Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Negative’s Best Friend.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Counter) Plans Because they didn’t limit the topic.
Advertisements

Matt Gomez Debating the Disadvantage (DA). 4 Part One: What is a Disadvantage?
 The plan says “United States”. The CP replaces that with the word “global” and the net benefit is a critique of ethno-centrism.  2AC says “perm: do.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Mike Shackelford. Factors that make a good counterplan Does it solve the aff better? Is it competitive Does it solve the aff or a portion of the aff.
Advanced cp competition exercises
Welcome to the Dark Side of the Force Introduction to Policy Debate.
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Cross Examination (CX) Debate
Answering Counterplans  Acronym is PLOTS  Permutation  Links to their disads  Other disads to the Counterplan  Theory Objections  Doesn’t Solve the.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Affirmative’s Worst Nightmare.
Introduction to Kritiks Ryan Galloway Samford University.
PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!.  Cp text  Net benefit  Must be competitive ◦ Uniquely beneficial ◦ Mutually exclusive.
DISADVANTAGES. What is a Disadvantage?  Disadvantages are offcase positions that the negative advances to prove that the costs of the plan outweigh its.
Theory CODI 2014 Lecture. Rules of Debate Debate has surprisingly few rules Time limits and speaking order There must be a winner and loser No outside.
TOPICALITY James Stevenson, with due credit to Mike Hester.
 A counterplan is a competitive policy option to the affirmative plan.
The 1ar: Debate’s Paramedic Get the patient to the hospital…alive.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
Counterplan Lecture GDI 2013 Austin Layton Note: This PowerPoint can be accessed on the PaDS website.
Politics. How to pick your disad 1. Link Debate – certain affs just go a certain way. Gotta win that. In my mind, need to win its unpopular or get another.
By Beth Mendenhall. Introduction Why you should listen Please ask questions.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Introduction to Debate -Negative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L. Husick,
Topicality. Our Focus Significance Harms Inherency Topicality Solvency.
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.
Counterplans?. Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions.
Counterplans Debate Central Workshop August 30, 2008.
Alejandres Gannon UC Berkeley.  The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the.
Intro to Critiques. Fiat The assumption in the debate game that we pretend the plan gets passed by the USFG. Then, we can debate out the Costs (DA’s)
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Counterplans on the Topic The Honorable James R. Stevenson, Ph.D, J.D., M.D., Th.D., A.F., A.D.N.
Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions. The negative strategy.
INTRO TO COUNTERPLANS!. WHAT IS A CP? A net beneficial alternative proposal to the Plan Competitive with the Plan Strategic if… The Aff is huge The SQ.
Opposition Strategy NCFA Rookie Debate Camp. Agenda ❖ A Brief Word on Trichotomy ❖ Basic Path to Winning ❖ Opposition Strategies by Position* ❖ Quick.
Theory Debating Baxter MDAW  It Really is  There are 4 Components of a Theory Argument  Interp  Violation  Standards  Voting Issue  You.
Advanced Debate Friday, August 21,  Speaking Drills  Counterplans  Work on cases  Exam 1: Next Friday Preview.
Getting Started in CX Debate Julian Erdmann. What is CX debate? Team debate made up by two students from the same school. They will defend either Affirmative.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
Going Negative The Surveillance Topic. Outline for the topic I. Categories of neg ground -Go over the specific arguments we have II. Dealing.
Debating the case.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Critiques Brian Rubaie, Debate Central. What is a critique?  Disadvantages question desirability of action  Counterplans question methods of action.
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Counterplans Stanford National Debate Institute Summer 2012.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.
Intro to Counterplans Casey Parsons. Introduction to Counterplans Thus far in debate, we have assumed that the neg defends the status quo In the vast.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.
Counterplans. Counterplan Burdens Competitiveness To be competitive, CP must be: – Mutually exclusive – Net beneficial Topicality – Traditional theory.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards & Russell Kirkscey June 2015.
Beginning Policy Debate: I ain’t scared ! NSDA Nationals 2014 Jane Boyd Grapevine HS, TEXAS.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Topicality “That sounds good. That’s a good skill to have.” –Julia Marshall “Naw. Advantages don’t matter when it comes to Topicality.” –Humza Tahir.
Basic Strategies Dallas Urban Debate League December, 2007.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Matt Gomez.  What will occur in the status quo  Factors for good uniqueness  Post-dating – things change  Brink – why is the squo good but not guaranteed.
Introduction to the Negative
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
Answering the CP Casey Parsons.
Wining the DA Casey Parsons.
Debate What is Debate?.
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
Negative Attacks.
Introduction to the Neg
Introduction to CX Debate: Part II
Presentation transcript:

Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Negative’s Best Friend

Counterplan Basics  Counterplan is an alternate plan run by the negative  You run counterplans every day  Usually (99% of the time)  It is designed to solve the case advantage  While avoiding a disad

Why are CP’s the neg’s best friend? Counterplans do the following:  Consolidate the debate - one sheet of paper rather than three or four.  Control the Debate – Options  Reframe the Debate – away from the aff case.

Basic Counterplan  Plan: Go to McDonalds for lunch  What are some advantages to doing this?  Counterplan: Go to Wendy’s for lunch  How does this solve the McD’s advantages?

Avoids Disadvantages  What is a disadvantage to going to McDonalds?  What is another disadvantage to going to McDonalds?  Could those be solved by going to Wendy’s?

Topic Examples  AffirmativeCounterplan  USFG should fund, USFG should offer incentives purchase & develop solar for private ventures to power satellites develop SPS  A1. Warming +10A1. Warming +10  A2. Leadership +15A2. Leadership +13  Space Mil Disad -5  Total:  Without the counterplan, the affirmative would win!

Parts of a CP  The Text  (Competition Claim)  Solvency Evidence  Net Benefit (internal or external) Internal – the beneficial result is tied directly to the action of the cp External - can function as a disad on its own

Answering Counterplans  Acronym is PLOTS  Permutation  Links to their disads  Other disads to the Counterplan  Theory Objections  Solvency takeouts

Solvency Takeouts  Doesn’t solve your case  Why might a counterplan that has the USFG fund private company development of SPS not solve the case advantages? 1.Warming? 2.Leadership?

Links to their disads  Links to their disads  How could the privatization counterplan link to the spending disad?  The cooperation disad?

Other Disads to A Counterplan  Affirmative can run disads to a counterplan  Usually the affirmative will skip the uniqueness, and read a two card disad  Can we think of disads?

Theoretical Objections to Counterplans Theoretical objections are reasons why the counterplans might be unfair.

Status of Counterplans  A good cross-x question is: what is the status of your CP?  An unconditional Counterplan has to be defended  A conditional counterplan allows the negative to “switch back” to the status quo in the debate

Status Part 2  A dispositional counterplan is like “limited conditionality.”  We can revert back if you make certain answers  Most judges think some version of dispositionality or conditionality is fair

Permutations  A counterplan must COMPETE: it must provide an answer to the question, why not do both?  A permutation is an affirmative answer that says: we should do both  A permutation is designed to prove, the counterplan doesn’t compete

Answering Permutations  1) Still links to the disadvantages.  So the answer to “why not do both” is the disadvantage  There may be disadvangtes to the permutation by itself, separate from the aff  Two basic answers:  1) we shouldn’t do both  It links to the disadvantages  It has disadvantages to it (do both worse)  2) we can’t do both

Illegitimate Permutations  Permutation has to be the combination of ALL of the PLAN and PART or ALL of the Counterplan  Why must a permutation be all of the plan?  Plans aren’t conditional, you have to defend your plan  If you don’t defend the entire plan, it is called a severence permutation

Other permutations  All of the PLAN and PART or ALL of the Counterplan  Permutation cannot ADD anything into the mix  Intrinsiciness Permutation adds something to the mix  CP is incentives for private ventures  Net benefit is space militarization.  Permute: do the plan, give incentives and ban space militarization.  We can’t run disads, you would always solve for them with your intrinsicness

Some Different Types of Counterplans  Plan Inclusive Counterplans (PICS): does one or more parts of the cp and says the excluded parts are bad  Process counterplans: does the aff through a different process  Agency counterplan: does the aff through a different agency  Advantage counterplans: does something to solve just one specific advantage, not the entire case (→ plank counterplans)

Types of Counterplans, cont.  Uniqueness cp: one the creates artifical uniqueness for a disadvantage  Delay: enacts the plan at a later date and time  Consult: asks for input from another country or entity before enacting the plan