MAT 105 Spring 2008.  We want to measure the influence each voter has  As we have seen, the number of votes you have doesn’t always reflect how much.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How a Bill Becomes A Law.
Advertisements

The Islanders There are two beautiful yet remote islands in the south pacific. The Islanders born on one island always tell the truth, and the Islanders.
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems Lesson Plan
Chapter 2: Weighted Voting Systems
Weighted Voting, Algorithms and Voting Power
MAT 105 Spring  In many voting systems, the voters are not treated equally  Juries: If one voter votes “not guilty,” then the result is “not guilty”
Weighted Voting When we try to make collective decisions, it is only natural to consider how things are done in society. We are familiar with voting for.
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems Lesson Plan
Presented by: Katherine Goulde
Chapter 13 – Weighted Voting Part 4 Appropriate applications of measures of power Minimal winning coalitions Classification of weighted voting systems.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 The Mathematics of Power 2.1An Introduction to Weighted Voting.
Math for Liberal Studies.  In many voting systems, the voters are not treated equally  Juries: If one voter votes “not guilty,” then the result is “not.
DM.8. Is a set of numbers that are listed in the following format: [ quota: weight of voter 1, weight of voter 2,…weight of voter 3] Ex: [8:5,4,3,2]
US elections. What is the name of the current President of the United States?
§ The Banzhaf Power Index
1 Message to the user... The most effective way to use a PowerPoint slide show is to go to “SLIDE SHOW” on the top of the toolbar, and choose “VIEW SHOW”
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Presidential Election 2011 The Who? Where? What? & How?
The Mathematics of Power
§ 2.1 Weighted Voting Systems. Weighted Voting  So far we have discussed voting methods in which every individual’s vote is considered equal--these methods.
CS 206 Introduction to Computer Science II 03 / 06 / 2009 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Andrea Katz April 29, 2004 Advisor: Dr. Karrolyne Fogel Voting Blocs in Academic Divisions of CLU: A Mathematical Explanation of Faculty Power.
§ The Shapley-Shubik Power Index
Binary “There are 10 types of people in the world… those that understand binary and those that don’t.”
1 Permutations and Combinations CS/APMA 202 Rosen section 4.3 Aaron Bloomfield.
A SEARCH-BASED APPROACH TO ANNEXATION AND MERGING IN WEIGHTED VOTING GAMES Ramoni Lasisi and Vicki Allan Utah State University by.
Calculating Power in Larger Systems Nominal, Banzhaf and Shapley-Shubik.
Chapter 13 – Weighted Voting
Chapter 13: Weighted Voting Banzhaf Power Index Shapley-Shubik Power Index Equivalent Systems Examples.
Weighted Voting Systems Brian Carrico. What is a weighted voting system?  A weighted voting system is a decision making procedure in which the participants.
15.4 Permutations with Repetition. How many different ways can the letters of MEXICO be arranged?
Moon Phases. Vocabulary To Help Revolution – the motion of the moon around Earth, one complete orbit Phase – the shape of the moon as seen from the Earth.
Chapter 13 – Weighted Voting Lecture Part 2. Chapter 13 – Lecture Part 2 The Banzhaf Power Index –Counting the number of subsets of a set –Listing winning.
Electoral College Quiz!. How do we determine the number of votes per state in the electoral college? All states get equal number of votes Supreme Court.
Elections. How candidates are chosen – After candidates declare that they are running and fill their petition, parties must choose who will run Not all.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 The Mathematics of Power 2.1An Introduction to Weighted Voting.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We want to measure the influence each voter has  As we have seen, the number of votes you have doesn’t always reflect how.
Order Statistics David Kauchak cs302 Spring 2012.
Parliamentary Procedure!. Roll Call The Chair at every committee will call out the names of each country and will expect one of two responses: Present:
Weighted Voting Systems
Section 2.4 The Shapley-Shubik Power Index. ► Sequential Coalition ► Every coalition starts with a first player, who may then be joined by a second player,
Manipulating the Quota in Weighted Voting Games (M. Zuckerman, P. Faliszewski, Y. Bachrach, and E. Elkind) ‏ Presented by: Sen Li Software Technologies.
Mmm … doughnuts adding fractions with like denominators.
Theorem: Equal weight implies equal power but not the converse.
Parliamentary Procedure. Let’s look at how we can make sense of this game called “Parliamentary Procedure”.
Comparing Fractions and Decimals Let’s Review Comparing fractions Converting fractions to decimals Comparing decimals Converting decimals to fractions.
Exam 1. Spring Comparison Spring 2007 A’s 12 8% B’s 25 17% C’s 46 32% Passing 83 57% D’s 34 23% Median 71% Spring 2008 A’s 25 14% B’s 45 27% C’s 38 22%
Chapter 11. Weighted Voting Systems  Goals Study weighted voting systems ○ Coalitions ○ Dummies and dictators ○ Veto power Study the Banzhaf power index.
American Government and Organization PS1301 Tuesday, 2 November.
SOL 5f The Electoral College. Presidential Elections  When voters go to the polls on election day in November to vote for a presidential candidate, they.
The Shapley Value The concept of the core is useful as a measure of stability. As a solution concept, it presents a set of imputations without distinguishing.
Fairness Criteria Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system to satisfy.Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system.
Weighted Voting Systems Chapter 2 Objective: Recognize the notation for weighted voting system and be able to define quota, player, dictator, dummy and.
1 EFFICIENCY OF FAIRNESS IN VOTING SYSTEMS EPCS 2009 Athens, April 2-5, 2009 Frantisek Turnovec Charles University in Prague Institute of Economic Studies.
EXCURSIONS IN MODERN MATHEMATICS SIXTH EDITION Peter Tannenbaum 1.
The Banzhaf Power Index
With Like Denominators
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Impossibility and Other Alternative Voting Methods
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems Lesson Plan
Impossibility and Other Alternative Voting Methods
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems
Warm-up Find the Banzaf power index for the following Information: A 35% B 30% C 25% D 10%
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems Lesson Plan
The Banzhaf Power Index
Discrete Math Weighted Voting.
- '1:- bs? a ' I.
FAIRNESS AND EFFICIENCY IN VOTING SYSTEMS
The Shapley-Shubik Power Index
Presentation transcript:

MAT 105 Spring 2008

 We want to measure the influence each voter has  As we have seen, the number of votes you have doesn’t always reflect how much influence you have

 In order to measure the power of each voter, we will determine the number of times each voter is pivotal  For example, consider the system [8;5,4,3,2]  A has 5 votes  B has 4 votes  C has 3 votes  D has 2 votes

 Start off with each voter voting “no” A 5 votes NO B 4 votes NO C 3 votes NO D 2 votes NO  Then we go down the line, switching each vote from “no” to “yes” until the motion passes

 First we switch A’s vote A 5 votes YES B 4 votes NO C 3 votes NO D 2 votes NO  But there are still only 5 votes in favor, so the motion still fails

 Now we switch B’s vote A 5 votes YES B 4 votes YES C 3 votes NO D 2 votes NO  Now there are 9 votes in favor. The quota is 8, so the motion passes  We say that B is the pivotal voter

 If we had arranged the voters differently, then the pivotal voter would have been different  For the Shapley-Shubik power index, we need to consider all of the different ways the voters can be arranged  All of these arrangements are called permutations

 Let’s examine another permutation B 4 votes NO D 2 votes NO C 3 votes NO A 5 votes NO  Again, start with all votes being “no” and switch them one at a time until the motion passes

 Switch B’s vote B 4 votes YES D 2 votes NO C 3 votes NO A 5 votes NO  The motion still fails, so keep going

 Switch D’s vote B 4 votes YES D 2 votes YES C 3 votes NO A 5 votes NO  The motion still fails, so keep going

 Switch C’s vote B 4 votes YES D 2 votes YES C 3 votes YES A 5 votes NO  The motion passes, so C is the pivotal voter

 We consider every possible permutation and find the pivotal voter for each one  The Shapley-Shubik power index is the fraction of times each voter was pivotal

 For 3 voters, there are 3 * 2 * 1 = 6 permutations  For 4 voters, there are 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 24 permutations  For 5 voters, there are 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 120 permutations  For 50 voters (the US Electoral College, for example), there are 50*49*48*…*3*2*1 permutations. This number is 65 digits long!

 Our example was [8;5,4,3,2]  There are 24 permutations: ABCDBACDCABDDABC ABDCBADCCADBDACD ACBDBCADCBADDBAC ACDBBCDACBDADBCA ADBCBDACCDABDCAB ADCBBDCACDBADCBA

 Our example was [8;5,4,3,2]  For each permutation, determine the pivotal voter: ABCDBACDCABDDABC ABDCBADCCADBDACD ACBDBCADCBADDBAC ACDBBCDACBDADBCA ADBCBDACCDABDCAB ADCBBDCACDBADCBA

 We see that  A was pivotal 10 times  B was pivotal 6 times  C was pivotal 6 times  D was pivotal 2 times  So the Shapley-Shubik power indices are:  Power of A = 10/24  Power of B = 6/24  Power of C = 6/24  Power of D = 2/24

 [10;6,4,3]  Power of A = 3/6  Power of B = 3/6  Power of C = 0/6  C is a dummy voter ABCABCBACBACCAB ACBBCACBA