e.m. & hadronic showers from photo-nuclear interaction).

7 Primary spectrum Sampled from a primary mass composition model (a description of the relative abundances of cosmic rays and their energy spectra), at present, derived from the analysis of the MACRO experiment at Gran Sasso. For each primary nucleus and for each amount of rock to be crossed, we compute the minimum energy required to produce at least one muon underground (probability < to survive). Hadronic interaction model High energy cosmic ray interactions relevant for this work are treated in FLUKA by means of the interface to DPMJET.II.5. ( hadron-hadron, hadron-nucleus and also nucleus-nucleus collision by means of the Glauber-Gribov mechanism)

8 Muon bundle from primary iron nuclei (E ≈ 10 5 TeV) in the ICARUS T600 detector

9 First application: prediction for the charge ratio of underground muons Muons that reach the Earth come from mesons with enough energy: to reflect the forward fragmentation region of the primary initiated interaction and to “remember” the nature of the projectile (there are more protons than neutrons in the primary spectrum)  The muon charge ratio reflects the excess of π+ over π- and K+ over K−. NOTE: π and K hadronic production are affected by uncertainties up to 20%

10 Validation of the DPMJET-III hadronic models: Comparison with the NA49 experiment Data from the NA49 experiment at CERN SPS particle production by p beams on p, C targets: 158 GeV/c beam momentum First published results: Eur. Phys. J. 45 (2006), 343 hep-ex/ hep-ex/  +,  - production p + p p + C  +,  - production as a function of Feynman-x

11 p + Be => π + + X p + Be => π - + X Nucl. Instr. Meth. A449, 609 (2000) SPY experiment (CERN North Area) E cm = 450 GeV

12 p + Be => K + + X p + Be => K - + X Benchmark for the CNGS beam construction. Limited phase space for cosmic rays physics. E cm = 450 GeV Nucl. Instr. Meth. A449, 609 (2000)

13 FLUKA for Cosmic Rays validation at low energy (E μ < 100 GeV) Black points: exp. Data Open symb: FLUKA Simulation -- ++ FLUKA simulations comparison with the experimental data of atmospheric muons taken at the top of Mt. Norikura, Japan, with the BESS detector. (Phys. Lett. B 564 (2003), 8 – 20) 2770 m above sea level Geomagnetic Cut-off: 11.2 GV cone of ~11 o The energy range for muons extends up to 100 GeV. Results within 20%. S.Muraro PhD Thesis

14 The muons result from pions and kaons that decay before they interact in the atmosphere. As energy increases, the fraction of muons from kaon decays also increases: the longer-lived pions (π ± : cτ 0 = 780 cm, ε = 115 GeV) start to interact more before decaying than the shorter-lived kaons (K ± : cτ 0 = 371 cm, ε = 850 GeV). → the K + /K − ratio is larger than the π + /π − ratio. Instead of π production, because of the strangeness of K, inclusive cross section for K + production is bigger then inclusive cross section for K - critical energy ε: beyond this energy interaction process dominates on decay.

15 FLUKA in the TeV region: μ/All from π and K μ (from π ) / All μ (from K ) / All

16 As energy increases, kaon decays became a more important contribution to the muon charge ratio. Since Nμ + Nμ + ( from K) > ( from π) Nμ - Nμ − the total muons charge ratio is expected to increase with energy

17 FLUKA for Cosmic Rays validation (E μ < 1 TeV) R FLUKA =  R exp =  Vertical < cosθ < 1. Black points: exp. Data Open symb: FLUKA At large angle < cosθ < 0.6 charge ratio L3 + COSMIC experiment ( FLUKA simulations comparison with the experimental data of atmospheric muons charge ratio from L3 + COSMIC experiment (hep-ex/ ). (S.Muraro PhD Thesis)

18 FLUKA in the TeV region: muon charge ratio μ + / μ - FLUKA  μ + / μ - FLUKA from π   μ + / μ - FLUKA from K   from π from K PRELIMINARY

19 MINOS Charge Ratio at the Surface = 1.371± hep-ex R FLUKA =  R FLUKA =  FLUKA prediction ~5% lower then MINOS exp. data => Possible lack of K production in FLUKA

20 Conclusions FLUKA models have been benchmarked with experimental data from accelerator experiments and from atmospheric muons experiments (BESS: E μ < 100 GeV; L3+C: E μ < 1 TeV) The FLUKA charge ratio prediction in the TeV region is ~5% lower then MINOS experimental results Uncertenties on π and K production in hadronic models can reach 20% because of lack of data from K production experiments at high energy => Possible lack of K production in FLUKA We are waiting for OPERA data

21 Thank you

22 Muon charge ratio VS muon bundle multiplicity Muon charge ratio is expected decreases with growing multiplicity Muon bundle high multiplicity ↕ High primary energy and High primary mass number In the primary heavy elements the ratio of primary protons to neutrons decreases with respect to primary protons → the muon charge ratio is expected to decrease.

23 x lab = E j /E i ratio of the total energies of the secondary particle j over the primary particle i dN ij /dx lab differential multiplicity distributions of secondary j as produced by primary i in collisions with air nuclei as a function of x lab ”spectrum weighted moments” Z ij : the multiplicity of secondary particles j as produced by primary particles i in interaction, weighted for the primary spectrum. Strictly bound to inclusive cross sections. γ = 2.7 approximate spectral index of the differential cosmic ray spectrum.

24 For isospin symmetry: On the other hand: where N is a nucleon. So the K + /K − ratio is larger than the π + /π − ratio. Spectrum weighted moments (γ = 2.7) for secondary particles produced in p-air collisions as a function of the projectile kinetic energy in the FLUKA code. K + and 0 (S = +1), can be produced in association with a leading Λ or Σ barion, whereas production of K requires production of a strange-antistrange pair from the sea in addition to the leading nucleon