ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon: Problems And Effects IB SL C.C.S: Carbon Capture and Storage.
Advertisements

Presentation to the North Carolina DENR/DAQ Mercury/CO 2 Workshop April 19-21, 2004 Presented by Gerald R. Hill, Ph.D. Senior Technical Advisor Southern.
Joe Chaisson April 21, Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants and Geologic Carbon Sequestration Joe Chaisson.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Energy National Policy Statements Anne Stuart DECC Energy Development Unit 22 October 2009.
CCS Legal Issues Presentation to CWAG August 5, 2009 Karl Moor VP & Associate General Counsel Southern Company Services.
CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
Group 8: Kevin Carpenter Cong Nguyen Getastigen Woldeyes
Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.
Don Scott Director of Sustainability National Biodiesel Board Biodiesel Liquid Solar Energy.
Group 3: Geological storage of CO 2 Seminar I Farzad Basirat, Mattias Hogvall, Tito Maldonado, Cosima Hotzy, Daniel Sopher 12/02/2015 Group 3: Ethics in.
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
PROYECTO NEREIDAS VISIÓN EUROPEA DE LOS PROYECTOS TEN-T ALEXIO PICCO – CIRCLE Malaga 03/04/2014.
Using Natural Gas to Nourish the Oceans University of Sydney Earth Ocean & Space Ian S F Jones University of Sydney Columbia University, NY B.
The Case for Early Action Pew Center Early Action Conference September 13-14, 1999 Dale Landgren Asst. Vice President, Business Planning.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
From Research to Application Best Practices George Teather and Suzanne Lafortune Performance Management Network Inc.
1 Geosciences Research Initiative All technologies envisioned to meet future energy and environmental demands require advances in fundamental.
Capturing Carbon dioxide Capturing and removing CO 2 from mobile sources is difficult. But CO 2 capture might be feasible for large stationary power plants.
Carbon Sequestration Anjani Kumar CPSP218L Dudash
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
Carbon Capture and Storage State Legislation Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage in Reservoirs
Alexander Voice 24 November  Motivation for the development of CCS technology  Climate change  Energy profile and outlook  Public perception.
An Introduction to the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in Ukraine Keith Whiriskey.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Policy Matters Ohio To create clean energy jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce global warming pollution and transition.
The C8 Meeting: A Conversation about Clean Coal, Climate Change, Carbon Capture, and China CCS Deployment and Status Update: the U.S. and Globally Michael.
The Energy Construct Ben Cipiti May 1, 2008 Mid-Town Brews.
Carbon Capture & Storage(CCS)
1 CO 2 from capture to storage Gérard FRIES Executive Vice-President Institut Français du Pétrole.
Wyoming’s Energy Future: Creating Options Mark A. Northam, Director UW School of Energy Resources September 25, 2008.
WOC 1 view on the focus and scope regarding CO 2 sequestration in WOC 1 (upstream sector) study area. (according to the experience of CO 2 problem study.
Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,
1 FutureGen FutureGen Zero Emissions Energy Plant of the Future 2004 Indiana Energy Conference “Perspectives on the Energy Puzzle” September 16, 2004 University.
TRP Chapter Chapter 3.1 Regulatory approaches.
California Energy Commission Sacramento 9/30 to 10/ Stationary CO 2 Sources Sequestration Data and Impacts on Total Emissions Coal-Fired Power Plant.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Jeopardy $100 Land + SeaTrash/MinesPollutionWater Miscellaneous $200 $300 $400 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
1 Issues and Options for the BLM Geologic Carbon Dioxide Capture and Sequestration Angela Zahniser Air Resource Specialist, Soil, Water, and Air Group.
Guidelines for Carbon Dioxide Capture, Transport, and Storage Weyburn. Source: PCOR.
Game Changers. Technology Game Changer Barriers Many technologies are capable of significant deployment as “Game Changers” (energy efficiency, CH&P, renewables,
KEC MGA Committee, 2/21/2008 Midwestern Governor’s Association (MGA) Energy Security and Climate Stewardship Platform and Midwestern GHG Accord.
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage: Contributing to Climate Change Solutions Luke Warren, IPIECA.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 15 Energy Conservation.
3.00 Understand employment, agency, environmental, energy, and intellectual property law environmental and energy law.
R K Jain. CO 2 emission responsible for global warming Development process to go unhalted. Ways and means to be found for controlling and abating CO 2.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Your name Your institute Date, place.
CO 2 Capture and Geological Storage Demonstration at In Salah, Algeria Iain Wright (CO2 Project Manager, BP Group Technology) UNCTAD Africa Oil & Gas Conference.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
S Carbon Storage Stewardship Trust Fund Act of 2009 Presented to Washington Coal Club September 9, 2009 Tom Feeley Chris Tomassi.
PAKISTAN SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT PROJECT
Deploying Carbon Reduction Technologies In Time Daniel A. Lashof February 2007.
Greening Canada’s International Purchases Climate Law Symposium December 3, 2005 Warren Bell, IISD.
M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
Economics project draft. Jarred Mongeon.  Issues : Coal; Oil; Natural Gas. Fossil fuel dependency Greenhouse gasses (Climate Alteration) Contamination.
Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
Visiting Geologists Program
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Energy Sources and Sustainability
Australian Energy Scenarios Predicting Uncertainty
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
BP China Management 120.
Presentation transcript:

ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission

The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission

WHAT DO WE KNOW OR KNOW WE DO NOT KNOW ? CO2 LEVLES ARE INCREASING – 316 ppm to 375 ppm last 45 yrs GLOBAL ISSUE REQUIRING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS HUMAN ACTIVITY IMPACT CO2 LEVELS – LEVEL OF IMPACT DEBATED INCREASED CO2 LEVELS WILL IMPACT CLIMATE – LEVEL OF IMPACT DEBATED U.S. POLITICAL CLIMATE CHANGING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH SOME LEVEL OF ACTION TO REDUCE GHG

WHAT IS CO2 ? CO2 IS NOT A POLLUTANT UNDER FEDERAL AIR REGULATIONS CO2 IS NATURALLY OCCURING, MAKING UP 0.03% OF THE EARTHS ATMOSPHERE, AND IS ESSENTIAL TO PLANT LIFE ON EARTH CO2 IS A NON-HAZARDOUS, ODORLESS GAS, WHICH CAN BE HARMFUL TO HUMANS, IN HIGH CONCENTRATIONS, AS A SUFFACANT CO2 OCCURS AS A GAS, LIQUID, SUPERCRITICAL FLUID, AND A SOLID CO2 OCCURS NATURALLY IN GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS CO2 IS A COMMODITY, BOUGHT AND SOLD FOR MANY USES

GREENHOUSE GAS RESOURCE

REDUCING ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCES OF GREENHOUSE GASES REDUCING ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCES OF GREENHOUSE GASES ENERGY CONSERVATION INCREASING ENERGY EFFICIENCIES USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES USE OF NON-FOSSIL FUEL ENERGY SOURCES,SUCH AS NUCLEAR, HYDROGEN AND OTHER DEVELOPING TECNOLOGIES SEQUESTRATION THROUGH NATURAL PROCESSES OR PHYSICAL STORAGE

Primary Sequestration Mechanisms Geologic storage – Oil & Gas Reserviors – Coal Seams – Saline Formations Ocean sequestration Terrestrial sequestration Advanced chemical and biological approaches

Resource Management Drivers Environmental Drivers Economic Drivers CCS REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS EMMISSIONS TRADING REGULATIONS OWNERSHIP AND RESERVOIR PROTECTION UIC AND HEALTH & SAFETY

CO2 CAPTURE TRANSPORTATION AND GEOLOGIC STORAGE PROCESS

EXISTING ANALOGS PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR CCGS NATURALLY OCCURING CO 2 CONTAINED IN GEOLOGIC RESERVOIRS CO 2 ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY (EOR) PROJECTS NATURAL GAS STORAGE PROJECTS

CO 2 ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY INJECTION

CCGS Regulatory Stages Capture Stage Transport Stage Injection Stage Storage Stage

Capture Stage CO 2 for CCGS will initially be a direct or processed emission stream with a purity in excess of 95% or a processed emission streams with commercial value. CO 2 is not currently defined in existing federal air regulations as a pollutant. While pollutants such as NO 2, SO 2 and other contaminants should remain regulated for public health, CO 2 should not be classified as a pollutant and be viewed as a commodity. Existing state and federal regulations dealing with facility permitting, operating and emission standards can be easily modified to address CO 2 capture technologies.

Transport Stage Existing Federal and State transport regulations easily adaptable to address CO 2 transport. Large body of experience in CO 2 pipeline construction and operation, including well established materials standards and regulatory frameworks, will necessitate limited need for additional regulation. Eminent domain will require state statute review to determine extension of eminent domain powers to CO 2 storage sites and pipelines. Federal agencies will ultimately need to address “open access” issue for CO2 pipelines.

Injection Stage Existing regulations for CO 2 EOR and underground natural gas storage provide the necessary analogs for establishment of regulatory frameworks for CO 2 injection operations. Adapt and modify established permitting procedures and standards for site characterization for CCGS. Establishment of monitoring, measurement and verification protocols for emissions trading, resource management and environmental regulatory frameworks.

Post Injection Storage Consider the potential need for legislation to clarify and address the unknown issues which may arise in the ownership of storage rights (reservoir pore space) and payment for use of those storage rights. Construct a regulatory framework for storage which will allow for withdrawal of CO 2 for commercial purposes. Establish procedures for long-term reservoir management and monitoring technologies to confirm that injected CO 2 volumes remain in place for emissions trading and environmental purposes. Establish protections for nonperformance of responsible parties. Long term nature of projects will require innovative solutions beyond current analogs such as government backed surety bonds and insurance funds, government trust funds, and specialized Public, Private or Semi-Private Partnerships or federally guaranteed industry funded abandonment programs.

CONCLUSIONS At earliest possible time involve all stakeholders including general public in the development of regulatory frameworks. CO 2 should be regulated as a commodity to allow the application of expansive regulatory frameworks to address emissions trading, resource management and environmental issues. States have necessary regulatory analogs in place to facilitate development of comprehensive CCGS regulatory frameworks. Experience gained by industry and states in the production, transport and injection of CO 2 over last 30 years will enable development of technically sound regulatory frameworks.

CONCLUSIONS CO 2 EOR injection and storage promise a potentially substantial additional benefit to our economy and national security by increasing the amount of oil the U.S. is able to produce domestically from existing fields. This increases the likelihood that CO 2 EOR will be the vehicle that will drive CCGS development – providing the means by which we build injection/storage experience, regulatory and otherwise, and physical infrastructure (pipelines/facilities). CO2 EOR will likely provide a technical, economic and regulatory pathway for long-term CO 2 storage.